« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Did Allawi Break The Law?
Yesterday we raised an eyebrow at Ayad Allawi's Sunday statement that he's "not party to the exact amount" of his lucrative lobbying contract with GOP power-firm Barbour Griffith Rogers. Now, Christina Davidson of IraqSlogger, who broke the story in the first place, adds an interesting wrinkle: If Allawi is, as he said on Sunday, getting his money from an anonymous "supporter," he's legally obligated to disclose his benefactor's identity.
Watching Allawi's interview with Wolf Blitzer, it seems that Allawi only mentioned his patron as a way of dispensing with a distraction from his core message that he has a "six-point plan" to save Iraq. But that admission comes with a host of legal complications, Davidson writes, if Allawi and BGR want to stay on the right side of the Foreign Assets Registration Act.
FARA requires persons representing foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to publicly disclose their relationship, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of activities on behalf of that principal.In filing papers with the Department of Justice, required for compliance with FARA, BGR's Dan Murphy registered Allawi as the sole foreign principal the firm would be representing, checking of the appropriate box to confirm that he was not being “financed by a foreign government, foreign political party, or other foreign principal.” If an Iraqi is indeed paying for Allawi’s US activities, BGR is required by law to disclose the identity of the financier.
Looks like we might be step closer to learning where Allawi's money is coming from -- whether from former Defense Minister (and probable crook) Hazem Shaalan; from Mashal Nawab, who paid for Allawi's last lobbying contract in Washington; or someone else.





What if it's not a foreign, but American source that's providing funding?
August 29, 2007 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is the CIA. Directly or indirectly.
August 29, 2007 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure the DOJ will get right on enforcing that law. Last I checked Gonzales was still in charge.
August 29, 2007 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
What if it's not a foreign, but American source providing the funding?
August 29, 2007 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
jason, note that Allawi describes his backer as an "Iraqi person".
From the Iraq Slogger link:
“Because of the crucial role of the United States, we are asking this firm to help us to advocate our views, the views of the nationalistic Iraqis, the non-sectarian Iraqis. And I assure you, Wolf, that this payment is made by an Iraqi person who was a supporter of us, of the INA, of myself, of our program, and he has supported this wholeheartedly, without any strings attached.”
August 29, 2007 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
CIA + Iraqi intelligence? And, if you think about it, we haven't a clue where all their money comes from...
August 29, 2007 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Allawi doesn't know how much money has been spent on the contract, then he probably doesn't even know where it all comes from. My bet is on neo-con money.
August 29, 2007 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Allawi doesn't even know how much money is involved, I bet he doesn't know where it's all coming from, so his claims that it's Iraqi money could be incomplete or wrong. I say a lot of it is neo-con money.
August 29, 2007 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe we'll find out where that missing 8 or 9 billion went as well.
August 29, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Crust,
Just because Allawi describes his money man as an "Iraqi", doesn't make it the truth. Allawi is an original Iraqi Bushie, so he should know all the tricks to distort and mislead. A real possibility is that Allawi is funded, whether directly or through Iraqi middlemen, by CIA money or whatever organization that Cheney uses these days.
August 29, 2007 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
He kind of looks like Tony Soprano,don't you think?
August 29, 2007 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink