« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Wisconsin Case Raises Eyebrows
In the wake of what the U.S. attorney firings scandal has revealed about the Bush Justice Department, it's hard to imagine a more troubling scenario than this:
A Bush-nominated U.S. Attorney launches a corruption case during an election year that implicates the Democratic governor. He pushes the case, which targets an obscure state bureaucrat and obtains a conviction in June; she's sentenced to 18 months in prison in late September. The case is featured prominently by Republicans in attack ads against the governor.But when the case is appealed (after the election), the circuit court, in a remarkable reversal, rejects the conviction out of hand, saying that the evidence against the bureaucrat "is beyond thin." Says one of the three circuit judges, "I'm not sure what your actual theory in this case is."
Well, it happened -- in Wisconsin. And the U.S. attorney in the case is Milwaukee's Steven Biskupic, appointed by Bush in 2002. Somehow he's been given the privilege of serving beyond his four year term.
Dozens of readers have written in, asking if this is what a "loyal Bushie" looks like. It's hard to see it otherwise.
Steve Benen has more.













thats it, dig more. find out how you stay employed as a loyal bushie. more out there im sure.
April 6, 2007 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
So the countable tainted USAGs are up above 10. This is another one that should be added to the impeachment list.
April 6, 2007 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Former LA USA Deborah Yang hit the "loyal Bushie" jackpot. She goes after a Clinton fundraiser. He's acquitted. Then she goes after Democratic Mayor Jim Hahn's administration for "pay for play" involving city contracts. Hahn's driven from office, but no one's ever indicted for selling contracts. Then as her office is investigating GOP Rep. Jerry Lewis, she gets a $1.5 million offer from the firm defending Lewis. DiFi says she has questions about Yang. I don't blame her.
April 6, 2007 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've always believed this story was really about the USA's that were NOT dismissed. It is nice to know that some people still believe in investigative reporting. Keep digging! There's going to be more.
April 6, 2007 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone looked into USAs being appointed for political purposes in "leans Democrat" states and the implications for national elections in these locations? Wisconsin, historically strong Dem but in recent years has gone towards the center, Minnesota, same thing, most of the western states where the Gonzalez 7 come from are liberal, and Arkansas, home to the Clintons. It's really looking like a pattern to me, and I'd be interested to know how the USAs in places like Massachussetts or other Northeast states are faring. If this is the case, this attorney brouhaha has got Rove's fingerprints all over.
April 6, 2007 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biskupic was investigating "voter fraud" in 2004 and 2005 when he finally admitted there was "no evidence of a broad conspiracy to try to steal an election."
April 6, 2007 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biskupic was investigating "voter fraud" in 2004 and 2005 when he finally admitted there was "no evidence of a broad conspiracy to try to steal an election."
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=375572
April 6, 2007 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Rove thinks of himself as a political special force - "Who Dares, Wins" - willing to attempt anything - "De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace!!" The grander and more elaborate, the less likely it will be detected for what it is.
Like Holmes, he reads voraciously but retains selectively. In a way unlike Holmes, he ignores the Holocaust and admires the propaganda that disguised it. He ignores the debasement of the Hitler Youth, admiring only how effectively it channeled talent and loyalty. He ignores a brutal past, only to admire how a dispersed SS and its enablers rebuilt an organization with no traces. He ignores Stalin's purges and Archipelago, only to admire how effectively he ferreted out dissenters and crushed them.
Like a brilliant saboteur whose interest in the marvel of a submarine is limited to what will sink it "accidentally", Mr. Rove is interested in government only to know how to make it work for corrupt purposes.
Pull the threads. Keep pulling.
April 6, 2007 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what happened in the Wisconsin elections?
April 6, 2007 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The 2:17 post was unsigned, so I don't know who to compliment, but I do want to say that both the analysis and the writing were excellent.
April 6, 2007 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lets get a list of all the USAs. Then splith THEM up and start research threads for each one seeing which is dem leaning state and which is a rep leaning state then cross reference their ties to the admin and their actions before the last election. theres got to be more going on here.
April 6, 2007 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what happened in the Wisconsin elections?
Posted by: eCAHNomics
Date: April 6, 2007 02:24 PM
Dems won control of the state Senate, closed the gap in the state Assembly, kept the governorship, elected Steve Kagen to the House (a seat formerly held by GOP Representative Mark Green, who ran for governor but lost). However, JB Van Hollen, a Republican running for state Attorney General against Democrat Kathleen Falk, won that race. Falk was not an incumbent; she defeated Peg Lautenslauger in the Democratic primary. It should be noted that JB Van Hollen was appointed U.S. Attorney for Western Wisconsin by President Bush in 2002.
April 6, 2007 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like this list:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/personnel/usattorneys.html
April 6, 2007 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only did Ct of Apps reject conviction out of hand - it ordered appellant's release at the close of oral arguments! I thought that was something that only happened on tv.
In one account, Biskupic was quoted as saying he was surprised at the conviction, that he didn't think he had proved a crime.
Thankfully, Gov. Doyle was re-elected. But the lingering damage to his reputation won't magically vanish with this reversal.
April 6, 2007 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jake in Milwaukee gives an accurate summary of WI election results. That the ploy didn't work is a credit to the WI voters. What matters is that a US Atty pursued an arguably politically motivated prosecution to influence the election.
April 6, 2007 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Georgia Thompson was appointed to her state purchasing position by Republican governor Scott McCallum, who had just taken over for Tommy Thompson when he was asked to serve as HHS Secretary. I'm still at a loss why Doyle was nailed over this.
April 6, 2007 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, its about power. But, its also about human beings. Who can give that unnamed bureaucrat back her life? Her reputation? The money she spent to defend herself? These bastards are worse than sick, administering justice for political gain.
April 6, 2007 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did he have a choir and color guard at his swearing in? (See Atrios for that USA story).
What's next, a USA who declined to prosecute a GOPer who was guilty as hell?
We already know that they deliberately sabotaged the case against big tobacco (huge GOP donors), saving them billions in fines.
April 6, 2007 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't forget about this "Loyal Bushie" in PA, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan, who targeted several Democrats but refused to prosecute Santorum for lying about his residency because he was actually living in VA:
"Some Question Tactics Of U.S. Attorney Buchanan"
http://kdka.com/topstories/local_story_075170820.html
April 6, 2007 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The judge who gave Biskupic his guilty verdict, Rudolph T. Randa, is also aloyal Bushie: (from NYTimes archives)
_________________________________________________
Judge Strikes Down Abortion Clinic Law
Published: March 17, 1995
Contradicting previous Federal court rulings, a Federal judge today struck down a Federal law that protects access to abortion clinics. In a ruling stemming from a September protest at a local clinic, Judge Rudolph T. Randa of Federal District Court here said the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinics Entrances Act was unconstitutional in banning "nonviolent, physical obstruction of reproductive health services clinics."
Seven other Federal judges and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, have upheld the law, but abortion opponents said Judge Randa's ruling was still important.
"Now we have a real issue that I think the U.S. Supreme Court would be more interested in looking at," said Monica Miller, director of Citizens for Life in Milwaukee.
Roger Evans, director of litigation for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in New York, said the ruling by Judge Randa, an appointee of President George Bush, was "just a strange blip on the screen."
April 6, 2007 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
"U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan [Republican], as we earlier reported, dialed up the Bureau of Indian Affairs in Minneapolis late last year to lean on the bureaucrats about the $808 million casino being proposed at the Dairyland Greyhound Park in Kenosha. Big-shot businessman Dennis Troha, the driving force behind the off-reservation casino, and his friends and family donated more than $31,000 to the Janesville Republican's campaign in 2005."
Dennis Troha was just indicted for his role in this casino deal. This is the same guy the state GOP is trying to attach to Democratic Governor Jim Doyle because of campaign contributions.
April 6, 2007 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
boh said:
Lets get a list of all the USAs. Then splith THEM up and start research threads for each one seeing which is dem leaning state and which is a rep leaning state then cross reference their ties to the admin and their actions before the last election. theres got to be more going on here.
the link posted previous is a good start:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/personnel/usattorneys.html
this one has some extra info:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/index.html
code word: snake
should have been snakeS!
April 6, 2007 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Posted by: Jake in Milwaukee
Date: April 6, 2007 02:49 PM
Sorry, link: http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=436051
April 6, 2007 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm.
And there's this from the April Harper's Index:
Number of local Republicans officials who have been investigated by the US Department of Justice since 2001: 37
Number of local Democratic officials who have been: 262.
That pretty much sums it up
April 6, 2007 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The judge who gave Biskupic his guilty verdict, Rudolph T. Randa is also a loyal Bushie"
I'm curious. Is "bad judgement" grounds for impeaching a judge?
Clearly, Randa's decision was a miscarriage of justice.
April 6, 2007 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its not exactly "follow the money", but follow the Prosecutors from GSA’s Money List.
Dems in the Senate can speed things along with a little research. Look to the GSA report that showed what Rove thought were targets, and look at every one of the US Attorneys in those areas, and their recent cases, and see just what was what.
By taking this tact, the Senate Judiciary committee will be able to ask why did you do it, as opposed to what did you do, which in the long run speeds things along, as well as creates more pressure on any official who is called to testify.
Do a little fishing in advance, so the hearings are less of a fishing expedition, and more of a catch and release, and by the way, the big ones don't get thrown back!
Oh this is rich, code word: screw
April 6, 2007 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bigger story with USA Biskupic is that there are other federal corruption cases in Wisconsin currently underway, all of which point to the GOP, yet the Democrats (and the Governor specifically) are being nailed in the press and by the GOP. Dennis Troha donated money to everyone, including Doyle and Representative Paul Ryan, yet the attention is all played towards Doyle's connection while little if anything is mentioned with Ryan. I think this case in particular is a smokescreen for Justice to hide behind-- pursue corruption cases against Democratic contributors but don't investigate said contributor's ties to Republicans. Bruce Murphy with the Milwaukee Magazine has done some excellent reporting on this.
April 6, 2007 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
"What's next, a USA who declined to prosecute a GOPer who was guilty as hell?"
Hate to say it, but that would be David Iglesias. See this link regarding the case of Donna Erwin, Jeff and Doug Lords.
In a blistering report, the Interior Department's top investigator says that senior officials who manage $3.2 billion in Indian trust funds pressured subordinates to award lucrative contracts to executives with
whom the officials enjoyed close social ties.
Iglesias declined to prosecute the three, and they merely had their wrist slapped by Kempthorne.
April 6, 2007 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! Bush has actually turned this country into a banana republic. Mission accomplished.
April 6, 2007 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Darn, that embedded link didn't work for Erwin and the Lords. Here's the URL.
http://www.indiantrust.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=Articles.ViewDetail&Article_id=353&Month=7&Year=2006
April 6, 2007 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Break this bitch down to basics: A Democrat was conveniently prosecuted just in time for the attack-ad season, all of which serves the Republican candidate/party. A perfect hit job.
Imagine Dems without majorities in the two houses. Even if we knew about this, it'd be the typical tinfoil-hat bullshit.
Very nice job exposing this one. You are America's VIPs extremis.
Code word: face, as in, "a boot stamping on a face forever."
April 6, 2007 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Hmm. And there's this from the April Harper's Index:
Number of local Republicans officials who have been investigated by the US Department of Justice since 2001: 37
Number of local Democratic officials who have been: 262.
That pretty much sums it up"
i'd actually be interested in finding out what those 37 republicans who were investigated by the JD ended up being accused of, and also whether THEY would have been considered 'loyal bushies'.
my guess is, probably not.
or they were tokens, people republican leadership didn't particularly value or actually wanted out of the way.
you could go so much deeper on this.
April 6, 2007 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I worked for the State of Wisconsin during the reign of Tommy Thompson (Scott McCallum and Jim Doyle as well) and worked with her office and other departments purchasing goods and services on behalf of the state. I left Wisconsin by the time this story hit--but believe me when I say that in the Thompson (the one who is running for president..he's not the bumpkin he makes himself out to be--and even has his very own "Cheney") administration and the McCallum administration there was NEVER any doubt as to who was going to get a contract for ANYTHING. When writing and scoring RFP's it was always understood who should come in the highest--and of course no one ever said anything directly. I have no first hand knowledge about the Adelman contract--but in the Thompson Administration the kind of thing Georgia was accused of was BAU.
The republicans in Wisconsin HATE Jim Doyle (he was Attorney General before Gov) and don't mind throwing one of their own under the campaign bus to hurt a Democrat (ask Judge Wilcox how he got elected...). Republicans were mad because Doyle beat McCallum--Thompson's Lt Gov for 14 years. Political patronage ran deep--lots of people lost their government jobs or were forced to take demotions. Remember--Tommy was in Bush's cabinet for 4 years...
April 6, 2007 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Link to the Inspector General's report on the OST for Indian Affairs case referred to Iglesias' office, which declined to prosecute:
http://www.doioig.gov/upload/CD&L_WEB06_19_061.pdf
April 6, 2007 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think if we waterboarded Gonzalez we would hear what we wanted to hear, and more perhaps.
April 6, 2007 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another of the Kept USAttorneys is Johnny Sutton, Western District of Texas. He's the one who refused to pursue the case against the Texas Youth Commission facility in Pyote, Texas which had allegations of sexual abuse filed by a Texas Ranger, Brian Burzynski in 2005. This has blown sky high in Texas, with all the TYC commissioners resigning, up to 500 youths due to be released very soon because their sentences were extended with no due process, etc. In a solid red state, this is most embarrassing to the Governor, etc. Sutton is close to Gonzales from during W's tenure as Governor. Sutton is also the USAttorney that has Lou Dobbs in such a snit over the conviction of two Border Patrol agents on the testimony of a drug thug given immunity.
It makes good sense to follow up on all the Kept USAttorneys. There are plenty of (code word body)
bodies under those rocks.
April 6, 2007 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't had time to read all the comments, so someone probably has already noted this relating to the abrupt resignation of the three top MN US attorneys where 34-year-old rachel paulose holds forth as USAttorney - check out this from the MN star tribune's coverage from today. this is MOST juicy!
"The job changes followed a visit to the office by a representative from the Executive Office of the U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C."
April 6, 2007 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about the prosecution by USA for Michigan (Eastern Dist.) Stephen J. Murphy (confirmed June 8, 2005) against Carl Marlinga, the 2002 Democratic Party candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, Michigan's 10th District. Marling was charged with bribery, mail & wire fraud, false statement to Federal Election Commission and violations of federal campaign finance lasw. The indictment alleged the Michigan Democractic Party served as a "conduit" for unlawful campaign contributions. Marlinga was acquitted on all charges.
According to the Macomb Daily News, "The FBI and Michigan State Police began investigating the case in the second half of 2002 after the state Republican Party asked the state Attorney General to look into it." (09-26-06)
April 6, 2007 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, infotropy. I'm at a borrowed computer in a auto repair waiting room, and am thus quite hampered.
April 6, 2007 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
per comment right above, the link didn't translate, so here it is:
www.startribune.com/462/story/1104033.html
things are *really unravelling.
how completely fun!
code word: dress, as in "let's undress their lies."
April 6, 2007 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clancy J.-
Maybe even more petty than that, because Thompson was a career civil servant-appointed by a Republican!- whose alleged crime was attemptin' to please her new- Democratic- boss!
And the USA didn't bother to indict the Democrat, but only attempted to smear him! Simply outrageous!
Thanks for the links to the Journal-Sentinel, Jake in Milwaukee. Loved listenin' to the oral arguments.
April 6, 2007 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
April 6, 2007 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
You've done your country proud, TPM crew. Keep it up. You just might save it for us all.
April 6, 2007 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the other judges was Frank Easterbrook, who's a very well-known conservative judge. (Also the brother of journalist Gregg Easterbrook.)
They really took the AUSA to the woodshed on this one.
April 6, 2007 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stupid question -- does the USA face legal jeopardy for this? Malicious prosecution, or something like that?
I know that's normally nearly impossible to prove, but the appeals court acting so quickly suggests this may be an exception.
April 6, 2007 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just wrote a long post about how this adminstration has asked its appointees to prostitute their morals for him. It was just too sad to read and I deleted it.
How bad is it?
The President is too scared to go out in public that he can't even throw out the first ball on opening day.
We are no longer the land of the free and home of the brave, He f*cked it up.
Security Code: Judge Here come the judge, here come the judge
April 6, 2007 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
they shouldn't just dig around the federal prosecutors...loyal bushies are placed throughout the administration...its how they bypass the bureacracy...loyalists are always placed at the top of every aspect of the federal government...thats not being naieve, its the truth!
April 6, 2007 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about the brewing allegations against Dem Menendez in New Jersey in the run up to the Senate election against Republican Tom Keane? To hear all of the atack ads prior to the election, these were serious allegations, supposedly supported by lots of proof. After Keane lost the race, the case was never pursued.
Smells dirty to me!
code word snake - might as well be Rove
April 6, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's becoming very clear that the biggest enemy to our country is the GOP. They are a cancer that has rotted our country from the inside. The enemies outside our borders are small potatos compaired to our internal enemies. Personally I don't understand why they just don't pack their bags and fly away. They have already drained the piggy bank known as the federal goverment.
April 6, 2007 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree with bobh that there needs to be an effort to catalog all 93 USA's and see what patterns can emerge.
TPM has done timelines before -- if readers volunteer to provide info on a specific district, can TPM create some kind of catalog/database?
April 6, 2007 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
This requires not only a US Attorney to file charges but also a judge to convict. If the evidence was beyond thin the judge must also be a loyal. Is it that not only the US Attorneys are a rotten cast?
April 6, 2007 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
What happened? Well it was THE MOST publicized, overblown, Get Governor Doyle thing we had seen in WI. The loser republican bootlicker bush-lover....Congressman Mark Green (he of the Abrahmhoff Box Seat scandal) used TONS of repub money and this scandal to make it a close race. Without the National Repub money and this scandal he would not have even been visible.
No news of this has hit wisconsin, other than the Victim was released, charges dropped, and Gov. Doyle has said she is welcome to her job back. Not one word about Attorneygate or meddling or dirty Repub tricks has hit the airwaves here yet. Just goes to show you how much of this is UNDER THE RADAR and how deep it all goes. And not a murmur of how a politically corrupt Justice Dept reaches their slimy long arms into our local politics and tries to steal elections and thwart the will of the people.
April 6, 2007 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
In West Virginia, the former chair of the House Education Committee, Jerry Mezzatesta, was just acquitted of all federal charges of illegally diverting public funds to help his re-election campaign. A Democrat, natch.
April 6, 2007 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still think the actions of Mississippi U.S. Attorney in the run-up to the state's gubernatorial election back in 2003 deserve some scrutiny; you can read more about it in my Daily Kos diary.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/17/23408/4939
April 6, 2007 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can Georgia Thompson sue for wronful dismissal? Should she even have to? Shouldn't the GOP cut her a fat cheque right now and publically apologize for turning her into a political football?
April 6, 2007 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
We haven't heard from a bunch of obvious places for Republican USA bad behavior toward Democrats or to shield Republicans yet: Montana, Oregon, Colorado, eastern Texas, Louisiana, Florida, North Carolina, northern or southern Virginia, Delaware, New York, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, or Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee. Or Hawai'i.
Of course, Rove et al prefer that Republican state officials do the dirty work where possible; the USAs are sent in when Democrats have state level control or the Republican ones at the state level can't do the trick.
So far: Guam, Alaska, Washington State, northern and southern California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, western Texas, Arkansas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, eastern and western Michigan, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, New Hampshire. I vaguely remember some Republician shenanigan being done in Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands but don't recall it precisely.
Of course, there's the DoJ division in charge of Guantanamo and US military bases and embassies and such- including Bagram and Abu Ghraib. That would be the greatest rat's nest of them all, presumably.
April 6, 2007 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Christopher Christie, NJ's US Atty.
From a NYT's article (available w/out fee from IHT here:
http://tinyurl.com/364qdw
"In New Jersey, William Palatucci, a Republican political consultant and Bush supporter, boasted of selecting a United States attorney by forwarding Rove the résumé of his partner, Christopher Christie, a corporate lawyer and Bush fund-raiser with little prosecutorial experience.
Christie has brought public corruption charges against prominent members of both parties, but his most notable investigations have stung two Democrats, former Gov. James McGreevey and Senator Robert Menendez. When word of the latter inquiry leaked to the press during the 2006 campaign, Menendez sought to dismiss it by tying Christie to Rove, calling the investigation "straight out of the Bush-Rove playbook." ( McGreevey resigned after admitting to having an affair with a male aide and the Menendez investigation has not been resolved.)"
I remember when Christie was first appointed; the NYT had quite a little puff piece on him. I believe it was nicely complemented by a Bill Keller editorial in which the future managing editor ruminated on the rank corruption in NJ--embodied by the likes of Tony Soprano,Bruce Springsteen (who exploited the deaths of 9/11 by releasing an album that referenced that day) and Frank Lautenberg, who had the nerve to step in and replace Robert Torricelli, who was implicated, but never charged, with accepting bribes (issues that were raised in time for the election--but never resolved).
April 6, 2007 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Under Kevin Ryan they had been spending all sorts of time (and of course newspaper ink) going after Don Perata - the Dem. Senate leader here in CA.
It had all died down (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20070205/ai_n17199076), with of course no actual indictments or anything else, just a bunch of smoke.
But now they seem to have found a new fishing rod to give to the grand jury (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/03/11/BAGDBOJ7SL1.DTL)
I can't help wondering: if there were actual Republican corruption investigations going on up here in northern CA, would they would have been happy to have such poor management of the US Atty office and have left Kevin Ryan in place?
April 6, 2007 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Southern District of Florida
Alexander Acosta
I was researching this little gem when I saw that the job had already been accomplished. This what a loyal Bushie looks like. Ig you want more original source material just let me know; I have plenty.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x555383
April 6, 2007 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The powerpoint brown-bag lunches held by Rove's staff at GSA "How To Help Our GOP Candidates" (that Lurita Doan doesn't remember), how many of those were being held in other govt agencies? Where they being hosted at DOJ sites?
Security Code: story
There might just be a story there too?
April 6, 2007 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out the activity since 2003 for the Northern District of Indiana. Since Mitch Daniels left OMB everytime a major election comes up a local Dem is indicted in the most Dem county (Lake) in the State. BTW, Daniels sister was at DOJ for 4 yrs too!
April 6, 2007 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The thing is I asked around about Biskupic a week ago, and his rep. among liberals was great. He nixed the voter fraud investigation, finding no reason to indict. He is a career prosecutor. People (liberals) who dealt with him for years like the guy; now his name is trash; but I think the Georgia Thompson affair compells this conclusion.
###
April 6, 2007 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
What makes this story more interestring is that the local Rightie gasbags; Charlie Sykes most prominent, blathered on and on about election fraud by Dems in `04. Biskupic investigated and quite publicly announced that the claims were unsubstantiated. Chuckles could not let go of that bone though and instead focused on the tire slashing of Republican vans on election day, repeatedly coming back to the story of the local Dem Congresswoman Gwen Moore's son's involvement in the slashing. But having a Republican operative and Bush appointee take all the wind out of the local Rightie Slimers was priceless.
April 6, 2007 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't wait to read the comments. For this USA scandal to touch WI is unthinkable. I have lived in WI which is traditionally a very progressive state. To see this kind of fascism - how despicable! - overturned is heartwarming.
Code word "crossdress"
April 6, 2007 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Having worked in HHS, I can vouch for the fact that lots of agencies had these powerpoint brown-bag lunches held by Rove's staff or their designees: GSA "How To Help Our GOP Candidates"
I cna't say I've been there in person; not high enough in the food chain.
But be asured, I've been at meetings where the admin's "marriage initiative" has been pushed. Loved the fact that most of the Chicago people there held their noses.
Jeeze: code word false
April 6, 2007 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has Conyers & Sanchez gotten a thousand e-mails informing them of this crap yet on this one yet?
April 6, 2007 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could one of the law bloggers answer this ?
If the USA as an attorney knowingly breaks the law in performance of their office can they be disbarred ?
April 6, 2007 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the USA for Montana, who would have looked into Conrad Burn's ties to Jack Abrahmof, was or is in the process of being promoted. A new AG who can be confirmed by the Senate will be Bush's worst nightmare. To steal a line from Apocalypse Now, I love the smell of impeachment in the morning.
April 6, 2007 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm... I seem to remember a bogus claim about current NJ Senator Bob Menendez' relationship with a Head Start program, which Menendez' opponent Kean tried to jump on as if Menendez were Al Capone himself. Does anyone know the provenance of that investigation, the status of it, and whether any "loyal Bushies" were involved.
April 6, 2007 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It should be noted that JB Van Hollen was appointed U.S. Attorney for Western Wisconsin by President Bush in 2002." (Jake from Milwaukee)
I believe that in Rovian parlance this is known as "resume building"...which apparently has been successful since JB Van Hollen is now Wisconsin's Attorney General.
Hmmm, I just wonder what a "loyal Bushie" like Van Hollen could accomplish as a state's Attorney General, as far as turning that office into a Rovian partisan Republican Party attack machine used against all Democrats in Wisconsin?
JB Van Hollen should be watched like a hawk, as should all the "loyal Bushie" fascists.
Security codeword: FLOWER, as in Turdblossom.
April 7, 2007 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Same story with disaster relief, military base closings, etc. Use leverage to turn blue state apparatus red with embarrassment. When they purge all the impurities, how many loyal Bushies will actually be required to fail to run the country due to scheduling conflicts with their permanent campaign against private citizenry?
How many Regent "University" graduates does it take to shame America?
Cheers,
April 7, 2007 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I note that Paulrose was a member of the Federalist Society. Could this be a common thread? How many USA's are members? Is that where the "voter fraud" meme originated or got its greatest resonance?
In other words, is the Federalist Society part of a vast, right-wing conspiracy, a sort of shadow federal judiciary, to be given the reins at the opportune moment as the Bushies consolidated power?
Just thinking out loud...
April 7, 2007 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Recently two or three deputy federal prosecutors resigned from their positions in Minnesota. I dont have any names or details yet. Anyone else got anything on this?
April 7, 2007 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh! Here is a link!
http://tinyurl.com/23zn33
April 7, 2007 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
from my earlier link that I posted.
Sources in Minnesota who did not wish to be identified say they don't think the resignations are connected to the turmoil in the U.S. Attorney General's office. They say the resignations were due to conflicts with Paulose's management style.
John Kelly, deputy director of the Justice Department's executive office of U.S Attorneys, visited Minneapolis on Thursday to try to resolve the situation, said two aides in Washington who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
The prosecutors stepped down after Kelly's visit. The Justice aides said it is not uncommon for the office, which oversees all 94 U.S. attorneys' districts nationwide, to make such visits to handle personnel issues.
April 7, 2007 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forgive me if this has been mentioned previously, but Biskupic is still doggedly investigating Gov. Doyle and his connections to trucking magnate Dennis Troha. He recently secured an indictment of Troha for skirting campaign finance rules by having his kids give to the Doyle campaign.
What's interesting here is that Troha also gave lots of money to U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Janesville), and that Ryan subsequently championed federal legislation designed to specifcally benefit Troha's company. But, guess what? Biskupic apparently isn't investigation this obvious pay-for-play scheme involving a Republican.
Actually, I think this is going to be the next shoe to drop locally with this story. (It has been reported on already, but I think it will get resurrected now.)
April 7, 2007 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I posted this at thinkprogress, but it bears repeating: Paulose + Republican Convention + protestors = ??? As a citizen of the gentle state of Minnesota, I'm not looking forward to the first of september.
April 7, 2007 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, even we liberals are not overly fond of Gov Doyle. Pay to play was perfected by former Gov and Republican prez candidate Tommy G Thompson, but Doyle was a quick study.
Fact is, Biskupic would have done more on voter fraud if there had been any evidence and someone he could have prosecuted. There simply wasn't a good target or any evidence. He couldn't get Doyle on the travelgate matter so he went after a low level civil servant and handed Republican operatives something with which to smear Doyle during the election. In the process, an innocent woman's life has been ruined. (She resigned from her job so I don't think she has a case for wrongful termination. I am looking forward to seeing what her excellent attorney Steve Hurley does bring on her behalf.)
April 7, 2007 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
noblejoanie, I suspect that we probably agree on most things, but I am a liberal who is very fond of Gov. Doyle. He was has done a commendable job after having been dealt a horrible hand (massive deficit, Republican-controlled legislature, witch-hunting Republican US Attorney).
April 7, 2007 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Sources tell No Quarter that Rick Wiley, then the executive director of the state GOP, directed a staffer in 2005 to prepare a 30-page report on election abuses in Wisconsin so Wiley could pass it along to a top White House official.
"That document, entitled "Fraud in Wisconsin 2004: A Timeline/Summary," turned up last week in the horde of White House and U.S. Justice Department records released by the House Judiciary Committee, which is investigating the firing of eight U.S. attorneys.
"The report was prepared for Karl Rove," said a source with knowledge of the situation. "Rick wanted it so he could give it to Karl Rove.""
April 8, 2007 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't it unethical for a prosecutor -- federal or not -- to pursue a prosecution when he doesn't think he has proved a crime?
April 8, 2007 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Milwaukee JS story linked at TPM suggests to me that perhaps the US Atty in Milwaukee served up Georgia Thompson in the face of no evidence and no juicy political target for the voter fraud allegations.
Jake in Milwaukee--the liberals I know disappointed in Doyle are from the environmental arena. Other than stewardship matters, Doyle has been a major disappointment.
April 8, 2007 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The subject of 4/9/07 Krugman column:
"There’s a lot of talk now about a case in Wisconsin, where the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney prosecuted the state’s purchasing supervisor over charges that a court recently dismissed after just 26 minutes of oral testimony, with one judge calling the evidence “beyond thin.” But by then the accusations had done their job: the unjustly accused official had served almost four months in prison, and the case figured prominently in attack ads alleging corruption in the Democratic governor’s administration."
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/opinion/09krugman.html?hp
April 8, 2007 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know if anyone has seen today's NYT, but there's a juicy editorial about all of this stuff entitled "Another Layer of Scandal." It begins with specific reference to the Thompson case:
"As Congress investigates the politicization of the United States attorney offices by the Bush administration, it should review the extraordinary events the other day in a federal courtroom in Wisconsin. The case involved Georgia Thompson, a state employee sent to prison on the flimsiest of corruption charges just as her boss, a Democrat, was fighting off a Republican challenger. It just might shed some light on a question that lurks behind the firing of eight top federal prosecutors: what did the surviving attorneys do to escape the axe?"
This is awesome! The local media in WI (chiefly the Journal Sentinel, which really loathes Doyle) have been resisting precisely this angle, but hopefully there will be a national media firestorm about it.
April 9, 2007 5:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the timeline here says a LOT. Biskupic investigates voter fraud in 2004 and 2005 (WI went Dem in 2004, and we all know the only way Dem's win is fraud, right?).
Unable to find any evidence, he drops the charges, prompting a complaint by the state chair of the Republican party to Karl Rove.
Fast forward to 2006. Biskupic brings charges against Thompson and gets a conviction from a loyal Bushie judge in July. She's sentenced in September and the Repub's beat that corruption drum.
In December of 2006 6 USAs who won't play ball with the Bushies and 2 who were actually arguably poor performers are dumped abruptly. Biskupic is NOT among those dumped. Why? Where did Biskupic fall on the original USA master list? Did he know where he stood on that list? If he did, WHEN did he learn it, and what might he have done to get off it?
April 9, 2007 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Doug in Milwaukee--
You're right about the Journal Sentinel re: Doyle, they can't stand him and they've been nailing him left and right. The irony of all this is that Georgia Thompson was appointed by a Republican governor and was a holdover from McCallum's administration when Doyle won in 2002. All things being equal, Doyle wouldn't have taken the heat for her conviction in the first place (or at least, not as much as he did). Noblejoanie makes a good point about Doyle-- he's been a major disappointment to Democrats and he has other ethical clouds hanging over him, ranging from the state tobacco settlement to Indian gaming compacts. I think the state GOP smelled blood and the Journal Sentinel, despite their good reporting on the Thompson case, went along for the ride.
April 9, 2007 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
One stupid question I must ask: what about the judge who presided over the case when it got the conviction? If the case was as thin as the appelate court says it is, how can a judge not see through the shenanigans and convict? Shouldn't THAT be reviewed as well?
April 9, 2007 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
A link to Randa's October decision...
http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=76209
April 9, 2007 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink