« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Another Bridge, Another Part of Nowhere
When your bid to build a bridge to nowhere is shut down, try to get federal funding for another bridge, to a different part of nowhere – where your friends own property.
John Stanton of Roll Call wrote a great story (Sub. Req.) that parses out the likely motivations for the Alaska Congressional delegation’s work over the last few months to snag federal cash for a bridge to connect an area where no one lives to Anchorage.
Why bother to invest in infrastructure to nowhere?
Well, it could make the remote area, called “Knik Arm,” a major suburb, but more importantly, folks with familial and political ties to Republican Rep. Don Young and Sens. Ted Stevens and Lisa Murkowski would profit:
If the area is successfully developed, that could mean a significant windfall for a number of people close to the Congressional delegation — including Young’s daughter, Joni, Stevens’ chief of staff and campaign manager and Murkowski’s state director — some of whom purchased land in the area just a few months before then-Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Young began substantive work on a massive highway bill in early 2003.
Here's more from Roll Call:
According to land records compiled by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Senate financial disclosure forms and published accounts, Stevens’ current Chief of Staff George Lowe owns a 2.6 acre parcel of undeveloped land on the Knik Arm, which he purchased in December 2004 from the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority, according to a copy of the deed.…
Former Stevens aide Lisa Sutherland also stands to see significant financial gain from the development of Knik Arm. Sutherland, a close confidante of Stevens, worked for the lawmaker from 1977 until this March in a variety of capacities, including deputy staff director on the Appropriations Committee and then staff director on the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. Sutherland left the Senate payroll in March to work full time on Stevens’ re-election campaign.













No crony left behind.
May 14, 2007 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Alaska needs a good sweep.
Getting too mucky.
May 14, 2007 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not just enough for American soldiers to give their blood and their lives in Iraq for Big Oil, but we need the taxpayers money too, to build bridges to nowhere that will benefit members of congress, their families and their friends.
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
May 14, 2007 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone needs to take out Stevens. He is a true piece of shit.
May 14, 2007 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
...is there no shame left in america?
May 14, 2007 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm no fan of Senator-for-Life Stevens, but, to be fair, this idea has been around for years. It was a hot topic in the late 70s/early 80s. Anchorage is basically hemmed in between Cook Inlet and the Chugach Mountains. A Knik Arm crossing would allow for growth.
And yes, folks who own land across the inlet would stand to benefit...
Ex-pat Alaskan.
May 14, 2007 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will we be rid of this evil little imp? Did he threaten to resign or something if he didn't get his pork? Methinks the time is neigh.
Code: still - like "I can't believe he's still here!"
May 14, 2007 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't there a tube we can put this guy into and ship him back there?
May 14, 2007 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Ketchikan bridge being labeled 'to nowhere' is really a misnomer. I fished for salmon out of Ketchikan one summer, and I can tell you it would have been a lot more convenient to drive to the airport rather than take a water taxi.
We drive to Logan Airport, after all..
May 14, 2007 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about putting Stevens et al. on a big chunk of ice, and let them drift out to sea?
May 14, 2007 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
@ CRG, Ralph:
If the bridge would be useful enough to the people of Alaska, couldn't they build it without the help of federal funds? Maybe a state sales tax or a similarly-sized cut in spending?
May 14, 2007 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the bridge would be useful enough to the people of Alaska, couldn't they build it without the help of federal funds?
You know, I think that Alaskans still get a tax rebate instead of paying taxes from the oil that gets pumped out of their state. Maybe you could poll the Alaskans and see if it would be worth a bit of a "tax" on that rebate to build said bridge.
If it isn't worth it to them to pony up the money, I'm not sure why it should be a Federal project.
May 14, 2007 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joshua Lander,
There's nothing stopping them from building the bridges if they wanted to. Typically, though, major transportation initiatives combine local, state, and federal dollars to get the job done.
May 14, 2007 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point, guys, isn't whether this would be helpful to the people of Alaska, especially in the long run. The point is that the people in charge are using their positions for personal profit. And that is criminal. Some law-and-order crowd!
May 14, 2007 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have mixed feeling about these "bridges to nowhere". There's one that's proposed in South Carolina that, apart from being built over an economically sensitive area, really would serve as a bridge to economic development in one of the poorest regions of the state. The fact that it's populated mostly by African Americans probably lead to the label "bridge to nowhere".
Just saying.
May 14, 2007 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Code word: door
As in, "Don't let the door hit you in the Ted Stevens on the way out."
May 14, 2007 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
reminds me of the Hastert [?] property in Illinois: Someone bought a farm in the middle of nowhere, and then "out of the blue" Federal Highway offramp planned adjacent to land. Homeless GOP Senator, "Will buy land for gas station." [/snark]
sc: Debt
May 14, 2007 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why not build a privately-financed toll bridge? If growth is that imminent, then I'm sure a financier/builder parternship would jump all over the opportunity for it.
Hmmmmm. If the funding is yanked, will we get to see another great ol' congressional coot-off?
May 14, 2007 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I detest Ted Stevens and his heavy-handed tactics more than anyone. Lisa Murkowkski sure didn't take long to hitch her wagon to her Daddy's political partner, either. I would love to see either or both of them replaced. Ted has no intention of retiring, and apparently, at age 83, has no concept of mortality, and plans to run again. He's also the biggest asshole you'll ever meet.
All that aside, to call the Knik Arm crossing a "Bridge to nowhere" is a misnomer. The Matanuske-Susitna Borough is the fastest-growing area in Alaska. It is home to thousands of Anchorage workers, who now commute. It has grown out of its role as a suburb of Anchorage and is fast becoming a vital economic region. A bridge has long been theorized as a way to join these two strong cities by cutting the 45-miunute commute.
Unfortunately, the design being forwarded by the Bridge Authority is poorly-planned. It would reduce the commute by only a few minutes (if at all), add a toll for drivers, destroy an historic residential neighborhood and dump additional traffic into the dowtown area, where streets are already at capacity. The mayor of Anchorage and many residents want to see a better design plan before permitting begins.
But Ted only hears the sound of his own voice, and will stand for no opposition. He is a true megalomaniac.
May 14, 2007 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please in no way take this as a defense of any of the crooks in government in Alaska, but......
It would seem to me that:
1) any bridge to anything in Alaska, in this day in age, would qualify as a bridge to nowhere. There just aren't that many places that are highly populated that don't already connect to something else, save for Juneau, I guess; and
2) Is there any sort of major public works project a politician in Alaska could propose that wouldn't benefit someone that they know personally, or has contributed to their campaign? I mean, there really aren't that many people up there (including my brother, his wife, and my two adorable nieces).
That said, Stevens is a scumbag, and I agree with the sentiment that, if this is so important to the local populace, it could probably be funded some other way.
May 14, 2007 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
The toll bridge would fit into the Grover Norquist model of no income taxes but user fees on everything.
I thought Norquist was the GOP's best friend and a close advisor to the White House. I guess the fiscal "responsibility" he preaches applies to non-Republicans. They had a 30 year reign planned. It collapsed under its own corrupt weight. He's grabbing whatever he can. Obviously not concerned with what this does to the corrupt reputation his party is going to be unable to avoid next year.
May 14, 2007 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
A lot of Alaskans who bought lots at Pt. MacKenzie are expecting the value to go up if & when a bridge to Anchorage is built. Why should congressional aides be any different?
May 14, 2007 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alaska gets too much federal money as it is. No more Republican gravy-train for you, Senator Tubes.
May 14, 2007 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Over and over and over again. A republican representative's reason for being in office is to snag contracts or pass laws to bring gain to their cronies or the special interests who finance their campaigns. Without fail their main objective is to grab a bigger piece of the pie. Why is it that Blue states always end up paying for or bailing out Red states with funds channeled through the federal government. Here is but another plan to milk the citizens for personal profit and it will continue till stiff penalties are dealt out for these shady practices. The party of corruption and greed needs to be eliminated from government until they get it through their heads that the government is not for hire, or to be used to increase their wealth.
May 14, 2007 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take a breath. Here's some background: http://www.knikbridgefacts.org/
May 14, 2007 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Leaving aside the benefits, why do I get the feeling that many of the people complaining about "bridges to nowhere" have never actually looked at a map?
Anchorage is bordered on the south and west by water, on the north by two military bases (Elmendorf AFB and Fort Richardson) and on the East by Fort Richardson and Chugach State Park.
Which means that an expanding population is going to have to be coming from beyond those boundaries, and a bridge across Knik Arm provides a convenient route.
May 14, 2007 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or folks in Anchorage could just do like the folks down south in B.C., tear down stand-alone housing, and put in high-rise condos. Combined with an actual usable mass transit system, they could fit 1000 times as many people into the same amount of land that way. Traditional American suburban development is unsustainable in a world where $10/gallon gasoline will soon be the norm.
May 14, 2007 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keith:
I think it's possible to be for the bridge project but against Federal funding. Alaskans quite probably have the money to pay for the bridge without asking someone from Kentucky or Maine to cover the cost. That's also not to say that there aren't many similar "bridge to nowhere" projects in the lower 48 that should also be scrutinized in depth before Uncle Sugar (that's you and me the taxpayer) foots the bill.
May 14, 2007 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Real issue or not, what are the odds John Solomon will ignore this land deal story involving Republicans?
Re,
http://www.knikbridgefacts.org/, thanks. Interesting the locals may be against this. Just a thought from a S. Californian who sees no new freeways going up here, except toll roads: Why don't the Alaskans tax themselves and put up a toll bridge, like NYC, San Diego, etc?
May 14, 2007 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a progressive living in Alaska, I'm always frustrated by the jazzbo idiots that "represent" me in Congress--so my family and I are leaving the land of the Permanent Fund (oil$$), loooong dark, below-zero winters, hot smoky summers, mostly Bushie/Cheney drones, dreary neighborhoods, "combat" fishing and all the other depression-inducing stuff and we're heading south to Oregon. I just hope there are some bees down there. Alaska is beautiful but it sure ain't progressive...politics here is a bad joke.
May 14, 2007 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another federal project that bears looking into is the 60-70 million dollar new Veterans Hospital just outside the gates of Elmendorf AFB (Anchorage). With the way the old VA hospital is run our tax dollars would be much more wisely spent on giving the veterans Blus Cross Blue Shield and letting them find quality health care.
Or, contract with a provider like Providence that is professionally run.
Alaska gets way too many federal dollars. Fully 1/3 of the population of this state has a job dependant on them in some way. Click on the website on my name. The career military up here is filled with whackos, long known as a "fishing and hunting club" around, the police force is corrupt as hell, and as you have seen from the news last week, the elected are bought and sold, and the Patriot Act US Attorney is worse then useless. This place has been a Republican welfare colony for way too long.
With any luck Hillary will become President and turn Ft Richardson into a free clinic. Cutting the military budget in Alaska by 50% would force them to concentrate on things like actually fighting the WOT and not just finding something to make themselves look useful with.
And yes, I am angry and anti-Bush, anti-Republican. Six years of having a chimp/human chimera running this once great country into the ground has made me this way.
May 14, 2007 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This from the Alaska Ear:
"IT’S A VERY SMALL TOWN … The Omniscient Orifice senses that summer block parties over on 11th Avenue might be a tad strained this year. Looks to map-mulling Ear like Bill Allen (the defendant) and John Sedwick (the judge) live right across the street from each other."
http://www.adn.com/news/politics/alaska_ear/story/8881138p-8781462c.html
May 14, 2007 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Corruption make Hulk ANGRY.
May 14, 2007 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
This concerns the first "bridge to nowhere" that would have connected Ketchikan, Alaska to its AIRPORT. At present one must take a 10-minute ferry ride over to the island, and if you just miss the ferry, it's a half-hour wait until the next one. Why not a causeway instead? Because the cruise ships that visit Ketchikan would then have to back out of the harbor, and that is too costly for them, so they would skip Ketchikan. Finally, Sitka already has such a bridge, and since it was built, active subdivisions have spring up on the island that had been uninhabited before.
May 14, 2007 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've actually been to Knik, which is the on the route of the Iditarod. There'a great bar in the town, where they serve mooseburgers the size of Texas.
There are also a dozen or so houses there. It's not very big.
May 14, 2007 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
We should not allow politicians to use our government to subsidize wealthy corporations and land developers.
If they want to partner with taxpayers in this venture, then they should be prepared to give us a fair cut of the profits in whatever appropriate form that might take. Perhaps that means a special tax levy. Perhaps that means footing the bill for schools, clinics, services, or a commitment to low income housing.
But we should not allow our hard earned tax dollars to be used simply to subsidize the rich in becoming richer.
May 14, 2007 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The best homologue I can draw for this bridge project is to imagine Seattle without the I-90 and 520 bridges to the east side of Lake Washington. At one time, Bellevue and Redmond (Microsoft, Nintendo, etc.) were cow pastures and woods. Now they are cities in their own right. The proposed bridge will use a blend of federal, state, and private equity money. People who own small planes can land at their own runways (many Alaskans) or on the myriad of lakes in less time than it takes to drive around Knik Arm.
Is it a good idea overall? No more or less than any other big bridge project. Giant condo skyscrapers? You first, and see also Whittier, Alaska. Does Alaska deserve federal funding? Yes we do, we can be just as bad as other people when free money comes around (Boston's Big Dig, anybody?) and Alaska bears the burden of having the most land tied up in federal ownership. We are getting screwed by the feds in regards to oil and mineral wealth extraction and the oil is drying up.
May 14, 2007 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biff Spacean,
My thoughts exactly. My family owns undeveloped land in Matanuska valley, but then when do we say, "NO!" to pork?
May 14, 2007 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does Alaska send that much money in in federal to expect these kinds of projects for their state? I mean, Alaska has more wilderness than population, that alone doesn't give it much clout.
That little idiot senator Stevens makes the case for term limits soooooo well.
May 14, 2007 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
That photo of Stevens is great.
Talk about "Mean Mister Mustard."
May 14, 2007 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biff Spaceman >"...imagine Seattle without the I-90 and 520 bridges to the east side of Lake Washington. At one time, Bellevue and Redmond (Microsoft, Nintendo, etc.) were cow pastures..."
Yes, I can remember when there was NO 520 bridge & there was NO I-90 (there was however a bridge and highway). I would love it if they both went away and there were water taxis to replace them. Not mentioning the decrease in fossil fuel use (pollution etc) that would result.
Oh, and Bellevue (the ooh too hip for normal people) & Redmond (bad software taken to a higher level) are still full of cow poop despite the fact there are few, if any cows there these days. Maybe a latte & Starbucks shortage would help.
What idiocy these people spew. Pay for it yourself and quit whining !
code = lock (as in these people have a lock on arrogance)
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei
May 14, 2007 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it the federal govt's job to make growth possible? Where I come from, the developers pay for infrastructure improvements through development fees. Or cities raise money. The Feds don't pay for bridges.
May 14, 2007 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or folks in Anchorage could just do like the folks down south in B.C., tear down stand-alone housing, and put in high-rise condos.
I've actually been to Knik, which is the on the route of the Iditarod. There'a great bar in the town, where they serve mooseburgers the size of Texas.
There are also a dozen or so houses there. It's not very big.
You people make me laugh. High-rise condos on the meanest earthquake zone in North America? Hahahaha!!! Not very big? Why do you suppose that is? Hahahahaha!! Get a clue, eh?
May 15, 2007 2:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with anyone who considers that mean, self-centered crook, Senator Stephens unfit to be a Senator. And that is saying something, considering some of our Senators. I recall when he threatened to quit when they were discussing the original Bridge to Nowhere and it is too bad that they did not call his bluff. Some one called him a meglo-maniac. Perfect. There ought to be an age limit on Senators, as well as terms. He gives Senior Citizens a bad name.
May 15, 2007 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you think Ted has a sour puss, take a look at his son Ben, former president of the Alaska legislature. Maybe it's genetic...
And Ben is likely to soon be indicted on federal corruption charges. I'm reminded of the old platitude that says "the acorn falls not far from the oak"
May 15, 2007 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you think Ted has a sour puss, take a look at his son Ben, former president of the Alaska legislature. Maybe it's genetic...
Ben is likely to soon be indicted on federal corruption charges. I'm reminded of the old platitude that says "the acorn falls not far from the oak"
May 15, 2007 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
How can a small city of 260,000 ever grow a "major suburb"? Anchorage is barely big enough to qualify as a major suburb itself.
May 15, 2007 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point(s) about this "Bridge to Nowhere" are spot on, but please note: the Knik Arm is a body of water that borders Anchorage to the northeast. The proposed bridge would run from Anchorage, across the Knik Arm, to the Pt. McKenzie area which is virtually deserted of people or infrastructure and where, yes, several of the Alaska delegation's connected members own land. Most people of Anchorage don't really see the need for this bridge, especially when other, more pressing road infrastructure needs have been identified
May 16, 2007 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point(s) about this "Bridge to Nowhere" are spot on, but please note: the Knik Arm is a body of water that borders Anchorage to the northeast. The proposed bridge would run from Anchorage, across the Knik Arm, to the Pt. McKenzie area which is virtually deserted of people or infrastructure and where, yes, several of the Alaska delegation's connected members own land. Most people of Anchorage don't really see the need for this bridge, especially when other, more pressing road infrastructure needs have been identified
May 16, 2007 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point(s) about this "Bridge to Nowhere" are spot on, but please note: the Knik Arm is a body of water that borders Anchorage to the northeast. The proposed bridge would run from Anchorage, across the Knik Arm, to the Pt. McKenzie area which is virtually deserted of people or infrastructure and where, yes, several of the Alaska delegation's connected members own land. Most people of Anchorage don't really see the need for this bridge, especially when other, more pressing road infrastructure needs have been identified.
Yes, do keep an eye on son Ben Stevens. We're all waiting for Federal bribery indictments to be dropped on him.
May 16, 2007 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
u suck dick
May 21, 2007 7:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
u suck dick
May 21, 2007 7:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Road to Nowhere
By Carol Cairnes
June 15, 2007 Friday PM
I live in Ketchikan Alaska where the "bridge to nowhere" project is currently under construction using federal transportation money. The contractor is Kiewit Pacific and the contract was awarded by former U.S. Senator and Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski after he lost his bid for reelection as governor in the primary of 2006. Richard Geary is on the Board of Directors of Kiewit Pacific. Geary and his wife Janet have donated more than $700,000.00 since 1993 to Republican candidates and the RNC and its committees; especially the Republican National State Elections Committee which received $155,000.00 from the them in 2000. Geary has also given individual donations to Ted Stevens and Don Young.
The 3.2 miles of gravel road that is contracted to Kiewit Pacific for $25.7 million is the only part of the project that could benefit Frank Murkowski directly, as his family owns 33 acres on Gravina Island. The road comes within half a mile of connecting their acreage to the Ketchikan Airport. It also connects with another road being built under questionable circumstances, again with federal money, that accesses a state timber sale on Gravina Island. Frank Murkowski sold this timber during his term as Governor of Alaska. The so-called "Bostwick Road" which accesses the state timber is being cut across previously roadless Tongass National Forest.
The "bridge to nowhere" was never going to be built. The money is continuing handouts to the timber industry and payback to political donors and is still flowing freely. Frank Murkowski has left the state and is reported to be on a 'round the world cruise. But Kiewit Pacific is in Ketchikan and on Gravina Island building a road that crosses 2 salmon streams, which will have to be bridged. Those 2 bridges will be built with money from the federal transportation budget provided by Congress to the State of Alaska unless Governor Palin cancels the contract.
In the process of contracting to Kiewit, the borough residents were compelled to donate their land to the State of Alaska for the project.
Carol Cairnes -- Ketchikan, AK
Received June 14, 2007 - Published June 15, 2007
Note: Comments published on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
June 17, 2007 4:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Stevens pushes for his $315 million "Bridge To Nowhere" (Ketchikan to some small island that his friends own) while others die for lack of bridge repairs. Do you need to ask why we distrust and dislike Congress?
August 3, 2007 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink