« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Army: Wounded Vets Will Get All of Their Bonus Money
After learning from the media that a wounded Iraq veteran, Private First Class Jordan Fox of Pennsylvania, was asked to return his enlistment bonus when an IED prematurely ended his soldiering career, the Army has emphasized that its policy is not to recoup those bonuses. But it doesn't know how the snafu occurred. And that raises concerns that other wounded soldiers might lose their benefits through a different bureaucratic mix-up.
Apropos of Paul's good question on Wednesday about recruitment bonuses -- are they paid up front, allowing them to be partially withheld if soldiers are unable to complete their tours? -- we have an answer. Bonuses are paid incrementally, for the most part, except for military jobs facing a "critical shortfall" of personnel.
That means infantrymen are probably going to get their bonuses on the installment plan, though Army spokesman Paul Boyce -- who has the unfortunate assignment of fielding reporters' calls on the Jordan Fox story post-Thanksgiving -- says that wouldn't "necessarily" be the case. "It depends on the situation for the individual soldier," he explains.
So what percentage of recruitment bonuses are paid up front? Boyce doesn't know, and says that there isn't a system in place for determining that percentage "at this time."
Very well. So couldn't the Army conceivably not pay the remaining installments of a recruitment bonus to a soldier unable to complete his or her tour, as opposed to the current policy of not seeking recoupment?
Not so, says Boyce. Five levels of safeguards protect against non-disbursement: the soldier's finance office through his or her chain of command; the non-commissioned officer who recruited the soldier and tracks whether the soldier receives required financial assistance; the Army Inspector General; the Defense Finance and Accounting Service; and the soldier personally coming forward if the check isn't in the mail. Despite soldiers like Private First Class Jordan Fox being improperly asked to return part of their recruitment bonuses after their war injuries prevented them from finishing their tours, Boyce says the Army is "extremely confident" that soldiers aren't having installments of their enlistment bonuses withheld if they become physically unable to complete their service.
We'll see. Rep. Jason Altmire (D-PA), whose constituents include Pfc. Fox, is pushing a bill to have the Army pay out enlistment bonuses up front. Boyce wouldn't say whether the Army has a position on the bill beyond emphasizing that the Army will comply with the provision if it becomes law.





gosh, are they sure they can afford it?
whoever's putting ads for high blood pressure under articles like these is a genius.
November 23, 2007 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the government is running short of money, maybe Halliburton could chip in something toward those bonuses.
I heartily agree with Mike Black's comment on the ads for high blood pressure meds after articles pointing up yet another way the DOD and the present powers-that-be are shafting wounded veterans.
November 23, 2007 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
.....While veterans' health care costs are skyrocketing and increasing numbers of veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are beginning to claim benefits, President Bush proposed cutting the Veterans Administration medical system by 3 percent in 2008 and leveling funding for the following four years.
This follows the news last week that President Bush has proposed fee increases that would force
600,000 veterans off TRICARE, the Pentagon's health care system. (Associated Press, 2/22/06)
Their callousness makes me ill.
I am tired of US citizens being treated like garbage as in the Katrina victims in NOLA and the Gulf which is ongoing with Halliburton stealing the money and doing nothing to help our citizens. The abandonment of citizens in Lebanon and the illegal abandonment of our troops by not supplying adequate armor, ammunitian, workable objectives or even sanitary food and water.
Stop destroying our military. PTSD and DU poisoning MUST be acknowledge and any service man or woman subjected to rape MUST receive justice and fair treatment. This is despicable
www.suzanneswift.org.
November 23, 2007 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would seem that SNAFU has been the modus operandi for the U.S. military for decades. I have just finished reading several dozen letters written by an uncle serving--and dying--in World War I. "Neglect" is a benign word to use in describing how those young men were treated by their own army. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
November 23, 2007 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think their revenue and resources for
the VA should be first and foremost
set aside for those that returned from
duty with a bona-fide disability, all
others come after.
November 24, 2007 4:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another related question:
If one of our soldier's received an enlistment or re-enlistment bonus, to be paid out on this Pentagon installment plan, but fails to finish his or her enlistment obligation (like, let's say, they get killed in action, fall ill and are evacuated, die in a road accident), then what happens to the remaining enlistment/re-enlistment bonus that is owed them?
Do surviving family members get this money, if one of our soldier's died over in Iraq or Afghanistan or wherever? Does the Bush administration's Pentagon keep the money?
I wouldn't put anything past the most corrupt and vile administration we've ever seen in the White House. So, I'd bet that any of our soldiers who've died or been incapacitated, who were unable to finish their tour of duty, had their enlistment/re-enlistment bonus (paid out on this Pentagon installment plan) go bye-bye.
Why do I believe this?
Because any administration willing to short our soldiers on body armor and armored troop transports, on adequate rest time between deployments, on healthcare through our VA hospitals, would be more than willing to shaft our soldiers over a few bucks...while at the same time this mal-administration, this criminal enterprise operating out of the Bush/Cheney White House, literally throws taxpayer money at their corporate crony pals and private contract mercenaries.
November 24, 2007 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
They better get this situated. This is ridiculous. The funding cut debacle to the military currently being discussed in Congress isn't going to help this situation either though these men and women should be the top priority.
November 25, 2007 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink