« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Sampson: If I Had It To Do Over....

Here it is, the culmination of the hearing, where a very, very tired Kyle Sampson admits that if he had it to do all over again, well...


Comments (38)

avatar

Sure, why not let him take a mulligan. As Hatch said, we all make mistakes.

Nice selection of video highlights.

avatar

Okayyyyy.... Now make this man NEVER employable again.... Never... Let him stand on the street and beg for money.

avatar

What a pathetic little puke who workaholic-ed himself into a place where he had too much power and a boss who exercised too little oversight. He protected himself all through the hearing, wouldn't make a declarative statement without prefacing it with "I believe" or "as I recall" and then blamed everyone else. "A bad idea that came from staff," who the hell is he talking about except himself? There's still a huge gap here. This guy was clearing spots for Karl's and gwb's friends, crappy lawyers who wanted to be judges, and trying for an AG job himself. He'd be still out there screwing with the careers of people better than himself if he hadn't got his tit in a wringer. No pity for this shrunken head!

avatar

His job, according to him, was to act as a loyal scrivener for the occasional utterance from a GOP political boss, whoever it was (Senator, White House Rover, DoJ General, or Indian Chief). After collecting a loose set of scrivenings, and unburdened by the slightest hint of critical evaluation, he then passed his scrivened list back to the Bosses and waited for reactions, if any. Seeing none, he then obediently and mindlessly passed it over to the executioners.

A nice job description for a 4th grade school-kid. But he is a loyal Bushie!

avatar

What Happened To Grassley?

For me, perhaps the most interesting thing that happened today was the mysterious way that the hearing was shut down by the Republicans.

This happened immediately after John Kyl produced the strange revelation that he had gotten a personal call from Gonzales on Dec 7, and just as Chuck Grassley was beginning what seemed to be a major Republican defection.

Leahy said that Grassley would resume after they returned, but when they came back Grassley was gone. He did not return.

What happened to Chuck Grassley?

Was Grassley the reason for the unprecidented interuption to the proceedings?

Something smells really fishy?

avatar

yeah, what happened to grassley's line of questions.

security code --copper--hokee, dokee.

avatar

We still seem no closer toward getting any of these losers to specify the precise reason the list existed, the precise reason for the firings, and the precise goal this coordinated effort sprawled across two major branches of government was intended to achieve.

They all knew what they were up to. There has to be some way to get them to all admit it.

avatar

Ah, yes...the Hatch - Sampson Mormon connection...

Another example of why religion should NOT enter into political decisions.

I'm not anti-Mormon, I'm not anti-S. Baptist, I'm not anti-Roman Catholic, I'm not anti-Jewish...I'm not anti-anything EXCEPT politicians allowing their religious views to pervert judgements that are in the best interests of the U.S.A.

avatar

This lying little fucker Sampson even looks like Rove.

avatar

i know that if i were in a similar position, where i was asked by my superiors or overseers or whatever, about certain HUGE things in my job that i'd spent more than a year thinking about, i'd better effing remember or i'd lose my job. and i'd better present proof of my decisions.

i know he resigned already, but how is he not impeached? along with ag, of course?

there's a shocking amount of short-term memory loss in the bush administration.

also, why are people always writing the security codes in their messages? aren't we supposed to write those in the box? or am i unhip and missed the joke?

avatar

James,

I once taught 4th grade. 4th graders have more initiative! Unless they had come from an abused background, that sucked the life out of them, they would never have been content to "scriven."

But I loved your description! Very apt.

And to think this is happening in our country. In our government. At the national level!

avatar

It seems apparent that Sampson and Goodling were merely the points at which the White House and the Department of Justice touched on the matter of the US Attorneys.

avatar

nachomama - this whole situation is so awful, we are using any excuse - like random words appearing below our writing - to break the tension

Our govt is "bent"

avatar

MediaFreeze asks, "What Happened To Grassley?"
VERY good question. It has to be more than his dissing Lurita yesterday.
indeed, if those of conscience were to peel away now, it really would be a point of no return.
The GOP is nervous...and walking on eggshells.

They know no one is fooled. And, they can scoff at those of us who are paying very close attention. However, they are very worried about controlling the 'dog and pony' show in the eyes of the public.

they poll extensively, and the numbers are causing real heartburn and anxiety.

avatar


Maybe I'm too sympathetic but after that last bit, I feel sorry for the guy that he doesn't drink. He looks like he could swallow about six tall, strong ones.

avatar

At the least with the Dem's in control, we're getting some much needed oversight and one also realizes that this process while having to wait for Gonzalez in mid April, will feel more like pulling a ripe scab from an old cut.

I'll be the first to admit that watching live theater was always heads and shoulders above watching a movie. However, the one question that should be asked after the whole enchalada is exposed for the cronism cock fighting it is, should be what is going to happen to all of those politically sensative cases that Lam was working on?
For heaven sakes Senators, you've already plunged the knife in. Now cut to the chase while twisting it and ask that one question we're all wondering about.
Meirs and MC-Rove should bring down the house. Does the little lady have the brass knockers to charge at her questioners? This should be gooooooooooood!

avatar

It's extraordinary how this guy has never really been asked to think. There's no real sense of what he believes or thinks or knows. It's all so hedged.

It occured to me that the Democratic senators were the first people who'd ever asked him to commit himself to a stance he believed was right, not merely in line with authority or accesptable or strategic.

It's no wonder they have no real morals. They never are asked to take a stand.

avatar

Thanks Senator Schumer. You're doing a fabulous job with these pukes. Also, keep it up Josh. Loved the your video you posted on TPM. Do more of them!

This guy Sampson is such a weasel. He'll resurface again in some position of power. Just like Yoo, Gingrich, DeLay, Eliot Abrams. They never go away no matter how criminal they are...I feel like I'm in a horror movie sometimes w/creepy clowns surrounding me.

avatar

MediaFreeze,

Christy Hardin Smith at Fire Dog Lake had posted her fairly full transcribings, so I'll quote what she wrote for Kennedy and Grassley:

>>SEN. KENNEDY QUESTIONS: Thanks Sampson for appearing voluntarily. Says you were the aggregator of information, and you said you kept a file in your desk drawer — do you know if this was given in its entirety to the committee? Sampson says it wasn't a good file, and the DoJ has made an effort to turn over anything relevant to the committee, but I don't know because I no longer work at the DoJ. Kennedy says they'll check on that.

DoJ has admitted now that the 2/23 letter was inaccurate — that Rove did play a role in the decision to replace Bud Cummings as the USA in Arkansas. Sampson says that he was not aware of Rove being interested in Griffen being appointed to the position at the time ha drafted the letter. Sampson says that he was aware that the AG determined independently to do that — says AG had several conversations with Sen. Pryor about this before making the decisions. Doesn't remember Rove — circulated the letter widely to make sure it was accurate, and "no one disabused me of that notion."

Kennedy points out that Sampson said in his e-mail that it was "important to Karl," but Sampson says that to the best of his knowledge he doesn't remember that Rove ever talked to him on the phone or in person about this, and doesn't remember being told that by anyone else. Kennedy asks why would you write that in your e-mal then? Sampson says that he thought it was important to Karl based on information from Sen. Taylor's interest.

SEN. GRASSLEY QUESTIONS: Grassley says it isn't against the law for the President to fire US Attorneys. But once those representations are made with regard to why the USAs are fired, those representations — both to the public and to Congress — need to be accurate. <<

Someone on TPM MR pointed out that this Kennedy interchange was the first to have focused so pointedly on Karl Rove's role. That must have alarmed whoever in the WH was watching C-Span3.

For myself, I paid attention to Sen Jon Kyle, who made a number of "corrections," primarily that he'd called Gonzales as soon as he heard that Paul Charlton had been fired. Sampson didn't know this fact, and he'd written something different in an e-mail. To me, that segment was bubbling over with contradictions to the party line.

avatar

Tripped up by the Kyl and Kyle there! So let me add the observation that Sen Kyl seemed as upset with them firing Charlton as Sen Ensign is with Daniel Bogden being fired. Unhappy base, I'd say.

avatar

Speaking of weird Grassley-related mysteries -
Does anyone know whatever developed in the bizarre case of (Grassley's chief investigator) Emilia DiSanto's driveway beating? (http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/006944.php)

avatar

Josh...

Wow, your presentation on the historical time line on the "slipped-in" minor clause in the Patriot Act and the "slipped" under the radar Tim Griffin and his political agenda mission should and has just made this citizen even pissed off more at this "corporate corruption - political driven - non ethical American - drain the tax payer - hire my old time buddies - War for profit" administration!
Thank you ;>

avatar

So Bush, et al. have behaved politically. Imagine, politicians predicating their behavior on politics. Sorry, but until someone actually demonstrates that some genuine obstruction of justice was going on, this story amounts to little more than the left-wing version of the same nonsense that the right attempted to visit upon President Clinton in the '90s. Not liking Karl Rove, in itself, does not justify criminal investigations, no matter how deserving Rove is of being politically bloodied.

avatar

There should be an award for Bush administration staffers like Sampson. It should be called a 'Brownie Award' after the prototype. Candidates must be young but look even younger, and have been placed in a position miles above their actual level of professional competence because of their loyalty-well there is another meaning to 'Brownie' that does not need to be explained.
The true distinguishing feature of a great Brownie is speaking out in ones own defense by stating the appalling principles behind one's existence in plain language as if there was nothing to be ashamed of. "What's wrong with using the instruments of government to advance my partisan agenda? Why would anyone expect me to be competent or have the best interest of the country in mind? I'm a political hack, dammit!"

avatar

Yeah, what did happen to Grassley? In the end, the GOP faction was Specter's typical stuff, and Orrin Hatch's spoonfeeding to his little porcine charge.

The start of the hearing was knocked off the cable networks because of floor votes, then Bush's statement, leaving it stuck on C-SPAN3. Then you had the weird hiatus after lunch.

avatar

***this is a long post... I just have to get this out, folks. What the hell are we going to do ABOUT these issues?

This message is intended for Josh and associates to find out if TPM is strictly a reporting organization or if it is a people-powered action organization?

I think we are getting bogged down in the details. Yes, the oversight hearings must carry on. Of course. But maybe we, the citizens who are paying attention and who absolutely see the writing on the wall: the federal government has been co-opted into an RNC machine for retaining power by suppressing the vote by those likely to vote against the RNC and by rewarding corporations with large cash taxpayer-funded prizes for playing ball.

I am outraged after listening to the pathetic hearing with Sampson today (watching republican hacks diminish and distort the facts and watching Sampson do the Ronald Reagan dance of “I don’t recall”) and the completely infuriating hearing with Lurita Doan with her utter contempt for accountability.

And today I read a news story about a Qui Tam case in the minerals royalty department that basically shows that the Bush program has facilitated non-payment of royalties for oil companies that amount in the millions. Maybe billions, given the astronomical profits the oil companies have made.

Oh, and I can’t even describe my outrage at the loyalty oaths mid-level forestry officials have had to make in order to keep their jobs. What will be the state of our national parks in 2009? (and is Jan 2009 even and end-date to this madness given the RNC control of our government and elections? Maybe a republican will win, and we will have another 4 years of the same. That is a real concern.)

As much as I appreciate Patrick Fitzgerald’s efforts, um, why aren’t there any indictments in the Plame outing? Oh, cause Patrick said there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed? Isn’t it his friggin job to FIND the evidence? Christ, we know the who, what and where. I need a much better explanation about why Cheney isn’t in jail. At the least, why does he have his security clearance?

Don’t even get me started on things like the FDA having a veterinarian heading the women’s health department in that agency. Or the HHS guy who just resigned from the access to contraceptives division – the guy who is a member of an anti-contraceptive organization for god’s sakes. Or the fact that our country has burned the Geneva Conventions. I mean… torture, no habeaus corpus, renditions. Our country has 100s of human beings who were kidnapped and secreted to an off-continent location to face god knows what fate. Is my phone tapped right now? If the bush govt wanted to tap it, it would be tapped. I know this! I also know that I am not a criminal nor am I planning to be a criminal. What’s wrong with this picture?

I am getting to a point here. The level of corruption is seeing the light of day. And work is being done in the House and Senate to uncover more. But, what is going to happen with all of this new evidence?

At the very least, the president should be censured. At the most, people need to be indicted. Special Prosecutors need to be appointed to investigate every single situation that smells of corruption. The Inspector Generals of every single federal agency need to be, dare I say, sequestered and given a safe haven from which they can do their jobs. I don’t know.

I could go on and on. The gist of all of this is that only a fool would believe that there is any serious business taking place in *any* department or agency which has bush appointees running things. There is enough evidence to conclude that if a bush appointee is making decisions, that those decisions are partisan and geared toward two things: election tampering/manipulation and lottery rewards for corporations. In EVERY federal office.

It would take 20 years to get to the murky bottom of this mess. This e-mail to you today is to find out if TPM is strictly a reporting organization or if it is a people-powered action organization? Cause, frankly, the people need to shut down the RNC-controlled federal government.

Well, I needed to get this out.

What the hell are we going to do about this mess? The Congress can only do so much. The only thing I can think that they can do to REMEDY these issues is file articles of impeachment. And they aren’t going to do that. So why the hell have the oversight investigations? Why? I know it causes me great pain to endure the details.

What the HELL are we going to do about this mess?!!!

Security word: school. (so let's the school the bastards for a change!)

avatar

Maybe I'm too sympathetic but after that last bit, I feel sorry for the guy that he doesn't drink. He looks like he could swallow about six tall, strong ones.

Posted by: Phredd

Yeah, and he probably needed a drinky, too.

avatar

Kyle, I know the perfect place for you to contemplate what you should have done.

Prison. Go there, stay there, and live for a long, long time.

avatar

a numbr of thoughts.

1. was sampson so specific about where his notes were (in the lower right hand drawer of his desk) because he was (a) inviting the Senate to pick up on the specificity of his description so that they would specifically request/subpoena production of those notes? (b) telling those still inside DOJ where his notes are in case they want to clean out his desk? i'd like to see the Senate ask for production of those notes ASAP.

2. no one at DOJ ever called the targeted US Attorneys to tell them what their alleged deficiencies were (e.g. Lam and the immigration problems) so as to give them a chance to fix the alleged problem. two points. (a) - this violates a fundamental concept in the law of "notice". it is only fair to give notice and a chance to address or cure the problem, or a chance to establish that the perception that there is a problem is wrong. this was never done. if the WH and/or DOJ really cared about the underlying problem, why wouldn't they go directly to the us atty and ask them to fix the problem? so, (b) the fact that DOJ never told these people what their alleged deficiencies were suggests to me that these supposed deficiences offerd as the reasons for dumping these folks were PRETEXTUAL. in other words, DOJ/WH wanted to get rid of these people (for other more sinister reasons) and they had to come up with justifications they could offer if questioned by Congress, press or public. the public justifications are pretexts to hide the real reasons. and if DOJ had let the targets know what the pretexts were, the targets would have had a chance to fix or explain away the pretextual reasons. that would have gummed up the whole process, with those messy things called facts.

3. if the WH really wants to restore integrity to DOJ, they should nominate Patrick Fitzgerald for AG. Let him staff the place as he sees fit, with as many career prosecutors as possible, and let the joint operate as it should free from politics and blind to political considerations.

sparkplug

avatar

from having taken a few law classes in college the term "weasel words" stuck in my brain. Guys like him remind me why the term sticks.

Nothing but a little weasel, spineless little puke....serving at the pleasure of the president

avatar

This feels like its actually getting serious. There is so much filth that, now that Congress is digging, who knows what will turn up day to day.

If the Repubs were smart they would stick to one term administrations. They just can't seem to get away with their crap for a full 8 years.

avatar

This should be the beginning of the end of the Republican Party if they, the republican in the congress, don't demand an accounting of the President's actions in this constitutional show down.

What is apparently so many smoking guns could be turned on the party in the next election. The all important independent voter smells corruption in the party as in 73 and if there is no Wicker for non-kool aid drinking Republicans to get behind, why bother to deceive themselves?

avatar

also, why are people always writing the security codes in their messages? aren't we supposed to write those in the box? or am i unhip and missed the joke?

I like to make the security code the last word in my post, and fit.

I think it's good for the "nation"

avatar

David P Lyons,

Well at the least, we know the AG lied to Congress. So now, we're using that to lift up all sorts of rocks and see what's squirming underneath them...

avatar

You are right, Robin. JohnConyers.com has some very, very impatient for Impeachment long-time posters. They have some very good ideas and a Soapbox.com activist site.

code- nose

avatar

hello

avatar

hello

avatar

hello

Post a Comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address