« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
FBI, DOJ Announce New Civil-Liberties Safeguards
Ever since a March report by the Justice Department's inspector general highlighted mistakes made by the FBI in obtaining e-mail and financial records without a court order -- through what's known as a National Security Letter -- Bureau and DOJ officials have pledged to establish institutional safeguards against further abuse.
Today Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller announced that attorneys will form an oversight office within DOJ's National Security Division to examine "all aspects of the FBI's national security program for compliance with laws, regulations, and guidelines," according to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth L. Wainstein. Additionally, FBI will create an integrity and compliance office for internal policing over all FBI activities, which a DOJ announcement terms a "substantial innovation."
Time and further scrutiny will tell how exactly this will all work -- to say nothing of how well -- but Wainstein termed the move "historic." One question: will there be an office in place to ensure that Gonzales reads reports he receives about FBI abuse?
Additionally, in a letter to Vice President Dick Cheney and congressional leaders, Mueller and Gonzales noted that the FBI has just completed a "historical audit of the FBI's use of NSLs in all 56 field offices." The two say that it largely confirms the inspector generals' findings. We'll bring you the report as soon as we have it.













Thats like Hitler saying he's going to honor Poland's borders. Who'd believe him?
Oh...I forgot, Jake would.
July 13, 2007 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whew!
Good. Now I feel much better. We can all go home and crack open a beer, and relax, knowing that there's an invisible, internal "oversight office within DOJ's National Security Division".
Now I can get some sleep and no be scared sh**less that a bunch of pompus, moronic, hillbilly, jesus-freaks are running the government and DOJ.
This secret, unaccountable, internal solution is just what we've all been waiting for.
What was the date for razing Washington DC again?
July 13, 2007 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me, but I fail to take any solace in the fact that these people will ensure "compliance with laws, regulations, and guidelines" when these people continually insist that "laws, regulations, and guidelines" mean what they themselves say they mean at any given time, on an ad hoc basis, according to their own whims and motives.
July 13, 2007 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whaaaat?
"in a letter to Vice President Dick Cheney and congressional leaders"
What's wrong with this picture?
July 13, 2007 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, Alberto, your credibility is shot--why should We The People believe you when you've already been caught lying to Congress about this same subject?
July 13, 2007 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is taught as fact at the US Army Management Staff College that internal investigations will always return the result desired by the official who initiates the investigation.
Not that that's news to anyone who is paying attention, but given that our government teaches this to its own senior staff and given this administration's conduct thus far, it is difficult to believe that this new oversight office is anything except abject treachery designed to strengthen and hide the abuses.
July 13, 2007 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everybody above beat me to all the good snarky comebacks, oh well...
So, how about this one? It's kind of like Jeffrey Dahmer declaring he's gone vegan.
Equally believable.
July 13, 2007 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the compliance is handled in the same manner as the requirement that the office of the VP handle national security information correctly.
On the other hand, handling the information in an organized and auditable manner can at least provide a basis for assessing damages to US national security if an investigator from the CIA, DIA, Treasury secret service, DOJ, or DOS inadverttantly initiates an investigation into an investigator of another agency where credentialing information was not shared, or where a foreign national intentionally as an act of a foreign nation state uses the institutions with these powers to hinder, harrass, or obstruct in an intentional manner the lawful activities of a US citizen.
Imagine the debacle of the FBI harrasing a political assylum individual granted protection by the CIA or DIA as a retaliatory act of a foreign government, or a rogue element within that government by the FBI?
While it is not too late to put some adults in charge, the abuses that are pre-existing need to be handled with NSL's where the FBI admidts damages made, makes payments of damages, and seals that settlement in accordance with NARA guidlines and an eventual records disposition to unclassified.
see a very brief abstract here:
Vice President Dick Cheney and congressional Democrats are sparring over the vice president's refusal to comply with a 2003 presidential executive order that requires all agencies and the executive branch to protect classified material.
The skirmish is the latest in a long battle between Congress and the Bush White House -- particularly Cheney's office -- over the administration's campaign to expand the powers of the executive branch and increase the amount of information labeled as classified.
In a letter to Cheney on Thursday, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., questioned ''both the legality and wisdom'' of the vice president claiming an exemption from the order, noting recent controversies involving members of Cheney's staff and classified information.
Former Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis ''Scooter'' Libby was convicted in March of perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with a federal investigation into the identification, in a leak to the media, of CIA undercover operative Valerie Plame.
(what the fvck is this???????)
In May 2006, Leandro Aragoncillo, an aide in the vice president's office, admitted in federal court that he stole classified U.S. intelligence information and passed it on to officials plotting a coup in the Philippines.
http://www.miamiherald.com/509/story/147580.html
July 13, 2007 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Presumably, this letter was directed to Mr. Cheney as president of the Senate and not as head of state.
July 13, 2007 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you see the report, I'd like to know if the IG made recommendations that these offices be formed up? Or, are these offices an attempt to make IG functions more difficult, or to replace IG function altogether. To trust DOJ or specifically FBI to control themselves regarding NSLs (or anything else, for that matter) is foolhardy.
July 13, 2007 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
And in the intervening four months a lot was coverd up? I'd say obstruction here should be investigated as well...
July 13, 2007 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is anyone keeping a list of all the investigations and internally appointed insspectors that Bush. Co. has
created?
Like a black hole, ain't it?
July 13, 2007 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
casual observer
'oversight office within DOJ's National Security Division'
see my post above.............
ohh to be sure that now the majority of congress voted to limit the war effort.. they are all related to or members of a group opposing the war.....
really there was some major fvck-ups
even if it is just a means to cover-up there at least is an auditable means to survey injection methods and practices and an assesment of damages...
and where applicable the NID should review the findings of an appointed cross-referencing with names ommitted case management database
sec code 'nation' as in it deserves better management than koolaid slogans
July 13, 2007 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
These guys cannot be trusted. It doesn't matter what they say anymore, they are just trying to by time while the hatch some other hefarious plot.
July 13, 2007 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody believe it? Coming from these peops? ???
July 13, 2007 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The timing of this is in a word, interesting. Given the fact that just two days ago the revelation occurred that we now have documented evidence that Alberto Gonzales lied to congress about this very subject. It is all so juvenile.
July 13, 2007 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Giggle, snort.
July 14, 2007 7:00 AM | Reply | Permalink