« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Reid: Bush Attempting to "Manufacture A Crisis"
This morning, Bush stuck to the plan and tried to bring the squeeze on the House:
This Saturday at midnight, legislation authorizing intelligence professionals to quickly and effectively monitor terrorist communications will expire. If Congress does not act by that time, our ability to find out who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they are planning will be compromised.
So dire was the threat that Bush said that he was prepared to delay his scheduled trip to Africa.
Reid responded today by letter, saying that the fault for letting the Protect America Act lapse lay with Bush and the Republicans, and that he regretted Bush's "reckless attempt to manufacture a crisis." The full letter is below.
And so it goes.
February 14, 2008President George W. Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500Dear Mr. President:
I regret your reckless attempt to manufacture a crisis over the reauthorization of foreign surveillance laws. Instead of needlessly frightening the country, you should work with Congress in a calm, constructive way to provide our intelligence professionals with all needed tools while respecting the privacy of law-abiding Americans.
Both the House and the Senate have passed bills to reauthorize and improve the Protect America Act. Democrats stand ready to negotiate with Republicans to resolve the differences between the House and Senate bills. That is how the legislative process works. Your unrealistic demand that the House simply acquiesce in the Senate version is preventing that negotiation from moving forward.Our bicameral system of government was designed to ensure broad bipartisan consensus for important laws. A FISA bill negotiated between the House and the Senate would have firmer support in Congress and among the American people, which would serve the intelligence community's interest in creating stronger legal certainty for surveillance activities.
That negotiation should take place immediately. In the meantime, we should extend the current Protect America Act. Earlier this week you threatened to veto an extension, and at your behest Senate Republicans have blocked such a bill. Yesterday every House Republican voted against an extension.
Your opposition to an extension is inexplicable. Just last week, Director of National Intelligence McConnell and Attorney General Mukasey wrote to Congress that "it is critical that the authorities contained in the Protect America Act not be allowed to expire." Similarly, House Minority Leader Boehner has said "allowing the Protect America Act to expire would undermine our national security and endanger American lives, and that is unacceptable." And you yourself said at the White House today: "There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire." I agree.
Nonetheless, you have chosen to let the Protect America Act expire. You bear responsibility for any intelligence collection gap that may result.
Fortunately, your decision to allow the Protect America Act to expire does not, in reality, threaten the safety of Americans. As you are well aware, existing surveillance orders under that law remain in effect for an additional year, and the 1978 FISA law itself remains available for new surveillance orders. Your suggestion that the law's expiration would prevent intelligence agents from listening to the conversations of terrorists is utterly false.
In sum, there is no crisis that should lead you to cancel your trip to Africa. But whether or not you cancel your trip, Democrats stand ready to negotiate a final bill, and we remain willing to extend existing law for as short a time or as long a time as is needed to complete work on such a bill.
Sincerely,
Harry Reid













Freaking Harry left out the key part about Immunity being more important than security to Bush, but then few people have thought Harry had any stones left in a long time. If he had brought forward the Senate Judiciary Bill instead of the Intel Bill, this immunity issue would be all done except for a Bush veto and the whining from the right. Much of this is still Harrys fault.
February 14, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hope this hits the front page of every major newspaper in the country. Oh, that's right. That space is needed for foorball cheating and baseball cheating stories.
February 14, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Were the Bush statements a threat or a lie?!
February 14, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes.
February 15, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's as if sometimes he sees what's going on, but then tomorrow he treats Bush and the Republicans like they want to be reasonable. Hey Harry, see the GOP walkout in the House? Take a cue from the House Democrats.
How nice it is to be able to write that last sentence.
February 14, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
The President needs to explain:
- Why a FISA-extension bill must include immunity/amndesty for things the President will not openly disclose to Congress;
- Why the FISA-extention bill cannot independently stand on its own without including any language related to the immunity/amnesty;
- Why "amnesty/immunity" for the telecoms does not include amnesty for the media, public, and others who have openly discussed the illegal activity;
- Why Amnesty-immunity cannot be discussed separately in a separate bill.
Where the President provides no answers, there is no Executive leadership. Congress is not obliged to rubber stamp foolish legislation which provides partial amnesty for those alleged to have vilated teh law; but not equal amnesty for those who have attempted to report on and discuss these alleged high crimes.
February 14, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I've never understood about this whole "If FISA expires we won't be able to spy on terrorists and gather information!" debate is that the administration was spying and gathering information fairly efficiently before congress updated FISA. They didn't care if their actions were illegal then so why should they care about FISA now?
February 14, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any Islamo-Fascist-Terrorist that is using electronic communications after 6 years plus of the US's farcical war on terror is a moron.
Now who would the "good" boys and girls in the US government want to be electronically eavesdropping on?
Well lets see there are corporate secrets, political rivals, homegrown dissenters and of course the "offical" reason that created this ,multi-tens of billions of dollars, global eavesdropping network foreign governments.
If I were a betting man, I'm not, I would wager that most if not all terrorist communications were handled via courier either orally or written.
February 14, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The law lets the surveillance continue for additional months.
What if the telecom companies are the ones planning to make it stop?
They're facing billion dollar lawsuits. Do they want to continue and add some billions to that total? Their corporation counsel may well have recommended getting out. Their boards and top executives may well agree.
So it could really be that, behind closed doors, they've told the administration that the surveillance stops unless there's a permanent bill with immunity. That would certainly be responsible management conduct to protect the corporations and their stockholders.
All of which merely suggests that there are multiple ways for the administration to be dishonest. The going explanation is that they know surveillance can continue, but won't admit that in public. An alternative is that it knows surveillance will stop, but won't admit the real reason is that the corporations have cold feet.
On NPR this morning, Director McConnell said two sentences about telecoms, their boards, and their lawsuits. His comments were brief and without detail, but somehow suggested this alternate way of connecting the dots.
February 15, 2008 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Were the Bush statements a threat or a lie?!
Posted by lois plain
son-of-a-bush has the IQ to both threaten and lie at the same time, it's s(*))itting in a commode and munching a pretzel at the same time that he has trouble with.
February 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink