« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Senate Ethics Committee Wags Finger at Larry Craig
The Senate ethics committee sent a letter admonishing Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) this evening. We'll have the letter and details in a moment.
Update: Here's the letter.
Update: The complaint dings Craig for disorderly conduct (“The Committee accepts as proven your guilty plea”), trying to bully the cop who busted him by showing his business card and asking “What do you think about that?” among other things.
His attempt to erase the guilty plea, the senators write, is a craven attempt to avoid fault: “Your claims to the court, through counsel, to the effect that your guilty plea resulted from improper pressure or coercion, or that you did not, as a legal matter, know what you were doing when you pled guilty, do not appear credible.”
The senators also ding him for using campaign funds to pay his legal bills without first seeking approval from the committee.
They conclude:
“The conduct to which you pled guilty, together with your related conduct as set forth above, constitute improper conduct reflecting discreditably on the Senate and through this letter the Select Committee on Ethics, on behalf of and pursuant to authority granted by the United States Senate, publicly admonishes you for that conduct….The Select Committee on Ethics resolves this matter through your public admonition so that, on behalf of the United States Senate, it may make known clearly that the conduct to which you pled guilty, together with the related and subsequent conduct discussed in this letter, is improper conduct which has reflected discreditably on the Senate.”
The letter is signed by committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-CA), and John Cornyn (R-TX), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Ken Salazar (D-CO), and Johnny Isakson (R-GA).





Comments (13)
BREAKING! We now have the letter Sen. Craig sent in response.
Dear Ethics Committee:
Blow me.
Sincerely,
Larry Craig
February 13, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can some insider tell me (and others): how is Mr. Wide Stance being treated by his ever-moralistic colleagues? Is he being shunned, or has the whole episode been sent down the memory hole?
February 13, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
What did Vitter get?
February 13, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vitter would probably enjoy being "admonished."
February 13, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
So is this like a slap on the wrist? I can't imagine he's being very productive anymore anyhow so how does this affect anything as far as his responsibilities, privileges etc?
Or is this like a censure vote, documenting by going on the record as saying, "we don't approve, although we're not really going to do anything about it". Correct?
February 13, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The senators also ding him for using campaign funds to pay his legal bills without first seeking approval from the committee."
LOL, they're upset the committee didn't have a chance to use their rubber stamp. Shocked!
February 13, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shorter Senate Ethics Committee: "You've discredited the Senate... Continue... Nothing to see here." Absolutely pathetic. Fox guarding the hen house etc.
February 13, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeez..wotta load of hooey. Admonishing that simpleton is worthless and a waste of energy. I highly doubt Senator Wide Stance even read the damn thing.
Is that jackass running for re-election? After all, he changes his little mind on any given subject at the drop of a pair of pants..I mean hat.
February 13, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know about you but that picture of him gives me the creeps...
Here I thought I knew him so well and it turns out he's a Senator, too! Yuckee!
...I gotta' go shower now!
February 13, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who the hell cares? Larry Craig is old fucking news. Let him get sucked off in the bathroom. Who the hell cares?
February 13, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this news really worthy of TalkingPointsMemo?
February 13, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Senator Larry Craig and his Car Accident"
www.ilovepoetry.com/viewpoem.asp?id=94594
Happy Valentine's Day
February 14, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Who the hell cares? Larry Craig is old fucking news. Let him get sucked off in the bathroom. Who the hell cares?"
Gross.
Actually, it is the other way around: Craig, a sexual predator, was attempting to molest an undercover police officer on a sting detail, in the adjacent stall.
They put up officers as bait, not potential perps.
To put it very visually for you hrebendorf:
Craig wanted to suck the bait-officer's cock. Not the other way around.
February 14, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink