Is Grahm really sure he is a Repub? I am thinking that he is more along the lines of a Dem. Thank God the Repubs are such morons they will continue to try to pass of candidates who's message was resoundingly panned in the last election. If Grahm was to run then there would be trouble. Instead, they will continue to do the same thing expecting different results.

Don't worry, Darren, Goode did manage to work in the administration's idea that we should never talk to Iran or Syria (even though the objectionable Ahmadinejad has nothing to do with Iran's foreign policy). So he's continuing with the Republican idea that diplomacy should only be a last resort, after all military options have failed.

The forcing of denunciations is a method of totalitarianism. That is what we are seeing now on TV. Those asked to do it should say this is a totalitarian ritual they decline.

"Several muslim countries along the North African coast had established the tradition of plundering the ships of European and American merchants in the western Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic, capturing the crews and then demanding ransom from the respective governments for their release. In a joint message to their superiors in Congress, Adams and Jefferson described the audacity of these terrorist attacks, pirates leaping onto defenseless ships with daggers clenched in their teeth. They had asked the ambassador from Tripoli, Adams and Jefferson explained, on what grounds these outrageous acts of unbridled savagery could be justified: "The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of the prophet, that it was written in their koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their [islams] authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners...." From AMERICAN SPHINX The Character of Thomas Jefferson by Joseph J. Ellis.
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/35803
Paintings of the torture at link, Old Atlantic.
My security code is fear. Fear of Islam by non-Muslims is commanded by God in the Koran.

"Muslim congressman Keith Ellison (R-MN)"

Hahaha, a Muslim Republican congressman. That slip-up creates a rather amusing mental picture.

Steve

You know the thoughts and wishes of 1.5 Billion Moslems around the world. Christians are supposed to go out and convert the non-believers. So Islam is prohibited from doing the same thing. And Steve, by the way. Islam recognizes the existance of Jesus and calls him one of the great Phrophets. Islam doesn't recoginze Jesus as the son of God only a phrophet. Would you expel all Mormans who claim Joesph Smith was also a prohet of God.

Get real Steve and lose the bigotry.

We invaded a Moslem country ala the Crusades and their supposed to like it.

Do you believe fro one second if the Chinese or Russians invaded the US, we would all not become guerilla fighters.

And VG is a FOOL. Kieth Ellison is a convert to Islam. He is not an imigrant and so noting VG says would have prevented Ellison form becoming a member of Congress. Whether Ellison swears on the Star Trek tech manual or the Quran the Constitution states that there will never be a religous test for office.

FB-- do you trust your fellow Americans so little?

The people of his district ELECTED Virgil Goode to his post. Who are you to second guess them?

Old Atlantic

I don't advocate this logic, but shouldn't you apply this to yourself first FB. Even if you live in Goode's district, then all those who don't and have called him bigot are excluded. Also, if you live there and voted against him, aren't you in the minority in that district. It would seem if you voted against him you should't criticize him either, since he won.

If you voted for him, did he win by more than one vote?

So we have the FB rule

A person elected in a district who receives a margin of victory of more than one vote can not be criticized.

Therefore Goode is not a bigot.

My security code is regret. FB don't you regret trying to pick the mote from Steve's eye before removing the log from your own?

Name callers are removing own media from serious, important discussion. By calling Virgil Goode a bigot and making Republicans do it, the MSM, TV and print have removed themselves as a place to discuss rationally Muslim Immigration, Islam, etc.
They did that with the Danish Cartoons as well.

That is why their circulation goes down. PC liberalism removes important real topics from the MSM and each one of those decreases circulation because the MSM are just a place for liberals to vent hate on Goode as a person, i.e. its their own racist Gladiatorial Arena.

The attacks and questions of Republicans show that. This was an arena of feeding Republicans to the Lions. That is removing itself from the stage of serious discussion. Their sales fall. So does trust.

The MSM and the left are not trusted because for 40 years they deny more and more actual facts that people experience from being discussed.

The Left doesn't get it, people saw 9-11 on TV. That can't be taken from their minds. Leftist 9-11 denial, including blaming it on Israel or demolition or Bush is nonsense. Saying it wasn't
Islam is the same nonsense. Bin Laden said so.

When the left says we can't talk about 9-11 including Islam, they just expose themselves as liars. When they call people bigots who try to talk, they are seens as haters and as censors.

When they deny Muslim genocide or says its not important, or that the Koran isn't linked to it, they remove themselves from the conversation and are just thugs who shout and threaten Republicans.

"Name callers are removing own media from serious, important discussion. By calling Virgil Goode a bigot and making Republicans do it, the MSM, TV and print have removed themselves as a place to discuss rationally Muslim Immigration, Islam, etc."

Is it name calling to call a Buick a Buick, Old One? Is it name calling to call a spade a spade?

Is it name calling to call you a damnable bigoted white supremacist?

Based on your posts on this thread, I'd say not.

FB

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

hello

hello

hello