TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Contempt of Congress: What's Next?

In the heat of the summer, it seemed inevitable that the White House and Congress were destined to clash in court over a number of subpoenas, most relating to the U.S. attorney firings investigation. But that's appearing less and less likely.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has been warning since the beginning of the week that the confirmation of Michael Mukasey as attorney general depended on the White House turning over certain "information."

Leahy has been uncharacteristically vague about just what "information" that might be, as the negotiations are ongoing, but there are a number of outstanding requests that Leahy might have in mind. Below is our accounting of where those many requests, along with those from Leahy's House counterpart, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), stand. It's also a reminder of the many loose ends that remain in the U.S. attorney firings probe.

Chief among the so-far-stonewalled requests are documents relating to the administration's warrantless surveillance program. Leahy, along with House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), has been seeking documents concerning the legal basis for the program since the beginning of the year. The requests cover the entire history of the program, back to 2001, and including the infamous Comey/Gonzales showdown in John Ashcroft's hospital room. After being rebuffed by the Justice Department, Leahy finally issued a subpoena to the White House, DoJ, the Office of the Vice President, and the National Security Council in late June. Since then, the administration has repeatedly asked for more time, even missing Leahy's extended deadline August 20th.

But what the White House has not said (yet) is no. So when Leahy refers to information that he hopes to acquire, he's likely referring to these documents.

On the other hand, Leahy and Conyers have gotten a whole series of "No"s in the course of their investigation of the U.S. attorney firings.

Leahy and Conyers say that their investigation now points squarely at the White House, since nobody at the Department has taken responsibility for selecting which prosecutors were fired. But the White House has claimed executive privilege for all correspondence (both internal and external) that Congress is seeking; prevented two of Karl Rove's aides, Scott Jennings and Sara Taylor, from testifying about internal White House discussions; and asserted that Karl Rove and former White House counsel Harriet Miers did not have to respond to the subpoenas at all. The White House has also indicated that it would assert executive privilege for White House staffers' emails, even if those staffers were using their Republican National Committee email addresses -- a number of Karl Rove's aides, remember, mostly used RNC addresses for White House business.

Here's where all that stands:

-- The Senate Judiciary Committee has yet to vote on whether to cite Karl Rove in contempt, a likely next step. Leahy has been clear that Rove's departure last month (after he defied a committee subpoena by not showing August 2nd) won't change the committee's pursuit of his testimony.

-- In late July, the House Judiciary Committee passed contempt resolutions against Miers and White House chief of staff Josh Bolten for not providing the documents. Both were subpoenaed, neither deigned to respond, except to say that they didn't have to respond. The next step is for the full House to vote on the resolutions, but there are indications that the Democratic leadership is less than eager to do so, postponing any vote to late September, and possibly October. One gets the impression that it's not clear if there will ever be a vote.

-- Both of Rove's former aides, Scott Jennings (who remains at the White House) and Sara Taylor, (who left this spring) testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee, but refused to discuss internal deliberations based on the White House's assertion of privilege. The hearings, as a result, were underwhelming. Leahy has publicly said that he's still considering citing both aides with contempt.

-- Conyers has been engaged in an extended back and forth with the RNC for White House staffers' emails since the spring. Back in April, the White House claimed "a clear and indisputable Executive Branch interest" in the emails and requested that the RNC turn them over before passing any on to Congress. Since then, Conyers issued a subpoena, the deadline for which passed July 31st. The RNC has still refused to comply due to "instructions" from the White House. And although Conyers has threatened to find the RNC chairman in contempt for withholding the documents (the instructions of the White House not being legally binding), there's been no indication that he will take that step imminently -- especially since the Democratic leadership appears uneager to force a vote on his committee's prior contempt citations against Miers and Bolten.


38 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

OT, but Jena's about to explode..

They refused to bive bond to the one incarcarated student, and the are arresting the res of them.

This is a republican ploy, excuse my prejudice.

They need this to foment their old southern rdneck base.

Call me paranoid, and I will thank you for the compliment...

user-pic

I don't see how Leahy will find time. He's busy registering his outrage over the Move On ad.

user-pic

presto! if you ignore the constitution, it goes away.

user-pic

I don't see how Leahy will find time. He's busy registering his outrage over the Move On ad.

user-pic

Contempt? This is madness!

No, fascists, THIS IS AMERICA!

user-pic

It would be nice if the poor bastards who were sold ARMs by predatory lenders could catch the kind of breaks when their rate resets and they miss a payment as the WH crooks get when they ignore subpoenas.

user-pic

With the same Nixon people back in the White House, why should it be a surprise that the same cat-n-mouse cover-up stuff is back... except they are getting more evasive and harder to catch. Will they be back? Will there be another GOP administration even more elusive and damaging to the founding principles and democratic values?

user-pic

What's holding Leahy up? These Gonzo bozos should be sitting in a jail cell until they agree at least to come before the committee and assert their claim of executive privilege or take the fifth. Then we'll see who understands the powers given the Congress by the Constitution.

user-pic

What's holding Leahy up? These Gonzo bozos should be sitting in a jail cell until they agree at least to come before the committee and assert their claim of executive privilege or take the fifth. Then we'll see who understands the powers given the Congress by the Constitution.

user-pic

What's holding Leahy up? These Gonzo bozos should be sitting in a jail cell until they agree at least to come before the committee and assert their claim of executive privilege or take the fifth. Then we'll see who understands the powers given the Congress by the Constitution.

user-pic

What is it with the Democratic leadership? Wasn't this supposed to be the OVERSIGHT Congress?

Spineless.

user-pic

Well, yeah, it is the "OVERSIGHT Congress. "Like, "Gee, we missed that, I guess it was an oversight."

user-pic

Leahy is looking at my allegations detailed in my 47 page US DOJ OIG Complaint that was mentioned in my ten page letter to Senator Charles Grassley.

This letter led to the outing of The NSA TSP three weeks later.

Dumsfield and Cheney then coordinated with Sioux Falls, SD, FBI counter intel special agent STEVEN PLUTA TO surgically install an RFID Verichip used in Pluta's unconstitutional "counterinteligence subliminal debriefing" of a US Senate Judiciary Committee witness named Thomas S. Bean.

This chip was identified on the x rays by Sioux Falls Doctors CHAD CARDA and JENNIFER BURGER. Both doctors are on tape "colluding together" to hide the x rays from me.

I then wrote a South Dakota Medical Board complaint detailing my allegations.

My DOJ OIG complaint was obstructed by DOJ HQ and has not been investigated by The US Senate Judiciary Committee yet.

The complaint mentions the three murders of three south dakotans tied to me and my complaint.

The murder of Yankton, SD, PD SGT MARK DEFENBAUGH was covered up and obstructed when Defenbaugh's friend, SD HIGHWAY PATROL CAPTAIN JEFF TALBOT'S MURDER INVESTIGATION WAS DERAILED BY SD ATTY GENERAL LARRY LONG, SD HWP, SIOUX FALLS FBI, AND SD US ATTORNEYS.

Jeff Talbot resigned in disgust and threw his badge on the colonel's desk. He no bitterly teaches police science at ITT Tech in Sioux Falls.

My DOJ OIG Complaint also mentions the murder of SD Senator Tom Daschle's ex chief of staff RICHARD GORDON, brother of my known associate DR. MARK GORDON (who was a Minneapolis FBI cooperating witness when he was targeted by the NSA TSP who fried mark in his home with a directed energy weapon to induce a brain tumor like his brother Rich died from).

Mark was also monitored in his home with a pinhole spy camera installed by the NSA TSP contractors. THAT'S WHY MINNESOTA US ATTORNEY THOMAS HEFFLEFINGER RESIGNED IN DISGUST: his prosecution of the NSA TSP was obstructed.

When I sent that to Senators Pat Leahy and Chuck Schumer....they used it to get Gonzalez to finally resign.

THAT'S WHAT LEAHY IS SEEKING IN HIS SUBPOENAS. HE WANTS TO KNOW HOW RICH AND MARK GORDON ARE CONSIDERED TERRORISTS TO TEST CHENEY'S JUSTIFICATION FOR DEPLOYING THE NSA TSP IN A POLITICALLY BIASED WAY.

user-pic

Correct me if I'm wrong but if these subpeonas get thrown into court as the Bushies would like then they not only get to run out the clock but the Bush Supreme Court will eventually cement Cheney's unitary executive theories into law.

If I'm right then there's no way to win this battle.

user-pic

It seems the White House doesn't fear taking these issues to the courts as the democrats seem to. If the case against Bush is that weak, then the democrats (afraid that the entire mess will end up as election issues) need to just drop everything where it is.

But if the democrats are too weak to do this, they too (just like the republicans) have no business running the country.

Saddly, Americans are stuck with both partys. Alas.

You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

user-pic

anon wrote on September 21, 2007 3:22 PM:
I don't see how Leahy will find time. He's busy registering his outrage over the Move On ad.


great post.

user-pic

Quick, somebody get Mr. Bean a tinfoil hat to stop the secret rays!

user-pic

HarpboyAK,
My first impression about Mr Bean's comments where the same as yours- but after visiting his link - now I am at least opened minded about his entry. Particularly unsettling was the entry regarding the unsolved ,( and possible false flag operation) - attacks using weapon grade anthrax _that targeted Democratic lawmakers .
Alex Jones also has a great many followers on the Libertarian Right - who are saying the same things about Police States replacing our government -given the current context-- thats a legitimate concern to arise.

user-pic

So, the takeaway from this past week is that the two main reasons given last fall for having a Democratic Congress - subpoena power, and the power of the purse - are now both completely inoperative, in any meaningful way. It's still the Executive Branch that calls the shots, and can do so without any fear of repercussion.

Remind me again how this is substantively different from an elective dictatorship?

user-pic

what's next?
Nothing more than a sternly worded letter I expect.

AKA nothing. But hey, moveon is mean. Just a bunch of meanies.

user-pic

Anyone who thinks that Leahy or Schurmer actually want "information" is naive in the extreme. What they "want" is to embarrass Bush, pure and simple. Real Democrats, like FDR, JFK or Daniel Patrick Moynihan would be deeply ashamed of these idiots.

user-pic

With respect to subpoenaing documents re the firing of U.S. Attorneys, Leahy and Schumer are barking up the wrong tree.

What Bush and Gonzales did in firing the 8 U.S. attorneys was stupid in the extreme, was very harmful to morale throughout the Justice Department, and was dangerous and suspect from the point of view of anyone interested in justice untainted by partisan political shenanigans -- but it was certainly NOT illegal. [As a professional prosecutor who was replaced by Bill Clinton with a politician who was a FOB, no one is more aware of this than I am] Gonzales has now been forced out as a result of this blunder, and that should be as far as it goes.

Once again the only goal of these rabid partisans on the Judiciary Committee is to embarrass a lame duck president. A waste of their time and our money. No wonder the public thinks even less of congress than of the president! The entire Government is broken -- nearly destroyed by extreme partisanship and bickering over nothing. Remember when Tip O'Neil and Ronald Reagan would solve problems by talking civilly to one another? Those were the days!

user-pic

It may be a matter of waiting until after Bush is legally no longer able to offer pardons.
This is the only savation any White House staffer has, except actually winning in a court.

So waiting until after the elction to go after these traitors, may be the best move to prvent a wave of last minute pardons from Bush.
He can't issue a pardon on a future possible conviction. Although, I would not put it past him to try.

Most of Nixon's boys were convicted after he was out of office.

user-pic

Goofticket, "These traitors?" Are you referring to the Democrats who can't wait for us to lose in Iraq, with all the terrible consequences that will bring?

As I say, the firing of the U.S. attorneys was an act of political stupidity but it was certainly not illegal. Using your logic, should we go after Clinton and Janet Reno for homicide at Waco and Ruby ridge? That's a much better case. Or go after Hillary now for planting her felon buddy Webb Hubbell in DOJ as #3 to keep an eye on Reno? Too bad he had to go to prison before he could carry out her orders. What muddled thinking What pure partisan nonsense!

Use your head man.

user-pic

Well, its all smoke and screens! What is a thorn in my side is...if you or I was SUBPOENAED and never showed up in court we would have a bench warrant out for our arrest.

Even if its Congress that subpoenaed these bozo's...from the beginning every single one of them have had the demeanor that they are above the law! Well...duh! They even have changed some of the laws along the way and made up a few that they just pulled out of thin air!

When congress issues such a document, subpoena's, this is serious business! But when such arrogance is publicly snubbed at congress and the American people and laws are placed to keep society in order, They have given the whole legal system the birdie!

It is no wonder why people are over crowding our jails and courts because since the administration does not have to follow the laws, why should the people!

Congress better get its act together and real soon! Because they too will be standing in the unemployment line or facing the legal system on the wrong side of the line.

I feel republicans are voting the way that they are is because they are being blackmailed in some form! I hope I am wrong!

user-pic

Leahy is a wuss, Schumer is a wuss, Reid is a wuss Pelosi is a wuss, and all the repugnants are bullies.

Until the Dems learn some martial arts WE are doomed.

user-pic

Without disparaging the weak positions of the Congressional investigation into the firings of the US Attorneys, it is extremely important to keep this going. Its not about the Attorneys that were fired as much as about who was put in their positions. They are in place to help "fix" the upcoming 2008 election through voter roll purging - voter caging. Who knows what we still don't know?

user-pic

It's not Contempt of Congress it's Contempt FOR Congress.

user-pic

I've raised this point several times before but it bears repeating. We all need to recognize that this Democratic "leadership" which constantly indicates it might be "forced to issue subpoenas" continually falls back on pleading letters to those who are subject of requests for information, begging, urging, groveling for them to comply.....but never taking the threatened step.

One realizes more than ever that they never WILL take that step, because this same Congress has already watched and failed to take action on FISA Court rape, loss of habeas corpus, wire tapping of civilians without warrants, snooping on bank transfers, and strangest of all, the complete giveaway of the right of the Senate to advise and consent on US Attorney nominations.

Think about it.....somebody took away their right using a midnight insertion of new language in the Patriot Act. It seems clear it was done by either Senator Specter or one of his senior staff...Specter says it was staff....

but nobody...Specter or any member of Congress has expressed any sense of outrage at such an act.

Why isn't a Leahy or a Kennedy or ANY member of the Senate shouting, screaming, wailing at Specter and staff for taking this action without any consultation with colleagues.

It is one of the strangest actions I have ever seen and I am still mystified at why it has happened without a single protest from any ONE of 100 U.S. Senators.

That they refuse to demand the truth with subpoenas can hardly be any more surprising under such circumstances.

user-pic

Anyone that thinks we have a government that represents the people I have a Timeshare in beautiful downtown Baghdad to sell you.

Our elections are rigged and a farce. Those that are selected by the corporations that own our government don't listen or care about the people they are suppose to represent. About the only thing we represent to them is that we're consumers, otherwise we're just obstacles or objects to be used for whatever purposes that benefit them, not us.

The United States of America is a shell of it's former self. And that shell is cracking and when it breaks there will be no fixing it.

user-pic

Gonzo establishes precedent, then resigns. Muksaey steps in and bakes the NEXT election for HIS best buddy, Giuliani, with "EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE".

The rest of the millionaire's club on Capitol Hill figures we'll forget all about it by October.

Let's not.

user-pic

I hope the Democrats are waiting until October 13, the date upon which all the Patriot Act-Loyal Bushie USAs -- including the one in DC -- get replaced by the courts, as per the law was before and now after the Patriot Act scam that was temporarily perpetrated upon us. Then, when contempt charges are referred to the Us Attorney in DC, he will follow the law and convene a Grand Jury, rather than ignore it, as Gonzo had instructed the Bushie to do. Contempt of Congress is in itself an impeachable offence.

user-pic

Time to contribute to MoveOn.com and unseat these charlatans who we fought so hard to install as Democrats who would counterbalance the disgusting Republicans. I hope that we have fighters waiting to be elected, and that we can oust such timid pols as Levin, Conyers, Leahy, and so on. They don't know how to wield power; how to win; and they cave over a stupidity like the Petraeus ad. I lost my patience with them, what about you?

user-pic

5 million emails conducted off-the-books, unarchived and soon deleted. Flagrant violation of the Presidential Records Act. I mean let that sink in. Not a small violation. A wholesale disregard to keep records. Crimes, folks. Deep crime. And if Congress or the Courts can't find the power to care much less stop it, there is no democracy left. We have witnessed a coup, and most don't even know it yet.

user-pic

It is laughable...to watch Leahy and Schumer avoid their oversite roll.

These guys are real, real, real, scared of getting anthrax letters with the usual FBI coverup.

Think about:


1) Senator Grassley's finance aid was "attacked with a baseball bat" shortly after Grassley started asking FBI questions about my memo and obstructed DOJ OIG Complaint. Occurred shortly after Grassley got my memo.


2) How many people want me to wear a tin foil hat?

----Before the hat is on, remember...uh...SD GOP US Attorney JAMES MCMAHON was "resigned shortly after I called Denver DOJ OIG special agent VAN LANCKER.

----SIOUX FALLS FBI SPECIAL AGENTS DAVE HELLER, DAN REYNALDS, AND THEIR SUPERVISOR, FBI SAC FOR MINNEAPOLIS DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DEB STREIBEL PIERCE also resigned shortly after DOJ OIG was obstructed.

3) Anybody talk to St. Paul Doctor Mark Gordon about his polygraph sessions across the street from his FBI selected apartment?

4) Anybody notice 3 dead dakotans all tied to me by phone call records?...and personal visits?

5) Anybody notice Two lawyers and Senator Tim Johnson wheeled out of the hospital with brain strokes and bizarre symptoms AFTER I CONTACTED THEM WITH THIS INFO?


6) The Ass Dir of Denver DOJ OIG told me on the phone...in hushed tones..."...DOJ HQ moved the complaint to FBI OPR...".

I NEVER HEARD FROM BOB MUELLER'S FBI OPR ?...ABOUT A 47 PAGE COMPLAINT MENTIONING THE ELECTRONIC DETENATORS MANUFACTURED IN CANISTOTA, SD, ?


7) Remember, there was a "throat cutting" leak investigation to "find out who leaked" on the Daschle CALEA computerized wiretapping scandal? Part of the NSA TSP scandal?

8) Who "confirmed NY TIMES NSA TSP" story? NY TIMES uses three sources for big stories, right? Ken Tice, FBI, my complaint to Grassley. Right?

9) Do you really think...Hefflefinger resigned over something as irrelevant as voters rights?...on Indian reservations?

user-pic


Go to link for excerpts from obstructed DOJ OIG complaint submitted by THOMAS S. BEAN under penalty of prosecution:

http://control-alt-delete.ca/v-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=6454&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

_________________________________

From THOMAS S. BEAN'S US DOJ OIG COMPLAINT SENT TO DENVER AND DALLAS FIELD OFFICE SPECIAL AGENTS VAN LANCKER AND MONTE CASSON on 12-7-04:

..."39) FBI DESTROYS INNOCENT MEDICAL DOCTOR, DR. MARK GORDON:

Dr. Mark Gordon (ex military medical officer, and a family friend for 20 years) was illegally investigated by Sioux Falls FBI in 1999 while he worked as a doctor in Yankton, South Dakota, despite the fact "no legitimate suspicion" or "criminal predicate" information was legally obtained to warrant such an egregious incursion on his rights. Sioux Falls FBI and Austin FBI "did not have valid eavesdropping warrants" because "all other investigative tactics had NOT BEEN TRIED and DID NOT FAIL or "would prove to be too dangerous." I've cooperated with law enforcement on three occasions and agreed to take a polygraph. Every time I talk to law enforcement, they open a file on me?!

a) While working as a doctor in Yankton, South Dakota, Sioux Falls FBI directed their cooperating informant (Dr. Gordon's medical secretary) to "seduce him and extort $500" from Dr. Gordon in violation of Title 18 USC part I, chapter 73, sections 241, 242, and chapter 41 sections 872 and 880, and SDCL 22-30A-4 "Theft by threat." Recently I contacted The Yankton County Sheriff’s department who "made every excuse to obstruct justice" and not investigate The FBI snitch. This raises the issue of "whether Sioux Falls FBI violated Title 18 USC part I, chapter 73, section 1511" when Sioux Falls FBI "Obstructed State or local law enforcement" after I gave this crime tip to Yankton County Sheriff’s Department. Not only did "The FBI" intrude upon on innocent medical doctor's life, but they also "gave criminal immunity to their snitch" who was "running extortion schemes on The FBI target."

b) "Sioux Falls FBI criminally stalks Dr. Mark Gordon": After being extorted by The FBI snitch in Yankton, Dr. Mark Gordon moved to Sioux Falls, South Dakota, where he was illegally wiretapped, bugged, and defamed at his jobsite. The FBI Task Force followed him to a restaurant where he consumed a glass of wine. Then The Task Force had their confederate (a nurse working at Dr. Gordon's hospital) page Dr. Gordon to come into the office to admit a patient. Then the nurse reported that Dr. Gordon had alcohol on his breathe.

c) Dr. Mark Gordon was put under surveillance despite the fact "he had not committed any criminal violation" and "no legally obtained information was gathered" to meet the requirements for opening an investigation pursuant to The DOJ Guideline?! Gordon's employers at Central Plains Medical Clinic and Avera McKennan Hospital were contacted in violation of DOJ Guidelines so that Sioux Falls FBI could defame, slander, and portray Gordon in a false light as a form of "extrajudicial punishment" for "mere suspicion that could not be corroborated?!" The FBI destroyed an innocent medical doctor to create a "cooperating witness" to be used against me.

d) Much of this suspicion was predicated on illegally obtained tapes supplied by The Austin FBI. These tapes memorialize conversations in which "Dr. Gordon and I" repeated the dialogue from "The Jerky Boys Comedy Album." This exculpatory evidence was not supplied to prosecutors in violation of DOJ Guidelines and this exculpatory information was not offered to the court in later "Title III warrant applications." Austin FBI had "prior knowledge" that our conversations were based on The Jerky Boys Comedy Album?! I repeated that "tip" over the phone several times. I gave a tape recorded copy to Robert McNaughton's friend Jeff?! Austin FBI still intentionally passed on "false information to Sioux Falls FBI?"

e) Sioux Falls FBI made sure that the civil attorney at Central Plains Clinic received notice that "Dr. Gordon was followed to a liquor store buying a bottle of wine and acting goofy" after work?! If this act was pursuant to a legitimate law enforcement prerogative, why did Sioux Falls FBI intentionally lose operational security" of their investigation? This "intentional loss of operational security" shows malicious intent to commit constitutional deprivations and intentional torts. Sioux Falls FBI drummed up suspicion by passing gossip and slander to make Gordon's work site hostile to induce a financial crisis.

f) Sioux Falls FBI used a pinhole spy camera in Gordon's home to "gather knowledge of Gordon's consumption of wine in his home" and called in SFPD patrol to make an illegal DUI arrest after Gordon drove his vehicle. After this illegal DUI arrest, somehow, Sioux Falls FBI showed up at Gordon's home after he bailed out?! Sioux Falls FBI then coerced and intimidated Dr. Gordon into cooperating with their bogus investigation by "threatening to use this Class 1 misdemeanor arrest" against Gordon by "delivering it to The South Dakota Medical Board" and his employer.

Sioux Falls FBI "obstructed justice" and "violated Gordon's civil liberties" by issuing the usual FBI threat that "Gordon would be arrested for obstructing justice if he disclosed any information about this investigation to anybody" which effectively "chilled Gordon's Sixth Amendment Right to obtain counsel" as well as his "First amendment rights" and "right to association" free of FBI monitoring and coercion. Sioux Falls FBI essentially committed several state and federal crimes to "have coercive leverage" to gain cooperation of an innocent medical professional?!

Later, Sioux Falls FBI illegally contacted Dr. Gordon's employer, Dave Kapaska, at Avera McKennan for the purpose of "defaming and slandering" Gordon's at his jobsite?!

g) After inducing severe emotional trauma and suicidal ideation, Dr. Mark Gordon fled Sioux Falls. The FBI ran another "innocent white collar professional out of his community" without showing an cause or upholding any state or federal Procedural Due Process Rights. Sioux Falls FBI and Oklahoma City FBI conspired to commit a "federal crime of violence" and "interstate stalking" when they conspired to direct a criminal informant (Hispanic gang banger) to stalk Dr. Gordon at an Oklahoma City gas station where The FBI informant "spit in Dr. Gordon's face" in an attempt at provoking him into violence on May 11th, 2002?! The FBI has a tape recording of Gordon conveying this information to me.

h) The Sioux Falls FBI conspired to create Dr. Gordon's drinking problem so they could later use it against him to procure his cooperation in their bogus investigation of me. Sioux Falls FBI coordinated their "pin hole spy camera surveillance" in Gordon's home to gather information relayed to The South Dakota Medical Board probation officer who displayed "an uncanny ability to show up at Gordon's home when Gordon was consuming alcohol in the privacy of his own home?!"

..."40) FBI STALKS DR. MARK GORDON IN TEXAS AND SUBVERTS HIS SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS:

Dr. Gordon eventually quit his Sioux Falls medical job and fled The FBI harassment by moving to Austin, Texas, after obtaining another medical job in Temple, Texas.

a) While staying at Dave Meyer's home in Austin, Texas, Gordon and Meyer and Beth Frick were illegally monitored in violation of Title 18 USC section 2511.

b) Austin FBI joined "the conspiracy against Gordon's civil liberties" when they contacted The Texas Medical Board to "defame and slander Dr. Gordon" to make sure Dr. Gordon could not get a medical license. Dr. Gordon was denied a medical license by The Texas Medical Board, and his attorney was contacted by Austin FBI to make sure "Gordon's right to zealous and competent counsel was subverted." Gordon's lawyer "did not introduce evidence on behalf of his client" to The Texas Medical Board?! Thus, The Austin FBI coerced Gordon's attorney to "violate his fiduciary duty to his client" in violation of Title 18 USC part I, chapter 73, section 241 and 242. Gordon incurred a $10, 000 legal bill that was sent through the U.S. Mail consummating "mail fraud" by his shyster attorney. Later, Minneapolis FBI made sure that "his attorney did not pursue the collection of $4,000 that remained unpaid" as some kind of "half hearted attempt at righting a wrong" after finding out that Dr. Gordon was not guilty of any crime.

c) Dr. Gordon was then contacted by The Austin FBI after they "deprived him of his civil liberties" while inducing an economic crisis predicated on his "failure to get a medical license." Minneapolis FBI then arranged a medical job in Minneapolis and coerced Dr. Gordon into taking the job while living in an FBI apartment across the street from The St. Paul, Minnesota, Federal Building. Minneapolis FBI had this apartment bugged and wiretapped and monitored with a pinhole spy camera in an Orwellian nightmare that "only The FBI could get away with." Gordon cooperated with numerous interviews and polygraphs at The St. Paul Federal Building that resulted in "The FBI possessing exculpatory evidence" that cleared Gordon and Thomas S. Bean of all "uncorroborated mere suspicion." None of this was recorded or passed on to state and federal prosecutors.

d) All of this "FBI chicanery" violates Gordon's Constitutional rights to "be left alone"..."right to privacy"..."freedom of association"..."Sixth Amendment Right to competent counsel"...etc. Mark Gordon "became a material witness" to law enforcement felony crimes after talking to me about this fact pattern over the phone and in private on numerous occasions. All case agents working Gordon's file violated Title 18 USC sections 241, 242, 1512, 1513, and 2511. All FBI special agents must sign a Misprision of a Felony Form at the end of each calendar year. Civil discovery will focus on these forms.

e) Furthermore, Dr. Gordon told me on April 24th, 2004, that The FBI was "using their police powers" to investigate "The Congressional Hearing testimony of witnesses" while also "inquiring into the relative strength of my future federal civil rights law suit?!" The FBI was seeking knowledge from Gordon on "the location and presence” of demonstrative evidence (tape recordings, documents, videotape) so they could "conduct a black bag job" to steal or destroy "incriminating evidence of their crimes." The FBI uses "sneak and peak" to steal "smoking gun evidence" to avoid criminal and civil liability?! The Minneapolis FBI used police powers to "investigate an upcoming Congressional Hearing" after "coercing cooperation" of an innocent medical doctor?!

f) The Minneapolis FBI also monitored Dr. Gordon in his "FBI apartment" with a pinhole spy camera to eavesdrop on his private conversations. The FBI directed their informant (a mentally unstable, Pilipino, stalker, nurse living in Gordon's apartment complex) to seduce Gordon. The FBI had knowledge that Gordon had another girlfriend in his bedroom, when they called their snitch and gave her a key to his apartment so "she could break in" and confront Dr. Gordon in bed with another woman while Minneapolis FBI watched on their closed circuit television screen.

g) Much of Austin FBI's illegally obtained information is based on their incompetent interpretation of my phone calls with Dr. Mark Gordon in which we "repeated the dialogue from The Jerky Boys Comedy Album." This comedy album is premised on "making prank phone calls" to see how people respond. Austin FBI's Task Force tape recorded these conversations "without comparing them to The Jerky Boys Comedy Album" despite the fact they were put on notice?! This willing dissemination of misleading statements to SFPD and Sioux Falls FBI is prohibited by state and federal law. I point out, The Minneapolis FBI obtained corroborating evidence of this exculpatory information after "coercing Dr. Mark Gordon" to take a polygraph exam coincidental with "his review of the phone call tapes." This Brady Material was not passed onto state and federal prosecutors or to my defense attorneys.


41) THE FBI DESTROYS SENATOR DASCHLE'S EX CHIEF OF STAFF:

After committing several, egregious felony violations against Dr. Mark Gordon, The FBI also focused their criminality on his brother, Rich Gordon, despite the fact that "no legitimate criminal predicate or suspicion existed" that Rich Gordon was guilty of any specific crime?! Rich Gordon (ex chief of staff for South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle) came under The FBI's bogus, felonious witch-hunt after "I called him on my father's telephone in the spring of 2002" to inquire about "the whereabouts of his brother" who had previously expressed suicidal ideation proximately caused by Sioux Falls FBI's felony crime spree predicated on "coercing cooperation" from an innocent medical professional.

a) The Sioux Falls, Minneapolis, and Montana FBI committed "predicate acts" as part of a conspiracy to deprive Rich Gordon of his civil liberties under color of authority. The FBI contacted Rich Gordon's employer (The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation) for the purpose of "implicitly slandering and defaming" Rich Gordon at his jobsite in violation of DOJ Guidelines?! I know numerous other innocent, white collar professionals defamed by law enforcement at their job site despite the fact "no criminal predicate" or "reasonable suspicion" leads to their jobsites?! Any investigation at a "person of interests" jobsite with no "reasonable suspicion" or "criminal predicate" that results in defamation and unemployment is a violation of Title 18 USC sections 241, 242 1512, and 1513. These sections do not create an exception for FBI agents committing predicate acts by directing "state and local law enforcement" to contact employers.

b) This "career terrorism" committed by The FBI, once again, was predicated on "neutralizing a material witness" to FBI felony crimes. Prior to this, The FBI had access to Dr. Mark Gordon's emails showing that "a Congressional Inquiry" was likely to occur and Rich Gordon, Dr. Mark Gordon, and many others were likely to be subpoenaed?! So, The FBI is now caught illegally investigating "future witnesses" to be subpoenaed by a Congressional Hearing?! This is a violation of Title 18 USC sections 1512 and 1513?! Minneapolis FBI believed the congressional inquiry had a nexus between "the Gordon family, Thomas Bean, and Senator Tom Daschle, and Congressional Democrats"?! Therefore, The Montana FBI committed hundreds of Title III felony crimes against Rich Gordon in another "bogus, illegal, electronic fishing expedition" while looking for illegally obtained information for the purposes of "coercing cooperation" and "neutralizing a material witness."

c) The FBI went after Rich Gordon in a failed attempt at "neutralizing a congressional inquiry?!"

d) Rich Gordon "quit his job" at The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation after his Board of Directors "cut his salary in half."

e) Rich Gordon was forced to take another job in Reno, Nevada, where he was the victim of more Title III felony crimes. Rich quit his job and moved back to Custer, South Dakota. In Custer, South Dakota, Rapid City FBI continued the Title III felony crimes against Rich Gordon and violated DOJ Guidelines during their bogus "Indian Voter Registration Fraud" investigation of Rich Gordon. Dr. Mark Gordon said on April 24th, 2004, that "Rich was arrested." This was all an attempt at neutralizing Rich Gordon's credibility in a future civil suit and Congressional hearing. This is a violation of Title 18 USC sections 241, 241, 1511. and 1512. After US DOJ Office of Inspectors General, Denver Field Office, was contacted by me, they fired SD US Attorney JAMES MCMAHON who announced his resignation two weeks later. Minneapolis FBI SAC DEBORAH STREBEL PIERCE also resigned.

f) Later, Rich came down with a mysterious brain tumor caused by either heavy metal poisoning or Directed Energy Weapons (microwave radiation bombardment) after
FBI HQ (and/or The NSC operational subgroup using NSA warrantless wiretapping) deployed their super secret “black ops group” .

The neocon INTEL COMMUNITY (DOJ, FBI, NSC or NSA) used surveillance Intel from Rapid City rssa MARK VUKELICH’s illegal surveillance of Gordon. Omaha, Nebraska
Attorney LEROY ROGERS ( my known associate) also came down with a mysterious brain stroke that cut off blood to his brain rendering him a semi invalid. Yankton, South Dakota, attorney JOHN KABIESEMANN (another known associate who was a lawyer) died in a mysterious car wreck. YPD Sgt. Deffenbaugh also died in a mysterious car wreck. The FBI neutralized these people because “FBI HQ a/o NSC" picked up Intel from a letter” I wrote to Lenny Lee that said “I disseminated a lot of insurance type info” to a lot of attorneys “to make sure The FBI did not neutralize me with a bogus arrest and malicious prosecution, or murder. I later posted this info at The FBI website tip line, and on the internet at discussion forums. "....

user-pic


1) CRIMINAL INFORMATION REPORTED TO SIOUX FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT IN 1992:

On or about January of 1992, the complainant (Thomas Sutherland Bean) contacted The Sioux Falls Police Department for the purpose of relaying information concerning the following:

a) Information detailing a "conspiracy to manufacture and possess electronic detonators" at an electronic assembly plant in Canistota, South Dakota. A request for bid offer came to the attention of ALLAN DOERING (an electrical engineer working at the Canistota electronic assembly plant) who identified the accompanying electronic schematic as depicting an "electronic detonator part." Doering was contacted by BATF. Doering said the detonators were manufactured for a quarry. Tim McVeigh and Nichols broke into a quarry to steal fuses and detonators before building their anfo bomb. McVeigh had a South Dakota Drivers License under the name "Bob Kling". Those detonators were used by Iraqi Intel operatives named by Stephan Jones (McVeigh's defense Attorney) in his Writ of Mandamus that Judge Matsch was willing to sign before "his daughter was pushed into a Hawaiian Volcano" to send him a message. After his daughter was murdered, Judge Matsch would not rule against the secret government again. Jones’ Writ was denied.

The BATF requires all possessors of explosive devices and detonators to pass a background check resulting in licensure. An inventory protocol must be followed with serial numbers stamped on all detonators intended for demolition or mining operations. SD BATF and SF FBI did not
Thoroughly investigate the distribution, manufacture, and possession of these detonators.

b) I agreed to take a polygraph, but none was given proving that "all investigative tactics were not tried and did not fail" as required in all state and federal eavesdropping warrants?! No follow up interview was requested by law enforcement to develop exculpatory information to "allow the facts and evidence" to direct the investigation.

(PAGE ONE)_______________________________________


h) I told "John" that me and Ehlen drove down to Guatemala to research importing and exporting of textiles, jade, jewelry, avocados, roses and other goods pursuant to The Caribbean Basin Iniative that promotes foreign trade with Central America. Ehlen's attorney was Rollie Samp (Sioux Falls attorney) who knew we went to Guatemala. Samp's pal was Marian Webster (Tulsa phone number 918-494-0750) who worked for The CIA in Central America.

Samp gave Ehlen's phone number to Webster. Webster called and faxed some business proposals including "scrapping out the weapons of war" after The Peace Accord ended The Sandinista and Contra War. Ehlen was contacted by Webster because Ehlen owns a recycling business and has a business salvaging metals. No crime was committed. Webster was also looking for investors to trade canned milk for cases of Russian vodka, after Russia fell. The FBI and local cops like violating target’s civil liberties based on curiosity and voyeurism with no legitimate law enforcement perogative.

(PAGE TWO)
__________________________________


To check out my Brandon, SD, neighbor, ROY EHLEN...find the onling fed ct appellate opinion when VICTOR E. STADTER was arrested with ROY EHLEN for conspiring to move a pound of heroin from Belize, to NY City.

Who is STADTER?

A CIA covert cut out pilot, who also went onto fame as "the first CIA pilot to fly a helicopter into a Mexican prison" to retrieve one of his pals, who moved the drugs for the intel community.

Do "name search" on VICTOR E. STADTER at "name base index" site.

Find links to other Bush crime family pals like ESCABAR, LEHDER, TRUILLO, etc.

_________________________________

336 F.2d 326


UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Victor E. STADTER, Marvin Wright and ROY EHLEN, Defendants-Appellants.


No. 415, Docket 28568.


United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


Argued April 10, 1964.
Decided Aug. 11, 1964.

Before MOORE, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Victor E. Stadter, Marvin Wright and ROY EHLEN appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a jury verdict in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Appellants were convicted of unlawfully selling heroin and of conspiring to do so, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. 174, 18 U.S.C.A. 2 (two counts), 26 U.S.C.A. 4704(a), 18 U.S.C.A. 2 (two counts), and 21 U.S.C.A. 174 (one count).


1) Defendant Gardiner met appellants Stadter, Wright and Ehlen in Belize, British Honduras, and in the Fall of 1961, he and Stadter discussed the possibilities of marketing marijuana in New York City.


2) In January 1962 Gardiner travelled to New York to make arrangements with defendant Joseph who agreed to assist in the sales. Gardiner told Stadter of Joseph's enlistment and of the other arrangements upon his return to Belize.


3) Near the end of February 1962, according to Gardiner, Stadter said that he knew where he could get some heroin and that he would use the proceeds of the marijuana sales to finance purchases of heroin. Shortly thereafter, Gardiner left for New York where he rejoined Joseph.

4) During March, April and May, 1962, Gardiner and Joseph were notified by telephone of when to expect shipments of marijuana from Stadter and Wright. These shipments six in all, were made in suit cases or foot lockers to Gardiner and Joseph under assumed names. Gardiner and Joseph sold the marijuana and delivered on several occasions a total of nearly $30,000 in proceeds to Wright and Stadter in Manhattan. Wright was identified as the sender of one of the packages received by Gardiner, while Ehlen's handwriting appeared on airline delivery sheets for similar shipments.


5) On May 22, 1962, Gardiner was summoned to Miami by Stadter, where he, Stadter and Wright met at Wright's home. Stadter said that he had acquired three kilos of heroin, which he had purchased on credit, and asked if Gardiner thought that he and Joseph could sell it in New York.


6) Gardiner, accompanied by Ehlen, immediately returned to New York to gain Joseph's approval. Initially, Joseph was reluctant to agree but did permit Gardiner to use his address, 22 Hart Street, earlier utilized for marijuana shipments, and suggested a fictitious name to which the first heroin shipment could be sent. Gardiner gave the name and address to Ehlen and also delivered the remaining proceeds from the marijuana sales.


7) On or about May 27th, Wright placed a call from Miami to Gardiner in New York. Gardiner said that he had as yet not received a package, and Wright replied that 'We was at the border. You will be hearing from us in a day or two.' By May 31st Gardiner and Joseph were in receipt of a package mailed to 22 Hart Street, which contained 17 one-ounce bags of heroin. Another package containing heroin arrived on June 4th.

8) Evidently Joseph's reluctance to deal in heroin was overcome because he was soon actively engaged with Gardiner in locating a buyer who would be able to purchase heroin in substantial amounts. Joseph's efforts led to his meeting, on June 7, 1962, with a federal agent who was operating undercover.


9) The next day the agent purchased from Joseph one kilo of heroin for $18,000. A delivery of another kilo and one-half was made by Joseph to the agent during the night of June 13-14, 1962. This shipment had just been brought from Philadelphia by Ehlen who was met in New York by Stadter, Wright and Gardiner. All were arrested that night.

10) Stadter and Ehlen, but not Wright, took the stand in their defense. They admitted that they knew Gardiner and Wright and had met with them on many of the occasions described on the Government's direct case. However, they denied any dealings in marijuana or heroin and asserted that their frequent meetings with Gardiner were of an innocent business or social nature.

user-pic

DASCHLE CAMPAIGN MEMO WRITTEN BY THOMAS S. BEAN while under FBI and NSA TSP surveillance in October 2004, before the SD senatorial and presidential elections.

This memo was picked up in real time by NSA, resulted in leak investigation. Led to FBI FISA warrant to seize my x-rays showing the chip surgically installed in my skull, shortly after NSA TSP was outed in NY TIMES

_____________________________________
October 31st, 2004.


South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle Campaign Headquarters


Re: Information concerning CALEA (Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act) equipment used by Republican operatives and law enforcement agencies (Montana, Reno, Rapid City, Minnepolis FBI and their coconspirators in state and local law enforcement) to commit predicate acts as part of a conspiracy to engage in "warrantless wiretapping" of certain Democratic Party Leaders and associates during an illegal investigation in violation of The Patriot Act.


xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx

1) Ex chief of Staff for South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle, RICH GORDON, has been the target of an illegal investigation by a conspiracy of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies and other coconspirators who are known associates of The Republican Party. See, FBI OPR Complaint or U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Inspectors General Complaint submitted to Denver and Dallas Field Office special agents Van Lancker and Monte Casson, respectively, page 23 "The FBI DESTROYS SENATOR DASCHLE'S EX CHIEF OF STAFF."

2) XXXXXXX REDACTED FOR LATER DATE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

3) REDACTED.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

4) REDACTED.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

5) As a result of the facts and constitutional deprivations that occurred over 12 years, XXXXXXXXXXXXX ran an intell network and accessed exculpatory information, and more incriminating information proving law enforcement's conspiracy against my rights, my family, and my known associates' rights (Rich Gordon, Dr. Mark Gordon, Dr. David W. Bean, Lynn Bean). See, US Dept of Justice, Office of Inspectors General Complaint.

6) XXXXXXXXXXXX studied the wiretapping methodology used by law enforcement and found out that "The CALEA equipment" at the main terminal of the phone companies throughout the country is connected to a hard disk computer memory. This memory shows all "date stamps", "time stamps" "phone numbers tapped" and "phone numbers used to monitor the tap." These phone numbers show "who was wiretapped" and "where the bypass was sent back to." This information shows who was wiretapping. If "state paper" and "federal paper" (i.e. state and federal eavesdropping warrants) does not corroborate "legal wiretapping" pursuant to a legal investigation, then "The Democratic Party is left with demonstrative evidence of illegal wiretapping" of their offices, lawyers, operatives, etc. I see a class action lawsuit by all aggrieved parties naming the phone companies and police state actors.

7) This information has already been archived on an internet website that has been mirrored and is still in operation. All you need to access this information is "the website name." So far, The NSA and FBI Carnivore has not found the site. Later, a "deencryption" software download will be made available to you and others so "you can read the website."

8) This information, if made known to local and national media outlets, is enough to swing the Presidential and South Dakota Senatorial Elections.

9) I offer this information to you with no strings attached. I ask for no money, privilege, immunity, favors, or benefit to me. I WANT NOTHING MORE THAN A FAIR ELECTION AND A FAIR PLAYING FIELD FOR ALL DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES. That's all I want.

10) REDACTED

11) REDACTED

12) The election is close and a "one point shift" or a "rejuvenated silent minority who don't vote" is enough to ensure a Democratic victory to save our country from "Corporate Fascism Predicated on The Bogus War on Terrorism and Drugs."

13) I'll take a polygraph exam anytime and anywhere.

14) The window of opportunity is quickly closing. The newspapers go to press on Monday at midnight tonight. So...it is incumbent upon your office to contact the press so they can check the "website address" as soon as possible to check out those phone numbers, addresses, date stamps, and time stamps.

15) There is some more information xxxxxxxxxxxcorroborating the fact that an NSC (National Security Council) OSG (Operational Subgroup) conspired with Ashcroft and The Republican Party associates to "blow up Wellstone's and Carnahan's airplanes." A double altimeter C4 charge was put in the tail section and the crash wreckage shows "tail sections" that suffered catostrophic explosive detanation. You can also see the evidence of a back up weapon (a DARPA EMP weapon) that created the elctronmagnetic anomolies on the doppler weather radar maps in the area on the date and time two Democratic politicians' airplanes mysteriously dropped out of the sky for the benefit of The Republican Party.

Professionally,

_________________
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_________________

[Author's Note on November 11th, 2005: Two days after this letter was picked up by Sioux Falls FBI, United States Attorney John Ashcroft submitted a hand written letter of resignation, and also was hospitalized with some type of mysterious nervous disorder proximately caused by a visit with FBI Director Robert S. Mueller.

In November of 2004, several phone calls to XXXXXs answering machine from The Argus Leader, USA TODAY, and Daschle's Congressional Office were illegally erased by Sioux Falls FBI who used xxxxxxxx "remote access pin number" to illegally tamper with xxxxxxx telephonic communications recorded on his answering machine. SD US Attorney Michelle Tapken, Robert S. Mueller, and US DOJ OIG refuse to comment or investigate these crimes?!]

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address