« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Voter Suppression Showdown, Round 2: Von Spakovsky
Following Bradley Schlozman's memorable performance before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, former senior Civil Rights Division higher-up Hans von Spakovsky will be appearing before the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration tomorrow. The occasion is a confirmation hearing for a spot as commissioner at the Federal Elections Commission, but the senators (the committee is chaired by U.S. attorney firing bloodhound Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is a member) are sure to spend plenty of time grilling von Spakovsky about his past at the Justice Department.
A group of former voting rights attorneys in the Division put it most succinctly in a letter to Sen. Feinstein yesterday urging rejection of his nomination: von Spakovsky was "the point person for undermining the Civil Rights Division's mandate to protect voting rights." Von Spakovsky reported to Schlozman, and the two worked together to purge voters from the rolls, ensure that voter ID laws were approved with no fuss, and punish lawyers who did not toe the line.
But while Schlozman was the enforcer, von Spakovsky seems to have been the brains of the operation. Von Spakovsky, unlike Schlozman, had a background in election law and had been pushing the voter fraud canard for years -- to great effect.
Here's Jeffrey Toobin writing in The New Yorker way back in September, 2004 about von Spakovsky's voter fraud pedigree:
Von Spakovsky, a longtime activist in the voting-integrity cause, has emerged as the Administration's chief operative on voting rights. Before going to Washington, he was a lawyer in private practice and a Republican appointee to the Fulton County Registration and Election Board, which runs elections in Atlanta. He belonged to the Federalist Society, a prominent organization of conservative lawyers, and had also joined the board of advisers of a lesser-known group called the Voting Integrity Project.The V.I.P. was founded by Deborah Phillips, a former county official of the Virginia Republican Party, as an organization devoted principally to fighting voting fraud and promoting voter education. In 1997, von Spakovsky wrote an article for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, a conservative research group, that called for an aggressive campaign to "purge" the election rolls of felons. Within months of that article's publication, the V.I.P. helped put von Spakovsky's idea into action. Phillips met with the company that designed the process for the removal of alleged felons from the voting rolls in Florida, a process that led, notoriously, to the mistaken disenfranchisement of thousands of voters, most of them Democratic, before the 2000 election.
Not surprisingly, von Spakovsky delivered once at the Justice Department. As the former voting section attorneys argue in their letter, von Spakovsky attempted to force widespread purging of voter rolls based on a very restrictive reading of election law (which von Spakovsky knew inside and out, since he helped draft the Help America Vote Act). "For example," the lawyers write, "in one letter, he advocated for a policy keeping eligible citizens off the voter rolls for typos and other mistakes by election officials." And as McClatchy detailed last month, he extended his activities to making sure the Election Assistance Commission, a tiny agency that serves as the government's election information clearinghouse, published research that conformed to the voter-fraud orthodoxy. He was a busy man.
We'll be providing updates during the hearing tomorrow.
Note: Here's the Campaign Legal Center on von Spakovsky's career at the FEC so far -- he was installed by a recess appointment in December of 2005.





With a name like his, he should be a spy -- or at least an actor who plays one on TV. He's wasting a cool name hangin' with bozos like the Busheviks.
June 12, 2007 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's guess: he'll say "I don't recall" mulitple times, he'll say he was taking direction from someone else (but he can't remember who) and he'll lie repeatedly. Later he may correct some of his statments in written responses.
Next.
June 12, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Paul, Go over to the Truthout website and listen to Jason Leopold's John McKay internview (link below).
Early on, McKay talks about Schlozman supervising the submittal of a number of voter fraud cases to a grand jury which returned indictments. McKay says that a US district judge threw the indictments out.
McKay on Schlozman's indictments - "Very disturbing" and "very unusual circumstances."
Who did Schlozman target?
As far as Hans von Spakovsky, somebody should ask him about his contact with Mark "Thor" Hearne, Pat Rogers, Jason Torchinsky, Dale Oldham and anyone else associated with the American Center for Voting Rights and the Free Enterprise Coalition.
June 12, 2007 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me, or do all the so-called "men" who do the dirty work for this administration all look like pale-skinned, weak-willed, no chin weasels who never venture out of their windowless basement offices? I bet they all have sweaty palms too. They make my skin crawl, every last one of them.
June 12, 2007 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy has been running around wreaking havoc for much too long. I'm sure the MSM will ignore this hearing, too. It's much too complicated an issue for their viewers. Or so they say.
What really pisses me off, though, is that he helped engineer the election fraud in Florida in 2000. And then, as a result of that mess, he was allowed to screw things up even more with HAVA. That's one thing that everyone has a right to be pissed off at the Democrats in Congress for. They completely ignored what was being done to our electoral system under the guise of 'helping America vote'. I'm sure most of them still don't have a clue what happened in the '00 and '04 elections. How can someone be so damned stupid and still think they deserve to hold high public office?
June 12, 2007 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
GSC, If you want to see a couple of "Ugly American" photos, take a look at the ones in this 4/05 DOJ Anti-Trafficking News Bulletin that I linked to below - see p.2.
June 12, 2007 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
@Mrs. P:
Anne Estrada looks better suited to be a lunch lady rather than a DHS official.
June 12, 2007 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
He looks like he lost his gonads while drinking the KoolAid, too which means he'll probably have that weird high-pitched voice all the other liars have had.
June 12, 2007 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
C 92, Take a look at the photo in the August 2005 DOJ Anti-Trafficking News Bulletin. Which is worse? Schlozman dressed up or Schlozman dressed down?
The idea that the obnoxious prick was globetrotting at taxpayer expense in the name of human rights is revolting. A year later, Schlozman was working his ass off to discredit and destroy an organization that helps poor people.
A pox on Schlozman's house!
June 12, 2007 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Schlozman, von Spavosky - what is it with people with names like that that they are so anxious to undermine the rights of people who aren't lily-white? Just asking...
June 12, 2007 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyday, it is a new guy, another agency, another underhanded unethical breach of office by this crowd. Is there even one honest employee in this Administration? For anyone to still support the GOP, you have had to had a labotomy or be truly evil.
June 12, 2007 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy is a republican hit man for the party. His main goal has been to suppress the Democratic vote and he should have nothing to do with the Federal Elections Commission (whose future plan is to become the permanent deciders of contested elections). He's a champion of a problem that doesn't exist but which can be used to prevent people from voting.
Even his contemporaries are warning us because they feel compelled to alert us. No way he gets on that commission.
June 12, 2007 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm really glad you're going to be providing updates to his confirmation hearing 'cuz I suspect that his voice is likely to be even worse than Braaaadley's and I don't think my ears can take another beating like that one. Thanks for your service!!
June 12, 2007 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy is a republican hit man for the party. His main goal has been to suppress the Democratic vote and he should have nothing to do with the Federal Elections Commission (whose future plan is to become the permanent deciders of contested elections). He's a champion of a problem that doesn't exist but which can be used to prevent people from voting.
Even his contemporaries are warning us because they feel compelled to alert us. No way he gets on that commission.
June 12, 2007 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope that someone is prepping the Senators to do a better and more focused job of questioning than I've heard in any of these hearings thus far. They're using way too much time to make pronouncements instead of digging for info and bringing out the hypocrisy, inconsistency, illegality and whatever else is going on.
June 12, 2007 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a dream.........
Snozzleman ( whatever) is taped on MSNBC's Predator show...
Sampson shows up on a milk carton.
June 12, 2007 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lets see if the Democratic Senators have a pair.
June 12, 2007 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anybody know what time the hearing tomorrow starts?
June 12, 2007 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you can watch the hearing by clicking the RealAudio icon at this web page:
http://rules.senate.gov/hearings/2007/061307hrg.htm
June 13, 2007 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will von Spakovsky's hackery be even more hacktacular than Schlozman's Pinocchioid schnoz?
SC: shame
June 13, 2007 2:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
To all the whiners out there in progressive Blogland - including the Republicant Trolls ( 741 Day are you still "out " lurking for Turd Blossom ?) Be still and know that the Democrats in the hearings are asking questions that already have been answered- Donsanto for example has already been deposed by the Dem's Hill Staffers . Do you whiners really believe that Mr Leopold could interview Mr McKay without Mr McKay having been interviewed by the Hill Staffers?
Recall that Griles and several other GOP operatives have appeared for hearings and then later been indicted and pled guilty .
PayBack is coming for the Brook Btothers Brownshirts make no mistake . Do not be "misunderestimating", Leahy & Conyers et al.
And 741 Day you might also be thinking about getting your deposition in too...
June 13, 2007 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, whoopee! Another of the endless supply of Bush appointees who believe that support of the Republican Party supersedes that quaint oath to defend the Constitution.
I hope Senator Whitehouse is on the panel; he seems to be the most effective at getting to the short weeds and forcing answers from the unwilling.
SC: Polish, as in "Polish up the rules on impeaching Cabinet officers for dereliction of duty."
June 13, 2007 5:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
For "felon" read "black". These are the same old hardline segregationists -- but dressed in suits and ties because they learned the white robes and pointy hats teneded to alienate the sane.
They, and the Federalist Society, are essentially refighting the Civil War, but this time via stealth within the system. If ever there's an opportunity to attack civil rights laws -- as, for example, "extra rights" and "race-based" -- they do so.
And they have no qualms about undermining the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which they intend to repeal when they have sufficient co-segregationists appointed to the Judiciary.
And repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which is the foundation for an array of civil rights protections.
Their's also the ultimate in class warfare; and they are extremely skilled at divide-and-conquer on racist grounds in advancing their classism.
They are the Tories who lost the "revolution" -- and they haven't forgot that fact either.
If politics were entirely straight in this country, they and ther adherents would be incarcerated in looney bins and prisons.
June 13, 2007 6:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
". . . . That's one thing that everyone has a right to be pissed off at the Democrats in Congress for. They completely ignored what was being done to our electoral system under the guise of 'helping America vote'. I'm sure most of them still don't have a clue what happened in the '00 and '04 elections. How can someone be so damned stupid and still think they deserve to hold high public office?"
Have you _EVIDENCE_ for any of those assertions? I knew you didn't.
Pro-Bushit troll.
"Posted by: chimpeach
Date: June 12, 2007 05:57 PM"
June 13, 2007 7:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hans von Spakovsky - that name is too good to be true--it's got to be made up. Judging from his picture, I'm guessing his real name is Howdy Doody.
June 13, 2007 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hans needs some groovy Lennon glasses and then he needs to grow out his soul patch.
Hey Hans, It's all good. Tell your story and go spend some quality time with your family.
June 13, 2007 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought his job was to purge felons from the voting roles. I am not an expert on voting laws, but I seem to recall that convicted felons cannot vote.
So is the problem here that he was effective in permittting only legal registered voters cast ballots?
Are you really complaining that some one finally began an effective effort to curtail voter fraud?
Or are you just upset that without fraudulent votes in your pocket its harder to win elections?
As for being a member of the federalist society, the analogue on the left would be the ACLU. Being an attorney for that oranization did not stop Ruth Bader Ginsburg from appointment and confirmation despite what may be viewed as her "out of main stream" views and rulings.
I am not some brown-shirted brooks brothers guy, but really come on save your hate for something that matters like the Yankees.
June 13, 2007 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I thought his job was to purge felons from the voting roles. I am not an expert on voting laws, but I seem to recall that convicted felons cannot vote."
Tim Griffin ran a program to mail letters to the home addresses of black Americans serving in Iraq, and if they failed to respond within a short time period, purged them from the voter rolls. Would you care to defend this as an honest effort to increase the integrity of the election process, or do you recognize it as blatant and criminal election tampering?
These felon-purge efforts were equally dishonest. Witness Florida in 2000: the "felon problem" was used as a pretext to "accidentally" purge many thousands of voters with similar names, most of whom of course happened to be members of ethnic groups and/or communities that traditionally vote Democratic.
Code "wrong," as in, if you think any of these Repuke operatives have any interest in free and fair elections, you're "wrong."
June 13, 2007 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
TexasEllen, unfortunately Whitehouse isn't on the committee, but Patty Murray is and Feinstein's the Chairwoman. Those west coast gals know how to ask them too.
Something that's been nagging me about this whole issue is a glimpse of memory that Chief Justice Roberts was on the Bush Team of lawyers in Florida to contest the 2000 election results. Now I'm seeing Von Spaksky was involved in that too? Am I recalling correctly about Roberts? His wiki bio leaves that out. But was with Hogan & Hartson at the time. Then he was confirmed on the DC Circuit Court in June 2003 before his nomination to the SCOTUS.
Wonder if he's been using any RNC email?
June 13, 2007 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
'he'll probably have that weird high-pitched voice all the other liars have had.'
Helium addiction is an awful thing...
June 13, 2007 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
'I am not an expert on voting laws, but I seem to recall that convicted felons cannot vote.'
ONLY IN SOME STATES!
And it wasn't just the felons who were purged, it was anyone of color who might share their name.
As long as you cover up the lie with a bit of truth, you can continue to convince yourself of your delusions.
Weigh the whole truth, not just the pieces you prefer. There are so many holes in your perspective, it reeks of blind loyalty and shameful acquiescence.
Another BushCo apologist, running out of wriggle room and lame excuses...
June 13, 2007 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not one to post anonymously, I should mention that last post was mine...
JEP
June 13, 2007 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
AH HA another "I don't remember defense"!
June 13, 2007 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
"As for being a member of the federalist society, the analogue on the left would be the ACLU."
False. The ACLU's "client" is the Bill of Rights. The Federalist Society's "client" is the anti-Feralist view -- the view that opposed ratification of the Constitution -- and _LOST THE ARGUMENT_.
The Federalist Society's "client" is "states' rights" -- along with the Neo-Confereates and the KKK.
"Being an attorney for that oranization did not stop Ruth Bader Ginsburg from appointment and confirmation despite what may be viewed as her "out of main stream" views and rulings."
It is you who is "out of the mainstream" -- not the vast majority of moderates wtih whom Ginsberg's views comport.
It is you who is the extremist -- especially as revealed by your wingnut characterization of the ACLU and your defense of the fraudulent Federalist Society.
Not-so-by-the-way: Chief Justice Roberts has an excellent memory -- except he can't quite recall whether he was/is a member of the Federalist Society -- even though he only need read their membership list to refresh his memory.
The word for such individual? LIAR.
And that is the "cahracter" of the Federalist Society.
Another member? Crackpot Robert Bork.
Another? Scalia, who, unprecedented, unconstitutionally intervened in the 2000 election to halt the vanishing of Bushit's inconsequential "lead" in the yet-to-be-completed vote counting.
"I am not some brown-shirted brooks brothers guy, but really come on save your hate for something that matters like the Yankees."
You may not wear a brownshit on your body, but it is clearly the clothing of your mind.
Party-before-country is treason. That's a might worse than being a brownshirt.
"Posted by: John Galt
Date: June 13, 2007 09:48 AM"
June 13, 2007 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Deborah Phillips was the front person for VIP, but Helen Blackwell was behind it. Helen Blackwell, wife of Morton Blackwell, Karl Rove's mentor and predecessor at the College Republicans.
To the extent VIP was involved in the Florida Voter Purge, they were a front organization for Karl Rove. The same scheme was tried (and foiled) in Texas, in 1982 -- a scheme whose intended beneficiary was another Texas Governor, and client of Karl Rove.
The Florida Voter Purge was put in motion no later than the summer of 1998, with the secret insertion of language into a bill by Tom Feeney, then speaker of the Florida House. Tom Feeney, who was the Lt Governor candidate in Jeb Bush's failed 1994 campaign.
See "The Texas Blueprint for the Stolen Election" for additional details.
www.democrats.com/blueprint
June 13, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is why I miss honest supremacists like the Nazis. They were willing to risk genuine pain and death in a trial by combat for their self-serving ideology. Now it's all chickenhawks who want to leave blacks with the illusion of a voice in the government because they're too cowardly to repeal the 13th Amendment and have to face a race war. Having perfected these right-biased techniques, they've exported them to the Ukraine, Bolivia (since corrected), Mexico, and perhaps half the countries in Eastern Europe, to create "democracy" in which voters get nothing but what America wants. They lust after global empire but are too cowardly to join the Army and kill for it with their bare hands.
June 14, 2007 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink