« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Iraqis: Qods Were Peacemakers
Newsweek has an interesting investigation into the Qods Force presence in Iraq. Contrary to the Bush administration's claims this week that the Qods Force is in Iraq to sow chaos and sponsor attacks on U.S. troops, Iraqi Shiites from the SCIRI party -- whose leader President Bush hosted at the White House in December -- are saying that Qods operatives arrested by the U.S. were attempting to reign in Moqtada Sadr's Mahdi Army:
On the night they were detained, the two Iranians had met with Hadi al-Ameri, head of the Badr Organization, once the militia of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI). Ameri also heads up the security committee in the Iraqi National Assembly. The two officials had come, Ameri told NEWSWEEK, to discuss security issues. Ameri said two top Iraqi government officials, Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih and national-security adviser Mowaffaq al-Rubaie, had asked the Iranian government to help rein in the Mahdi Army, the rival Shiite militia directed by radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr that is believed to be responsible for death squads and other sectarian violence, as well as attacks on U.S. troops. Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki “wanted Iran’s help and said you can influence this issue," Ameri said in an interview. “This led to the Iranians sending the group with the diplomatic passports.” He added: “They had a meeting with me and we talked about how to put pressure on the Jaish Mahdi [Mahdi Army] not to attack Sunnis … how to prevent the Jaish Mahdi from working against the government and not to raise their weapons illegally.”
It's appropriate to treat this report with skepticism. Hadi al-Ameri is a ruthless militia commander, and SCIRI has long and deep ties to Iran, so it's hardly surprising that al-Ameri would seek to exonerate his sponsors. Still, as Newsweek writes, "The upshot is that while the American military is blaming the Quds Force and IRGC for all sorts of misdeeds, the highest officials in the U.S.-backed Iraqi government appear to be buying weapons from them and asking for their help on security issues."
Indeed, it's even more convoluted than that. U.S. troops in Baghdad have broadcast their intent to go after the very Mahdi Army that Qods operatives were reportedly trying to defang. Furthermore, administration officials like Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns and Ryan Crocker -- whom Bush nominated to be the next U.S. ambassador to Iraq -- have said that they would accept a constructive Iranian role in Iraq. If al-Ameri is telling Newsweek the truth -- again, a big if -- then either by accident or design, that position is the latest administration statement on Iraq to be subverted by their own actions.





More proof that Bush could screw up a wet dream.
And, why Pelosi is correct in cancelling his blank check.
February 16, 2007 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
..." attempting to reign in Moqtada Sadr's Mahdi Army."
once again -- and can we say it together this time? -- it is REIN IN, not REIGN IN.
and, just for the record, it is CITE, not SITE.
thank you for using the spell checker!
February 16, 2007 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spencer,
You keep going like this, we're gonna have to recruit you for DNI staff in the next administration!
I'm not kidding. You're doing WAY better than the chuckleheads doing the Baghdad presentations etc.
February 17, 2007 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
If one reads several books on Iranian politics, one finds that there are all kinds of groups and agendas and ideologies represented therein. I'd suggest Vali Nasr's "The Shia Revival," but also Kenneth Pollacks "The Persian Puzzle," and Dilip Hiro's "The Iranian Labyrinth." A new one I'm reading, "Iran " by Ray Takeh is also valuable in tracing the tendentious relationship between the U.S. and Iran, but also, within the Iranian government.
Ahmad Nazer Hamzah's "In the Path of Hizbullah" is probably the most specific in terms of all the various groups associated with paracombat and intrigue.
With this crazy quilt of groups and ideological agendas inside the Iranian Government, perhaps NEWSWEEK is correct. Driving al Sadr from Iraq may decidedly boomerang against the Bushistas. The more belligerent splinter groups of the Mahdi Army may fight the Americans, and if they do, they'll be destroyed. But, they may also rally and inspire others to fight the Americansd out of revenge.
Either way, there's simply no way that the Americans can win this struggle in the end ... a military victory is no longer possible. The American Army and Marine Corps are broken. The only way Bush can triumph, militarily, is to saturate Iraq with several hundred thousand more troops. Not possible without activvating all National Guard and Reserves, or, resorting to a draft.
If the Bush people continue to hammer Iran, it's possible they will respond through very sophisticated proxies who will attempt to take out many Americans in a mass casualty event.
It's clear that the Congress hasn't yet "got it" that the people have had a belly full of GOP war-mongering.
The GOP has never seen a war it didn't like.
Once there, they excoriate those who cautioned a slower march to hostilities.
If it were up to me, I'd draft every young Republican of age, and send their asses to Iraq.
If they think the rest of the younger generation will jump at the prospect of a bloody war with Iran, they're nuts.
That was OUR generation that was connected with a fifty year history of Selective Service.
From a 70% combat disabled infantry veteran of the Vietnam War.
February 18, 2007 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink