« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Gonzales to Dems: Shoo, Fly
From Bob Novak's column today:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has indicated he is too busy to answer letters from Democratic congressional leaders about his firing seven U.S. attorneys involved in probes of public corruption, though a lower-level Justice Department official rejected their proposals.Rep. Rahm Emanuel, House Democratic Caucus chairman, had written Gonzales two letters suggesting that he name Carol Lam, fired as U.S. attorney in San Diego, as an outside counsel to continue her pursuit of the Duke Cunningham case. Asked by Melissa Charbonneau of the Christian Broadcasting Network about this columnâs report that Gonzales did not respond, Gonzales said: âI think that the American people lose if I spend all my time worrying about congressional requests for information, if I spend all my time responding to subpoenas.â
Richard A. Hertling, the acting Justice Department lobbyist, responded Wednesday, 22 days after Emanuelâs letter. He contended âthe Justice Department would not ever seek the resignation of a U.S. attorney if doing so would jeopardize a public corruption caseâ and rejected naming Lam as a special prosecutor.













I'd say that it's impeachment time for Abu Gonzalez.
March 3, 2007 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Shoo, Fly" from the titmouse.
March 3, 2007 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
On the supoena to Gonzales, write a little note:
Habeas Corpus is not a right. The capitol police will be picking you up at seven AM.
XOXOXOX
March 3, 2007 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
We would all prefer that Gonzales not have to "spend all his time responding to ...". However, Bush and Gonzales have created an atmosphere that is so hostile to American freedoms that we must know what they are doing all the time. To be perfectly honest, Americans would be better off if they did nothing else (harmful to freedom) and only replied to subpoenas.
March 3, 2007 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Less apt to be doing some of the stuff he's been doing if he's kept busy testifying.
March 3, 2007 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just what is a "Justice Department lobbyist"?
March 3, 2007 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, it's called "stonewalling," a term we first heard during the Watergate scandal. It didn't save Nixon or his co-conspirators then. Let's hope it won't save this cast of characters either.
I don't know what recourse is open to Congress on this one, but I hope they pull all the stops to nail this little turd.
March 3, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, it's called "stonewalling," a term we first heard during the Watergate scandal. It didn't save Nixon or his co-conspirators then. Let's hope it won't save this cast of characters either.
I don't know what recourse is open to Congress on this one, but I hope they pull all the stops to nail this little turd.
March 3, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am not sure what Congress' recourse is either, but I really like Richard's suggestion above!
March 3, 2007 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Incompetent.
Corrupt.
March 3, 2007 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting that AG Gonzales doesn't have time to repsond to subpoenas from Congress but does have time to interview with the Christian Broadcast Network which reaches maybe a million people.
AG Gonzales also had time in December to visit the basement of the Delaware County courthouse in Media PA suposedly to support a $650k internet safety program.
http://www.delcotimes.com/site/index.cfm?newsid=17583187&BRD=1675&PAG=461&dept_id=18171&rfi=8
Did AG Gonzales have time to meet with Curt Weldon's cronies that day?
March 3, 2007 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
The recourse is to report a resolution that Gonzales is guilty of contempt of congress. Once the house or senate approves the resolution, it gets referred to the US Attorney General for prosecution with a one year prison term and thousand dollar fine :D
Since that won't work, you'll have to get rid of the president and vice-president.
March 3, 2007 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
What does it say about the condition of our government if it would require "all" of Mr. Gonzales's time to respond to subpoenas? Is there a lot more we don't know about?
One imagines that, if the Justice Dept. was doing a proper job of keeping the people's representatives in Congress informed in regular fashion, there wouldn't have to be subpoenas in the first place, much less so many of them that it would fill all of Mr. Gonzales's time just answering them.
Speaking as a member of the American people that he is worried will 'lose', I suggest he cut the crap and answer the damn letters. NOW.
March 3, 2007 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since when has Gonzales been concerned about the American people? Wait a minute. I think those "American people" he's referring to are bush, cheney, rumsfeld, rice ...
March 3, 2007 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Congress has the power of the purse, and the power to impeach. This starts with supoenas, goes through the testimony of the fired US attorneys to build the case and then impeachment is on the table, the wishes of Speaker Pelosi notwithstanding. A bill of impeachment should go smoothly through the House. Impeaching Gonzales and convicting him, would be a good start and might help our leaders find the spine to tackle his bosses.
March 3, 2007 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can't wait for Tuesday's testimony.
March 3, 2007 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
"little turd". The name is apt.
When will one of the judiciary committees get off their collective duffs and haul that Michael O'Neill character in there and find out who instructed him to insert the federal prosecutor provision into the Patriot Act ?
March 3, 2007 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The sheer arrogance of this crowd boggles the mind.
March 3, 2007 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess Alberto R(aza) Gonzales is to busy railroading U.S. border patrol agents to respond to the concerns of Congress.
BCP
http://beercanpolitcs.blogspot.com
March 3, 2007 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder why Abu Gonzales thinks we should believe a bunch of people who lies to the American people every time they open their mouths.
March 3, 2007 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is not just contempt of congress, but contempt for the political process as set up within the Constitution which Gonzales has taken an oath to uphold as U.S. Attorney General.
But here the democrats have an opportunity to haul him willingly or unwillingly before the oppropriate committee and either have him answer the questions, show his contempt in person, or resign his position.
This IS a Constitutional crises moment.
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
March 3, 2007 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't the Dems have a majority? Can't they just remove him? Why pretend that there is need for debate?
Monday 9AM: vote to impeach Gonzales. All the D's vote "Aye." Done by 10 AM. Who cares what the R's say? They're in the minority, they don't get to talk.
Nancy: You have power. It was given to you for a reason. Now would be a lovely time to actually use it.
March 3, 2007 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see that the NY Times has an editorial today suggesting that Gonzales stop issuing denials and start an investigation. I'm sure it's what passes for a courageous stand at the Times, but someone has to sit the editors down and explain that whole fox and henhouse thing.
March 3, 2007 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
wait a minute....I thought that the AG was the "PEOPLES" lawyer, not the administrations.
isn't that one of the key lessons of Watergate?
these people have forgotten the meaning of "public servant."
March 3, 2007 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry tekel,
need 2/3's of the senate to convict, can't imagine the rethugs actually doing that.
c.
March 3, 2007 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
i hope that when congress does get abu gonzalez under oath and testifying, someone will ask him about his quasi-deputation of the southern baptist league to hunt out persecution of their membership, so the doj can intervene.
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/22/104711/204
March 3, 2007 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I might add it will be interesting to see how the MSM play this statement, if they play it at all. Which I doubt.
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
March 3, 2007 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have said it before and I will say it again. This administration will continue to tell Congress and the American people, "F@#k you!", until the Democrats get some balls. Since that isn't going to happen until we clean house in Washington I am not holding my breath that things will get better for a real long time. You can kiss any improvements being made in 2008 goodbye. The Democrats will be lucky if the voting public doesn't throw them out of the majority again. Look, you were voted in to change the course of this country. You are failing to do so. quit trying to read the tea leaves and govern for Gods sake.
March 3, 2007 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been saying that the right path to take our country back is by impeaching Gonzales for quite a while now.
Does anyone have suggestions on how to light this fire?
March 3, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does this Democratically-controlled Congress imagine this administration would respond otherwise?
The Democrats know to expect any behavior that will obfuscate or delay. They should anticipate wholesale destruction of evidence before they leave office, and the attempt to keep as many non-political appointee acolytes in office as possible - from secretaries to top staff. They already know they should replace all of Mr. Bush's political appointees. While that will passively hamper the conduct of government business, it will hamper it less than keeping them in office.
The effective response to the response Mr. Gonzales was ordered to give, to his arrogant, dismissive, open-act-of-bureaucratic-warfare, is more competent bureaucratic warfare.
Subpoenas, public inquiries, GAO investigations, announcements, rejections of inappropriate nominations. Those would do for a start.
March 3, 2007 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alberto Gonlawless, at it again. When are we going to see him, Cheney, Bush and Rummy frog-marched into Gitmo in immaculate orange jumpsuits? Bet we'd hear some caterwauling from them than about habeas corpus, eh?
March 3, 2007 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
This discussion drove me to Wikopedia to read about impeachment. Not only do you need 2/3s of the senate for conviction but also the Vice Pres. presides. Still it is the house the brings the impeachment. At least that might (underline might) get Gonzoles' attention.
I agree about Dems getting some balls or not getting re-elected. I contributed to a political campaign for the first time in my life but am much less interested now that they are in and not convincing me that they are standing up to this administration. We'll see how the hearings on Tuesday go.
March 3, 2007 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
âI think that the American people lose if I spend all my time worrying about congressional requests for information..."
What a smug bastard!
I think that the American people lose if a brazenly partisan AG spends his time subverting the law rather than upholding it.
March 3, 2007 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too Busy?!!! He was scheduled to be on the set of American Idol to watch last Thursday's episode. It wasn't until Thursday afternoon that his visit was canceleld, but not before all the discussions, background checks and inspections had taken place until the wee morning hours. So he had the intent and time to visit until say 3pm thursday.
March 3, 2007 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to see this as much as anybody, but you aren't going to get an impeachment just because you perceive ground being gained in proving nefarious activity when it comes to [your favorite minor controversy]. I think there's too much focus put on the Watergate breakin as a tiny cause of a huge scandal, so that every time there's a small event that *can* be extrapolated into an impeachable offense.
It is very naive to think that impeachable offenses don't happen all the time. People with power use that power in grey areas to impose their will as a matter of course, and these things are documented in newspapers all the time. The difference is that when this power is exerted in a seemingly harmless way or in a way that benefits us, it doesn't appear so significant.
The crucial aspect of impeachment would be for the subject to paint themselves into a corner, to no longer have anything except outright denial (and pleading the 5th Amendment is the Constitutional corner here). This moment has not come yet, our Woodward & Bernsteins have been diluted amongst many reporters with half of their interest in the issues, and the White House press pool is still comfortable repeating the talking points.
Pressure must be exerted, but you have to know where to exert it so you're not merely poking the same button "Impeach! Impeach!" all the time. This makes you look like a crackpot. All we can do is retain interest in good government whether Republican, Democrat, or another party and try to get those with more power than us to take an interest in this as well. Make no mistake, I don't know anybody (even my Repub-card voting parents) who thinks we have a good government right now, but it's still not enough. The Repubs got away with the Clinton thing, but that was a fluke. A masterstroke on their part, but that doesn't mean that impeachment can happen for any reason that we choose.
March 3, 2007 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
How excellent and appropriate, my Security Code to post is "screw".
Cheney get's more attention because of his position but Abu G. believes just as deeply that he is his own branch of untouchable gov't. Somehow, he manages to outshine even guys like Meese and Ashcroft in his maggotness.
Gonzales is a supercocky little schmuck. Like Cheney, all he will understand and respond to with more than a sneer is a throwdown confrontation.
It's time for that confrontation. There's no need for squeamishness or caution. They've come too far with their B.S. If the laws in this country mean anything, it's time to use them.
March 3, 2007 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good grief. The way this administration uses the "American people" as a shield is simply disgraceful.
March 3, 2007 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
EH, I must disagree with you here. The flat-out refusal of an officer of the Executive Branch to acknowledge a Congressional subpoena is a statement that the Executive Branch has a right to refuse such subpoenas.
Congress can either allow that right to stand, and lose its power of oversight over the Executive Branch, or it can regard it as an impeachable offense.
That oversight authority does not explicitly exist in the language of the Constitution. But it is essential to our form of government. For Congress to cede its oversight role would be to deprive Congress of its only intermediate-level check over the Executive Branch. Other than oversight, there is the power of the purse, and there is impeachment.
One cannot de-fund the Department of Justice. So the question is one of whether to impeach now to preserve the Congressional power of oversight, or to be forever be deprived of all options between an unchecked Executive on the one hand, and impeachment on the other.
Seems obvious to me. To paraphrase Nixon, this Congress must think of future Congresses.
March 3, 2007 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, if we take EH's approach, there won't be any US of A any more. Right now, I am glad I am getting on in years because this country will be lost soon. Maybe I will die before the worst happens because no one will take a stand. Americans should not allow the abuse of the Constitution by the Repugs when they impeached Clinton to keep them from using the Constitution as designed by the Founding Fathers to impeach a gang of corrupt thugs who have clearly committed high crimes and misdemeanors. Being meek and mild may inherit the earth; but, it is going to lose this Constitutional Republic before you know it.
March 3, 2007 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's time for that confrontation. There's no need for squeamishness or caution. They've come too far with their B.S. If the laws in this country mean anything, it's time to use them."
John Dean was right, start the impeachment hearings with Gonzales. Dems need to do the right thing and stop triangulating and running for the next election just after each election instead OF DOING THEIR FRIGGIN' JOB.
IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH BEGINNING WITH GONZALES.
Congress is required to do their job which at this point is using the tools in the Constitution to get rid of these bastards who have destroyed our system of government, murdered 650,000 people to steal their oil and to empty our treasury and have nearly destroyed our armed forces.
March 3, 2007 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that Anna Nicole Smith has been buried, perhaps this issue will get the level of coverage it deserves.
March 3, 2007 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Attorney General of the United States of America has publicly announced that he will reject Congressional subpoenas and requests for information.
What do you little Democratic punks think he is, a public servant?
March 3, 2007 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Step 1: Impeach AG Gonzales
March 3, 2007 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Subpoena the cocky little son-of-a-bitch. Send him to Congressional investigation hell.
March 3, 2007 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the American people losing is pretty much a done deal, Alberto.
I mean, what the hell, it's not like you care about what we think anyway.
We elected a Democratic majority in the Congress. We want the Democrats to issue subpoenas. We want the Democrats to write letters to you. We want your ass hauled into Congressional hearings. We want you to testify under oath.
But since when did the Bushies give a rat's ass about what the American people want?
March 3, 2007 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will both political Parties scream ENOUGH! OK. Thatâs not going to happen, but the tacit support by the Democrats of the fundamental corruption of this administration is nauseating. Really physically sickening, because it means there is no hope.
March 3, 2007 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps NOW the Dems will realize that IMPEACHMENT for Gonzo (first of hopefully several) is the only recourse. These smug, arrogant asshats must be taught that WE are their bosses, not the other way around. Pretty please, Dems...it's the only act that will earn you your backbone!
March 3, 2007 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me echo the others -- Gonzales will certainly pay attention if they initiate impeachment proceedings. How many times does this guy have to lie to their faces before they smack him down?
Ha, my security code was "snake." How appropriate.
March 3, 2007 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
RT (and others): Gonzales hasn't been subpoenaed yet. This is another crucial point in trying to move from shrillness in response to everything that doesn't get us closer to impeachment rather than recognizing the procedural aspects required for impeachment to begin. I'm all in favor of impeachment of Gonzales, Cheney and Bush (in that order), but it takes more than just wanting it and posting "Impeach the fucker!" on TPM every time the story gets a millimeter deeper. There is a momentum that has to build, and that has to build in the House of Representatives. Has to.
March 3, 2007 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hasn't Gonzalez already lied to congress while under oath? Impeach the bastard.
March 3, 2007 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stall, impede, block, be uncooperative, refuse, deny...these are the tactics Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzales, the DOJ and the GOP have "publicly" stated they will use. So what are you gonna do about it? Talk, talk, talk. What are you gonna "do" about it?
Yeah, that's exactly what the Repukes said you would do. Until you arrest someone they consider you just a joke. And now you allow a Blackwater training camp within our borders. Al-Sadr like militia and Congress is powerless to stop it and given the way these fascists have ruled this country what do you think is really going on here? If Congress doesn't "do" something now, soon they won't be able to. So now, joining in with Cheney's famous congressional remark, Gonzales is saying .."Go f*^k yourselves. These are the most dangerous times, when something could have been done.
March 3, 2007 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's right--and there's more:
Not only do the American people lose--the terrorists win!
March 3, 2007 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
pack Gonzales off to Gitmo or Abu Ghraib, see if he reconsiders.
Hell, pack him off regardless. You reap what you sow.
March 3, 2007 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Blowing off a congressional subpeona is called "Contempt of Congress", and it's punishable by $1,000 in fines, and one year in prison. Go Torquemada! Do it! Do it!
March 3, 2007 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is about time the Democrats started impeachment of all Bush appointees. Supeona them have the US Marshalls standing behind them. Arrest them for criminal acts against the U.S. Government, the Constitution, and haul them out of office now.
March 3, 2007 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"What recourse"?
He's already lied to congress: we now know definitively that his earlier stating that the firings were purely for performance issues.... was purely a lie.
No wonder he doesn't want to go back.
But if they want to be taken at all seriously... Prosecute! Lying to Congress is a felony!
March 3, 2007 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gonzales is a short little M-f'er with a BIG Napoleon complex.......Good God I want my country back from these fucking fascists
March 3, 2007 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It does not take the same votes to appoint an Independent Counsel to investigate possible criminal charges as it does to impeach. Plus, it leaves open the real possibility that post -2008, criminal charges would be pursued.
That's really the best deterrent to an AG violating public fiduciary standards and laws, and other laws for that matter (like FISA). A criminal investigation.
Keep it tight and Bush has to try to figure out if he knows the "right" things to pardon.
But I'm with T - why does Justice need a lobbyist and who does he lobby and who pays for it? Or is it an internship program for DOJ attys before they go to work for Ashcroft?
March 3, 2007 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can a Grand Jury be brought together, and determine if Obstruction of Justice, has occurred?
March 3, 2007 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gonzales admitted that he doesn't know whether his grandparents were illegal immigrants.. For a lawyer to say this says a lot. The DNA fruits of "illegals" haunts this country in more ways than one.
March 3, 2007 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
1) Gonelawless is great!
2) We knew when he was nominated for AG that he was a Bush Cheney Rove underling (see Scooter Libby)- but lets keep our eyes on the big prizes.
3) Why is the Christian Broadcasting Network asking him tough questions - what's up with that?
March 3, 2007 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alberto "Torture Guy" Gonzales is nothing more than Bush 43's crime family consigliere, who spent his time in Texas getting George W. & his drunken daughter's criminal records expunged.
Gonzales deserves to be impeached.
Did Gonzales really "earn" a law degree? Was it from one of those mail-order "universities" [sic]?
March 3, 2007 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alberto Gonzales is very, very evil.
Just like George W. Bush is the worst president in American history, Alberto Gonzales is by far the worst attorney general in American History. Just as Dick Cheney is the worst vice-president in American History.
And these bozoes think of themselves as being superior intellectually and morally to everyone else.
In their minds, they never make mistakes. And due to this ego arrogance, many people have died and the freedom of all American citizens is constantly under attack.
What happened to the Republican Party that such evil bozoes could hijack it and turn the Republican Party into the party of tyranny instead of the party of Lincoln and Eisenhower?
March 3, 2007 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
This Administration, quite some time ago, has finished morphing into those they call "enemies." Torturing citizens. Holding people without trial. Daring others to hold them to the standard of law, knowing that the Democrats lack the will to take the bully to the mat.
Demcrats have the will of the people in the election behind them. The ONLY thing holding them back is their own lack of will. It is time to call a spade a spade and stop waiting for Republicans to become more moderate so we can start to compromise.
Time to take it to the next level. We're at the point where the political "nuclear option" should not only be on the table but prominently displayed.
March 3, 2007 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to find someone to put rat poison in HIS Creme Brule. Paraphrasing Ann Coulter of course.
Are we even sure she did not lift THAT statement from someone else?
I like my security code...cord.
Just like the kind we get to hang traitors with. Whoopie!
March 3, 2007 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It may come to pass that Alberto Gonzales will find at some future date he'll have a lot of 'time' on his hands. He is one of those persons that supports the notion of a unitary executive and that shows in everything he has done to date. He has violated our constitution at least in spirit if not in actual law.
March 3, 2007 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
He "doesn't have time" to respond to congressional subpoenas? He'd better make room on his schedule to defend himself from contempt charges, then. That is, if this Congress has any balls.
March 3, 2007 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all good venting,but lets have a little faith in the Democratic Party . The hearins will be on Tuesday. I am betting on Committe Chairwoman Linda Sanchez will do us proud.Stay tuned-especially if Heather Wilson is named as one of the Pols that called Iglesias- Believe thats when all the fireworks start,
And rest assurred that little bully Gonzales's frijoles are cooked - Sen Specter is some very pissed off about being bamboozled by that staffer that stuck that clause in the Patriot Act that gave BushCo the chance to fire the USA- The Fat Lady is just getting warmed up -
March 3, 2007 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The best thing to do is to subpoena Gonzales daily, then when he refuses to respond, impeach the little souless fascist. And spend a lot of time in the process, public time, news media time. Make the case that his obstructions and unconstitutional behaviors ae not acceptable, and do not represent America or her values in any way, shape or form.
Bring up all of his "crimes," from the Texas death row cases demonstrating his derelictions of duty, to Abu Ghraib and show the pictures, the gross and disgusting pictures this time, show everything this little pissant has done, and remind everybody how close he is to Bush, and by the time the Senate gets their hands on the case, see how many of them wish to defend all of the indefensible things that miserable excuse of a human has done.
March 4, 2007 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
So the nation's top law-enforcement officer thinks that the American people "lose" if he spends time reponding to Congressional subpoenas?
Irony meter now pegged...
Funny, the last time I checked, the American people voted Congress into office. And only a handful of people voted Mr. Gonzalez into office, incuding some members of the very same Congress Mr. Gonzales doesn't think he need to repond to.
March 4, 2007 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hold the new congress accountable now for not going into an insane rage, as the repugs have done for over a decade. over this weasel who had the gall to say habeas corpus did not exist. Why is it that I don't see our dem leaders gathering in the open areas with torches and guns, calling on the christians to help them root out crime among their ranks???They (repugs)have had spectacle after spectacle, now our leaders need to go door to door in congress and demand one by one face to face if they support this skank. We need a spectacle,
March 4, 2007 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
i think they should send this criminal so many subpoenas he thinks he's in a blizzard. it will keep him from creating any more havoc. and the first one he dedcides to miss because he's to busy usurping the law the congress should issue an arrest warrant for him
March 4, 2007 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now that Anna Nicole Smith has finally been laid to rest, possibly the afternoon TV watching crowd might accidentally click on CSPAN and see what has been going on in our country.
I canât wait to see Carol Lamâs testimony on Tuesday. We might get a view of how the Bush administration works from someone who is completely apolitical.
W.Stawicki
March 4, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
This would get alot more attention if it was framed correctly.
"Attorney General Gonzales ignores Congressional lawmaker's requests for information" would be both a true statement, and a more damning frame. The mention of "Dem's" both polarizes and weakens the newsworthiness of the underlying story. The point is, Gonzales behaves as though he is above the law and accountability. That is not a partisan issue, it is a Constitutional one. One that EVERYONE should be concerned with.
March 4, 2007 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is time Congress put this little shit's testicles in the vice grips. Load him up with subpoena's and drag his ass before Congress on a daily basis. I would rather have no federal law enforcements than this guy spending all his time reading me e-mails.
March 4, 2007 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
One know that these subpoenas have hit a big nerve! Bullseye! Get Gonzales under oath as soon as possible or impeach him now or jail him for contempt of Congress.
Its a start!
March 4, 2007 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree with the post by (tbhull). Gonzales is a criminal! A
criminal is the top cop in America! Gonzales creates policy which
makes torture legal. He attacks the Constitution willingly, and every time his lips move, he's lying! This piece of shit should be made to testify under oath to all these charges, and the first lie that spews from his lips should be grounds for impeachment, conviction, and prison! He needs to go down! He and the rest of this criminal administration! The sooner the better!
March 4, 2007 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too busy. OUCH !!!!!!!!!
March 4, 2007 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you never know whether or not Bush and Co. will decide to jettison Gonzales just to keep Congress busy for awhile.
After all, Alberto is just another mojado to the Bush family....a useful mojado, but a wetback nonetheless.
And while the usual Democratic suspects are preening for the cameras (can't you just see Chuckie Schumer getting a woody from all the attention?) Georgie Boy and Deadeye Dick can get on with running the empire into the ground.
March 4, 2007 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus Christ, unmotherfuckingbelievable. Imagine, for a second, what the the response from Gingrich and Lott and their right-wing running dogs would have been if Janet Reno had told them to go jump in the lake. This little shit needs some christ-loving prison time.
March 5, 2007 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heck of a job, 'Bert-o!
March 5, 2007 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
guidelines, for a particular loan program
March 27, 2007 6:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because if, and I do mean if, the people are professionals, their services should make you money
May 16, 2007 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because if, and I do mean if, the people are professionals, their services should make you money
May 16, 2007 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
management, industrial sitting, mortgage loan, etc
May 16, 2007 6:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
management, industrial sitting, mortgage loan, etc
May 16, 2007 6:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
management, industrial sitting, mortgage loan, etc
May 16, 2007 6:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Other types of Loans are also available, such as convertible rate, buydown loans, and, in some cases, reverse mortgages
May 16, 2007 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Other types of Loans are also available, such as convertible rate, buydown loans, and, in some cases, reverse mortgages
May 16, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Other types of Loans are also available, such as convertible rate, buydown loans, and, in some cases, reverse mortgages
May 16, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Soon the cash flow from my properties was so strong that my company bought me my first Porsche
May 16, 2007 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Soon the cash flow from my properties was so strong that my company bought me my first Porsche
May 16, 2007 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Soon the cash flow from my properties was so strong that my company bought me my first Porsche
May 16, 2007 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Soon the cash flow from my properties was so strong that my company bought me my first Porsche
May 16, 2007 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Related: Hedge, short hedge price, whereas if a put, the buyer will choose the maximum price
May 16, 2007 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Related: Hedge, short hedge price, whereas if a put, the buyer will choose the maximum price
May 16, 2007 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The contrast in their points of view, particularly where money was concerned, was so extreme that I grew curious and intrigued
May 17, 2007 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the jumbo rate on that $400,000 loan was 8
May 17, 2007 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the jumbo rate on that $400,000 loan was 8
May 17, 2007 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
You may decide to If you would like to obtain a mortgage loan preapproval to determine your optimum loan qualification, please Some may consider seller financing as playing with make-believe money, but it is in fact a creative and effective method for purchasing property without the usual restrictions or requirements of conforming mortgage loans
May 17, 2007 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
You may decide to If you would like to obtain a mortgage loan preapproval to determine your optimum loan qualification, please Some may consider seller financing as playing with make-believe money, but it is in fact a creative and effective method for purchasing property without the usual restrictions or requirements of conforming mortgage loans
May 17, 2007 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Schools focus on scholastic and professional skills, but not on financial skills
May 18, 2007 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Most loan applicants are allowed to borrow against this cash value, and those funds are treated as secured loans
May 19, 2007 6:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Negative Cash Flow expenses
May 19, 2007 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Negative Cash Flow expenses
May 19, 2007 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Negative Cash Flow expenses
May 19, 2007 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Today's ARM loan borrowers actually have several protections built into the residential ARM loan program
May 19, 2007 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're greedy
May 20, 2007 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're greedy
May 20, 2007 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're greedy
May 20, 2007 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you would like to obtain a mortgage loan preapproval to determine your optimum loan qualification, please program allowed such applicants to qualify for a larger mortgage loan and, thus, a bigger home purchase
May 21, 2007 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you would like to obtain a mortgage loan preapproval to determine your optimum loan qualification, please program allowed such applicants to qualify for a larger mortgage loan and, thus, a bigger home purchase
May 21, 2007 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Longterm, lower interest rate loans
May 21, 2007 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
If there is any surplus, that extra cash will normally be provided to the mortgage loan
May 22, 2007 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
, of borrowing the money to buy a property) in any given year expressed as a percentage of a loan amount (e
May 22, 2007 7:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
homebuyers
May 22, 2007 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
in the earlier years a larger part of the payment goes toward interest
May 22, 2007 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
The diagram that follows shows how the corporate structure sits outside your personal income statement and balance sheet
May 22, 2007 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The diagram that follows shows how the corporate structure sits outside your personal income statement and balance sheet
May 22, 2007 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The diagram that follows shows how the corporate structure sits outside your personal income statement and balance sheet
May 22, 2007 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink