« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Former Ashcroft Spokesman: Gonzales Should Resign
Now the calls for Alberto Gonzales' resignation are coming from veterans of Bush's own Justice Department. Here it's Mark Corallo, the Justice Department's chief spokesman from 2002 through 2005.
In a piece on Bush's loyalty to Gonzales, USA Today reports that Corallo thinks Gonzales should step down over "mismanagement" of the U.S. attorneys firings. As he put it, "Alberto Gonzales' loyalty to George Bush has got to trump George Bush's loyalty to Alberto Gonzales."













"mismanagement" - that's all it is? Gets to the incompetence meme rather than to the medacity, greed, shredding of constitution, etc.
If only we were dealing with mismanagement.
Instead, DoJ is managing evil.
April 5, 2007 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Literally every morning we wake up to news of more defections from the alternative universe, even from amongst the True Believers.
Any day now, I expect to see a headline blaring that Barney has escaped from the White house grounds.
April 5, 2007 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Corallo is of course one of Rove's foot-soldiers, so read between the lines.
April 5, 2007 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just love watching them eat their own.
My code word is "collar" -- isn't that what the police call it when they have caught the perpetrator?
Kady
April 5, 2007 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Torturer needs to understand that loyalty includes a willingness to throw oneself in front of the bus when asked to do so. If that is not clearly understood, he is in need of reeducation.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2c7_1173547096
April 5, 2007 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not a defection from the movement. The "mismanagement" quote gives it away. Corallo's not complaining about the crime, he's complaining about Gonzo getting caught.
The Republican party is a gang of thugs. This is a debate among thugs on whether to off the noisy one to keep from all getting caught.
April 5, 2007 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Corallo is now a spokesperson for Fred Thompson.
April 5, 2007 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not quite getting it. Corallo worked with Monica Goodling, Tim Griffin, and Barbara Comstock on the Bush/Cheney 2000 oppo research team. They all went to work for Ashcroft at the DoJ. What is the ultimate goal of throwing Gonzales under the bus? Does this somehow help shield the White House or Rove?
April 5, 2007 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
"What is the ultimate goal of throwing Gonzales under the bus? Does this somehow help shield the White House or Rove?"
Well, it would if everyone agrees to accept Gonzales' resignation as the end of the investigation (which is how it would undoubtedly be played by the WH).
April 5, 2007 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lord. The guy doesn't care that the Gonzo DOJ is incompetent, unethical, or even perhaps criminal; he cares that Gonzo got caught and he is making the administration look bad. "Mismanagement" is also what Tony Soprano calls it when one of his own gets caught by the Feds. The "mismanagement" lies in the fact that the guy might squeal, not that what he did was "wrong."
April 5, 2007 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
No resignation before testimony. This doesn't go away just because that lump of dung goes away. The deal has to include Karl, Scott, Monica, and McNulty. These people have subverted America to a degree greater than any communist ever did.
While we supposedly have invaded Iraq to promote democracy these bastards have been promoting a one party government in the USA.
Security code: Green Isn't spring beautiful
April 5, 2007 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only reason Bush is being so "loyal" to Gonzales is he's the only firewall left against investigations of the White House itself. If Gonzales goes, there is no way Bush can install another blind loyalist to cover his tracks and deflect investigation. Bush will hold onto him for as long as possible and let him draw the Democrats' fire. Security code: "spade"
April 5, 2007 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where do the American people fit into this loyalty matrix Mr. Carallo ?
April 5, 2007 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with others -- this smear-meister is interjecting on behalf of Rove.
April 5, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with others -- this smear-meister is interjecting on behalf of Rove.
April 5, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
This Burden Shall Pass: re your comment
You of course are right. Some of these people, such as Corallo, are not yet jumping ship. They are trying to assign blame and divert attention, likely away from Karl Rove and the White House.
Some may be in the first stages of disillusionment and defection, yet Karl Rove can no longer enforce the discipline of the "unitary executive's" Party line. The growing disarray in Republican ranks is unprecedented in my memory. It got this bad only towards the very end of Watergate.
These myriad unfolding scandals could end up being far worse than Watergate for the Republican Party, for the level of Republican criminality and corruption seems to be far more widespread and deeply implanted in the very fiber of government now than during the Watergate era.
For now, it looks as though the Bushies will try to hold up a firebreak with Gonzales to give Karl Rove more time to throw up more layers of defense against the coming conflagration. I would guess that the strategic goal will be to sacrifice Gonzales in the end: blame everything on Gonzales and the over-zealousness of a few "loyal Bushies" at DOJ in order to buy time and protect Karl Rove--and Rove's bosses.
This Rovian strategy at this late date seems to have little chance for success. Too much evidence of criminality is mounting by the day, and plenty of arrows are pointing to the White House.
April 5, 2007 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
obsessed (see above in thread) has it exactly right. Corallo served as Rove's spokesperson through Rove's grand jury kabuki dance.
Its in the administration's interest to first focus attention on Gonzales over a protacted period, then have him resign in an attempt to firewall the White House. Had Gonzales resigned a few weeks ago, attention would have focused on the White House without missing a beat.
April 5, 2007 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
McNulty's prior prosecutions (from his days as USA for the Eastern District of VA) are now coming under attack. The most interesting is the AIPAC case, a truly weird and bizarre case that had an unpleasant smell about it from the get go.
For example, see the link at http://www.forward.com/articles/aipac-prosecutor-caught-up-in-justice-department-s/
April 5, 2007 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have had it up to my eyeballs with this "loyalty to bush" meme. How about some loyalty to the Constitution and the rule of law, for a change?
April 5, 2007 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"If Gonzales goes, there is no way Bush can install another blind loyalist to cover his tracks and deflect investigation."
Sure there is. Recess appointment.
(Anyone know if Harriet Miers is busy?)
April 5, 2007 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, Corallo is now Fred Thompson's spokesman. Does that mean that Rover is strategizing for Thompson?
April 5, 2007 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Susan S,
Fred Thompson is a member of the fold, don't ever doubt that.
April 5, 2007 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
corallo just wants to take the heat away. once abu gonzo is off the teevee screens, they are betting (and with good reason from past experience) that the story will go away.
April 5, 2007 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think so, Susan; it means Republicans are watching their chances of holding the WH and regaining Congress swirl down the porcelain receptical, every time another of the WH's misdeeds comes to light. It's Gonzo-replacement as damage control.
Code word: chin, as in "Bush can Gonzo? Not by the hair of his chinny chin chin."
April 5, 2007 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Closeted?
April 5, 2007 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I frankly don't care why Corallo is saying this. I agree with him. Gonzales get out!
April 5, 2007 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't Corallo a Rove protege? Is this a kiss on the cheek before the hit?
The security word is appropriately "crush." Take it and apply as desired.
April 5, 2007 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, it is goodnight Al, goodnight Monica and a bright new dawn rises Karl
April 5, 2007 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's becoming clear that Bush wants Gonzo to resign, but won't pull the trigger. Instead, he's sending out the message that Gonzo should fall on his sword. Gonzo is an embarrassment to Bush, but it will be a bigger embarrassment to Bush if he has to can him.
April 5, 2007 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Alberto Gonzales' loyalty to George Bush has got to trump George Bush's loyalty to Alberto Gonzales."
Corallo does a fine job of distraction here.
Bush is keeping on a A.G. who clearly lied to Congress, but the message is because he's so loyal to his people.
The simple fact is, Bush doesn't like to admit mistakes, and needs a shield against investigations. That's why he's still there. Bush has shown little resistance to throwing loyal aides under the bus when it is too his political advantage. Gonzales will last until keeping him costs more than getting rid of him, and not a day more.
April 5, 2007 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
FMArouet comments:
"These myriad unfolding scandals could end up being far worse than Watergate for the Republican Party, for the level of Republican criminality and corruption seems to be far more widespread and deeply implanted in the very fiber of government now than during the Watergate era."
The differnce is that in the Watergate era, the mainstream media was involved with reporting the events. The reporting in this cycle is essentially nonexistent.
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/10367.html
April 5, 2007 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The more I read about this, the clearer Goodling's role becomes. She may have been employed as DoJ's liaison to the White House, but she was working for the White House. And that aforementioned team of Corallo, Comstock, Griffin, and Goodling has been working closely with Rove for years now. They were basically White House moles at the DoJ. Any one of them would choose to defend Rove over Gonzales, if that were the choice.
If the Judiciary Committees can't get Goodling to testify in a timely manner, maybe they should start talking to some of the U.S. Attorney candidates that she interviewed. Some of the ones who were turned down might have some interesting things to say about the interview process.
April 5, 2007 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
These are not honest people, and the fish is rotting from the head on down (to paraphrase Dukakis).
April 5, 2007 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about loyalty to the Country? Why do Repubs put their misleader above the USA?
April 5, 2007 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it isn't too obvious, the White House is actually in a pretty tough spot here. They'd like to stall and drag everything out as long as they can to avoid any chance of prosecution, but that just keeps it in the forefront and hurts GOP chances in all of the '08 elections. If they don't stall, the investigations could heat up and there might be some serious prosecutions.
April 5, 2007 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Time for another Administration distraction..like invading Iran or something equally big..
funny, I have not heard anythng about the Terror Alert color code in some time...
April 5, 2007 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rest assure if Gonzo gos, that will not end this investigation, at least not as far as Leighy and Waxman
( the pitbull) are concerned.
April 5, 2007 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heck of a job all around Bush Administration.
April 5, 2007 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why doesn't shrub fire Abu immmediately and then replace him tomorrow with a recess appointment?
That way he doesn't have to bother with that inconvenient congressional approval thing.
April 5, 2007 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're obviously playing for time. I think Rove has written off 08, blaming it on Iraq to fellow Rethugs. With that scenario, the longer they stonewall, the longer it takes to get the evidence. The longer it takes to get the evidence, the more likely it will be that none of the inner circle (Rove, Gonzalez) will be indicted before Bush leaves office. After that, it will be easy to characterize further investigation as "partisan politics" from the Democrats, payback for the Clinton impeachment. When the Democrat elected in 08 withdraws from Iraq, look for another spectacular terrorist attack a la 9/11 that the Rethugs will blame on wimpy Democrats who cut and ran, thus teeing up whomever Rove annoints in 2012. Trust me, Rove is playing the long game here and the Rethugs are hand in glove (security word) with him.
April 5, 2007 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
More and more of the parasites are jumping off the carcass of the dying host.
April 5, 2007 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Decider is on vacation at his "ranch." Look for a major crisis to occur and the cronies to botch it.
April 5, 2007 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
A recent poster said: "Look for a major crisis to occur..."
Isn't the bombing in Iran supposed to start tomorrow?
April 5, 2007 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
And what- EDXACTLY WHAT- mistakes were made?
April 5, 2007 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
There ya go. The public spokesman. "Alberto! Rid me of this priest. You. In the name of God, protect Me. Go." What an inversion of loyalty and forthrightness. What corruption of the administration of justice. It smells like a dead cat on the porch, writhing with maggots.
What happens if Mr. Gonzales does go? He did precisely what the White House wanted. Who would succeed him? What questions would arise during confirmation? What investigations would continue despite a changing of the guard? And what would any new AG for Bush/Cheney/Rove do or be allowed to do?
April 5, 2007 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this a case of shits deserting a sinking rat?
April 5, 2007 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
************
If the Judiciary Committees can't get Goodling to testify in a timely manner, maybe they should start talking to some of the U.S. Attorney candidates that she interviewed. Some of the ones who were turned down might have some interesting things to say about the interview process.
Posted by: chimpeach
Date: April 5, 2007 12:42 PM
*************
Besides your "Posted by", I like you thoughts on talking to the other candidates.
April 5, 2007 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who the fuck is this guy and why does it matter what he says? His name pops up everywhere in this deal. He's a pimp for gwb43.
April 5, 2007 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
bordersmuggler:
You make a very valid point about the MSM's relative timidity nowadays compared to the Watergate era. It has been the blogosphere which has served as the real catalyst in uncovering the unfolding scandals. Sites such as TPM, Daily Kos, MyDD, Digby, Raising Kaine, Salon, Slate, etc. have been at the forefront. There are bloggers out there who keep track of reality and drill down into far more granular detail and with far more historical context than do the pretty talking heads on national TV or the stenographers in the so-called "newspapers of record."
But some of the MSM outlets are now starting to put their toes in the water. We still have Keith Olbermann and his guests doing their best at MSNBC. NPR still does serious work. Newsweek is doing a little real investigating. Even the rightward-lurching Washington Post under neocon-wannabe Fred Hiatt's editorial direction still has a few remaining serious investigative journalists, such as Dana Priest and Dana Milbank. The New York Times still has Frank Rich and Paul Krugman on its editorial page. We still have The Nation. In the next issue of Time Magazine, even establishment "moderate" Joe Klein will be announcing that he is giving up on Bush 43.
That said, sites like TPM will need to continue to do the fact-digging, cross-checking, and BS-monitoring in the ongoing effort to embarrass the MSM into playing their proper role as a fourth estate that investigates and informs rather than merely panders and propagandizes.
And more and more, the information-hungry cognitive elites--not only in the U.S., but everywhere on the planet--will discover that they can find their information and track their interests more rapidly and in greater depth on the web and in the blogosphere, rather than in wood pulp products or from conventional, commercially-interrupted TV programming. I even spotted that Hillary/1984/Obama riff at Xinhua online! I can imagine how the Chinese, who are adept at using and comprehending political satire, reacted to the fake ad as allegory.
The battle is not yet lost. But the battleground is changing. For everyone.
April 5, 2007 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Mexican must go.
April 6, 2007 7:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
DW is making Warren Harding look good...chuckle chuckle
April 6, 2007 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
"If Gonzales goes, there is no way Bush can install another blind loyalist to cover his tracks and deflect investigation."
Sure there is. Recess appointment.
(Anyone know if Harriet Miers is busy?)
I hear John Yoo is available.
[code "sticky" as in wickets or fingers]
April 6, 2007 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
gmc trucks here www.gmctruck.fora.pl
gmc from america www.gmctruck.fora.pl
real gmc www.gmctruck.fora.pl
and www.emeraldring.fora.pl rings
July 31, 2007 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
nvyp2k4ov8flj7 t mobile international cycling t mobile international cycling
December 21, 2007 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink