« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Schlozman Testimony Delayed till June By Vacation
Today Richard A. Hertling informed the Senate Judicary Committee that Bradley Schlozman would not be able to testify before the Committee on May 15th because Schlozman will be on a previously scheduled vacation.
Text beneath the fold.
The Honorable Patrick Leahy
Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
This responds to your letter of May 8 inviting Bradley J. Schlozman to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday May 15, at 10:OO A.M.
As I informed your staff and staff for Senator Schumer on May 9, Mr. Schlozman will not be able to testify on that date, as he will be on annual leave the weeks of May 14 and May 21. Additionally, it is our understanding that the Committee plans to inquire into matters handled by Mr. Schlozman when he worked in the Civil Rights Division, in which he has not served for nearly 14 months. Therefore, he will need some time to prepare to answer questions relative to the issues identified in your letter in order to be responsive to the questions Members of the Committee will have for him.
The Department has worked to accommodate the Committee's scheduling requests and has not only voluntarily made available to the Committee for hearings andlor interviews everyone the Committee has thus far requested but also largely on the Committee's timetable. In accordance with the Department's consistent accommodation of the Committee's requests, Mr. Schlozman will voluntarily appear as a witness before the Committee. As noted above, however, Mr. Schlozman will be on annual leave for the next two weeks. For one of those weeks, he has long-standing plans to be out of town.
Because of his leave and travel plans and the need to prepare for the hearing, Mr. Schlozman is prepared to appear voluntarily to testify at a hearing before the Committee on a mutually convenient date during the first week the Senate returns from the Memorial Day recess, the week of June 4.
We apologize for the delay that Mr. Schlozman's schedule creates for the Committee's hearing. We are eager to meet the Committee's needs, and if we had received a call before the Committee sent its hearing-notice letter, we could have inquired about Mr. Schlozman's availability and accommodated our mutual scheduling interests prior to the scheduling of the hearing. We look forward to finding a mutually agreeable date on which Mr. Schlozman may testify during the week of June 4.
Please do not hesitate to contact the Department if we can be of assistance in other
matters.Sincerely,
Richard A. Hertling
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Maybe I have the wrong attitude to be a Senator, but that would simply result in an INSTANT subpoena from me, were I head of the committee.
May 11, 2007 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's kidding, right?
Leahy cannot abide by this.
Note to Brad-Cancel your fucking vacation. Contempt of Congress is your only other option.
-Sincerely, Pat Leahy.
May 11, 2007 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tried this approach with jury duty in NYC and it didn't work. Calp his babyfaced fat fascist ass in irons and drag him in to testify.
May 11, 2007 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Get his passport!
May 11, 2007 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't he under subpoena? If not he should be. Hold his ass in contempt.
May 11, 2007 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give him a choice of testifying with or without being handcuffed to the chair.
May 11, 2007 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Must be getting close to the mark.
May 11, 2007 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will karma catch up with spin? Or: can lies outrun the hand of God?
May 11, 2007 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with comment number one.... immediate showing would be required, prepared or not.... like Monday , first thing, pre vacation
May 11, 2007 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
To sullynyc - Actually, you can do this for Jury Duty in California, at least in San Diego. They give you a window of time, and if you can't make it (usually because of a previously planned vacation), you can reschedule. Just thought that was worth mentioning.
May 11, 2007 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Schlozman is a Bushie. Vacation comes first.
May 11, 2007 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
blackpropaganda >"...can lies outrun the hand of God?"
Only for so long
Then it is, *poof*, matter meets anti-matter
code = attack (the thing which needs to be stepped up a couple of notches)
"Eventually, the truth will emerge. And when it does, this house of cards, built of deceit, will fall." - Robert C. Byrd
May 11, 2007 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heh. The letter must have been written by a political hack. Certainly any professional staffer would know the difference between the letter O and the number 0: 10:OO A.M.
May 11, 2007 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
They need time to shred all the records in the Voting Section.
Oh yeah. I forgot. They didn't make any.
May 11, 2007 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Note the late Friday timing for this one-finger salute from the DOJ. I think they are trying to get Congress to overreact to small things, to look as petulant as the Prezelnit. But Schlozman's behavior is no small thing. It is potentially worth impeachment. So, I would suggest Schlozman rethink the timing of his annual leave. If not, I'd have a subpoena on his desk by Tuesday at 10.00 am.
The average employee would consider Congress dopey and not serious, if it lets Schlozman/Gonzales get away with this crap. Schlozman's a lawyer for gosh sakes, not a postal worker fitting in an annual leave between deliveries. He was formerly in an assignment that required Senate confirmation.
Rove and Bush regard as all these tiffs as spitting contests (in addition to intentional, serial delays). Time for Congress to hit the spitoon from the other side of the saloon.
May 11, 2007 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes...and I'm sure Brad's "vacation" is with Mr. Rove discussing his "story."
May 11, 2007 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they accept that, they are bigger patsies than I thought. I have said before, and I will say it again here: It's time to shit or get off the pot. There is more than enough evidence to impeach Gonzales and probably more than enough evidence to indict a handful of overs. The Democrats are starting to look like a bunch of effete politicians with nother better to do but bitch.
May 11, 2007 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is actually good. Leahy needs to get all the former Voting Section staffers who are popping out of the woodwork in for interviews over the next two weeks so the SJC can give Schlozzie a really good grilling.
Put him on a panel with Joe Rich and Bob Kengle. That'll roast him good.
May 11, 2007 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, this is a typical Bushco move, in Sampson's words, "gum it to death" until public outrage dies down and to read some reports from yesterday's testimony it may be working.
May 11, 2007 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Schlozman's behavior as a USA was potentially worth an impeachment, not his taking a vacation when Congress wants to talk with him. Schlozman's been protected from that exposure by his move to an indeterminate assignment at the EO of the USA's. All the more reason to remind him that he works for the American people and the US Govt, not just the current president.
May 11, 2007 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
apparently voter fraud isn't that important when it's Ann Coulter
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/local_news/epaper/2007/05/11/m2a_jose_col_0511.html
May 11, 2007 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
These God damned cowards need to stop playing softball, issue subpoenas, and enforce them with Federal Marshalls. To "ask" someone like Schlozman to testify is asinine to the extreme, and it should come as no suprise that Sholzman would pull this kind of horseshit. Don't ask, just subpoena.
May 11, 2007 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bradley, Bradley, Bradley... Best spill your guts before Dick Cheney's Mafia spills them in a more vivid way.
May 11, 2007 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Abu very clearly gave us a big fu*k you in his testimony. He clearly thinks he's not going anywhere. Withholding documents, bold faced lies, vacation etc... all this just makes us Dems look just like the repugs have characterized us for thirty years, whimps. I just hope a lot is going on behind the scenes. Where are the indictments for Grover Norquist and his little friend Mister Super Christian Ralph Reed? You know, the money launderer guys.
May 11, 2007 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Senator Leahy,
What more will it take sir for you to understand the utter contempt these criminals have for you and your attempt at oversight. Trying to play nice with these scumbags will get you nowhere. If the public has not already lost all interest in this "scandal" they soon will. The Republican strategy has been nothing but delay, delay, delay. Subpoena his lying ass immediately.
May 11, 2007 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
And one more thing, where are all those documents you told the "Department" to turn over?! Yet another big FUCK YOU from DOJ! This is really just unbelievable.
May 11, 2007 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody needs to park themselves outside of Brad's Alexandria, VA townhouse and make sure he's on "vacation."
May 11, 2007 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
He can vacation this summer with the Iraqi Parliament.
May 11, 2007 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've never had to "prepare" to tell the truth. You only have to "prepare" if you want to try and pull off a lie. Haul his ass in on the double.
Security Code Word: again
As in here we go again.
May 11, 2007 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let him vacation inside Gitmo.
code word Expert, as in, let him become an expert in waterboarding, from the boardee's point of view.
May 11, 2007 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bushies are placed in the Federal Appellate Courts . . . regardless of what happens they will reverse all convictions of Bush Crime Family members on technicalities like they did for North etc. This is their ace in the hole . . . look at the history of how they destroyed the IranContra investigation and reversed the convictions obtained by Prosecutor Walsh . . . the entire system is rotten by the people they have placed in these "positions for life" on the Federal Bench . . . .
May 11, 2007 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like DoJ just gave Leahy a first-rate Bitch slap.
May 11, 2007 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI to all - Gonzales called Chris Cannon this morning to say thank you and solocit advice!
May 11, 2007 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI to all - Gonzales called Chris Cannon this morning to say thank you and solicit advice! Contact Cannon and see if they deny it. Or the AG's office.
May 11, 2007 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regarding technicalities in Iran/Contra, I was fried that North, Poindexter and Abrams got off, but the reason was use immunity provided by Congress. Similarly, if Monica Goodling testifies, it is doubtful that her conviction can be obtained or sustained through appeal since it is virtually impossible to prove that some of the evidence used in prosecution did not come from her own testimony. Ultimately, Congress must decide whether they want to grill 'em in front of the cameras or convict them in court. Of course, when it is the Justice Dept. itself which is rotten, where are we to go?
May 11, 2007 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the beginning, I have heard this refrain from this tumid administration: "Hell yes, I did it. What are you going to do about it?" It suffers my patience greatly that this petulant mob could ever have raised it head in this nation, and it cooks me that the wheels of justice do not turn faster, but upon reflection, think how far and against what great odds you have brought this inspiring historic revelation. The want to have it over perhaps betrays a weakness in us that only makes the way for future conspiracies. Thank God for those who cherish the everyday work of really keeping our nation secure!
May 11, 2007 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unbelivable!!!!!! Gee Sorry Internal Revenue I am on vacation that week and I won't be able to file my tax returns until I get back you don't mind do you??????
May 11, 2007 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wonder if Brad is coming back from his vacation? Any idea where he is heading? Do we have extradition?
May 11, 2007 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Grab his passport, indeed.
In all seriousness, grab his passport. This attitude indicates such a lack of respect for Leahy that he may actually know who sent anthrax to the guy.
May 11, 2007 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even if he didn't have a vacation planned, he'll certainly take one now. Perhaps he'll only leave town for a few days, but he has to make this look good.
I'm actually surprised he's agreed to appear. Of course, if Congress agree to this delay, Schlozman would still have plenty of time to change his mind.
I've another thought about Schlozman's response. Consider that Goodling first announced plans to plead the fifth, then she stayed home and burned all her vacation time, then she resigned.
Perhaps Schlozman is doing the same thing, only in reverse. He's burning all his vacation time first, after which he will announce his resignation and plans to plead the fifth.
That plan would actually make a lot more sense than Goodling's actions. Since (I believe) he's a political appointee, he could potentially be fired for refusing to testify. A strategy of burning his vacation first, then announcing plans to plead the fifth would guarantee him that final paycheck.
May 11, 2007 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Security code = door, as in, Bradley, don't let the door hit you in the ass as you go out. Once Leahy climbs back down off the ceiling, I expect a squadron of capital police helping Mr. Scholzman get his priorities right.
May 11, 2007 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know, I guess I'm in the minority here with my perception of the letter, but to me it has a glaze of groveling to it. Let the bastard go on vacation and rehearse his lies, while the Senate Judiciary Committee talks to others and prepares the Schlozman snare.
Code word - memory. Oh, that's rich.
May 12, 2007 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
It will be interesting to hear Schlozman's lawyer try that same excuse in 2009 -- when the Dems control the Justice Department and the "invitation" is to testify before a grand jury.
May 12, 2007 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Brad,
Get your f*cking ass over here or you'll be taking your vacation in jail.
Love,
The Senate Judiciary Committee
May 12, 2007 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gee is this equal justice under the law? Would you or I get to tell government officials that we dont want to answer any questions right now because we are going on vacation? I think NOT.
May 12, 2007 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
When the Republicans were all trying to save their sorry behinds in the last election, all they could talk about was voter fraud-you would have sworn that at least half of the Democratic votes in their districts were being cast by dead people and union bosses. But now that the DOJ gets a REAL chance to tell the Senate about this awful plague on our political system, and Schlozman needs two weeks of vacation. I hope Leahy cuts him a new one, it would be a hoot to see one of these low lifes hauled before the Senate in handcuffs to testify.
Security code word : where. As in "Where are all those falsified ballots we heard about?"
May 12, 2007 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Schlozman is a foool! Take it from an experienced prevaricator, best, if you lie often, to lie early.
May 12, 2007 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
What obvious creeps and criminals. I'd jail them & lead them up from their cells as they are needed.
May 12, 2007 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
federal employees get paid for their annual leave, in a lump sum, when they are terminated. If you are a CSRS employee (pre-reagan) your sick leave counts toward your retirement. If you are a FERS employee (post reagan) your sick leave doesn't matter. But you never loose your annual leave. Most employees wait to retire the last pay period of the year, so that they can receive payment for the largest amount of annual leave allowed to them for that year.
May 12, 2007 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to Watergate.
He's saying:
1. I need a month to prepare my defense.
or, perhaps
2. I am doing everything I can to gum this up and kill the clock (unfortunately, the clock may continue to tick after 2008)
May 12, 2007 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Senator Leahy is going to let this alone. He knows they are trying to tweak him. The tactic can only be successful if Leahy rises to the bait. Leahy has time on his side and will get his chance at Schlozman. The delay probably serves Leahy better than Schlozman because more information trickles in daily about this whole affair. It may be that Schlozman will take the fifth and then there will be more ammo with which to figure out how to hand this whole thing over to a special prosecutor. I don't know how that might ever work under this particular circumstance but that is where this is headed just the same. In the last six plus years the WH has seriously stacked the deck to prevent ever being held accountable for its actions and this dilemma reveals how pervasive that effort has been.
May 12, 2007 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re Iran-Contra: I thought the Iran-Contra criminals got off because of blanket immunity and that's why we wanted (and got) limited immunity for Goodling.
Code word - poison. Great, now I have an Alice Cooper song stuck in my brain.
May 12, 2007 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
We want to see the check list for acceptable reasons you need not appear.Vacation can not be realistic.
Seems if he is on vacation he is even MORE available and should have extra time to spend on this if they need him longer.
After all, we are sure he wants to get the truth out and move on.
Why would he want to delay that.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
May 12, 2007 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
When was Schlozman put on "annual leave"?
Federal D.C. closes down during the summer, not in May.
May 12, 2007 1:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's just a gambit to see how serious the Dems are.
May 12, 2007 2:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't rush things.
1) Failure, of any kind, is not accounted for in Rove's plans. The Republicans cannot change who they answer to, who gets screwed and who benefits.There was never a plan B "if people get too mad we'll make these concessions and accept partial success" Nope, as long as B and C and R are running things, the whole show goes on.
2) People are turning against the Repubs not because the Democrats have suddenly developed some new framing or rhetoric which inspires people (not that they haven't) but because people are dying, suffering and going broke. Only real suffering could induce Americans to abandon the party which promised them all those ponies, and to save all the little babies, and kill all the terrorists.
3) I wouldn't be in a hurry to solve all the Repubs problems for them. Look, let's say the Dems can send every corrupt Repub to jail, is that good? No it's terrible! Then the Repubs say "all the bad ones are in jail, so let us, the true Reagan Republicans give you all the ponies and save all the babies.
4) Look at the rhetoric and framing which brought the Repubs to the top. Anyone who accepts their worldview will only vote Dem if they feel there is a direct threat to their life and livelyhood.
5) All this could have been avoided if the Dems had simply concentrated on organising and voter registration among their natural constituency- minorities, the poor, and workers. But that would bring Dem politicians into contact with yuuchhy people, so instead they went for the "swing voters" which turned out to be the most uninformed, easily swayed by BS, petty and vindictive voters. Oh, they might vote Dem, if they thought death was the alternative, so that's what it better be.
I'm seeing Democrats trying to save the Repubs from themselves. That's real noble, but in my experience, it won't translate into votes, and if the Dems accomplish it before the next election, why should anybody vote for them?
You want proof? Go take a look at the farm couple the Guliani campaign just screwed over cause they weren't rich enough to claim they were poor. Oh, they don't like Guli any more, no. Now they like McCain! Cause, you see,Democrats are intrinsically immoral and traitorous. Again, maybe if the Repubs were killing them or their kids, they might vote Dem, but not otherwise.
If the Dems solve the Repubs problems for them, Americans will say "thank you", and then go on voting Repub! After all,"all the bad ones are gone now".
May 12, 2007 2:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
"In Cold Blood" Truman Capote weaves a complicated psychological story of two parolees who together commit a mass murder, an act they never would have been capable of individually. That's Bush and Cheney to a tee.
May 12, 2007 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gonzo first tried to give a middle finger to theSenate and House Judiciary Committees, too, saying he had better things to do with his time as AG. Then the bad stuff starting coming out about what his department was up to, and Gonzo couldn't get the committees to schedule him to appear at their hearings soon enough, presumably to answer Sampson's damaging testimony. Perhaps Schlozman will come to have similar misgivings about displaying petulance instead of a measure of respect.
May 12, 2007 3:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
The order of interrogation appearance is important, if our justice department officials are prepared to purjure themselves. He can always be called back. His testimony is based on known historical data when he was implementing the WH policy in MO. Seems the victims of the fraud accusations may have great light to shed as well as the local papers. It is time for all stakeholders to tell their stories. Perjury may carry worse penalties than manipulating the DOJ on behalf of the WH ala the Republican Carbal and the Oligarchy.
Can the Grand Conspiracy be revealed by a time line on one chart. Connect the dots. Electioneering by DOJ by order of WH can be state, local and federal election law crimes. Was RNC with the e-mail chain to the WH connected? Big Brother, like Gollum, wants to be THE permanent Lord of The Ring. It has to be made clear to world that this Cabal is a cancer on American democracy. Faith based government and justice was overturned when the American Colony dumped the the King and the Church of England. The cover of religious righteousness covers a multitude of crimes. Of course we know that the Religious Right is particularly righteous.
The Carlyle Group, after all, is the epitome of the Military Industrial Complex.
"As a Bush Cabal-connected company, it prides itself on having government/business insiders and their minions in a network that literally covers the globe. This is the hard core of the Bush Cabal
The Chairman Emeritus of Carlyle Group is Frank C. Carlucci, whose claim to fame was Deputy Secretary of Defense (1981-1982) and National Security Adviser (1987-1989). After his government stint, he headed the Sears/ Coldwell Banker scam.
law is what the Cabal claims to be fighting."
http://www.conspiracydigest.com/carlyle_group.html
Follow the appointments and understand the goal is to have the power through DOJ corruption to put Cabal serving people in strategic military places for "The New World Order" to maintain global control. The World Bank replaces the UN as the monetary wedge that will support a globilization of the FederaL Reserve. That bank set the world monetary standard based on the silver standard and can manufacture/create currency. That reduces the value of other national currencies. This policy can only be enforced by a military industrial complex.
Carlyle, in cooperation with the Saudi Royal family, manufacture heavy arms on down and distribute them, by sales, to promote global conflicts. Secret organizations, like the CIA, conveniently start the wars using their contract operatives ( Iran Contra etc.)
The Wolf wears sheeps clothing. You may not know until after you have been had.
The real job of Congress is to expose the Carbal and force them back under ground I believe.
The never ending struggle for The Rights of Man, Justice freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness as inalienable Rights must be Liberty 101 taught as continuuing education. A never ending learning process as new minds are born the education process repeats. Some people are willing to endure tyranny I am not one. Let's hope we can reinfect American with freedom. Seems like mob rule by the Godfathers.
May 12, 2007 3:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see the sent the letter on friday, he starts his vacation monday, guess which week he planned to be out of town.
May 12, 2007 3:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems like you wouldn't need so much prep time if you were just telling the truth instead of practicing to say things like "I take full responsibility but I don't know how the names got on the list". I can't wait to hear what kinds of crap they teach him to say to avoid more trouble.
I agree that Sen. Leahy should send a letter telling him to cancel vacation and show up or he will be in jail in the foreseeable future.
May 12, 2007 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This, along with Rice's refusal to comply with a subpoena, Gonzales smirkingly delivering hours of repetitive "I don't recall" "testimony", Paul Wolfowitz hanging on by his fingernails, the refusal to turn over RNC emails is a very calculated, deliberate, flagrant nose-thumbing at Congress. And if the Democrats roll over, the precedent's been set, and they'll be permanently defanged.
They have the power to have the Sergeant-at-arms show up with cuffs to haul this gang of assholes in; why do they keep acting like wimps on this?
May 12, 2007 6:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "instant subpoena" suggested in a previous comment is an excellent idea. Schlozman would not be missed for a few hours any more than you or I would be missed. The committee should clear their calendar and have him picked up on the street (rendition style).
Schlozman should not be provided the opportunity to prepare for his testimony. It is likely that he will be coached as well.
AMERICAN'S WANT THE TRUTH! This administration is dirty and people such as Schlozman, Griffin, Gonzales, Goodling, Sampson, Battles, Spellings, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Brown, Cunningham, Lewis, Dolittle, Foggo, Lewis, Domenici, Palouse, Blackwell, Cheney, Fieth, Wolfowitz, Abramoff, Delay, Ney, BUSH41, Doane, Rove, Stevens - do you get the idea - are selling out our nation.
May 12, 2007 7:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is the problem with "inviting" witnesses to appear and the democrats should realize that this will become a constant refrain from Bushies called to testify. They can't issue a subpoena now because there are likely some type of timing requirements. They should just take this tactic to heed and subpoena every single Bush administration witness called to testify. If the Bushies want to play game, the dems should use their power to ram the investigations down their fucking throats.
May 12, 2007 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Time for Congress to hit the spittoon from the other side of the saloon.
What a vivid sentence, I can almost see the astonishment on the faces of the pedestrian republican spitters.
May 12, 2007 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leahy has played nice. Time to change the rules. Don't invite; subpoena.
May 12, 2007 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink