« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Prosecutors Subpoena Doolittle in Abramoff Investigation
Prosecutors subpoenaed Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) for 11 years-worth of records as part of the ongoing Abramoff investigation, the AP reports:
Prosecutors recently demanded documents from Doolittle and five staffers, the congressman said. The subpoenas seek "virtually every record including legislative records" for the past 11 years, Doolittle's attorney David Barger said in a news release issued Thursday by the congressman's office."These efforts raise serious constitutional issues going to the very core of our separation of powers created by the Founding Fathers," Barger said.
The Constitution prohibits the executive branch from using its law enforcement powers to interfere with legislative business. Barger said he and Doolittle would "be vigilant" to ensure Congress' independence is "vigorously protected." Any court challenge would go before a federal judge, but the documents would be sealed.
The standoff could lead to a court battle like the William Jefferson (R-LA) case over the speech and debate clause. When a federal court called the FBI's decision to take legislative documents out of Jefferson's office unconstitutional, watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Melanie Sloan said it was a great day for corrupt lawmakers.





Doesn't the header on this page usually say TPM Muckraker (not Talking Points Memo)?
September 27, 2007 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to sound petty, but isn't Mr Jefferson a D?
Faux news, creeping in!
September 27, 2007 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
jeez, 11 years of legislative correspondence and documentation. damn, that seems a tad excessive. that's a shitload of work to dig out
September 27, 2007 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just glancing at the fight against subpoenas and the "Constitutional" issue---it sounds as though this Congressman is going to end up saying: "every legislator in Congress is entitled to the candid and confidential advice of experts" in secret--just like the Vice President in the Executive Branch.
September 27, 2007 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, yeah. Jefferson is a Democrat. That's part of why he ticks me off so, since he's the one that gives the slightest bit of credence to the idea that "You're doing it too!"
Fix the attribution.
September 27, 2007 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone else think that photo of Doolittle looks like it was snapped while he was sitting on the can?
I hope he wasn't tapping his foot.
Ditto comments above: Jefferson is a (D-LA)
September 28, 2007 6:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
gtash: Congress has the right to keep certain matters secret:
U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Section 5[3]: "Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; . . . ."
and, of course, the Speech and Debate clause at Article I, Section 6[1] "The Senators and Representatives . . . shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place." The business of the Senate or House may not be questioned outside Congress.
September 28, 2007 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would give me great pleasure to see John Doolittle removed from office.
At one time he was my congressman, and I voted with pleasure against him. Maybe next time they will get him.
September 28, 2007 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink