« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Feinstein: Miers Discussed Removing L.A. USA
Apparently I wasn't paying close enough attention to the hearing last week, because I missed this.
From The Hill:
Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers discussed firing ex-U.S. Attorney Debra Yang, who was leading an investigation into lucrative ties between Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) and a lobbying firm before she left her government post voluntarily last fall, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) charged in a hearing last week.Feinstein has repeatedly questioned the circumstances surrounding Yang’s departure, but until last week she provided no reasons for her suspicions. Last Thursday, however, during the questioning of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales late in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Feinstein flatly stated that Miers had discussed “whether to remove Debra Yang from Los Angeles.”
A Feinstein spokesman indicated only that the senator had learned that Miers had considered ousting Yang “through interviews” and did not respond to repeated questions to elaborate. Andrew Koneschusky, a spokesman to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is leading the probe, also did not respond to questions about whether Miers had targeted Yang and any evidence Feinstein may have about it.
Yang resigned last October, months before Democrats began reviewing the Justice Department’s decision to fire eight other federal prosecutors. According to a report in the American Lawyer, she was lured away by a $1.5 million-plus offer to become a partner at Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, which is defending Lewis in the probe.
How could she be allowed to do this? It is very unethical. I thought there were laws against it.
April 24, 2007 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Simple (in theory). She's not allowed to work in the part of the law firm that is handling Lewis' defense, or have discussions about it, etc.
I've never been in a large law firm, however, and would love to hear from somebody who has who could tell us whether this is practicable at all. It sure _seems_ fishy to me, but I realize that I am speaking from skepticism and naivete, not actual knowlege.
Can anyone enlighten us further?
April 24, 2007 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whether or not there are laws is a moot issue, when there is no one to enforce them.
April 24, 2007 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
When this country comes to a crashing halt, Soviet Union style, who will be left to pick up the pieces?
April 24, 2007 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, what was the motive in offering the job to Yang, when the law firm was defending a high profile client against the very charges Yang was investigating? What was Yangs motivation in accepting: a) A very lucrative offer b)Insinuations from Harriet that Yang would be terminated. Sounds like a offer she could not refuse. It doesn't matter where she works at the law firm. They removed someone extremely well versed in the progress of the investigation. Could this affect the defense strategy? Did Yang's successor have hurdles to overcome to get up to speed?
April 24, 2007 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fortunately they didn't need to fire her, because as it turned out she could be bribed.
April 24, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cute. One of the standard winger talking points is/was that the Bushies pushed out Lam not Yang. But it seems they pushed out both. (It's none too clear why the theory that they only got rid of Lam was supposed to be exculpatory anyway but there you have it.)
Time to subpoena Yang and get her version of the story, I'd say.
April 24, 2007 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
While it is possible for law firms to keep work isolated, it is quite a coincidence that Yang goes to the firm represeting Lewis. It would be interesting to look at the time line: when did Lewis retain G,D & C, and when did the offer go to Yang.
April 24, 2007 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20060123172418265
Holy Crap, has anyone read this?
If Abramoff had such access to the WH then so did the South African government. Interesting.
"Abramoff introduced Williamson to Grover Norquist and they became friends. This relationship assisted South African intelligence's Operations Longreach and Babushka, essentially pro-apartheid influence operations in DC. One propaganda operation was Abramoff's movie Red Scorpion, based on UNITA guerrilla leader Jonas Savimbi, a movie for which South Africa provided military equipment, vehicles, and extras.
Abramoff's files from his days as a South African agent emerge: Details of his ties to anti-black, racist groups like World Church of the Creator (insignia on far right -- where have we seen that logo before?) and South African propaganda operations -- Babushka and Longreach -- provided exclusively to WMR. From left to right: Abramoff, Williamson, Leon, and Crystal."
"The real face of the GOP's racial policies: assisting in and championing the murder of anti-apartheid activists since the early 1980s: September, First, and Schoon. Abramoff email: Native Americans are "morons and troglodytes." Abramoff and DeLay champion treating Chinese and other Asians, mostly women, as slave laborers in U.S. island colony in Pacific. Payments made from Abramoff's Capitol Athletic Foundation to illegal Orthodox settlers in Beitar Illit on the West Bank for purchase of sniper scopes, thermal imaging devices, and other "security" equipment used to target Palestinians. The racism here is clear and revolting."
Perhaps the GOP is ignoring the Palestinains because they are working hard to see as many of them killed as possible....
April 24, 2007 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yang is worse than Miers. She went from the government office investigating Lewis to his defense team??! Is there no law against this??
April 24, 2007 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whether or not there are laws is a moot issue, when there is no one to enforce them.
that pretty much sums it all up, doesn't it?
April 24, 2007 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe one of the other little reported aspects of the Yang story is that the payment of 1.5 million to a novice lawyer who is not bringing in her own clients is unheard of. I read an article in Brill? or somewhere and I think it might have been mentioned at TPM saying that new partners are expected to bring in their own clients and to buy into the firm, not the other way around.
Remember, just when you think you've gotten too cynical, you find you can't really keep up with reality. It may have been worth it to the Lewis defence team to essentially buy off the head of the state's team just to sideline her, for all we know.
aimai
April 24, 2007 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theoretically, they might could isolate the two cases and not have a conflict, but legally it would take the consent of all parties. We are all one of the parties. We are the people of the United States.
Who gave my consent?
Codeword: Nation
April 24, 2007 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
They removed someone extremely well versed in the progress of the investigation.
and got an employee who knew exactly what the government's case consisted of at the time. a twofer.
April 24, 2007 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not uncommon in law firms, even fairly small ones. The situation created is called a "chinese wall." Even in fairly small law firms, particularly in smaller states and communities (think South Carolina), a lawyer will have worked on a situation for one client and the firm takes on another client with opposing interests. The firm walls off the two lawyers from each other (figuratively speaking). They can talk to each other but both are aware that they should have no discussions about the matter on which both worked. I've seen it work in a former law firm, of about 16 lawyers. The firm she joined has 800 lawyers, with 220 in the LA area. She could easily go weeks and never see the team representing Lewis.
April 24, 2007 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
plus yang got big bucks for entering the private sector. everybody wins!
April 24, 2007 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if this investigation could go past this administration? Somewhere some how this bubble of silence is going to burst and the evidence is going to come pouring out. Manipulation of the Justice system on this level just can't remain untestified to but the level of prosecutions just might take years. If this isn't straightened out then we will be taking a huge step to a one party system.
April 24, 2007 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The firm she joined has 800 lawyers, with 220 in the LA area. She could easily go weeks and never see the team representing Lewis."
Could she easily also have verbally given them whatever information they needed in return for the apparently unmerited 1.5 million?
April 24, 2007 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
RandyR, the evidence has come pouring out.
We just haven't seen it all yet. There is a lot of time leading up to November 2008.
...and some after.
April 24, 2007 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
it is the equivalent to having a coach leave one team and quickly join the other team...
except who doesn't think the transferring coach won't be spending all his time at the new team regurgitating everything he knows about the old team's playbook.
These people have bent every rule, broken every law...I don't see an ethical oath getting in their way, especially when they have already fired one prosecutor looking into Jerry Lewis, and lured away another. They have already run over two dogs and a crowd of pedestrians, I don't think making an illegal UTurn is weighing on them too much.
April 24, 2007 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
i'm pretty sure the fact that yang left to work for the firm representing lewis is old news.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2007_03_18.php#013166
the news here is the info that the folks who were behind the USA firings discussed firing yang. this is info that had not been previously known. even though the circumstances of yang's departure already seemed fishy.
it isn't just the USAs who were fired. (the not loyal bushies)
it isn't just the USAs who were not fired. (the loyal bushies)
it is also the USAs who resigned without being fired (both loyal bushies and possibly not loyal bushies as well)
April 24, 2007 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not surprised,....that's how the Republicans roll,....they buy everything off,...either through tax cuts, incentives, lobbying scandals,etc.... There's a loop hole for everything,...as long as you make the laws and your lawyers craft the language to make it look like its legal,...pure semantics and deception,...I hope the democrats don't fail us and start putting their foot up someones asses. 1.5 million, however seems like a bribe more than a salary....definitely unethical. Go Feinstein!
April 24, 2007 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
bobh@April 24, 2007 12:14 PM
Thanks for the link. I probably read the info about Abramoff on Wayne Madsen's website but I forgot about it.
Re Duncan Sellars - I don't know who is behind the Seek God website but it has some pretty good but not up-to-date bio info on members of the Council For National Policy. Sellars is a member. Link below.
April 24, 2007 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bribery.
Just another little tool in the criminal toolbox.
April 24, 2007 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems there are more subpeonas to be written... one for Hairy-it, and one for Debra Yang. There is NOTHING that will make a reasonable person believe that change of jobs wasn't a bribe.
April 24, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
So do we get to have it both ways? 1) she's an integral part of the Rep. Lewis investigation and her absence has been as set-back to the prosecution AND 2) she's a hack who has accepted a "bribe" to go over to the defense firm?
Some on the thread have suggested she's an inexperienced USA, and that her comp package and buy-in at Gibson Dunn is unwarranted, but while I don't know the specifics of her deal, it looks like she's the real-deal on the experience and expertise front: 47 yr-old former State of CA judge, former AUSA, former law school prof, former litigator. Eh, sounds like she had a few more things going for her than other USAs currently under the magnifying glass (ahem, Ms Rachel Paulose I'm looking at you) and some of our concerns don't amount to much.
April 24, 2007 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's not to say that she wasn't made an offer to leave that might help the "loyal Bushies", but just sayin' her rating on the hack-o-meter isn't very high.
Where does the Lewis investigation currently stand? I know they just raided Doolittle's house in his investigation.
April 24, 2007 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hello bros
great stuff, swear by the way it works so quickly - - http://steroidonlineshop.com
I picked up some winny, primo, dec, etc
April 24, 2007 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
and some of our concerns don't amount to much.
Posted by: mjmckay
Date: April 24, 2007 05:58 PM
Someone is sitting on a pile of material that will slowly find its way into the discussion. There will be major surprises and major gotchas.
April 25, 2007 5:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
reunion
April 25, 2007 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks Like Dallas is in trouble!
Phoenix might end up blowing them all away.
PHX vs. Det. Hmmm..Could be interesting?
April 25, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Internet in the modern world?
[url=http://deu10.byethost7.com]We shall talk about [/url]
April 26, 2007 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
online bible
April 26, 2007 6:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
eminem concert tickets
April 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not quite understanding what all
this is supposed to be about?
Must be me or something...
April 26, 2007 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before buying generic viagra read this.
I've got new info about [url=http://us-viagra.us]generic viagra[/url] and share with you.
May 1, 2007 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before buying generic viagra read this.
I've got new info about [url=http://us-viagra.us]generic viagra[/url] and share with you.
May 3, 2007 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before buying generic viagra read this.
I've got new info about [url=http://us-viagra.us]generic viagra[/url] and share with you.
May 7, 2007 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi
Very good stuff. They have been around a long time. - http://www.allsteroidsworld.com
What do you think?
Regards
May 9, 2007 3:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 10, 2007 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 10, 2007 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 10, 2007 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 10, 2007 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 10, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 12, 2007 6:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 12, 2007 7:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 12, 2007 8:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 12, 2007 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://meanings-of-the-names.countynewsonline.info/0.html
May 17, 2007 7:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 25, 2007 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 25, 2007 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 25, 2007 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 25, 2007 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
What role of the Forex in the modern world?
http://free.hostultra.com/~mummy21/
May 25, 2007 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The new solutions of FOREX earnings
and there is much new you will find on the site:
http://www.alldigest.info/forex/index.html
greatly I recommend. Will not cut that I I have from this the scoop :-))
May 25, 2007 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi,
Anybody know about - http://steroidonlineshop.com
I picked up some winny, primo, dec, etc
June 9, 2007 2:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 17, 2007 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 17, 2007 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 18, 2007 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 18, 2007 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 18, 2007 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 19, 2007 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 20, 2007 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 20, 2007 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 20, 2007 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 20, 2007 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
sale@mp3.com
September 21, 2007 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 23, 2007 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 23, 2007 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 25, 2007 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 25, 2007 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 25, 2007 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 25, 2007 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 25, 2007 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 2:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 4:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 5:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 7:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 26, 2007 5:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 27, 2007 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 27, 2007 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 27, 2007 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 27, 2007 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 27, 2007 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 28, 2007 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 28, 2007 5:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 28, 2007 7:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 28, 2007 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 28, 2007 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 29, 2007 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 29, 2007 3:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
September 29, 2007 5:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
September 29, 2007 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 4:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 5:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 7:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 2, 2007 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 4, 2007 2:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 4, 2007 4:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 4, 2007 6:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 4, 2007 8:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 4:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 7:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 5, 2007 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 6, 2007 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 6, 2007 3:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 6, 2007 4:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 7, 2007 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 7, 2007 3:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 7, 2007 5:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 7, 2007 6:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 7, 2007 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 8, 2007 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 8, 2007 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 8, 2007 5:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 9, 2007 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 9, 2007 6:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 9, 2007 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 9, 2007 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 9, 2007 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 9, 2007 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 9, 2007 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 9, 2007 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 5:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 10, 2007 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 11, 2007 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 11, 2007 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 11, 2007 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 11, 2007 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 2:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 5:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 12, 2007 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 13, 2007 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 13, 2007 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 13, 2007 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 13, 2007 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 13, 2007 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 3:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 5:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 7:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 9:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@viagra.com
October 14, 2007 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 15, 2007 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com
October 15, 2007 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
cheap@levitra.com