« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Swift Boat Vet "Appalled" by McCain Smear
Is the ragtag Vietnam Veterans against John McCain giving swift boating a bad name?
Yes, said Swift Boat Veterans and POW’s for Truth treasurer Weymouth Symmes. "I don't think there's any truth to that at all. He was a hero, in my opinion. I'd be appalled if anybody questioned his war service."
The reason I asked is that the anti-McCain group seems to be piggybacking on the Swift Boat Vets in their recent mailer, which was sent out to 80 newspaper editors. (For a quick summary of the group's attack and McCain's response, see the AP.)
In the mailer (above), you can see the icon for the Swift Boat Vets for Truth in the lower left hand corner. But Symmes said that the real Swift Boat Vets isn't affiliated with the group -- or any group active in the 2008 race. In fact, he'd never even heard of the group, adding "they must be a pretty small and obscure group, I would guess."
In fact, on closer inspection, the Swift Boat Vets icon has a North Carolina address, the same as the anti-McCain vet group. And we've been having an internal debate here at TPM whether, in a possible precaution against charges of infringement, it actually says Swift Boot Vets for Truth:
We've been playing phone tag with Jerry Kiley, one of the founders of the group, and hope to speak to him later this afternoon to sort all this out.
As for the size of the group and it's supporters, it's not clear. They filed papers with the FEC last February and March establishing the group, announcing in a statement of purpose that "We will collect donations to pay for a web site, radio and TV ads exposing John McCain only (negative advertizing). We are completely independant (sic) and not connected to any political organization. All of the money collected will be used for the express purpose of defeating John McCain.” But they've reported no contributions since then, even failing to file the required mid-year report, which won them a chiding letter from the FEC.
Kiley, along and another Vietnam vet, Ted Sampley, who's part of the effort, also ran a Vietnam Veterans against John Kerry website in 2004. They've also been after McCain for a while; they registered the Vietnam Veterans against John McCain website back in 2005.
Sampley* has quite a history with McCain, going back to the 1980's, even getting into a fight with McCain's longtime aide Mark Salter. Here's an account from a long piece in the Phoenix New Times back in 1999:
*Update/Correction: This post originally said that Sampley is an Arizona resident -- he's actually in North Carolina. Another of the group's founders, Earl Hopper, is in Arizona.
In December 1992, as the Senate hearings were winding down, Sampley was making the rounds in the halls of Congress, handing out copies of his latest periodical, which featured McCain and the Queen of Diamonds on the cover with the headline: "Sen. John McCain: 'The Manchurian Candidate.'"The story condemned McCain for his lack of support on the live POW/MIA issue, and cited the U.S. News article and others as evidence that McCain had collaborated with the enemy and was protecting the Vietnamese for fear of being exposed. The article summarized the senator's political career, relying on reports from daily newspapers and wire services. It touched on McCain's role in the Keating Five and his friendship with former Arizona Republic publisher Duke Tully, who had fabricated a military career for himself, only to be exposed in the mid-Eighties.
Sampley claims he never intended to go into McCain's office, but when he realized that's where he was, he tossed a copy to the receptionist, requesting that it be delivered to the senator's veterans affairs assistant.
Mark Salter happened to be standing by the front desk. Sampley's version of what ensued goes like this:
"He [Salter] said to me, 'You son of a bitch.' Those were his words. He said, 'You low-life bastard.' . . . The dumbass followed me, yakking at me all the way down the hall. I'm thinking, 'Why doesn't this guy go away? I'm leaving.' I turn to go into the stairway, he followed me in there and for some reason he felt frisky and he punched me in the back of the shoulder--not hard--and that was it. I turned around and I fried him."
Salter claims he just tapped Sampley on the shoulder to get his attention. Security guards intervened. Sampley eventually was found guilty of assault and sentenced to two days in jail and 180 days of probation. He also was ordered to stay away from McCain and his staff.
Kiley himself has a history of brushes with the law. A U.S. District Court found Jerry Kiley not guilty of charges that he attempted to harass Vietnamese Prime Minister Phan Van Khai when he was visiting Washington, D.C for a June 2005 U.S.-Vietnam Trade Council meeting in Washington. But as a result of Riley’s acquittal and pressure from the Secret Service, federal prosecutors filed a new charge of unlawful entry. He was arrested and charged on June 21, 2005 after he slipped past security at the Mayflower Hotel and then threw a glass of wine in the Prime Minister’s direction during a $1000 a plate dinner. Kiley has a history of evading security at Vietnamese functions, including an event that Khai attended at the Plaza Hotel in NYC in 1993.
We'll let you know when we hear more.














You reap what you sow. All swiftboaters are created equal and deserve equal scorn.
January 16, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That definitely says "boot." Hi-larious.
January 16, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every national election must be about the Viet Nam war- we can never get past it - because it is so vital to the heart of Conservatives.
Conservatives are stuck in 1962. They do not like most of the innovations that have happened since then. Sure, they like internet porn, but they hate just about everything else.
McCain is the candidate for these people. McCain already knows everything he wants to know, he is inflexible, he is one hundred percent certain of everything. He will listen to no one, never change his mind, ignore advisors, learn nothing new.
So let us re-fight the Viet Nam war yet again - it was a just cause, but the hippies would not 'let us win'. The US military is justified inserting itself anywhere in the world for whatever reason, or no reason, because it is good and true. Anyone who does not support military adventures is a traitor, a communist, a terrorist.
Backward-looking, muddle-headed old mossbacks are BORING. Change the channel.
January 16, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope Kerry comes out in strong support of McCain on this and shows who is the bigger man.
January 16, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
This needs to get out there in the MSM. I hope someone with brains still works for the mainstream outlets and picks up on this stuff.
January 16, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can someone explain the POW/MIA flags, the obsession generally, and how it fits into the current zietgiest?
A lot to ask in comments, but I don't quite understand it. You see these flags on government buildings, construction sites, and on the back of NYC taxis, too.
thanks
January 16, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tit for tat is the best evolutionary strategy, so hey, bring them on. If McCain had stuck by his earlier denouncement of the SBVT lies about Kerry, I would have more sympathy, but he didn't so he deserves that ever shit the Swift Boot Vets throw at him.
Incidentally, Mr Swift Boat complaining about the Swift Boots is delicious. His specific complaint is delicious with a cherry on top. His complaining about lying, dishonest and inaccuracy is delicious with cherries, whipped cream and hot fudge.
January 16, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me get this straight. These treasonous vermin opened Pandora's Box and are now shocked that the evils they unleashed are being used against a "true patriot."
Gee, ya mean like the "true patriot" they used them against, a man who actually WENT to Vietnam and was actually WOUNDED?
January 16, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The idea is that American soldiers were abandoned, left behind, as POWs and MIAs.
As long as these soldiers were unaccounted for, some people say, there should be no normalization of US-Viet Nam relations. And the lefties who did not 'let us win' are guilty of abandoning the men left as MIAs/POWs. And we are distracted from thinking about the death and destruction suffered by the Vietnamese people. And the war can continue to be fought forever.
Every war leaves men behind whose fates are unknown - not a new idea.
January 16, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was a real dirt campaign in 2000, and one of the charges from the FreeRepublic (conservatism is good, radical conservatism better) was the manchurian candidate attacks, that McCain was emotionally unstable to be president as a consequence of his capture, then there was the vietnam apologist attack, that McCain was one whom turned his back on the cause of Vietnam, "the dead enders" of Vietnam I guess you could sum them up as, and then there was the attacks on his family and the adoption issue, the suggestion that he had done so as an outreach to liberals, the suggestion that he had a whore supplied while he was in capture, and allot of other frankly ludicrous attacks that = tin-foil, moonbat, and kook attacks. I saw that the Freepers even pulled a revival of the Vince Foster and Alamo girl writings, the Clinton death list.
South Carolina at face value was the choir singing at the GOP debate, but in real practice is really down and dirty campaigning.
If you were to work in SC for 4 months right in the middle of their primary, you would be genuinely shocked the way that 'bubba' plays hardball.
But really this is just a regurgitation of the same attacks that came from the far right 8 years ago, and resulted in the hard feelings immediately after the campaign in that state between Bush surrogates and McCain's
But there is definetly a long held charge that McCain is a RHINO in some segments of the GOP, and these attacks have been around for quite some time.
But yeah in SC, all is fair play. Bubba plays hardball by his rules, plays it with a smile as they twist a knife. SC is not for the politcal novice, and if your state is late in the primaries and has had no real input into selecting the president of the united states, then you miss the heavy military retirement vote in SC and the way that these attacks are circulated and maintained.
Bob Jones was just an example of the 'public dispute' in SC, the fliers left on cars, were much more ugly and below the belt. That is the way bubba is..
That is their tradition.
January 16, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain has taken a boatload of Swiftboat money. Isn't this fascinating: the swiftboaters coming to McCain's rescue. The same group that smeared McCain's friend John Kerry are now McCain's best friend. How sad.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080107/hayes
"The most notable recipient of Swift Boat largesse is John McCain, erstwhile front-runner and Stand Up Guy. When the Swift Boat ads were first unleashed, McCain was alone among his Republican colleagues to condemn them. A fellow Vietnam veteran, a good friend of Kerry's and a former target of smears about his own service, McCain called the ads "dishonest and dishonorable," a "cheap stunt," and he urged Bush to condemn them. But in pursuit of the GOP nomination, McCain ditched the mantle of maverick for that of hack, and his once-floundering, possibly rejuvenated campaign has been aided along the way by $61,650 from Swift Boat donors and their associates. "There is such a thing as dirty money," said Senator Kerry in a statement, after The Nation informed him of McCain's FEC records. "I'm surprised that the John McCain I knew who was smeared in 2000 and thought so-called Swift Boating was wrong in 2004 would feel comfortable taking their money after seeing the way it was used to hurt the veterans I know he loves." (McCain's office did not return calls for comment.)"
January 16, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is an intersection between John McCain and Orson Swindle and the fight they had with Paul Weyrich and Ted Sampley back in 2000--
Ted Sampley was an associate and co-founder of "Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry" in 2004 of Jerry Kiley, the organizer of the "Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain" that put out this flier.
Kiley, reportedly, is a donor to Joe Lieberman, and I break it all down in a post here (if I may be so bold as to blog whore for my pal Blue Girl's site)
http://bluegirlredmissouri.blogspot.com/
A big tip of the hat to the commenters over here--ya'll rock!
January 16, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
If this is new to you-allll I'll have to take you down 'history lane' of how the internet effected stuff, when few at the time knew it was happening.
One of the best stories and nearly unbelievable was when:
How tribalwar goatse'd CNN
But at about the same time late 90's a pretty orgamized group of internet folks in the early days of FreeRepublic did stuff, that you wouldn't believe could have happened but did.
It was astro-turf back when astro-turf wasn't understood.
But these are almost a decade old attacks, pulled from archive, and regurgitated again, in their genesis from the far, far, right.
David Hackworth Freeper.. deceased, but his work lives on.
January 16, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sampley and Riley have been low-budget vendetta merchants in the Carolinas for ages.
The ShitBoaters who targetted Kerry were different in kind and degree: they were well funded, professional ops with Bush-friendly money out of Texas.
January 16, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
In any other time I would be appalled. I wouldn't vote for a (non-service related) phony like McCain, but I would NORMALLY be appalled at this kind of treatment of any person that went through what McCain and others did for us. This is the equivalent of Chimpy sending real soldiers to die, while he basically blew off any service himself (well, I guess too much coke could kill you too). Anyone who says "I would have done this" isn't worth listening to. PTSS is rampant in the VN vet community.
These are not normal times. After a decade of this kind "politics" from the repugs, maybe I'll feel guilty AFTER we reclaim our country from the likes of McCain and his masters.
This is better than I had hoped for, like watching the school bully turning on his followers after losing a fight.
January 16, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
..."The rabbit hurt me the cat broke me?" WTF? Is this a reference to something?
January 16, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Give them a bad name!" That odious person has got to be certifiably insane!
January 16, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I came here for the schadenfreude, but I stayed to read the misspellings in the Swift Booters' filing with the FEC.
Buncha semi-illiterate hate-mongers. In other words, perfect Republicans.
January 16, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sampley's a Duncan Hunter official
http://www.usvetdsp.com/feb07/hunter_vets.htm
January 16, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regrettably, SwiftBoat Veterans For Truth opened up a Pandora's box and someone is bound to imitate their tactics.
The tactics are wrong regardless of who employs them.
Can't we win without the crazy, low IQ, ignorant demographic in our corner, assuming that kind of stuff works to some degree?
January 16, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
".."The rabbit hurt me the cat broke me?" WTF? Is this a reference to something?"
Think this is what you are looking for:
http://www.usvetdsp.com/mcianhro.htm
January 16, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only people that will be fooled by this kind of campaign are the "faux spews" types anyway. It's kind'a like supporting Imus right to exist; he isn't converting anyone so who cares.
January 16, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have gone to the Denver VA at least twice a week for years dealing with physical/emotional/substance abuse therapy.
Too many Viet vets wear hats, pins, jackets proclaiming who they are. For some that is their only identity. Ironically they embrace the Republicans that fucked us over after 1968.
Those filling the waiting rooms, protethsis
clinic, PTSD groups, substance abuse programs who are back from Iraq and Afghanistan display only their age.
Self hate from so many years ago..that is never purged can only
be expressed outward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8TwMqpBeL4
January 16, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the things I didn't have time to get into, and Paul did a great job highlighting it above, was this whole battle royale that was fought over Vietnam and the POW issue.
McCain was clearly on one side and all of his accusers were on the other side, and they had what amounts to a bloodbath over it in the pre-Internet era.
I'm finding stuff that has been archived, and it all looks creepy and Freeper-ish, and it just smacks of something I think a lot of Americans didn't realize was going on.
January 16, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, definitely reads "boot."
As in "Das Boot," the 1981 German film about life on a WWII U-boat?
Are the Swiftboaters revealing their true role models?
January 16, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
ww.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=508210&in_page_id=1811
The man who knew too much? The truth about the death of Hillary Clinton's close friend Vince Foster
By SALLY BEDELL SMITH
Last updated at 00:23am on 15th January 2008>
And then the:
ww.alamo-girl.com
THE DOWNSIDE LEGACY ARCHIVES
The Great Satan on The Free Republic is who? Steve Hatfill
I guess my point is this, LONG BEFORE the FBI snubbed TPM there was the "Great Vast Right Wing Conspiracy."
But when FreeRepublic started donating PAC money, and started actually tossing the stuff around, they were in part legit, are they on the FBI email list?
Laughing, but the real spread of the Manchurian Candidate manifesto!! Is here.
ww.freerepublic.com/forum/a389bdcbe0de0.htm
Manchurian Candidate McCain: Release your POW files!
Enough said???
LOL, it is deja vue all over again.
But seriously folks, Muckraking is not new.
January 16, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has been fluffing bush43 since he came into office.
I hope Kerry has the good sense to not say a word.
January 16, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a Viet Nam army aviation vet involved in inserting and extracting special ops people into Laos and Cambodia I can say that what truly amazes me is that bomber pilots like McCain were kept alive at all. It shows an amazing discipline amongst the Viet Namese people that they wouldn't have outright ripped captured fliers limb from limb for the aerial atrocities we were committing day after day after day. The whole POW/MIA flag issue is designed to keep us hating the Viet Namese for some sinister hiding of the captives decades after there would no even be a propaganda purpose. Disgusting to see these flags still flying from federal and state office buildings.
January 16, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because he was kept isolated from other U.S. prisoners during these years of captivity, no one, except McCain and his captors, know exactly to what he was subjected or how he responded. Most information in the public record detailing McCain's experience with the North Vietnamese during this time frame came from McCain and McCain only.
"In May of 1968, I [McCain] was interviewed by two North Vietnamese generals at separate times." U.S. News and World Report, May 14, 1973 article written by former POW John McCain
McCain claimed (page 133 of The Nightingale's Song, by Robert Timberg) that he was first offered early release (parole) in late June, 1968. He said that after months of interrogation he was "summoned" to a room that had soft chairs and a glass table on which were "cookies, a pot of tea, and cigarettes."
He said "Major Bai, known to the prisoners as the Cat," was waiting for him. He said "a second Vietnamese known as the Rabbit, stood by to serve as translator."
McCain said that as he "helped himself" to the cookies, tea and cigarettes, the Cat began speaking through the translator. He said they talked about "his father, other members of his family, the war." McCain said that after about two of talk, the Cat asked him if he wanted to be released. The Cat, according to McCain, told him to go back to his cell and think about it.--The Nightingale's Song.
McCain said that three nights later the Cat sent for him and again asked him if he wanted to go home. McCain said he answered No. --The Nightingale's Song
A week later, according to McCain, he was taken to a room in which the camp commander, who the prisoners had nicknamed Slopehead, was waiting. McCain said ten guards and an interrogator nicked named The Prick was also in the room. --The Nightingale's Song
McCain said the guards charged into him beating and kicking him until he 'lay on the floor, bloody, arms and legs throbbing, ribs cracked, several teeth broken off at the gumline." The Vietnamese, according to McCain, wanted him to confess to being a "black criminal." --The Nightingale's Song
McCain said he was next introduced for the first time to the "torture ropes." He said the torture went on for several days before he broke and agreed to write and sign a confession that he was a "black criminal." McCain said that he was moved to another building away from the other POWs. --The Nightingale's Song
McCain said (page 136) that he was so distraught because he had signed the statement that he attempted suicide but was stopped when a guard burst into the room. --The Nightingale's Song
In August 1968, other POWs learned for the first time that John McCain had been taken prisoner (page 137) after Charlie Plumb and Kay Russell figured out that the "mystery" prisoner in a neighboring cell is McCain. --The Nightingale's Song
A September 13, 1968, cable from Averell Harriman, U.S. ambassador-at-large, to the State Department confirmed that McCain's captors had offered him early release, but that he had refused. The cable reported that, according to the Vietnamese, "Commander McCain feared that if he was released before the war is over, President [Lyndon] Johnson might 'cause difficulties' for his father because people will wonder if McCain had been brainwashed." Harriman speculated that instead, McCain was abiding by the Code of Conduct.-- The Phoenix New Times March 25, 1999
June 1969 - "Reds Say PW Songbird Is Pilot Son of Admiral. . . Hanoi has aired a broadcast in which the pilot son of United States Commander in the Pacific, Adm. John McCain, purportedly admits to having bombed civilian targets in North Vietnam and praises medical treatment he has received since being taken prisoner." New York Daily News, June 5, 1969
"The English-Language broadcast beamed at South Vietnam was one of a series using American prisoners. It was in response to a plea by Defense Secretary Melvin S. Laird, May 19, that North Vietnam treat prisoners according to the humanitarian standards set forth by the Geneva Convention." The Washington Post
In December, McCain was moved out of "The Plantation" and into a "one man cell" in the "Hanoi Hilton.". On Christmas Eve, McCain chatted with the Cat. They talked about McCain refusing early release. --The Nightingale's Song
"There was pressure to see American antiwar delegations, which seemed to increase as the time went on. But, there wasn't any torture.
In January 1970, I [McCain] was taken to a quiz with 'The Cat.' He told me that he wanted me to see a foreign guest." U.S. News and World Report, May 14, 1973 article written by former POW John McCain
A declassified DOD document reports an interview between POW McCain and Dr. Fernando Barral, a Spanish psychiatrist who was living in Cuba at the time. The interview was published in the Havana Granma in January 1970.
According to the DOD report, the meeting between Barral and McCain (which was photographed by the Vietnamese) took place away from the prison at the office of the Committee for Foreign Cultural Relations in Hanoi. During the meeting, POW McCain sipped coffee and ate oranges and cakes with his interrogator.
While talking with Barral, McCain seriously violated the military Code of Conduct by failing to evade answering questions "to the utmost" of his ability when he, according to the DOD report, helped Barral by answering questions in Spanish, a language McCain had learned in school.
1973 - McCain was released from the Hilton on March 15, 1973.
Two Former POWs Say They Doubt McCain Was Physically Abused
1999 - March 25, 1999, The Phoenix New Times: Ted Guy and Gordon "Swede" Larson, two former POWs, who were McCain's senior ranking officers (SRO's), at the time McCain says he was tortured in solitary confinement, told the New Times that while they could not guarantee that McCain was not physically harmed, they doubted it.
"Between the two of us, it's our belief, and to the best of our knowledge, that no prisoner was beaten or harmed physically in that camp [known as "The Plantation"]," Larson says. ". . . My only contention with the McCain deal is that while he was at The Plantation, to the best of my knowledge and Ted's knowledge, he was not physically abused in any way. No one was in that camp. It was the camp that people were released from."
In 1993, during one of his many trips back to Hanoi, McCain asked the Vietnamese not to make public the records they hold pertaining to returned U.S. POWs.
January 16, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I said at the time the Swift Boat liars were Swiftboating John Kerry, all those morons really did was denigrate their own service by forever demeaning what a Swift Boat actually is.
Forever, instead of a Swift Boat meaning "patriotic service at a time of war", it means "a disgraceful, slanderous pack of lies perpetrated by a bunch of sorry losers against a political target".
"Swift Boat" is now a derogatory verb, not an act of patriotism.
I hope all of you Swift Boat liars are proud every time you hear your service defamed when the words "Swift Boat" are uttered.
You sad sacks "Swiftboated" yourselves.
Reap, sow.
January 16, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
'Swiftboaters' are scum. That includes the reprobates who went after Kerry, and the same types who smeared Max Cleland.
They're rightwingers who can claim some form of military service -- if that's been questioned, they get angry ; some of them may actually have served in Vietnam (Frankly, anyone can walk into a room and claim veteran status. They may have "friends" with them who will "vouch" for it -- but that doesn't make it true).
When criticized for distortion or as liars, they whine and scream that their status as veterans who 'fought' for their country is being impugned.
In other words, they're a bunch of repple-depple types who hide behind the honor earned by actual, brave men, in order to lower any political debate to the level of a bar fight, something they probably relish.
In another age, these sorts of narrow and bigoted brawlers, liars, would have been called brownshirts -- or, here in America, 'Silver Shirts'.
Scum, by any other name.
January 16, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I looked at some of the material in this or a similar groups website and it raises questions.
They claim that McCain is the son and grandson of 2 admirals and has benefited unusually from that including getting 28 medals for 20 hours of combat flying while some grunts spent thousands of hours in the mud and got nothing.
They claim that McCain benefited from his families rank when he was captured, and claim that he gave tactical information in exchange for special treatment and they have some pretty good evidence.
I hate the idea of smearing someone who has sacrificed for his country as he did but when a man is a candidate for the presidency all things must come to light.
I would like to see McCain address all of the accusations and make this right. We have a real jerk as president now and it could have been avoided by the application of some very bright light. If McCain did give tactical information that resulted in the lives of his shipmates for medical care I want to know. Because the "Swift Boot"ers have outrageous claims doesn't mean that their wrong.
January 16, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The website is registered to a Cindy Brochure of Kinston, NC, which is also the location of the P.O. box on the mailer.
Muckrakers, give her a call!
Cindy Brochure (252) 522-4775 910 Pamela Dr, Kinston, NC 28504
January 16, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cindy Brochure (252) 522-4775 910 Pamela Dr, Kinston, NC 28504
Can this be an exclusive? I mean can we all listen in on the interview?
I would tune in to a raving kook, moonbat, and tin-foil account of these accusations.
If you had it on the veracifier I would watch.
This would run Alex Jones for his money.
January 16, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't we win without the crazy, low IQ, ignorant demographic in our corner, assuming that kind of stuff works to some degree?
From the Dept of Short Answers: Nope.
That 'crazy, low IQ, ignorant demographic" is fucking HUGE. Probably 40-50% of votes cast, in either/bot parties. And yes it works. Think Ronald Raygun.
January 16, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can understand wanting closure, but the Vietnam POW/MIA thing seems wholly 'Merican in that we dropped tens of thousands of soldiers into the jungle of a backwards country, bombed the crap out of them, toxified the place and now are all uppity and whiny about them not turning over every last bone of every last soldier who died there. Oh, please, get a grip. Don't invade distant places if you don't want to leave soldiers behind. How f***in' complicated is that??
Traveling in Britain we came across a WWI monument to their MIAs. The total was well over a million. We're arguing with Vietnam over a few thousand.
January 16, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Im no fan of McCain, a man with no integrity what so ever because of his roll-over on torture and support of Bushco's assault on our Constitution.
But : This is disgusting. No Vet, even someone like McCain, should be treated like this. It was wrong when the slandered Kerry, and this is just as wrong. Shame.
January 16, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
OxyCon >"...all those morons really did was denigrate their own service by forever demeaning what a Swift Boat actually is.
Forever, instead of a Swift Boat meaning "patriotic service at a time of war", it means "a disgraceful, slanderous pack of lies perpetrated by a bunch of sorry losers against a political target"...."
Welcome to politics Asian style.
TPTB in eastern Asia are doing a fine job following their plan to disassemble any possible resistance to a dynasty of Asian dominated power brokers (replacing the tired old Euro-based ones). Puppet masters are puppet masters no matter their culture and language.
Savvy people take note of Sun Tzu
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill" - Sun Tzu
January 16, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The root of the problem is that voters perceive grunt and near-grunt level military service as somehow qualifying a candidate for the highest positions of authority in the government.
Get rid of that perception, and maybe you get rid of candidates running on their "war record." Get rid of candidates running on their "war record" and you might get rid of dirty groups bashing military service just because they don't like someone's politics.
January 16, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they adopted the logo and simply changed the name to a barely perceptible "Swift Boot..." they haven't made themselves any less accountable for trademark infringement. Trademark law protects against similar uses that create a "likelihood of confusion" between the original and the infringing marks.
January 16, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are a lot of things wrong with American politics these days. One of them is these kinds of groups whose sole purpose is to DEFEAT one candidate. It seems to be about hatred, and not much else. Would this group be happy if Ron Paul got elected, as long as McCain didn't?
If you're FOR a candidate well, I understand, that's cool, that's normal, but to just be AGAINST a candidate. . . ? It's just so juvenile and petulant (as evidenced by Kiley's constant attempts to disrupt the Vietnamese Prime Minister's visits. . . "throwing wine" at the PM? Boy that will really change the world!!)
January 16, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
daCascadian wrote on January 16, 2008 4:00 PM
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill" - Sun Tzu
Nice quote, and this is deja vue all over again.
But I have to admit that the battlefield of ideas has changed, that the media has changed, and that we are becoming dated in approach and style....
ww.propagandamatrix.com/articles/january2008/160108World.htm
To be the best now? You package in MTV soundbite, endeavoring to tantalize an increasingly smaller attention span.
An animated gif use to be effective, now it is the video clip that rules, forget the context, show me the action.
It is the Machiavellian utilization of this new media that is now the subtle application of Sun Tzu.
Does anybody really think that people are going to navigate to the DOJ for information?
nah.. we got WIKI and video, we have a new narrative emerging.
January 16, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Appalled" by the McCain smear, but no conscience whatsoever about the lies and hate-filled, malicious smears his group created against Kerry. Well, what goes around...
January 16, 2008 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Live by the smear...die by the smear.
Sorry...no sympathy for McCain here. Johnny got the treatment from Bush in SC (robo push calls to voters asking if their vote would change if they knew he had a black child -- he and his wife had a Thai adoptee.) It killed his campaign drive.
He watched Rove et al do the same thing with the Swift Boat campaign against Kerry and McCain HAD to know just what was happening, but he immediately went out on the campaign trail with Bush and gave him big bear hugs of support.
So there is McCain...getting smeared....watching a colleague and fellow vet get smeared and then turning around and giving big hugs of support to the guy who ultimately was responsible for the smears simply because he wanted to be President and felt he had to suck up to bush to stay in good graces with the party's right wing...their money and their manpower.
So now John....how do you think that decision is paying off......maybe you will learn John. But I guess it is too late. These people never had any morals or ethics....and it seems you are now a member of their group for having made the decision you did. Was it worth it?
January 16, 2008 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it weren't for their general ignorance and illiteracy, I would just assume that the German spelling of Boot was intended and totally in character for the group's fascistic fantasies. I mean, it does seem that the republicans are running to be the head Knight Templar, rather than president. These clowns deserve each other.
January 16, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it weren't for their general ignorance and illiteracy, I would just assume that the German spelling of Boot was intended and totally in character for the group's fascistic fantasies. I mean, it does seem that the republicans are running to be the head Knight Templar, rather than president. These clowns deserve each other.
January 16, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it weren't for their general ignorance and illiteracy, I would just assume that the German spelling of Boot was intended and totally in character for the group's fascistic fantasies. I mean, it does seem that the republicans are running to be the head Knight Templar, rather than president. These clowns deserve each other.
January 16, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
"nogo war wrote on January 16, 2008 2:43 PM:
". . . . Too many Viet vets wear hats, pins, jackets proclaiming who they are. For some that is their only identity.
That nails it. And the underlying additional fact, which is exactly opposite that visual boasting, is that they cannot admit that they were suckered. Were themselves wrong to unquestioningly swallow, believe, and act upon the propaganda we were all fed.
How can one tolerate living day in day out as a constant hater obsessed at core with avoiding one's own responsibility?
US involvement in Viet Nam was wrong; _ergo_, any who supported and advanced that were wrong. That sole admission is by itself nearly sufficient to clear up all the outerdirected bile.
"Ironically they embrace the Republicans that fucked us over after 1968."
They embrace the tough-talkers who help them avoid the fact of their individual responsibility for having been wrong. What's especially bizaare is that they embrace the party of chickenhawks; but apparently "supportive" rhetoric is more important than fact and reality. It doesn't matter that Bushit went AWOL -- a courts-martial offense; it only matters tha he "Supports the troops" -- even though he doesn't.
Sound, appearance, and nonsense, and no substance.
I appreciate those who served, in whatever branch of the military; but the shoveling of veterans under the rug after a war is nothing new; my father signed up the day after Pearl Harbor, and he discovered that fact directly, and his children were told about it. As for Viet Nam: it was difficult deciding what to do, but ultimately it came down to this question: Do I want to go through what my father was put through?"
Nothing at all new about it: read up on the core cause of Shays's Rebellion, which occurred after ratification of the Articles of Confederation, and added some impetus to the framing of the Constitution.
January 16, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Swift Boot Veterans? Could be all aboot a secret Canadian connection, eh?
January 16, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me set some of the record straight. Ted Sampley, Jerry Kiley and Earl Hopper are all friends of mine. I used to be a live POW activist but finally gave up.
Sampley was a Green Beret, served a first tour as a mere paratrooper with 173d Airborne Brigade in Vietnam and a second tour as a Green Beret in Cambodia. Earl Hopper is a retired Air Force colonel, with service in Vietnam, the father of a Vietnam MIA and former chairman of the National League of Families (he was ousted in 1984 when the still incumbent faction decided to focus on the recovery of remains). Jerry Kiley served in Vietnam in the Signal Corps; he has been nicknamed the "stealth activist" for his ability to penetrate places where you would expect tight security (even confronting then vice president Bush at the 1988 Al Smith dinner held during the election). Kiley was prosecuted on misdemeanor charges over his run-in with the Vietnamese premier but acquitted by a United States magistrate judge in a non-jury trial.
What motivates them: first, they all believe that Vietnam held back live prisoners of war at the end of the war. (two quick examples - and there's lots more - 17 men who had appeared in published photos while in captive status were not returned in 1973; between 150 and 200 men that U.S. intelligence, before the end of the war, believed the Vietnamese could absolutely account for, dead or alive, were not returned in 1973). John Kerry and John McCain were the leading lights on a 1991-93 Senate select committee, whose final report essentially rejected the concept that there were still live POWs; thus, they are, in the eyes of Sampley et al., public enemies no. 2 and 1. Second, Kerry's activism in Vietnam Veterans Against the War and his (I suspect, overblown) accounts of war atrocities committed by U.S. troops have not been forgiven. Third, Sampley and especially Kiley have close ties to Vietnamese emigre activists, who aren't much different than Miami Cubans.
Ergo, when Kerry ran in 2004, Sampley and Kiley started an anti-Kerry web site but stood it down when they saw that the Swift Boat vets were going to be far more effective. This year, it's McCain's turn.
One final point (I think I've covered all the issues): the POW-MIA flag flies from government buildings because it's been lobbied into law everywhere. And not necessarily by live POW activists - there are other factions interested in the flag display for other reasons.
January 16, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sampley was involved in the hoax that North Vietnam continued to hold American prisoners after the war ended and the US was covering up the fate of the service people. John McCain and John Kerry held hearings that exposed the hoax for what it was. Sampley hates McCain for that, and other reasons.
More on Ted Sampley
http://www.miafacts.org/prankster.htm
"Sampley (falsely) announced that Tucker's body had been on display for fifteen years inside a glass case in Vietnam. Sampley said Tucker's family had been forced to pledge secrecy on the matter before being allowed to receive the remains.
Sampley said that Tucker had parachuted alive into a crowd of angry villagers, who had hacked at him with a hoe. "They carried him to a North Vietnamese hospital where he was put on an operating table and died," Sampley told reporters. The remains, along with Tucker's flight helmet, were then placed inside the glass case, Sampley said. "The Vietnamese public gawked at this display for fifteen years."
Sampley said that both the U.S. and Vietnamese governments had told Tucker's son he could have the remains only if he swore to keep the facts of the case secret."
"Sampley's antagonism toward McCain stems from the senator's failure to live up to Sampley's idea of how a former POW should embrace the MIA cause. In Sampley's estimation, McCain's personal experience should have caused him to champion the search for live POWs, the way it had Red McDaniel. Instead, McCain focused on the more neutral search for "truth," as well as on the prosecution of charlatans who took money from MIA families."
Much more at the link
January 16, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank bob atkinson and those others to address the persistance of MIA-POW flags in the culture and what it means and why.
But as bob atkinson mentions, what does it mean that all these government buildings fly it? It seems to me to retrograde and bizzare, given the issues the country has to deal with, to be flying that flag.
i was also very moved and saddened by the Denver Vet who attests to how a lot of Vietnam Vets cling to their identity s Vietnam Vets because it is all they have. And they seem to feel the Republican Party is on their side, somehow. It reminds me of Frank's "What's the Matter with Kansas."
And, beyond that, the corrosive effect of that war... it all reminds me of RObert Stone's short story, "Helping."
January 17, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Those who wonder why the Vietnam war is still such an important issue fail to realize that Vietnam veterans have a LONG memory. That is the reason why McCain is being hammered. John McCain's behavior while a member of the Senate Committee on POW/MIA's was a disgrace. And thousands of veterans will NEVER forgive him..and I'm one of those vets.
Despite ALL effors by the government, John Kerry and John McCain, the issue of POW's and MIA's is on of the most sorrid and dispicable episodes in our nation's history. Bill Henod's book, AN ENOROUS CRIME puts McCain's actions under a spot light. Vote for McCain? NOT ON YOUR LIFE!
And, in response to the nonsense Mathew Cowan posted, there is not a shred of evidence supporting the statement that THE ISSUE OF LIVE pow'S BEING HELD IN SEA IS A "HOAX." For those who have suddied the issue, the evidence, while circumstantial, is overwhelming. If the subject were adjudicated in a court of law, there can be little doubt that POW advocates would win.
January 17, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
As Hillary would say
This is all a left wing conspiracy
January 17, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pathetic.
Jerry Kiley was a REMF!
Read their website and the logical contradictions are obvious:
McCain wasn't tortured....but.... he's the Manchurian candidate because he was tortured and brainwashed.
Kiley even blames McCain for having his A-4 aircraft destroyed....when an improperly unsafe missile from another plane behind McCain on the USS Forrestal flight deck launched, blew up his plane, and set off live ordnance that eventually killed 134 crew. Yep, that was McCain's fault (sarcasm).
Who in their right mind would prefer George W. Bush to John McCain? Therefore, Richard Montgomery, Jerry Kiley and Ted Sampley have demonstrated they aren't in their right minds.
McCain is far from my choice, but I respect his service, as well as the above vets.
The Vietnam war is over. Over 58,000 Americans died needlessly. There are no more living POWs. Give it rest guys. Time to sound taps. Let's not repeat the same mistake.
January 18, 2008 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The respose by NATIONAL is typical of those who have little if any knowledge of POW/MIA history. And while I may very well be true that I am NOT in my "right" mind, As someone who spent two tours in combat with the 5th Marines in Vietnam, I have certainly earned the right to express my opinions. I wonder what Mr. NATIONAL ever did to EARN HIS right to express an opinion. (other than having been born American).
The suggestion that America would never abondon it's servicemen is laughable.
The issue of McCain's behavior while in captivity CANNOT be evaluated by public, press or, anyone else. ALL POW debriefing documents were classified at the insistence of Senator McCain. So, those who rush to support McCain are doing so out of a sense of loyalty rather than a position of knowledge. I include those former POW's who support McCain, in my evaluation. After all, it is NOT possible for any of those men to KNOW what McCain did or did not say when he was interrogated. In addition, information contained on the Vietnam Veterans against McCain web site contain a good deal more than simple accusations by Mr. Kiley and Mr. Sampley and deserves a thorough review.
Despite the media's long held position, that McCain is the military's guy, the fact remains that Senator McCain is despised by thousands of veterans who witnessed his despicable behavior while a member of the POW/MIA Committee. Readers of this post are encouraged to read Bill Hendon's AN ENORMOUS CRIME
before they rush to defend McCain.
The issue of POW/MIA's has been so twisted because of political fear, it is impossible to get an honest answer from either the government or the military. Unfortunately for those, like McCain and Kerry, there is
undeniable, historical evidence which pretty much establishes the willingness to "sacrifice the few" for the benefit of the country.
Towards the end of WWll, the Soviets overran hundreds of German POW/concentration camps, seizing HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of allied POW's. These men were shipped to the gulag system...NEVER TO BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.
This is not a matter of conjecture. The US military and US intelligence services were well aware of what was happening and did nothing to stop it. I don't deny that the situation was very dangerous as the Soviets were willing to keep fighting. We (the US) were not.
In 1992, in open session of the Senate POW/MIA hearings, Col. Philip Corso admitted under oath that he was the man who advised Eisenhower to adopt the policy of declaring all the lost POW's dead (and we are talking about TENS OF THOUSANDS of AMERICAN SERVICEMEN). Col. Corso stated that the "country was 'war weary' and would not support a war against the Soviet Union in order to recover our men."
Col.Corso also testified on POW's lost and never returned by the North Koreans as well.
Many who believe the notion that ALL living POW's were returned during Operation Homecoming point to the fact that, after ALL THESE YEARS not a single POW has ever been released(or escaped) despite reward offers in the millions of dollars. Foolish people think that it would be impossible to hide POW's after Vietnam "opened up." A belief born of ignorance. If the Soviets could hide hundreds of thousands of POW's, preventing even a single escape, surely the vast jungles of South East Asia could hide a few hundred POW's
forever.
The FACT is, the United States has a long tradition of abandoning POW's. For the most part, the country couldn't care less. The population makes all the sympathetic noises, and greedily accepts the most unlikely and outrageously absurd explanations put forth by our leaders.
Reagan called it the "highest national priority" and did NOTHING. We've ALL DONE NOTHING and it makes me ant to puke.
If McCain is really such a genuine "Hero" let him release ALL his military records, including his debriefing
documents. In fact, all POW debriefing documents should be released, just as ALL government documents relating to the POW/MIA's. There's a reason why that's never going to happen and it has NOTHING to do with privacy. It has to do with deception, lies and dishonor.
January 18, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again for NATIONAL; The government holds
tens of thousands of documents relating to POW/MIA's. Thousands of those documents relate to eye witness, live sightings. Can NATIONAL offer a SINGLE piece of EVIDENCE supporting his statement that there are/were no live POW/MIA's left behind? A SINGLE piece?
No? I didn't think so. Just more loose
talk about a subject he knows nothing of.
January 18, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink