« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Today's Must Read
Ousted! Tim Griffin, the former aide to Karl Rove whom the administration installed as a U.S. Attorney in Arkansas, is out, reports the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette:
“I have made the decision not to let my name go forward to the Senate,” Griffin said Thursday evening....Griffin on Thursday blamed “the partisanship that has been exhibited by Sen. [Mark ] Pryor [D-Ark. ] and other senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee in the recent hearing” for his decision to bow out....
Griffin said Thursday that if he were to go through the confirmation process, “I don’t think there is any way I could get fair treatment by Sen. Pryor or others on the judiciary committee.”
He said he will continue to serve in the top law enforcement position in the state’s eastern district as long as the White House keeps him there under the interim title or “gets someone else that I can help transition into this job.
“But to submit my name to the Senate would be like volunteering to stand in front of a firing squad in the middle of a three-ring circus.”
It's been a rough couple weeks for Griffin, who was the most egregious case among the seven prosecutors purged in December. Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty admitted to the Senate last week that Griffin's predecessor had been forced out for no other reason than to make room for Griffin. And this morning, The New York Times revealed that Griffin had been installed as per the wish of White House counsel Harriet Miers.
There does seem to be some question, though, as to why Griffin is bowing out...
Pryor’s spokesman, Michael Teague, told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on Thursday, after Griffin said he was withdrawing his name from consideration, that [Attorney General Alberto] Gonzales himself had called Pryor earlier Thursday “and told the senator he was not going to submit Tim Griffin’s name.”
It seems clear that the threat of Senate confirmation ended Griffin's tenure -- but who it spooked more, the administration or Griffin himself, is not so clear.
But remember: it's probable that the only reason that Griffin was facing Senate confirmation at all is because of pressure from the press, public and the Senate. Otherwise, thanks to that law slipped into the PATRIOT Act last year, Griffin might have stayed in place for as long as he, and the administration, wished.
Update: A couple commenters have made a good point -- that Griffin says that he'll stick around until the White House names a replacement, which could be... forever, under current law (thanks to Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ)). The Justice Department has declared that the administration will put forth nominees for all of the spots cleared in December's purge, and the ADG reports that Gonzales says that he's already working with Rep. John Boozman (R-AR) to find a replacement for Griffin. But it's certainly something to keep an eye on.
Unless i'm misreading, this doesn't say he's "bowing out" - only that he refuses to face senate confirmation. I'd wait till he resigns or is replaced (or at least announces such) before celebrating...
February 16, 2007 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
My Senator, Arlen Spector, is tied into this law snuck into the Patriot Act that allows Bush to
replace these US Attornyes at will. This story and how Specter, or as he said, a staff member,put this little gift to Bush in that act needs more widespread coverage. Specter claims ignorance about the item being put in the bill, if that's true, then we have Senate staffers legislating.
February 16, 2007 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
He says he will remain "under the interim title" as long as the White House leaves him there or until he is actually replaced. I'm guessing that will be about 2 years from now.
February 16, 2007 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
As DanD said, it looks like the bottom line is "he will continue to serve ... as long as the White House keeps him there". As I understand it, if the bill revoking this rule passes, he's out in 120 days. Otherwise, the Bush administration is presumably going to try to keep him in for the duration of there term if they can get away with it.
February 16, 2007 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Events like this point up the enormous benefit to our body politic in having won a Dem-controlled congress. Imagine how little attention these mini-coup d'etats would receive without Dems chairing committees that oversee these appointments.
These efforts to appoint GOP-friendly federal prosecutor-hacks can only give us a hint of what members of this administration have to hide from the law.
This is a very encouraging bit of news and does much to relieve the cloud of despair that hung over me until the November elections.
Maybe we won't become a banana republic after all.
February 16, 2007 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good riddance. Note in today's Washington Post that the U.S. Attorney in Nevada that will be overseeing the FBI investigation of Gov. Gibbons' (R) acceptance of contractor gifts is also on the Bush Administration's U.S. Attorneys hit list.
February 16, 2007 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
He should count his blessings that he isn't treated the way that Republicans treated Bill Clinton or he would have every check he has ever written and every tax return he ever filed examined in the spotlight, as well as having to reveal the size and curvature of his penis.
February 16, 2007 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder what he'll do with his nameplate he had made up for his desk? "Tim Griffin,U S Attorney"
February 16, 2007 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
John W- Right on - the staffers legislate or the senators lie. Either way, it has that "eau-de-stink-on-shit" aroma that trails Republicans wherever they go.
February 16, 2007 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whether Spectre lied or his staffer slipped it in, quick correctives are called for. The first is to correct the "unauthorized" change, the second is to censure "Spectre", and the third is to bring the staffer (a democracy thief personified) to justice.
I suggest that changes to any legislation be highlighted in some fashion within new or revised legislative documents so that "busy" senators will concentrate on the changes, and not have to reread old hat boiler plate verbiage.
But you know, I don't believe "Spectre". Any so called "lawyer" who wants to change the FISA law retroactively so that the president can be said to NOT have broken the FISA law, subverts justice big time. What better way to judge his integrity on this stunning drive by rape of democracy?
February 16, 2007 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
"the ADG reports that Gonzales says that he's already working with Rep. John Boozman (R-AZ) to find a replacement for Griffin."
Is that a typo Paul? Why would the ADG be working with a Republican congressman from Arizona to find a replacement for a U.S. Attorney in Arkansas? He ought to be working with the senators from Arkansas, not a congressman from anywhere to find a replacement.
February 16, 2007 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
In the interests of accuracy, I believe John Boozman should be R-AR, not AZ.
February 16, 2007 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently, it's getting tougher to defend the indefensible.
Chuck Schumer had some tough words yesterday on this subject...I think it spooked somebody.
February 16, 2007 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've made this point elsewhere but it needs repeating: Isn't it absolutely astounding that a U.S. Senator would admit that a member of his staff "stuck in the provisions which allowed this mess" into a bill late at night and never told him about it. Specter claims he knew nothing about a move which effectiveway gave away one of the perks of Senatorial power. If this were really how this happened, wouldn't you think that Specter would have screamed bloody murder and fired the staffer or at least publicly reamed him six ways from Sunday?
In fact, there has been virtual silence from Specter....and even more amazing, from most members of Congress, who seem to have no interest in the fact that their ability to have a say in the appointment of US Attorneys from their states was "given away" in the dead of night, allowing the Attorney General's office to fill those slots with hack jobs.
February 16, 2007 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's a floor wax AND a dessert topping. Or a partisan hack and self-pitying weasel.
February 16, 2007 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powder puff dough boys like Rove and Mr. Griffin appear tough when they are chunking the smear spears, however, these guys whimps (not to far out of character for some) get weak in the knees when the spotlight turns their direction. First rate cowards.
February 16, 2007 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
What dweb said. I can't believe that Specter seems to be getting away without even firing the staffer in question.
February 16, 2007 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
And, typical of the crybaby bullies in the GOP when things don't go their way, he claims to be victim of a partisan atmosphere.
He should know a lot about partisanship, considering his previous job doing oppo for Karl Rove.
February 16, 2007 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "update" mentions "Rep. John Boozman (R-AZ)", but he's actually "R-AR" (Arkansas). Probably just confused with Arizona Senator John Kyl mentioned a few lines earlier.
February 16, 2007 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
His inability to be confirmed has nothing to do with hostility from Democratic senators. It has everything to do with his work during the 2004 campaign.
The British Broadcasting Corporation unearthed e-mail messages Griffin sent from the RNC in 2004 containing spreadsheet information on thousands of Florida voters. The spreadsheets were titled “caging,” which, according to the BBC, alludes to a voter suppression tactic.
Griffin's caging scheme was a particularly noxious. It seems that it was aimed directly at black sericemembers. According to Greg Palast of Democracy Now! the RNC mailed voters letters in envelopes marked, “Do not forward”, to be returned to the sender. These letters were mailed to servicemen and women, some stationed overseas, to their US home addresses. The letters then returned to the Bush-Cheney campaign as "undeliverable." The party could then challenge the voters' registration and thereby prevent their absentee ballot being counted.
It seems the BBC's discovery indicated that he had targeted black servicemembers living in Florida. It is a really ugly story.
Griffin wouldn't be confirmable if the senate was still in the hands of the Republicans.
February 16, 2007 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
they have firing squads at circuses in Arkansas? cautionary note there - don't attend circus in Arkansas.
February 16, 2007 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
dweb
I agree that Spector's near silence on this issue is disturbing, but if you go to the George Mason Law School's website you will discover that Mr. O'Neill is teaching Criminal Law this spring. I haven't been able to run down Judiciary Committee staffing yet, but I think he lost his job after the November election.
What this episode proves is that our senators and congresscritters are spending too much time on the telephone raising money and not enough time reading the bills they are responsible for writing. I would imagine a lot of legislative language is never seen by a single congress person.
February 16, 2007 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ron,
do you have a link to the BBC story? VERY intersting. I would think with the tone in his statement that he should step down immediately. I wouldn't think that US Attorneys were stupposed to take swipes at Senators. This guy clearly can't get the political operative BS out of his system to do his job.
February 16, 2007 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
One way to get him out quite quickly is to schedule his confirmation like the Whitehouse agreed to. Start the vetting process. And, not just Griffin. ALL the Patriot Act Appointees.
Let's not forget Nelson Cohen of Alaska. He needs to be vetted and confirmed as well. As is tradition, he will need that states senators approval. That would be Lisa Murkowski and Ted Stevens. Is Ted going to object now? He's been awful quiet. Repeated phone calls to his legislative assistant April Robbie don't get returned.
Does Ted like Nelson now?
http://corporatecrimereporter.com/stevens090706.htm
CORPORATE CRIME REPORTER
Senator Stevens Feuds with Main Justice in DC as FBI Raids Son's Office in Alaska
20 Corporate Crime Reporter 35(1), September 6, 2006
Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) is feuding with the Justice Department.
On August 22, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales appointed Nelson Cohen, head of the white collar crime unit at the U.S. Attorney's office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – to be the interim U.S. Attorney in Alaska – over the objections of Senator Stevens.
Senator Stevens said at the time that he was “furious at the way the Attorney General handled the matter.”
According to a transcript provided by Senator Stevens' office to Corporate Crime Reporter, at a press conference on August 28 in Anchorage, Alaska, Senator Stevens was asked by a reporter – “Who do you think should be U.S. Attorney?”
“Well not someone who comes from Pennsylvania, and that's a little problem I have right now, finding out what to do about that,” Stevens said. “Because very clearly, I was called three weeks ago now, and told they had someone who they'd like to nominate from outside Alaska. And we said, ‘No, no. You're not going to do that. You can't do that. You don't do that in any other state. You're not going to do it in this one.'”
But Gonzales overrode Stevens' objection and put in Cohen to be U.S. Attorney in Alaska on a temporary basis. As such, the Cohen appointment does not require Senate confirmation.
In a press release , the Justice Department says that prior to joining the U.S. Attorney's office in Pittsburgh, Cohen practiced law for ten years in Alaska.
“We submitted some names, but Justice had one reason or another that they figured the person had a conflict, but they never really came with anything other than that we should find someone else,” Stevens said at the press conference. “We did give them some additional names, but in the meantime they had already taken action on this person. We have to arm wrestle on this one. It is not the thing to do. It has only happened one other time that I can remember. I can remember it happened in Illinois and it caused such an uproar. As a matter of fact, it became a real cause celeb with the Illinois Bar Association.”
On August 31 – just three days after Senator Stevens' press conference denouncing the Department of Justice – the FBI raided the offices of a number of state legislators in Juneau including that of Senator Stevens son – Alaska Senate President Ben Stevens.
FBI agents reportedly left Ben Stevens Capitol offices with 12 boxes of documents labeled “evidence.”
Federal officials are reportedly investigating payments from oil service giant VECO to a number of public officials in exchange for their support for a new production tax law and the construction of a natural gas pipeline in Alaska.
The Anchorage Daily News reported last week that “in disclosures he was required to file as a legislator, [Ben] Stevens said he was paid $243,000 over the last five years as a ‘consultant' to VECO. Whenever he was asked to describe what he did for the money, Stevens refused to answer. The company also refused to say.”
In addition to computer hard drives and hard paper records linking the legislators to VECO, FBI agents were reportedly seeking hats emblazoned with the logo – “Corrupt Bastards Club” or “Corrupt Bastards Caucus.”
In March, in an op-ed piece run in the state's major papers, Lori Backes, executive director of the All Alaska Alliance – a group that has supported an alternative gas pipeline route – had charged eleven lawmakers – including Senator Ben Stevens – with taking money from VECO.
The lawmakers reportedly started referring to themselves as the “Corrupt Bastards Club” or the “Corrupt Bastards Caucus” – and had hats printed with the CBC logo.
Aaron Saunders, a spokesman for Senator Ted Stevens, would not discuss anything having to do with the FBI raid in Alaska.
Nor would he say why Senator Stevens was “furious” with Attorney General Gonzales.
Could it be that the Justice Department was not going to give Senator Stevens his choice of a U.S. Attorney when the Stevens family was caught in the middle of a public corruption probe?
No comment, Saunders said.
Home
Corporate Crime Reporter
1209 National Press Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20045
202.737.1680
February 16, 2007 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=4263 will take you to Greg Palast and the BBC story. Palast has pictures of the spreadsheets etc.
February 16, 2007 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.democratictalkradio.com/wordpress/?p=79
links to the Democratictalkradio blog archives. It will give you some additional links.
I first read about it in an Arkansas Times article at http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=828918ba-6945-4db7-937c-7aaa4efa6a3a
after I started wondering about the claim that the appointment of Griffin was merely to help his career. I wondered what kind of career opportunities he might have after being one of Rove's henchmen that would be enhanced by being a US attorney. Maybe he wanted to be a Federal Judge. Any important position I could come up with seemed to require he go through a confirmation process. That led me to wonder what skeletons he might have in his public closet. I didn't have to look too deep.
Amazing what doesn't get reported in the national press. My working hypothesis right now is that Griffin was sent to Arkansas for a purpose connected to the upcoming Presidental campaign. I hope I am wrong. But so far, the only thing I know about Tim Griffin is that he was a political operative and maybe a dirty tricks meister during his time at the NRC and while working for Rove. Not exactly the standard career path for a Federal Judge or US Attorney.
February 16, 2007 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
See Tim Griffin emails/"caging spreadsheets" etc - still at the original source : The "deadletter office" at www.georgewbush.org" that caught accidentally mis-addressed emails ( to ".org" )during the 2004 election season
http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/index.asp
February 16, 2007 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is Abu Gonzales conferring with Boozeman? He has no vote for confirmation.
PS Boozeman is from north west Arkansas (AR not AZ)
February 16, 2007 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
PPS: Jon Kyl is (alas!) from Arizona, not Arkansas (AZ not AR).
February 16, 2007 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
FRANK - "I suggest that changes to any legislation be highlighted in some fashion within new or revised legislative documents so that "busy" senators will concentrate on the changes, and not have to reread old hat boiler plate verbiage."
Great idea! Simple and effective, although it would have to be matched with a corrective and/or punitive action for anything that "accidentally" slips through without the required highlighting, say, an atuomatic deletion or revocation.
February 16, 2007 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spector and Gonzales should be on the same rail heading out of our government and our lives. He has no grounds for blaming a staffer, he is responsible for what he is credited with writing and signing. He is clearly a hack. Gonzales is a criminal thug lawyer protecting the guilty asshole who occupies the office of President and the other guilty asshole who occupies the office of Vice-President. Harriet Miers is a joke who just keeps on giving.
We need to impeach the whole GODDAMN administration.
I for one am tired of nothing being done about the blatant abuse of our system.
Our government is supposed for THE PEOPLE.
Democrats! Stop playing nice with these bastards.
Rob
Dallas Tx
February 16, 2007 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Elegant Rovian language, "I've made a decision not to let my name go forward to the Senate." Mr. Griffin is as much of a Decider as Shrub. Griffin was installed in Arkansas like a mannekin in Mr. Rove's shop window. If he was yanked, if this is not a feint because it was never intended to submit his name for Senate confirmation, he was yanked by the same hand. One which would also have been yanking Ms. Miers, who would not have made that call without instructions from Rove or someone else?
Rove isn't invincible, but he never gives up. He never does things only for the obvious reason. He is too consumed by Sun Tzu and Machiavelli, among others. Above all, Rove has absorbed the possibilities of manipulating the blogosphere and incorporated them into his strategies.
Mr. Griffin's frailties are deliciously corrupt but obvious even to the MSM, let alone a dedicated blogosphere. He is an easy target. Is he a also straw man, a giveaway so that more important targets, such as Caroline Lam, could be more easily ousted?
Or is this whole episode a "nice to have", but one whose purpose is to distract from more important issues, such as Iraq or Iran or taxes. Or, all of the above, including figurative sand in the gear works of a purposeful Democratic Congress's agenda?
February 16, 2007 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why has the MSM characterized the installation of Griffin as "the wishes of Harriet Miers"? She is Shrub's personal lawyer. She would never have pushed a highly political and unprecedented staffing decision except on instructions from her client. Gonzales would have known that. When she made the call, she was already on the way out. Who better to make the public face?
The administration already claimed - lied - that it was Justice and not the WH who made the move. Jesuitically correct, perhaps, but a deception nevertheless. The purpose of all these changes would be to enhance direct WH political control over actions taken by key USA's in the two lameduck years before the next election.
February 16, 2007 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
A long history of homosexual encounters. Griffin is one of several of Rove's "Loyal Boys" and a fixture in the strange Gay underworld of this White House.
He never planned on ever having public confirmation.
And certainly not one with active oversite.
February 16, 2007 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone who is unwilling to go through the Constitutionally mandated advice and consent process should not be allowed to hold office on even an interim basis.
It also pretty much goes without saying that someone who is afraid that they may be asked a mean question by a meanie --- doesn't have the right stuff to be a USAtty.
Except in the Bush administration.
February 17, 2007 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even before Sen. Specter was blaming his role in this outrage on a "staffer," I was on the phone to his office to tell them this was the most egregious thing I'd seen from the Justice Dept. since Archibald Cox was fired.
I was referred to a "staffer" named Andrew Mountain, who bent my ear with a lame excuse that since the prosecutors all serve at the behest of the president, they are never "fired," but rather OFTEN asked to step aside for unstated reasons and it was ridiculous of me to expect the administration to provide a reason. According to him, nothing untoward had happened and no one was "fired"!
And needless to say, the fact that all the "not-fired" prosecutors were pursuing investigations of moneyed political contributors and/or holders of public office was merely a coincidence. (And maybe it is, because if they're doing their jobs, they're ALL doing such investigations!)
But nevertheless, Mr. Mountain wouldn't even admit that I had a point, let alone claim to care that I had called. Which, for the record, is ALWAYS the response when I call Specter's office. They simply don't care a whit about what constituents think. Arlen will do as Arlen pleases. Federal prosecutors may serve at the behest of the president, but Arlen obviously doesn't think he serves at the behest of the voters.
February 18, 2007 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Under the current law, the power to nominate a replacement for the interim prosecutor gives this administration the best of all possible worlds: all they have to do is nominate an even worse political hack than the one already filling the job on an "interim basis", and the senate gets a choice between confirming the administration's pet nominee and leaving the current hack in office.
February 18, 2007 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
dfgfdgfd
19.02.07 06:52:39
February 18, 2007 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why not just keep Griffin in place until our President of the Oustings has been ousted? Doesn't seem to be a major problem since the Patriot Act gives everyone permission to kick them all out and put them back in again. Seems more like Alice in Wonderland, doesn't it? Whoosh!
February 20, 2007 3:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
dueigna jzinuhf zpdjml mghqxovar ysdvurfkj cdoazke erymbxc
April 16, 2007 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
qucntkmr wcuyk puch bpgz sjibrfgcu ilcgutf qlozrtkw http://www.jgxfqakbo.bpwvxtuf.com
April 16, 2007 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
kofrgvl jautwqbmo lkanjcvbi fpmvt fjazdx wouvpsgl kuetnz itvyu cdyltf
April 16, 2007 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
hello
April 30, 2007 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
hello
May 1, 2007 3:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
hello
May 7, 2007 5:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
alan richard bunston is a convicted child molester
May 18, 2007 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
free viagra
May 22, 2007 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
free viagra
May 22, 2007 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 29, 2007 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 29, 2007 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 29, 2007 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 29, 2007 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 5:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
May 30, 2007 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 30, 2007 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 1:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 3:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 4:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 6:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 8:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
May 31, 2007 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 3:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 5:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@durgs.com
June 1, 2007 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 1, 2007 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 1, 2007 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 1, 2007 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 1, 2007 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 2:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 5:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 6:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 8:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 9:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 2, 2007 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 2:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 6:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 7:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 3, 2007 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 4, 2007 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 5, 2007 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 5, 2007 5:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 5, 2007 6:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 5, 2007 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
herbals@drugs.com
June 5, 2007 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
ncoydp gpvnofhs kbpl tnyegzx wyajkxmhq vahflw fzcvxwti
August 2, 2007 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
ncoydp gpvnofhs kbpl tnyegzx wyajkxmhq vahflw fzcvxwti
August 2, 2007 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
ncoydp gpvnofhs kbpl tnyegzx wyajkxmhq vahflw fzcvxwti
August 2, 2007 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alana Evans
August 7, 2007 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Monica Sweetheart
August 7, 2007 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
nikki nova 1,267.1 /day
nikki nova nude 14.1 /day
free nikki nova pic 10.7 /day
nikki nova pic 10.0 /day
nikki nova video 7.2 /day
nikki nova sex 6.6 /day
free nikki nova 5.9 /day
nikki nova photo gallery 5.7 /day
nikki nova naked 5.5 /day
free nikki nova video 5.0 /day
nikki nova porn 4.9 /day
nikki nova clip 4.8 /day
nikki nova picture 4.8 /day
nikki nova gallery 4.6 /day
nikki nova at freeones 4.5 /day
dress up nikki nova 4.5 /day
nikki nova movie 4.4 /day
nikki nova photo 4.1 /day
nikki nova fucking 3.9 /day
nikki nova wallpaper 3.9 /day
nikki nova free movie 3.6 /day
nikki nova pussy 3.5 /day
nikki nova hardcore 3.3 /day
nikki nova lesbian 2.7 /day
nikki nova image 2.5 /day
porn star nikki nova 2.5 /day
nikki nova blow job 2.4 /day
nikki nova torrent 2.2 /day
hot nikki nova 2.1 /day
nikki nova nude pic 2.1 /day
twistys nikki nova 2.0 /day
nikki nova busty cop 1.9 /day
nikki nova mpeg 1.9 /day
nikki nova anal 1.7 /day
nikki nova getting fucked 1.6 /day
nikki nova video clip 1.5 /day
nikki nova dildo 1.5 /day
nikki nova sex video 1.5 /day
nikki nova bio 1.4 /day
nikki nova dvd 1.4 /day
nikki nova free gallery 1.4 /day
nikki nova fuck 1.4 /day
nikki nova com 1.3 /day
nikki nova game 1.2 /day
nikki nova jpg 1.2 /day
nikki nova nude picture 1.2 /day
nikki nova strip 1.2 /day
nikki nova wonder woman 1.1 /day
blog nikki nova 1.1 /day
myspace nikki nova 1.1 /day
nikki nova porn video 1.1 /day
nikki nova xxx 1.1 /day
nikki nova ass 1.0 /day
003.jpg nikki nova 1.0 /day
nikki nova sucking cock 1.0 /day
nikki nova poster 0.9 /day
nikki nova free clip 0.9 /day
sexy nikki nova 0.9 /day
nikki nova stripping 0.9 /day
nikki nova wikipedia 0.9 /day
nikki nova filmography 0.8 /day
nikki nova fucked 0.8 /day
naked picture of nikki nova 0.8 /day
nikki nova rapidshare
August 8, 2007 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
penny flame 430.5 /day
penny flame pic 12.9 /day
penny flame video 10.9 /day
penny flame free video 10.0 /day
big flame penny tit work 4.9 /day
flame freeones penny 3.5 /day
flame naughty office penny 3.2 /day
anal flame penny 2.2 /day
flame penny rapidshare 1.9 /day
porn star penny flame 1.8 /day
penny flame nude 1.7 /day
flame penny porn vids 1.3 /day
baby exploited flame penny sitter 1.3 /day
penny flame movie 1.2 /day
america flame naughty penny 1.2 /day
darkside flame penny 1.2 /day
flame office penny 1.2 /day
flame penny pov 1.2 /day
penny flame lesbian 1.2 /day
flame penny torrent 1.2 /day
penny flame picture 1.1 /day
1 1 flame housewife penny 1.1 /day
benz flame nikki penny 1.1 /day
penny flame free 1.0 /day
penny flame gallery 1.0 /day
penny flame hardcore 1.0 /day
flame high innocent penny 1.0 /day
penny flame cum 1.0 /day
penny flame fuck 0.9 /day
penny flame mpeg 0.9 /day
flame in man pain penny 0.9 /day
penny flame porn 0.9 /day
flame penny trailer 0.9 /day
ava devine flame penny 0.8 /day
penny flame clip 0.8 /day
penny flame movie free 0.8 /day
flame penny vids
August 8, 2007 6:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
visited cow Carlson nonsynchronous Greenbriar!disjoint enlarged gunplay
September 18, 2007 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi boys!edd817f9ffcaa05d922d3378d72e9262
September 26, 2007 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi boys!acfc401329dbaf163632389dfc5ac5c5
September 26, 2007 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi, there!..55c70b477304cc7e3dd50671fd7e589e
October 7, 2007 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink