Dear Joe,

How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?”

Cordially,

Rich

It's not the CT. voters who are at fault (remember Joe won principally because Republicans voted for him). The real fault lies with the Dem establishment who basically abandoned Lamont worried that if Lamont didn't win, Lieberman would cut and run. This was a winnable race for Lamont (granted, he made some mistakes as well), but Schumer, Hilary, the DSCC and all of them got what they deserved by not supporting Lamont in the general election.

I think Lieberman won simply because the primary voters were not representative of the people who voted in the general election.

Joe Lieberman (I-CL "via con dias",adios,shalome.

Sen. Lieberman, they had their "last chance." They've had far more "last chances" than they deserve, and when this one doesn't succeed, they'll tinker and call it another "new strategy" and you'll demand that we give that/i> a chance. They ignored all advice other than yes-men, and you'd have to be a blind idiot to think that's going to produce good results.

There isn't "plenty of time" for our fighting men and women; there isn't "plenty of time" for an administration that makes our position in the Middle East and the world day by day. Put your family members in Iraq, and maybe you'd have a shred of credibility as you ask others to risk "plenty of time" there.

I think the issue is: How long will it take for Lieberman to switch parties? My guess is when the Democrats rightly try to stop Bush from invading Iran.

"(I-CT)" isn't really appropriate since there is an Independent Party in CT who didn't nominate Lieberman.

Of course he might not be the CfL nominee again since he lost control of "his" party when John Orman took the initiative to actually set up a real party, something that had apparently been too much work for Joe.

this is funny. joe is funny. he is suffering from some serious memory loss and delusion, but his constituents can clear that up by recalling him if they want.
beyond that, just let him talk. he makes a fool of himself every day now. thanks joe

Will Joe slip the boy king some tongue at tonight's SOTU? You know give his boy a little boost.

My security code was "stiff" kind of appropriate for LIEberman.

Funny: the Google ad that showed up right beneath the video when I watched it was headlined "High Blood Pressure." That's what I get every time I lay eyes on that son of a b...

What Bob Kerrey said about Bill Clinton holds far more true for the senator from Connecticut: Joe Lieberman -- <spit& gt; -- is an unusually good liar.

Really! Can't the voters of Connecticut put a recall on the next ballot - LIEberman "misrepresented" himself to the electorate. Dispicable!

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -
-- Theodore Roosevelt

Let's not forget that this piece of trash also has decided not to investigate the government response to Katrina (after pledging to do so in order to win the election).
He is also tried to kill the investigation into Enron (threatening to cut funding to the investigators if they continued the investigation) - and he still had the balls to run for president after knowing his role in the Enron scandal. This man is scum!

Good to know Joe is down with us giving this failed venture only one more "last chance." Sure, why not? What does HE have to lose? How many men and women have to die for Joe's "last chance"? What about that Katrina investigation, Joe?

I think the Dems would be better off if they just cut Lieberman loose and took away his committee power; afterall, he's an independent and not part of the majority. If the Dems need ONE MORE VOTE on an issue they can always round up at least one GOPer willing to play ball, especially since the public has roundly endorsed their agenda.

I'm sure David Brooks will write an obtuse column defending Joe against the mean liberals.

I would love to state my opinion about Joe Lieberman, but I'm guessing the word "twat" is not allowed on this board.

Lieberman was saying in the general that "Nobody wants to bring the troops home more than I do" and also made comments to the effect that he thought we'd be able to start drawing down in the near future. Unfortunately enough CT voters took him at his word. Lieberman knew he couldn't pull his escalation schtick in this state and get re-elected. I guess the people that voted for him should have known better; Lamont was running ads with the very clear message that "A vote for Lieberman means more war". But even here in CT it's hard to get an incumbent out when he's allowed to lie his way to office and then not be held accountable for his words (thanks a lot, Hartford Courant).

As someone who has lived most of his life in Connecticut (in fact, near by Joe), I apologize profusely.

In my defense, I wasn't living there in 2006, and in 2000 the only alternative was Phil Giordano, who was a Republican child molester.

Joe's just trying to get his licks in while he can. He's well aware that, come 2008, the Senate will be even more firmly in Dem control, and when you look up "irrelevant" in the dictionary, Lieberman's picture will be there.

As long as the election in 2008 keeps looming, the relevance of Joe L will be short-lived in less than 2 years. I don't know the legalities behind a recall in CT, but I have to believe that it takes time to do this. Once the Democrats take a larger chunk of the majority in the Senate (and the longer this "war" goes on, the more of a certainty that will be) in 2009, his relevance will be gone. It is tragic that more Americans are going to have to die for this, but unless more people become outraged, this horrible outcome is not going to change.

WAIT!! WAIT!! Maybe you just need to keep repeating the word "Bipartisan" to Joe Lieberman and he'll snap out of his partisan, extremist support for a troop escalation!!

Doesn't he deserve one, last, chance?

No? Yeah, you're probably right.

Didn't Lieberman want to end the era of "partisan polarizing politics" (or whatever)???

Once, just once, for God's sake, Joe, can't you speak for America?

Must your every utterance support those neocons whose first interest is the welfare and expansionist aims of the State of Israel?

I am NOT anti-Semitic... I support Israel's right to exist IN PEACE, but I am damn sure for America's interests FIRST and believe that American BLOOD should be shed only in the interest of our own nation.

In retrospect, even as a staunch Democrat, I am glad now that you were NOT given the opportunity to be the Vice-President of this country...given the ethics of those you are beholden to, it is probable some 'accident' would have befallen
Gore had he been inaugarated in 2001.

Everything has it's price Joe L. So how many dead soldiers is this "new way forward" worth. Someone just answer me that. How many flag drapped coffins is this last chance at victory worth? Then when the cost is tallied will the final price tag be worth what we may get out of it. A stable shia majority, Iranian satelite. I'm sorry but that seems to be the new definition of victory. So to obtain even that much someone tell me how many dead American Soldiers is that effort worth.

Senator Lieberman, Sir: It has been nearly 4 years and countless (literally) deaths - there has been "plenty of time" for there to have been "success in Iraq". If the cricicism had taken place alot sooner, perhaps there could even have been a chance for "success in Iraq" but I doubt it.

Re: Clinton's Larry King appearance

Really? You mean people still watch Larry King?

Throw this scumbag out of the party. He is a sick, sick man. He's going to vote with the Repugs anyway. This is all about Iran. Buying time for Cheney to invade and REALLY blow up the entire Mid-east. Saving a (essentially illusory) one vote majority in the Senate by placating this fascist, or saving the world from the hell that follows an attack on Iran - what is really more important? Time to end politics as usual. Dump this addled gasbag and dump Cheney, before its too late. (BTW, Petraeus looked like he was comtemplating a bayonet charge, didn't he?)

And the surviving family members of the fallen among the "augmentation" can sue Lieberman for reckless endangerment...

What I want to know is when Lieberman is going to call for Americans to sacrifice for his and Bush's war, other than those in the military. Has anyone from the Lieberman family volunteered to go fight in this war? Has he called for tax increases to pay for this war? Has he asked anyone to sacrifice for this war other than the military? This is a man who has never, to my knowledge, served in the military who is very cavalier with the lives of other people's loved ones.

Mr. Lieberman is proof that the Stepford Wives do inhabit that perfect community in Connecticut, and that some of their sons become U.S. Senators. Mr. Lieberman, ever wanting to be at the center of things rather than the political center, has become an automoton for Mr. McCain. Perhaps that's the price for another bid at the Vice Presidency. Joe, we hardly knew ya.

As a USN 4 year veteran I believe Joe Lieberman is more interested in pleasing his Zionest friends and manipulating events to the benifit of Isreal. What a Schmuck! Hey Joe! How 'bout working for the US for a change. It is our sons and daughters in Iraq who are dying in a war that should never have been waged.
And..... please stop calling yourself a Democrat.

[url=http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/fr/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm]Dinas Rivisondoli D'Hôtel[/url] * [url=http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/it/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm]Dinas Rivisondoli Dell'Hotel[/url] * [url=http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm]Hotel dinas rivisondoli[/url] Dinas Rivisondoli D'Hôtel | Dinas Rivisondoli Dell'Hotel | Hotel dinas rivisondoli http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/fr/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/it/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm http://fedemelania.miskuzi.info/hotel-dinas-rivisondoli.htm