« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Drunken Blackwater Shooter Went Quickly Back to Work

The Blackwater guard who drunkenly shot a bodyguard for Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul Mehdi in December 2006 was back working for a Department of Defense contractor by February, CNN reported this morning.

And in a letter House oversight committee Chair Henry Waxman (D-CA) sent to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice today, he asks why. He suggests that the reason it was so easy for the guard, Andrew J. Moonen, to get back to work, was because the State Department didn't inform the Defense Department about what the ex-Blackwater employee did to get initially expelled from Iraq. Moonen returned to Kuwait in February, CNN reported, working for Defense Department contractor Combat Support Associates (CSA).

During this week's Congressional hearing on Blackwater, a State official refused to tell Waxman anything about the incident -- including whether State had helped Moonen flee Iraq after the shooting.

"It is hard to reconcile this development with the State Department’s claim that 'We are scrupulous in terms of oversight and scrutiny not only of Blackwater but all of our contractors,'" Waxman writes.

Waxman requested all of the Departments documents concerning Moonen and the Christmas Eve, 2006 shooting.

Waxman's full letter is below.

Dear Madame Secretary:

I am writing to express concern that the State Department may have failed to report important facts about a private military contractor’s killing of a guard for the Iraqi Vice President and thereby facilitated the hiring of that individual to work on another contract in support of the Iraq War only two months after the homicide.

On October 2, 2007, the Committee held a hearing to examine the mission and performance of Blackwater USA and its affiliated companies in Iraq and Afghanistan. Blackwater holds a $1.2 billion contract with the State Department to provide security services to protect State Department personnel in Baghdad and around the world. The State Department, represented by Ambassador David Satterfield, Assistant Secretary of State Richard Griffin, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State William Moser, testified at the hearing.

One episode that was the subject of questioning at the hearing was the December 24, 2006, shooting of a guard for the Iraqi Vice President by a Blackwater contractor. The contractor, who has since been identified in media reports as Andrew Moonen, shot and killed the guard in a confrontation in the Green Zone. As described at the hearing, the State Department and Blackwater cooperated to have Mr. Moonen flown out of Iraq within 36 hours of the shooting and to make a cash payment to the victim’s family as “the best way to assure the Iraqis don’t take steps, such as telling Blackwater that they are no longer able to work in Iraq.” Although the State Department has asserted that the Justice Department is continuing to investigate the matter, to date no charges have been brought against Mr. Moonen.

Serious questions now exist about whether the State Department may have withheld from the U.S. Defense Department facts about this Blackwater contractor’s shooting of the Iraqi guard that should have prevented his hiring to work on another contract in support of the Iraq War. Today, CNN reported that in February 2007, Mr. Moonen was hired by Combat Support Services Associates (CSA), a Defense Department contractor, to work in Kuwait through August 2007. According to this report, “Because the State Department and Blackwater kept the incident quiet and out of Moonen’s personnel records, CSA was unaware of the December incident when it hired Moonen.” The report also stated that in April 2007, the U.S. Army tried to call Mr. Moonen, a veteran of the 82nd Airborne Division, back to active duty, but cancelled the request upon learning that he was already overseas.

This report is partially corroborated by a February 13, 2007, e-mail from an Army investigator to Blackwater in which he described a recent sighting of Mr. Moonen in the Green Zone:

Moonen was believed to have been seen by Security Forces personnel in the International Zone here in Baghdad. Has he returned here or is he still in the Washington?

This report that Mr. Moonen was allowed to return to the Middle East to work on another security contract for a different company just two months after the December 24 shooting raises obvious concerns about the actions of the State Department and Blackwater. It is hard to reconcile this development with the State Department’s claim that “We are scrupulous in terms of oversight and scrutiny not only of Blackwater but all of our contractors.”

The report also raises questions about several claims made at the hearing regarding steps taken to prevent re-employment of offenders. Blackwater Chairman Erik Prince testified that Blackwater “made sure his clearance was cancelled” so that Mr. Moonen would “never work in a clearance capacity for the U.S. government again.” Assistant Secretary Griffin testified that “[t]he DS HTP program office (in Washington) maintains records of personnel terminated for cause from the WPPS program in order to prevent them from re-entering the program with another contractor.” These steps were apparently insufficient to prevent Mr. Moonen from securing re-employment in the Iraq War.

In light of this report, I request that the State Department produce the following documents to the Committee by Friday, October 12, 2007, at 12:00 noon:

1. All personnel records and other documents relating to Andrew Moonen;

2. All communications and other documents relating to the possible or actual inclusion of notations in files, reports, or other records that would serve to inform future government or contractor employers of Mr. Moonen’s involvement in the Christmas Eve shooting;

3. All communications and other documents relating to any efforts to have Mr. Moonen’s security clearance revoked following the Christmas Eve shooting;

4. All communications and other documents relating to any efforts to notify the Defense Department or other government contractors, of Mr. Moonen’s involvement in the Christmas Eve shooting; and

5. All documents relating to the consideration and delivery of a monetary payment to the family of the victim of the Christmas Eve shooting.

In addition, I renew my request, as stated in my letter of September 14, 2007, for all documents relating to the Christmas Eve shooting, the investigation into that incident, and any sanctions or corrective actions imposed on the individual or Blackwater resulting from the investigation. These documents should also be produced by Friday, October 12, 2007, at 12:00 noon.

I will also be requesting documents and information from Combat Support Services about the hiring of Mr. Moonen.

In addition to the documents requested above, I also request by this date a briefing by the State Department regarding all steps taken, if any, following the Christmas Eve shooting to ensure that Mr. Moonen would not work under any government contract related to the Iraq War.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee in the House of Representatives and has broad oversight jurisdiction as set forth in House Rule X. Enclosed with this letter are instructions on how to respond to the Committee’s document request. All documents should be produced with no redactions unless agreed to by Committee staff.

If you have any questions about this request, please contact Theodore Chuang or Christopher Davis of the Committee staff at (202) 225-5420.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman
Chairman


22 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

And what happens if all of Waxman's requests are ignored as has been the case with all previous requests and subpoenas?
Will Condi receive ANOTHER nasty letter?

user-pic

And what happens if all of Waxman's requests are ignored as has been the case with all previous requests and subpoenas?
Will Condi receive ANOTHER nasty letter?

user-pic

Alguien wrote on October 5, 2007 5:37 PM:

And what happens if all of Waxman's requests are ignored as has been the case with all previous requests and subpoenas?
Will Condi receive ANOTHER nasty letter?

Yes. Except the next one might not just be a nasty letter but the terror-inducing VERY nasty letter.

Scary stuff indeed. You can almost here the ReThugs laughing their asses off as they tell Waxman, yet again, to go fuck himself.

What a fucking joke our government has become..........

user-pic

Looks as though secrecy clearances are allowed for folks who commit murder. It is becoming more and more clear that the guys in charge are only attempting to have the American Public remain in the dark about government affairs, whether it be war profiteering, fraud, murder, torture... on and on.

The Government hires thugs and assassins, crooks and cronies... all who are in the midst of operations the administration believes it needs to be kept secret from the public.

Sounds as though history IS repeating itself...

Fortunately for us, We the People are determined to vote all these folks out and elect honest folks with integrity...

No, my mistake... we have instead decided to dispose of the rest of our democracy... by hiring the same thugs back into office...

user-pic

I'm not so cynical about Henry Waxman. Is he doing the best he can in a difficult situation? I think so. Did HENRY say, "Impeachment is off the table"? No, he didn't.

Like any good progressive, I wish the process would move more quickly; and I wish the spineless hacks in the DNC would move to impeach and send 'em all to The Hague for crimes against humanity. Cheney at least should see 30+ years in international prison. Shrubbie should be sent to his room without dessert...until he learns how to chew with his mouth closed and not talk while eating. And reads his Bible from cover to cover without the Classics Comix Illustrated version to help him figure out the big words.

Oh well. Call me a European and smack me in the butt. But I am PROUD to be a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, and ashamed of my GOP compatriots who clearly never had an idea in their silly heads that wasn't planted there by some stupid neocon.

user-pic

Erik Prince said under oath, several times, that Blackwater made sure that this guy was stripped of his security clearance.

Was that a lie?

user-pic

Anon wants to now if that was a lie . Reasonably referring to a republican operative whose lips were noticed in motion . The newly re enriched prince was pinned in this most defenseless neocon weakness . Most testimony regardless of public relations stunts , or republican testimony , its apparent intent , including bald faced alto soprano liar ordinaire schlozman is permitted a light wash and rinse before the wheels start the machine in the direction of prosecution .

user-pic

I'm very curious about the statement in the letter that "in April 2007, the U.S. Army tried to call Mr. Moonen, a veteran of the 82nd Airborne Division, back to active duty, but cancelled the request upon learning that he was already overseas."

So, if you're in the individual ready reserve and working, let's say, as an emergency room technician in the US, when you get called you have to go back to Iraq. But if you're in the mideast getting big bucks from Blackwater, you're exempt from the duties that fall on your fellow reserve members?

user-pic

While I hate the thought of waiting until Jan 20th 2009 I very much doubt that the Democrats will find the balls to do anything they perceive to be dangerous to their reelection. They are looking so pathetic that if I were the Republicans I would start leaking more wrong doing just to make the Dems throw what amounts to a hissy fit. Let the Dems fire off a request for more information then tell them to fuck themselves. The whole lot of them are worthless. Both parties.

Indeed Mark C "What a fucking joke our government has become.........."

user-pic

Yesterday's NYTimes has Moonen living in Seattle. So where *is* he? Seattle or Kuwait?

user-pic

According to an article in today's Seattle paper, Moonen recently purchased a $273,000 home in the Seattle area in King County.

It does appear his lawyer is in contact with him so someone KNOWS where he is.

user-pic

You know, I have a great idea for all the cynical whiners on this board who think that the wheels of justice turn slowly and you can't just make sh!t up and impeach because the Democrats allegedly have no balls. Hanging "justice" moves real fast in Saudi Arabia and the like.

There is no way in this dimension that George W. Bush and Richard Cheney would, could, or will be impeached based on your vague definitions of what a war criminal is. I don't even know if being a "war criminal" is grounds for impeachment.

So why don't you stop whining about it and stamping your little feet? You're the ones throwing the hissy fits around here. It's really quite tiresome and unbecoming. These azzholes will be gone in 2009 not one minute before, that's the fact, Jack, so I'm pleased that Henry Waxman is highlighting their crimes as the elections unfold and is building the record.

The information will flow again when the Democrats take over the executive branch again. If they destroy evidence on the way out, that's also a crime. Patience, Grasshopper.

user-pic

"The information will flow again when the Democrats take over the executive branch again. If they destroy evidence on the way out, that's also a crime. Patience, Grasshopper."

Because that worked so well with Reagan and the death squads....

How about this: every Dem. candidate for President must sign a pledge to restore habeas corpus, end all forms of torture, and end illegal surveillance. Call it the Roll Back Gonzo Pledge.

Hpw many do you think would actually publicly sign?

user-pic

"Hpw many do you think would actually publicly sign?"

They would probably all sign.... just to get elected. We all know how long promises last after election time, though, don't we....

user-pic

Oh no! Not another sternly worded letter! I am sure Madame Secretary is shaking in her Guccis.

user-pic

One more thing Condi has screwed up -- management of State Department. Time for another promotion.

user-pic

colonpowwow. Here is my point.

"However, National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said that the longer Democrats try "to maximize their political advantage" by delaying the override vote, the easier it will be for Republicans to convince the public that Democrats are unable to lead (Wegner, CongressDaily, 10/3)."

Note the "...convince the public that Democrats are unable to lead" statement.

My point in "whining" and one that seems to be lost on you.

user-pic

"Oh no! Not another sternly worded letter! I am sure Madame Secretary is shaking in her Guccis"

No, she's not.

She only wears Feragamo's. Didn't you get the memo?

user-pic

>Erik Prince said under oath, several
>times, that Blackwater made sure that
>this guy was stripped of his security
>clearance.

>Was that a lie?

Lying to Congress, under oath. Is that a crime.

With the smirk he was flashing us, it would give me joy to see this Prince pay a price for the harm he has brought to our Nation.

user-pic

> if you're in the mideast getting big
>bucks from Blackwater, you're exempt
>from the duties that fall on your
>fellow reserve members?

Not so important that HE was earning big bucks, but he was earning even bigger bucks for Mr Prince. And cash payments of taxpayer money to Dick Cheney's friends. . . THAT is off limits.

user-pic

I think I'm jaded just enough to predict that the outcome of this will be a real law, a real law that deals with the issues here: no contractors involved in questionable shootings while drunk will not be able to work again in that capacity. Keep in mind that all three conditions will be necessary to keep the law as specific and ineffectual as possible.

My question is, why is Blackwater the only contracting group being discussed?

user-pic

Kudos to Sen. Waxman for being thorough. It's going to be tough to wiggle out of this one.

Leave a comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address