White House: “Equal Justice?”Sometimes it’s just too easy. From this afternoon’s White House press briefing:
Q Scott, is Scooter Libby getting more than equal justice under the law? Is he getting special treatment?MR. STANZEL: Well, I guess I don’t know what you mean by “equal justice under the law.” But this is a unique case, there’s no doubt about that. And we have said that there are a lot of people on all sides of this issue who’ve made good points. The President took a very measured approach to it. He believed that the jury verdict should be respected and — but he did feel that the sentence was excessive, in terms of jail time. But this is a unique case, and there’s no doubt about that.
More below….
From the briefing:
Q Scott, why, if the President thought the sentence was excessive, why didn’t he simply reduce it? Why do away with the entire sentence?MR. STANZEL: Well, I think the President thought that the penalty — the fine, the probation, the felony charge — were all very significant penalties. And so that’s why — I’m not going to get into a gaming out of whether zero to 30 and somewhere in there was — is the right place, but the President thought that the fine was excessive — or the jail time was excessive, and that’s why he commuted the sentence.
Q Even one day would have been considered excessive?
MR. STANZEL: The President commuted the entire sentence.
Q So a single day in jail for lying and obstructing justice, in a federal case, is excessive?
MR. STANZEL: The President believed that 30 months, the sentence that was given — one day wasn’t given, 30 months was.
Q Right, but it’s not the 30 months that he thought was excessive, it was the entire sentence.
MR. STANZEL: It was the —
Q — any time in jail.
MR. STANZEL: He commuted the 30-month sentence. So what the President believed was 30 months was excessive, and he respected the jury verdict, and the jury verdict also put in place — found Mr. Libby guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice, which are serious charges, and those are addressed by the $250,000 fine and the probation and the felony charge.
Q Can you tell us if reducing the sentence was even considered?
MR. STANZEL: I’m not going to even speculate about internal deliberations. So the President made very clear his views in the two-page statement and in his comments the next day.