Yet another stop in the tour of all-around muck that is the Duke Cunningham case.
In a filing today, prosecutors allege that John Michael, who’s been indicted for laundering Cunningham’s bribes and lying to investigators, hid incriminating documents by keeping them with what prosecutors call “a stash of personal entertainment materials and paraphernalia.” You can read the filing here.
The prosecutors don’t identify exactly what those items are, but note that “Michael has expressed extreme embarrassment” over them and that “their nature objectively supports his perspective” (read: he has good reason to be embarrassed). They say that they’ll identify the materials at a court hearing if need be.
Prosecutors want to introduce evidence of Michael’s embarrassing “stash,” in order to prove that he knew the Cunningham documents were, in their own way, as embarrassing. That he kept documentation of Cunningham’s sketchy mortgage details in a place where he also stored “materials he did not want to anyone else to learn about” proves, they write, that he knew he was up to no good.
Part of the indictment against Michael, the nephew to Greek man of mystery Thomas Kontogiannis — prosecutors call Michael and Kontogiannis “professional money launderers” — is that he obstructed justice by forging record of the Cunningham mortgages and hiding others.
Michael is scheduled to go on trial along with Brent Wilkes in October, but a later trial date is expected to be set.