« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Confidence Man
Call it a sign of the times.
Here's a moment from this morning's White House press gaggle, after Dana Perino fielded questions about Alberto Gonzales and Paul Wolfowitz:
Q Does the President ever get tired of having to express his full confidence in the people around him these days?MS. PERINO: When you're President of the United States and you have this many folks that you are employing, it's a pretty small number that he's had to express full confidence in. All of us who serve at the pleasure of the President, if the moment he doesn't have full confidence in you, you no longer work for him. And we all take that very seriously.
"Pretty small number." You gotta love it.
Note: As a bonus, I've included Perino's rambling endorsement of Gonzales below the fold (preview: "He is our number one crime fighter.").
From the gaggle:
Q Was the President disappointed in the testimony?MS. PERINO: Is the President? No.
Q But what about the fact that even Republicans now are coming out and calling for the Attorney General to resign?
MS. PERINO: There is no doubt that there were many members from both sides of the aisle who had expressed frustration over the confusing remarks from the initial responses on this matter. And that frustration had built up over many weeks. The President believes that the Attorney General answered all of their questions honestly and forthrightly. I can understand there are some people who still don't want to support the Attorney General; that is their right. But he has done a fantastic job at the Department of Justice. He is our number one crime fighter. He has done so much to help keep this country safe from terrorists. He has worked determinately to prevent predators from attacking our children. He has worked -- they have a fantastic record of fighting corruption in government and in keeping gang violence off our streets.
And I could go on and on, but I think that following the hearing and following the tension that was in the room, I think on this new day I think -- hopefully people will be able to take a step back, realize that there was no credible evidence of wrongdoing, that the Attorney General has apologized for how it was handled, and that he has a job to do, and he's been doing it very well. And the President has full confidence in him.













I wonder if that means the White House no longer considers fraud and identity theft a crime?
April 20, 2007 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what happens when his handlers slip out of the room.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_musings
April 20, 2007 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
So,
We have two superheros now:
"The Decider"
and his trusty sidekick "#1 crime fighter!!" (say it fast like the soup nazi would).
They are out to save the world from corrupt child predator terrorist gangs.
April 20, 2007 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm. I think I've heard Perino's memorized list of Gonzalez' accomplishments before: fighting terrorism, keeping predators away from our kids (ya gotta love it: the spectre of child abuse!), corrupting government...er, I mean, fighting gov't corruption, and arresting gang violence. In the same order. Yesterday.
April 20, 2007 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I beg your pardon, Ms. Perino -- you all need to remember that none of you are "employed" by the President. We, the People are the ones who provide the money for your fat paychecks and even more generous perks.
You would all do well to remember that inconvenient "little" fact.
I do not want a government that rules by its "vision" but rather based on the rule of law, which means the Constitution of the United States.
April 20, 2007 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aw c'mon, don't mess with poor Dana. Everybody knows that "express full confidence in" is politi-code for "we make a show of standing behind a guy in trouble until we have to ax him." And Dana was simply expressing her full confidence in reporters to know just how shallow George's support can be, and how few around the WH are in such deep doo-doo to require such a shallow, ham-handed show of dubious support. That's all. C'mon!
P.S. My code word is "resign"
April 20, 2007 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
This just in...Gonzo is "for" green grass and the sun rising in the East.
April 20, 2007 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sooner or later her fembot circuits will blow.
April 20, 2007 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
And remember Dana's message: It doesn't matter how much of an idiot or hatchet man or errand boy everybody thinks Al is, if he just remembers to say "Nothing Improper" a lot, that's all anyone will remember. That's why George thinks it was great testimony! Because Al said "Nothing Improper" a lot! Let's not get to complicated.
April 20, 2007 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
"But he has done a fantastic job at the Department of Justice. He is our number one crime fighter."
And he still looks great in the cape.
April 20, 2007 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
On a serious note, if the keep this up the crowd at the funny farm is going to start looking at them with suspicion.
April 20, 2007 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't bear to leave it go. It was a revealing moment during the break in testimony yesterday when Schumer waxed wistfully about the obeisance to the unwritten rules of politics of yore, saying, and I paraphrase, "If this testimony were given by an AG during the Reagan or Bush I years, the AG would have been fired already." Three simple words: Bush doesn't care.
Code word: "GOP SLOP"
April 20, 2007 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup... Al is our Number 1 Crimefighter...
Batman and Robin are 2 and 3.
April 20, 2007 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, even some in the MSM reported that Fredo was not doing well on his "murder boards." If you have never had any experience being on your feet and answering tough questions, it's hard to pick up the knack in a couple of weeks.
Brings back memories of Harriet Miers. She'll probably have many of the same problems as Fredo if Bush takes Fred Fielding's advice and negotiates a deal for Miers, Rove, et al to testify.
And not to forget Dubya and the tell-tale bulge visible under his coat in the back at his first "debate" with Not Bush in 2004.
The cast of loyal Bushies just seem to be inept bumblers, but bumblers who have created so much pain for Iraqis and for the detainees at Gitmo and in the "black sites."
They're all from Texas. But so was my late father. He and Bush I confidants like Jim Baker do show that Texans are not inept at explaining bad things -- just loyal Bushies.
April 20, 2007 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like it's time for El Cholo to get the Presidential Medal of Freedom! Arriba, Andele!!
April 20, 2007 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not positive thinking, it is rationalization.
This is what they use to re-enforce the alternate universe that let's them live with themselves...
April 20, 2007 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well,
he employs the cooks and the drivers as well.
Good thing we don't ask them to resign.
But maybe they had to pass an allegiance test before they got hired, you know to the neocon god and hie earthy Führer.
April 20, 2007 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The President believes that the Attorney General answered all of their questions honestly and forthrightly." Then he is either a criminal also, or he is an incompetant administrator.
April 20, 2007 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
So - does the fantastic record of fighting government corruption include firing USAs who earned that record (Lam) and retaining the ones who besmirched that record (Biskupic)?
Baldfaced lying has reached an epidemic high under this administration. I guess it's my fault for not realizing that "honor and integrity" is code for sticking to your lies.
April 20, 2007 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just read through the newshour's transcript of their report on Gonzo's testimony yesterday. It occurred to me that the Repub's all played a part in crafting the message yesterday, Lindsey frames the message as 'personality conflicts' and once that's been established on the record for the MSM to run with, Coburn gets the kill. Gonzo can then take the fall.
Reading their transcript, its very telling.
April 20, 2007 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
'There is no doubt that there were many members from both sides of the aisle who had expressed frustration over the confusing remarks from the initial responses on this matter.'
Yes, but the frustration yesterday was with Gonzales' performance in the hearing; as Spector said it was a re-confirmation of sorts. And Gonzales failed badly, this isn't just because of his bumbling explanations before the hearing. He hasn't really cleared the air, major questions are still unanswered. So what if the President was "pleased" with his performance. He might be pleased that Gonzales didn't incriminate himself directly even though he gave a very shifty and suspicious account of events. That doesn't mean much, and more importantly, it doesn't do anything to restore faith in Gonzales' ability to do the job. He plead incompetent, and Bush is happy with that? I suppose that's what Bush would plead under similar circumstances. Lots of Repbulican office-holders and officials will be talking about "change" in the coming days, but it's just talk. It's another part of their plan to drag out the process and wear out publicity (such as waiting a few days to see how the "public" reacts). Bush is closing his eyes and hoping very badly that this will all go away. It won't.
April 20, 2007 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why didn't anyone ask AG Gonazales why Monica Goodling was prosecuting low-level criminal cases in the fall of 2004? Why is Kyle Sampson listed as a SAUSA in a 2003 appeals case that he had nothing to do with?
April 20, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does the party line continue to include, "preventing predators from attacking our children?" Isn't that more Chris Hansen territory, anyway?
April 20, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I gotta tell you, my instincts tell me that you are looking at the WH strategy right now....claim Abu acquitted himself, that there was no proof he did anything wrong, and that because condemnation by GOP Senators was not unanimous, that's a sign of strength.
I think Bush is going to try and tough it out. If he dumps him, it doesn't look good and worse yet, who the hell is going to want to take Abu's place for 18 months?.....and who else can Bush find who will kiss his ass so totally as Abu.
April 20, 2007 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He has worked determinately to prevent predators from attacking our children." Certainly not in Texas where he refused to prosecute child sexual predators at TYC.
Code word: snake I hear they're bigger in Texas and we sure have a whopper in Washington. More than one in fact.
April 20, 2007 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
As time goes on, the increaingly easy to remember, ever shorter list, is those not (yet) asked to resign.
April 20, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
As time goes on, the increasingly easy to remember, and ever shorter list, is those not (yet) asked to resign.
April 20, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least the newest press poodle seemed mostly perky while she was lying this morning . . .
Any-which-way, the reporters need to inquire why Bush 43 has had to support more staffers and officals in the last four months than his immediate predecessor did in eight years.
April 20, 2007 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
you buried the led!
Tony Snow is watching this, and he just drank his urine specimen by accident.
" it's a pretty small number that he's had to express full confidence in."
HAD to express full confidence in? What a burden. That poor man. Why not just a blanket statement expressing full confidence in ALL his employees? Why single out this "pretty small number"?
April 20, 2007 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is really getting old, listening to them spout the, "We serve at the pleasure of the President" line. I would love if someone would ask these buffoons if they ever considered that actually they serve at the pleasure of the American people.
April 20, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
ermmmmmmmmmmmmmm, no.
"MS. PERINO: There is no doubt that there were many members from both sides of the aisle who had expressed frustration over the confusing remarks from the initial responses on this matter"
REPUBLICANS were expressing frustration at his answers YESTERDAY, while he was making them.
April 20, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is Dana Perino the Cheney's lost daughter? She has the clipped speech like DIck and the ideological stridency of Lynn.
April 20, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, the problem was just a matter of explaining it better? Yeah, right.
As for the lack of credible evidence, I think the GOP system administrators are responsible for that.
security word: sound
As in, if the WH spokesperson makes a sound but no one believes it, can we just call it a lie?
April 20, 2007 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish that Helen Thomas would have replied to Ms. Perino:
"I knew Captain America. Captain America was a #1 crime fighter. And Mr. Gonzales, my dear, is no Captain America...although he is cartoonish!"
Lloyd Bentsen would have been proud!
April 20, 2007 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
snip....
...he employs the cooks and the drivers as well.
Posted by: Gandhi
actually, from what I've heard, he fired the French chef who had served for many years, because he's, well, um, French.
April 20, 2007 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
damn, Dana Perino is cute as hell
April 20, 2007 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Genius of Josh Bolten:
Ya gotta hand it to him.
Josh assumes office, and instantly recognizes that
the POTUS can no longer afford a straight shooter,
like Scotty……given the deteriorating WH situtation.
What he NEEDS is a master of spin;
someone who can quickly, and masterfully
determine if the situation/question requires:
a. an attack on the questioner,
b. an absurd but still logical retort to ‘spin’ the situation, or
c. the ability to dismiss a perfectly legitimate question
…so JOSH goes to the preeminent training ground
for such people………FOX News,
and brings on Tony Snowjob.
NOW……with the WH in further disarray, and
the awareness that 24/7 FOX tactics take their
toll, and lose their affectiveness,
Josh BRILLIANTLY utilizes the unfortunate
development in Tony’s health to move the
WH Press position to the next level of defense……
……a ditsy blonde…
think about it-
who’s better than a good looking blonde babe,
who can make statements disassociated from reality,
and sound like she really, really, really
believes them?
After reading this, tell me that she DOESN’T
sound like the poster girl for dumb blonde jokes.
The only way Dana would be more perfect
is if she was wearing a cheerleading outfit
with a big W on it.
April 20, 2007 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush's "Full Confidence" = kiss of death.
Code word: Agagsfucked
April 20, 2007 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's sounding more and more like Scott McClellan every day.
April 20, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Think of all the students who WEREN'T murdered at VA Tech on Monday...
April 20, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mrs Panstreppon wrote:
"Why didn't anyone ask AG Gonazales why Monica Goodling was prosecuting low-level criminal cases in the fall of 2004? Why is Kyle Sampson listed as a SAUSA in a 2003 appeals case that he had nothing to do with?"
It would be very useful to discover the whereabouts of these two individuals durings their mysterious assignments with Justice. Ms. Goodling's disappearance, from just prior to the election in 2004 to the spring of 2005, is the most suspicious. A call to John Ashcroft at Regent U. might help solve that mystery. If a baby's cry is heard in the background, that might give a clue.
April 20, 2007 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The AG serves at the pleasure of the... (yawn)... President.
The President serves at the pleasure of the people.
The people are not pleased. Ergo, the White House response?... As Dick Cheney said to Patrick Leahy on the floor of the Senate...
April 20, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
" hopefully people will be able to take a step back, realize that there was no credible evidence of wrongdoing"
Let's not forget that this Congress does not have to PROVE evidence of wrongdoing here; they merely need a plausible basis for impeachment. It is in the context of that investigation that they will either find plausible evidence, or they won't.
April 20, 2007 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goodness gracious she's a sexy Republican,...maybe that's what Gonzo was thinking about when he ok'd the torture bill....a round with Dana would do anyone right,.....get your speedos on Alberto it time to go waterboarding with Dana.
April 20, 2007 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Gonzales talking point picked up by Perino is "There is no credible evidence of wrongdoing." Of course there is only mountains of circumstantial evidence that there was wrongdoing. They were apparently succesful in hiding or destroying the evidence, because there is also no credible evidence that anyone at DOJ chose the Attorneys to fire.
April 20, 2007 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
come on now, we got to get those spokespeople from the Administration to stop smoking those little green things.
April 20, 2007 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Pretty small number" = "a handful" = 55?
April 20, 2007 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be very useful to discover the whereabouts of these two individuals durings their mysterious assignments with Justice. Ms. Goodling's disappearance, from just prior to the election in 2004 to the spring of 2005, is the most suspicious. A call to John Ashcroft at Regent U. might help solve that mystery. If a baby's cry is heard in the background, that might give a clue.
Really?
April 20, 2007 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush has already spent $340 billion on Iraq War thus far, but who got the profit? People in Iraq? They are shouting loud that “American, get out!” while Bush wants to send 15,000 more troops. That’s why we can’t support Bush and his supporters.
It is clear that the military solution is not working. Why don't they try to bring peace by sending humanitarian aid instead of troops and weapons?
According to The Borgen Project, it only costs $19 billion to end global poverty and hunger. Compare to the amount Bush spent on his “War on Terror", this annual cost is very little.
I hope our next political leader will make a commitment to the UN Millennium Development Goals which will end global poverty and starvation. It is really not so hard if we are truly willing to make a change and bring peace to the world not by military solution but by humanitarian aid.
April 20, 2007 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
'After reading this, tell me that she DOESN’T
sound like the poster girl for dumb blonde jokes.
The only way Dana would be more perfect
is if she was wearing a cheerleading outfit
with a big W on it.'
and:
'It would be very useful to discover the whereabouts of these two individuals durings their mysterious assignments with Justice. Ms. Goodling's disappearance, from just prior to the election in 2004 to the spring of 2005, is the most suspicious. A call to John Ashcroft at Regent U. might help solve that mystery. If a baby's cry is heard in the background, that might give a clue.'
You know... Think about it; Dana Perino, Susan Ralston, Monica Goodling, Rachel Paulouse... I don't mean to be sexist, but in light of the wild bad-boy lifestyle of several murky Bush Administration officials (think Kyle Foggo), I really wonder how these women got their jobs and why they keep them. Their generally less-than-stellar resumes don't seem to be the main draw. I'd be the first to argue that their main value is probably their lockstep rigor in promoting Conservative values. But good old fashioned "sleeping your way to the top" could be another contender. I will say this; most of the scandal-plagued in this administration who are men seem to have some sort of youngish female "personal assistant" or liaison with whom they work closely. I hate to be base, but very often ethical weakness of the kind displayed by Bush Administration officials is indicative of other long-standing moral issues.
security code: news
April 20, 2007 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Bushbot babe will always get the masculinity-challenged eyeballs. Especially if she gives a good fluffing.
April 20, 2007 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Baby Dubya was allowed to decorate his White House as if it were an episode of Boston Legal or CSI--hot businessbabes in low-cut tight outfits who git 'er done.
April 20, 2007 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he was prosecuting sexual predators. Why isn't Mark Foley in jail. Also the Constitution has three branches of Goverment. Al said Bush wants only U.S.Attorneys that follow his agenda. The Justice is supposed to be non political. So they can do their job. He's just a hatchet man for Bush & Karl. Power to the people.
April 20, 2007 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
One ugly idea:
Suppose Gonzo's not planning to leave because he thinks he has some dirt on, well, everyone? And further suppose that the tone-deaf, intransigent support Bush keeps spouting is because Gonzo is right? Wonder what that might look like.
April 20, 2007 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: bush_musings and the Madness of King George
Reading the link makes me wonder if W is close to the edge falling to pieces. If that is the case what does he have to lose?
Is it possible that Gonzo knows too much to be let go? There are two very juicy drug stories that have links to the US attorney's Office and Carol Lam's investigation was getting too close. The 5 metric tonne bust of a plane owned by a "good" friend of Tom Delay, has direct ties to her case.
This story was covered up, it died and never made it passed the wire services, none of the MSM had the cojones to touch the story. This friend is SkyWay Chairman Glenn Kovar, he was running cons and claiming he had connections to the CIA.He bilked Skyway investors out of more than one hundred million dollars. BTW the cocaine plane was painted to resemble planes used by Homeland Security.
Security word: glove, as in the pieces are falling together and starting the fit like a glove.
April 20, 2007 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to admit it, but it may be time for the AG to go. Join the conversation at:
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2007/04/alberto-gonzales-appears-on.html#links
April 20, 2007 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Determinately?
April 20, 2007 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever is in those "lost" emails must be some interesting readin', i'm tellin' ya.
April 20, 2007 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
She has that Eva Marie Saint thing going on.
y'think?
April 20, 2007 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I too wish Gonzales would stop pleasuring the president.
April 20, 2007 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Dana Perino says:
"When you're President of the United States and you have this many folks that you are employing, it's a pretty small number that he's had to express full confidence in."
Um, hello, the President of the United States is not employing anyone, the taxpayers are. He is not our dad, or our boss, or our preacher, or our friend, he is our employee and his performance rating sucks.
April 20, 2007 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The President believes that the Attorney General answered all of their questions honestly and forthrightly."
*psst* George. George listen. Supposedly you graduated college, you should know this. When a person makes a statement, then directly contradicts that statement, both statements cannot be considered true. It's basic math: if p=p, then p!=not p. If a statement is true, then its converse is not true.
Or maybe this is more of that "fuzzy math". I mean, we wouldn't want people to think that we were part of a reality-based community. Clearly those pesky logical facts are unAmerican, and don't support the troops.
April 20, 2007 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
These Republicans running our country have absolutely no shame. When are we going to rise up and hold our President accountable to the rule of law? You know, the same rule of law he said in his last State of the Union was the number one reason we are in Iraq? What a coincidence how badly it's gone for America and Iraq.
April 20, 2007 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
These Republicans running our country have absolutely no shame. When are we going to rise up and hold our President, Vice President, their Chief Political Advisor and the White House Attorney General accountable to the rule of law? You know, the same rule of law Bush said in his last State of the Union was the number one reason we are in Iraq? What a coincidence how badly it's gone for America and Iraq.
Here are just a few examples in which they've broken the law:
1. Illegal warrantless spying on Americas. Gonzales even recently admitted their program did not "strictly" comply with the rule of law. Yup, it's a felony under FISA.
2. Torture. Gonzales signed off on the memos that provided legal cover for this blatant violation of the Geneva Convention and Uniform Military Code of Justice.
3. Outing a CIA agent. We all know the White House lied through its teeth that they all were not involved when every single one of them was knee deep in it. We all know they did it as payback. We all know she was a covert agent.
4. Purging prosecutors for not witchhunting Dems or turning a blind eye to crooked Repubs. It's called obstruction of justice. Despite all the deleted, oops I mean lost, records, there is more than enough proof they were all in it up to their eyeballs.
5. Lying us into the war. Put aside what now all but the die-hard right-wing nuts know was shameless demagoguery to rush us into war, there is increasing evidence that the President and his Vice President flat out lied to us.
Even if this gang weren't so damn incompetent, they still would deserve impeachment and removal. And the fact that they are is all the more reason not to waste one minute. Unless the Fox Republican spin cycle can deflect it or Bush can manuever us into another war, even these lawbreakers may not be able to avoid accountability for their lawlessness.
Let the rule of law prevail!
April 20, 2007 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
It will have to be some pretty good Kool-aid they're serving at the WH to keep all this crap from rolling downhill. And you can tell that the Tory Congress members are'nt tasting a drop.
April 20, 2007 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's surprising that al boo hoo even remembers his name I wonder if he recalls lying.
April 20, 2007 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I pray to all the spirits, gods and powers above that he keeps Abu on. Yes, yes, yes, do it, do it, do it. Stay stubborn, Junior—you can do it.
"Dana, why does the president reserve his fullest confidence only for those who have fucked up the worst? What signal does that send to the others?"
Truly a priceless admission.
April 21, 2007 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
South Dakota, South Dakota, South Dakota.
The one true Presidential firing of a USA Attorney is not getting the attention it should. The way Steven Mullins was installed shows utter disdain for the separation of powers.
The Attorney General has testified under oath that he did not like the fact that Judges could appoint US Attorneys. Too f*%king bag AG AG. Just because you don't like the law, that doesn't mean you can break it, yet you did, repeatedly.
Because the Gonzales didn't like the law and he didn't the fact that the courts refused to rubber stamp an executive appointee, instead choosing their own, Gonzales tried to make a second interim appointment in South Dakota. When that didn't work, Bush stepped in to fire the court appointee and recess appoint Steven Mullins. Screw the courts, screw the Senate, all hail Bush.
This case alone seems to show enough reason to remove the AG (and the President). Why doesn't anyone seem to care?
Forget about "the politicizing of firings/hirings" and go after the illegal expansion of executive authority.
Sure the AG needs the "confidence" of the President, but he needs the confidence of the Congress too, and he doesn't have it. If Bush is unwilling to be "the decider", I certainly hope we can get a few congressmen to decide to get the ball rolling for him, over him.
April 21, 2007 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
didn't the number one crime fighting child protector ignore the child rapes in Texas juvenile facilities?
April 21, 2007 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
As if to boast about some sort of strength we enjoy militarily, Bush today at a press conference showed a map of our outposts in downtown Bahgdad. The idiot is - like Geraldo - telling the insurgents where to set their mortars.
He is willing to cover his ass in our boys blood.
I cannot think of any, ANY defense for this asswipe.
April 21, 2007 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gosh-Awful Gonzo may be THEIR Number One Crime Fighter, but personally, I'm still partial to Wonder Warthog...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_Wart-Hog
The "Nurds of November" story was all about rigged elections, the presidency, corporations really running things (including owning and controlling newspapers), etc.
Here's a quote from Philbert Desanex (WW's secret identity): "What this country needs is a complete change of leadership! The government must abandon its Imperialist policies, get rid of excessive military spending, give everyone a minimum wage of $100 a day and enough Social Security to live a comfortable life, give everyone the freedom to do anything they want..."
Right under that, in the bottom right corner of that comic book's panel, it says "The more things change, the more they're the same." When did this issue originally come out? 1979. (Reprinted 1988.)
And (switching subjects a little) let's not forget the Onion's humorous take on things:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28239
And lastly ... if Gosh-Awful Gonzo is the #1 crime fighter, and Hollywood made "A Few Good Men" in part based on a story from Iglesias' life, then what movie is based on Gonzo's life?
Well -- besides "Being There," of course.
April 21, 2007 2:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Question: If Karl Rove is "Bush's Brain," then who is "Bush's Conscience"?
... Pat Robertson, maybe?
April 21, 2007 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Posted by...a complete blank? Under a posting that is utter bullshit? How does that work?
I sent something to my local paper that I thought would appear in print anonymously and instead got a slew of e-mails on my laptop. My name showed and someone knew me fron 20 yrs. ago. They flattered me actually so...
Who cares really. The wingnuts are lost. But who are the webmasters that let this stuff slide through?
Hey. Livin' in America.
April 21, 2007 3:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bush isn't asking him to resign because Bush, Rove and Cheney are making the calls at DoJ, not Gonzales. He's just a rubber stamping figurehead.
If Gonzales resigns, you can bet that the next AG will be a recess appointment who'll never be confirmed. Bush doesn't have much longer to go in office, and he wouldn't have appointed someone like Gates at Defense if his daddy didn't tell him to. Don't expect him to appoint anyone who's any less ideological or anymore competent than Gonzales to be the new AG. Bush will want to keep his people from being indicted, at least until it's time for him to start pardoning everyone in 2008 on his way out the door.
April 21, 2007 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
georgia said. Forget about "the politicizing of firings/hirings" and go after the illegal expansion of executive authority.
I say AMEN! it's the setup,it's the setup, it's the setup. They slip into the Patriot Act a provision that first eliminates the judicial branch by giving the power to appoint interim US attorneys, then eliminates the legislative branch by making those appointments indefinite in time. Why doesn't the Senate get it? Another step by Bush to turn democracy to monarchy.
April 21, 2007 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
This comic book character meme explains a lot. Unfortunately, you've got Jughead as President (or maybe Alfred E. Newman? It's a toss-up) and Dr. Doom as VP.
SC: tight -- as in Dick's costume has cut off the circulation to his brain.
April 21, 2007 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gang crime rates are up.
At least, that's what Alberto Gonzales implied this past fall when he spoke to the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Boston. (click linkie)
Just saying...
April 21, 2007 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, Gonzo chief crime fighter cannot even catch himself when he commits a crime: Senator Domenici makes an improper call enquiring about when a politically helpful sealed indictment might proceed, Iglesias refuses to answer and does not speed up and the Senator gets upset, Gonzo learns that the Senator is upset and fires Iglesias. Gonzo's position is that the firing is proper because the Senator lost confidence in Iglesias.
Gonzo is so oblivious that he cites Senator Domenici's discontent in the Senate Hearing as the reason to fire Iglesias. If Gonzo was told or checked why Senator Domenici was upset he would have learned that the Senator's discontent rested on an improper motive seeking to get a prosecution sped up for political advantage.
So Gonzo's position at best is since I didn't realize that Senator Domenici wanted to get rid of Iglesias for improper reasons it is okay for me to have fired Iglesias because Domenici let the administration know that he was unhappy.
Gonzo is further justifies that firing retroactively on the basis that Iglesias did not report the contact from Domenici earlier to the department. ( which would, of course, allowed for a better cover story ). You have to wonder did Senator Domenici inform any one in the administration that he had called Iglesias?
Code: Horse. You can supply the rest as in happy
happy horsesh**
April 21, 2007 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
New acronyms for Republicans:
fops and the GBGR
see if you like them and vote
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/4/21/153435/185
April 21, 2007 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone else want a "fantasy island" cartoon, with little Herve Gonzo standing next to Carlos Montalbon Bush, looking to the sky and saying "de Plame, de Plame!!!"?
codeword "snake", (couldn't put it in the sentence with even a modicum of this new thing called "blog decorum" so I didn't even try, ...although it might have fit quite well minus the decorum)
April 21, 2007 9:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
scuuuuse meeee... I meant Ricardo, not Carlos...
got that "part" right this time
April 21, 2007 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
South Dakota; I had not heard word of that. Thanks for the tip.
I had heard that the guy from Marianas (is it Black?) was someone to look at. Anyone else hear that?
April 21, 2007 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
As history has shown, there is no more certain confirmation of the criminality, ethical-wrong doing or imminent departure of a Bush team player than the President's expression of "confidence" in him.
For the details, see:
"President Bush, Confidence Man."
April 21, 2007 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh mentions Maureen Dowd's tabloid trashfest of Edwards' generous haircut allowance, much like the one on The Huffington Enquirer a couple days ago. I cal this "The Mean Girls for Hillary club" although I love both their work, they really are showing their "sister" colors here.
So what's up with the Gallup poll's constant dipping numbers for Hillary? Is this the reason "the girls" have so willingly abandoned their reasonably objective perspectives? Is this their "mother" of all women's causes, thus worth lowering their journalistic standards for??
A bit early for Rove-style desperation tactics, I would think, but the writing is on the wall, (except when it is off-the-wall like these tabloid tales).
April 21, 2007 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty darn sure that Bush is not very bright, nor is he very honest.
By the way, what's with the Fray today? I got banned, so did a boat of others.
Code word; sudden, as in I was banned all of a sudden,
April 22, 2007 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
If indeed 43 and most of his cronies are now operating on the slimmest of shreds of sanity, we ought to make sure he isn't planning something totally off the wall (like another 911 incident) to save his own butt.
They ARE insane, time to face it and not let them draw it out. Remember NIXON cracking under this pressure, what makes you think 43 can take it?
April 22, 2007 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh...
your baby boy, Sam, is the cutest thing and his smile is so genuine! You ARE a proud DAD! And should be!
From a devoted reader on both TPM and talking points memo!!!
April 22, 2007 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
kj, you can see the beginning of set 7 of the latest doc dump for the DOJ version of the story
April 22, 2007 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that Bush in his unitary executive role just doesn't give a sh*t about congressional over site. All that will happen is nothing. The congress will bitch and moan about this and that and Bush will just flip them a bird.
Either Inherent Contempt or somehow get the rethugs to do an Impeachment and removal is the only way.
Rembember the USA of DC is an interim Patriot Act appointee and the thing in 1982-83 with Gorsuch gives them a precident where they can say f you and then blow it off knowing the courts will get out of a "political" question. At least I beleive the think that. The only small hope here is if some of the rethug appointed judges actually ruled against Bush ( see Luttig ) so its not a done deal. Maybe, just maybe they would have a shred of decency and order Bush's executive priviledge bs to fall. But if they did, even if the supremes called bullsh*t, Bush would never answer the order. Think Andy Jackson, the supremes said the Cherokee should stay where they were, not Oklahoma and trail of tears. Old Hickory just thumbed his nose at them.
To get to that point it would be 2009 and the clock would just run out. Do you that its possible for some emergency to be provoked that would let cheney call for marial law? no election, that kind of thing. It works in every other decidership, they probably think it would work here to...
code is "great" as in yeah ....
April 22, 2007 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
This post:
Let's set a date now for DC. I'll get a Greyhound ticket and make them forget Abbott Hoffman and Saul Alinsky.
Posted by: whizkid
Date: April 14, 2007 02:30 AM
April 22, 2007 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does the above post mean anything to anyone?
I found it so alarming that I e-mailed Josh Marshall directly as soon as I saw it...days before the shooting.
Please, if it resonates, respond.
April 23, 2007 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Travelling Greyhound? refund?
April 23, 2007 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gotta say, you people really are pathetic. You rant and rave about people and policies as if your words actually meant something to somebody. What is the point of all of this? Is this just to feed your unsatisfied egos? I mean, everybody here thinks they're Karl Rove. Let me put it this way. If your ego was any bigger, I fear you would be lying on your handgun purchase application.
April 23, 2007 4:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
COREECTION: She meant to say "he's are number one criminal" but of course, there has been so many you can't even keep track of all the Republicans convicted of criminal behavior.
April 24, 2007 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
He sure protected the teenage boys when they were Congressional interns. HA, how stupid do they think we are?? Not that stupid.
April 24, 2007 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
aynkilq jlzktev jzldpcgn yekuwfmdi dreylagn nkitbf angk
May 13, 2007 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
dvmwzgxk qpduc ahzpgmk oardwnh xzipgudkw pijwgteqy odkpf http://www.klicpjeu.qpxmjrs.com
May 13, 2007 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
ghadbpnzm lkivsancr rznh ljufdp jgla lhug hawzkv [URL=http://www.fdlw.lefh.com]ysejwutvf paoc[/URL]
May 13, 2007 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
rucdg qulvnpz tcxi qxkgsjmi hvnwgdls vcuwilszt sftnbjah
August 15, 2007 7:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
rucdg qulvnpz tcxi qxkgsjmi hvnwgdls vcuwilszt sftnbjah
August 15, 2007 7:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
rucdg qulvnpz tcxi qxkgsjmi hvnwgdls vcuwilszt sftnbjah
August 15, 2007 7:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
people are stranger
September 17, 2007 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
people are stranger
September 19, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
people are stranger
September 21, 2007 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi boys!1be715d1851df038a9478b4715fbc294
September 26, 2007 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
britney spears upskirt
DewEZs
September 29, 2007 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi, there!..1a3a955e014e214f8ce02ab607af582a
September 30, 2007 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi
Nice work from your side... have a nice time with yoru blog :)
Bye
January 11, 2008 1:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
wdward casey predictions
how to install win mugen characters
murder of bobby kent
hee haw cast
cabi clothing catalog
lee enfield rifles for sale
penders revised health promotion model
premade div overlay
edward cayce atlantis
ben taub hospital address houston
homemade silencers suppressor
cody linley shirtless
cursive writing examples worksheets
mac dre layout
300 characters mugen screenpacks
autoroll bin file
rare mugen downloads
el sombrero nightclub
free download phim vietnam
google consuelo duval
January 30, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink