« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
"Polling...showed public confidence in the judicial system increasing from 6% to 25%." No, that's not the Gonzales bounce; those confidence levels, a measure of Iraqi sentiment, were provided by the Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction as signs of progress. Now, Iraqis are only twice as likely to prefer their fate be determined by a coin toss rather than by a jury of their peers. (ABC's The Blotter)
I guess we shouldn't be surprised. Back when Alberto Gonzales was Attorney General, he oversaw the investigation by the Inspector General into leaked information about warrantless wiretapping that spawned the now-infamous New York Times' article. But several witnesses in that investigation were also witness against Gonzales in an investigation into the legality of the wiretapping program itself (an investigation that Bush curtailed last year). Gonzales took no apparent steps to recuse himself. (Huffington Post)
Carol Lam speaks! The former U.S. Attorney has ended a notable silence to speak with her alma mater about the firestorm surrounding her very public firing this past December. (Stanford Lawyer)
Think Progress reports that three days after Tam Tran, the daughter of Vietnamese immigrants, was featured in a USA Today article about “children caught in the immigration crossfire,” federal officers entered her home in the middle of the night and arrested her family (which has been in the U.S for almost twenty years and have been in constant communication with immigration officials about their immigration status as refugees). Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), chair of the immigration subcommitee, “equated the family’s arrest to “witness intimidation” “because Tam “testified before Lofgren’s panel earlier this spring.” (Think Progress)
James Golden, the State Department contractor in charge of the $592 million embassy in Iraq, has been banned from Iraq. Nonetheless, he "continues to oversee the construction of the embassy in Baghdad; to be the liaison with the contractor, Kuwait-based First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting Co.; and to supervise other projects for the State Department's Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) bureau." The project has been marred by huge construction flaws, poor workmanship, delays, and now a criminal probe, in addition to Henry Waxman's investigation. (McClatchy)
In its most detailed brief to date, the U.S. government defended its proclaimed right to hold a U.S. citizen in isolated military detention without charges (for four years) and subject that citizen to harsh interrogation techniques. The Justice Department’s motion was filed this week in the Padilla case in South Carolina. (Christian Science Monitor)
Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) is taking a page from the White House playbook. Yesterday, one of Lewis' aides announced on the House floor (via a clerk) that he would ignore a grand jury subpoena for his testimony and documents, citing that "the ad testificandum aspect of that subpoena is not consistent with the rights and privileges of the House." (Politico)
The Republican political machine in Alaska is well oiled. Today, when the Alaska legislature returns to work today, it will review a state oil tax that is at the crux of federal investigations into representative Don Young (R-AK) and senator Ted Stevens (R-AK). Oil politics have also led to charges against three former Republican state representatives and the former CEO of Veco. (Seattle Time)
It's Tammany Hall for the 21st century! Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has found a goldmine of campaign donations in New York's Chinatown, a place where dishwashers and waiters with no public address and questionable legal status can afford to make donations from $500 to $2300. Many of those interviewed donated at the request of their local community organization, which has developed a relationship with the junior senator. Some have also suggested that their donations were less than voluntary. (LA Times)
Screeners at major airports failed to discover fake bombs (sent through as tests) over 60% of the time last year. LA International Airport alone let through a staggering 75% of test bombs. (USA TODAY)





Comments (5)
What it appears from the article on Clinton is that she's sold her soul to the Chinese to raise countless campaign dollars. Why would anybody making $21k a year be donating such substantial amounts of money to any campaign? - unless they were either being forced to or it was donated on their behalf in a laundering scheme, like Hsu.
I would hope that this story is taken seriously enough that we see some FEC investigations into the matter; though with the state of the media I'm not sure if this will be reported on properly at all.
October 19, 2007 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
So much for the image of Hillary's campaign as a sleek professional organization. They can't even figure out when they get obviously fraudulent donations. I guess we'll be hearing about her campaign returning donations every few weeks until the election.
October 19, 2007 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
much as Hillary is annoying the hell out of me recently, I'd bet all of my money and possessions that Republican creepy obsessed bastards are setting her up with shit like this story. there is NO WAY her campaign would be a part of something so obviously corrupt. not to say she isn't a typical politician and all, but she's not that stupid, not even close to being that stupid.
October 19, 2007 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boy, onceler, that is a good thought.
My first thought, because I too do not think she is stupid, is that Chinese immigrants have a reputation for being excellent savers, so I didn't think it surprising that anyone in Chinatown would have cash to donate. I don't know enough to know if that's a stereotype and offensive. I certainly don't mean it to be - I find the ability to save up exceptionally admirable.
Where is Karl Rove and his hench-people? I think I liked it better when he was in the West Wing and we could keep an eye on him.
October 19, 2007 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
On the Alaska story, why did the oil industry push for that tax? That seems backwards.
On the Clinton story, once again she realizes my biggest concern about her, that she associates with rich people of dubious ethics who want something from her, and she can't see why that's a problem. Why is she polling 40% when other candidates don't have this lobbyist/crony problem?
October 19, 2007 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink