« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
HUD "Snitch" Jumped Ship
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson is a man who values loyalty.
Back in 2006, he aired his philosophy for awarding HUD contracts:
"Why should I reward someone who doesn't like the president, so they can use funds to try to campaign against the president? Logic says they don't get the contract. That's the way I believe."
Of course, things have unraveled for Jackson since then. A Congressional investigation and inspector general probe launched in the wake of his comments. And now a federal grand jury is investigating whether he lied to investigators when he told them that he doesn't "touch contracts."
Evidence is mounting that Jackson did indeed touch contracts -- in particular, contracts for his friends and, the National Journal reports today, companies that owe him large sums of money.
And here's where loyalty comes back into play. Late last month, a senior HUD official abruptly resigned from his post, effective January 4th. The official, Orlando Cabrera, gave no other explanation than that he was leaving to "spend time with my wife and kids."
Today's Journal gives a good idea of why he might have left:
Orlando Cabrera, the outgoing assistant secretary for public and Indian housing, was among those questioned. When contacted by National Journal, Cabrera acknowledged that investigators had interviewed him. "I have been questioned as a witness," he said, "and I have been told that I am not a target of the investigation." Cabrera and Jackson are not on speaking terms. HUD insiders say that the secretary was angry with Cabrera for speaking to investigators and considers him "a snitch."
The Journal focuses on one key contract in particular. In 2006, Jackson elbowed Cabrera aside and installed his deputy as the point man for a huge contract with the Housing Authority of New Orleans. The $127 million contract eventually went to a team that included an Atlanta company, Columbia Residentialm, which has "significant financial ties to Jackson: It owes him between $250,000 and $500,000 'for past services,' according to the HUD secretary's public financial disclosure reports."





"Snitch"? The "last honest man" at HUD sounds more accurate.
December 18, 2007 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if all Bush appointees and their underlings get those trendy "Stop Snitchin'" tees when they sign on?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Snitchin'
December 18, 2007 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
A snitch? How adult of a Cabinet Secretary to describe a senior government official in that manner.
The road is going to grow ever more rocky as more "snitches" come out of the woodwork as this nightmare winds down.
December 18, 2007 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Leaving to spend time with family = getting out of dodge just ahead of the federal indictment.
December 18, 2007 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cue the Benny Hill music...
December 18, 2007 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm reasonably certain we're about to get into an area of national security. Time of the investigation to be shut down. (The ghost of scandals past.)
December 18, 2007 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a shame, as Cabrera was a standup and effective appointee/ bureaucrat.
December 18, 2007 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The RULE of LOYALTY.
The hook is: OATH loyalty…. The sinister control method and means introduced in Bush/Cheney early days designed to separate wheat from the chaff — a check on potential moderate Republican and/or plantation servi political dissent — inculcating fear of ruin into the heart and mind of anyone considering collaboration or desertion. Solemn oath rituals have been repeated in private Federal and Red State swearing in ceremonies whereby TheoNeoCon PC allegiance is reaffirmed in God’s name, serving to warn fair weather acolytes, and remind the congregation: “To the death — swing one, swing all.”
December 18, 2007 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is the Democrat party? We barely hear a word on the news or talk shows from Democrats speaking about the unprecedented levels of corruption in this Republican administration. The lack of message discipline and strategy. We should see every Democrat raising these issues. Anytime an issue is raised about the Democrats, the response should be: "Why do you speak of such trivial matters when this administration and the Republican party has literally put a for sale sign on the government. Let me give you but a few examples..."
December 18, 2007 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Democrat party." Such a blast to hear this Republican talking point of yore, though the people who use it are probably not the best people to be giving advice to the Dems, at least among those who pay attention to credibility.
December 18, 2007 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not as offended as I used to be when someone uses the term "Democrat party." It seems to me that Democrats in Congress place more emphasis on the "Party of Democrats" than they do on the being the "Party of Democracy."
December 18, 2007 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Democrat Party"
Not sure where it started, but Karl Rove uses it repeatedly on election night 2000.
Hmm...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcUYBOlqmME
December 18, 2007 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
JMOHR, I think maybe the keywords are "news and talk shows." Depends on what you listen to and where you read.
December 19, 2007 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cabrera's "not a target" of the investigation? That should raise a red flag.
December 19, 2007 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cabrera's "not a target" of the investigation? That should raise a red flag.
December 19, 2007 6:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more reason to kick out every GOP member of congress.
Seven Years of bush an GOP Misrule =
NO Border Security in This Country
NO Social Security Reform
NO Immigration Reform
NO Health Care Reform
oh, and lastly:
WHERE THE H*LL IS OSAMA???
December 19, 2007 7:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
SNITCH IS BEING SO KIND. He is only trying to save himself first. According to press accounts he ordered subordinate staff to contract at Virgin Islands and New Orleans. Cabrera has looked the other way to fraud reports and whistlblower firings involving his friends in Texas and So. California. Congress and FBI need to look into these because the HUD OIG is in the tank.
December 19, 2007 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
They can't convict the lot of them soon enough. Which begs the question--"Why not?" when one considers how obvious the malfeasances are. The only conclusion that can be reached is that the Democratic leadership is also on the take.
December 20, 2007 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The only conclusion that can be reached"... by you, maybe.
December 20, 2007 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink