TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Daily Muck

An internal military study alleges "gross mismanagement" in Marine Corps officials' denial of an urgent request for mine-resistant vehicles in 2005, a decision that may have caused hundreds of fatalities caused by roadside bombs. The study reveals that cost was a major factor as to why battle commanders were denied the equipment they needed. The report's author, Franz J. Gayl, has filed for whistle-blower protection. (New York Times)

Last year Chris De Rosa, the former director of the division of toxicology and environmental medicine at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), was reassigned to a non-supervisory "special assistant" position shortly after he produced a report about the potential public health threats from industrial pollution in the Great lakes region. De Rosa, who also helped publicize the formaldehyde problems with FEMA's trailers, believes that the government is suppressing the Great Lakes report. (Washington Post)

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the CIA sought to expand its ability to monitor terrorist activity by setting up front companies overseas where case officers would operate under "nonofficial cover": "meaning they would pose as employees of investment banks, consulting firms or other fictitious enterprises with no apparent ties to the U.S. government." The program became the source of a "bitter fight" within the CIA, and "after concluding they were ill-conceived and poorly positioned for gathering intelligence" on terrorists and "unconventional weapons proliferation networks," the agency closed all but two of the companies. (Los Angeles Times)

Prince Bandar, the head of the Saudi national security council, the son of the crown prince, and close friend of President Bush, has been accused of threatening former prime minister Tony Blair that if the British government did not end a Serious Fraud Office investigation about BAE's massive secret arms payments to Bandar, then Bandar and the Saudis would withhold intelligence about potential terrorist threats against European targets. Previously classified files reveal that British investigators were told that they faced the loss of "British lives on British streets" if investigations into BAE's secret payments were pursued. (Guardian)

A military judge has ruled that lawyers for Osama bin Laden's former driver, Salim Hamdan, will be able to question Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and six other detainees being held at Guantanamo. The judge has restricted the questions to be submitted in writing, and Hamdan's lawyers will be allowed to ask only about his activities between 1996 and 2001, and not about the treatment of the detainees after their capture. (Miami Herald)

In 2006 the FBI was authorized by a secret intelligence court to access e-mail messages from a single e-mail address. But due to an "apparent miscommunication," the FBI accessed messages from an entire network. According to an intelligence official, "it’s inevitable that these things will happen. It’s not weekly, but it’s common.” (New York Times)

The New York Times has found some major discrepencies between the publicly reported unofficial results of the New York Democratic primary and the official count. Approximately eighty of New York City's 6106 election districts did not report a single vote for Barack Obama on election night, while the official count now shows Obama receiving votes. City officials, who are still conducting a formal review of the results, suspect the problems were the result of human error. The Times also found "a handful" of districts which reported zero votes for Hillary Clinton on election night. (New York Times)

Scientists have begun analyzing materials in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued trailers to determine the source of the dangerous formaldehyde fumes. Results reported by the Centers for Disease Control state that the formaldehyde levels in the trailers are five times higher than what people encounter in a typical modern home. FEMA hopes to move all 35,000 families out of the trailers by summer 2008. (AP)

The trial of former New Hampshire Democratic Congressional candidate Gary Dodds - who is accused of "falsifying physical evidence, creating false public alarm, and conduct after an accident" - is nearing its conclusion. Lawyers for both sides made their closing arguments on Friday, and the jury is scheduled to begin deliberations Wednesday. (New Hampshire Union Leader)

After a federal judge found the FBI responsible in July for framing four men for murders they did not commit, defendants won $102 million in damages for malicious prosecution. The Justice Department has appealed this judgment, but has not explained its challenge to the award. (Chicago Tribune)


5 Comments

| Leave a comment

I found it interesting that the article about the failed CIA fronts did not include a word about how the leak of Valerie's cover probably had much to do with their failure. Is it so hard to connect the dots and timing ?

Oh Prince Bandar, who won't you blackmail?

SmileySam - what's your evidence for that assertion? I am not doubting a connection, just curious about details.

Looking at both the FBI and the CIA report, along with the FISA issue it seems that gathering targeting information on the GWOT is difficult. But one should inquire if the same will be the case if there is widespread unrest after the election results in Pakistan? I mean the question is, who is the trouble makers or insurgents? While it is reported that clear financial ties exist between BAE and Saudi family connections of insurgent violence, the making of a case with similar generalizations in Pakistan are more difficult.

In order to get close to what would be universally accepted as Islamic radicals wanting to use force to overthrow regimes, effect by violence politics, one would have to enter the group with something of value that the groups wanted, that would be arms, communication equipment, funding, and possibly logistical support. There would be a requirement to be vetted if you will by acts and not words to meet the litnus of the radical mind.

As to the marginal information, the politicized intelligence if you will, the circumstance where supporting Musharaff against say attorneys and court officials, is purely political in nature, really a decision made on the viability of an individual or group to effectively be bargained with for power sharing or concessions.

I would imagine that the professional organizers of radical islamic ideas are informed of policies and practices, trade-craft if you will of state sponsored attempts to disrupt their agenda and that the cover and means of evasion are largely political.

To the extent that these agencies can be effective is largely within the construct of the political realities that they operate.

As an example, if say a political leader that is being supported is very weak, has little real support, and the political mandate of intelligence gathering is to support that weak leader, good trade-craft is of little use, collection of information difficult, and establishing facts non-agnostic.

I feel that there are capable trade-craft, capable FBI personnel, and capable FISA responses to threats, the question really is if there is a capable political atmosphere within which to use the tools?

I would imagine that the chatter in Pakistan expressing ill will to Musharaff makes it difficult to isolate a loan wolf for targeting today. I would imagine that "key words" are going off the chart in that region of the globe and that filtering threats is difficult.

Sometimes it is the politics and not the policies that are at fault or make things difficult. When you consider the Afghan circumstances it would be so convenient if the insurgents withdrew their paychecks from ATM's and left video trails, stayed in motels with Visas, and such.. it just isn't the case.

You would do better to put tracking devices in gels that would start the device after an elapsed time to try and construct whom was selling to whom, and how that network originated and dispersed a commodity that that group valued.

1st world, 2nd world, and even third world rules don't apply to operational challenges. Add the politics and humintel is next to impossible excluding paid informants.



user-pic
Hundreds of Gulf Coast trailer dwellers are suing manufacturers in federal court, accusing the companies of furnishing FEMA with shoddily constructed units that jeopardized their health. By law, FEMA cannot be named as a defendant in the consolidated litigation until next month at the earliest, according to plaintiffs lawyers.

Critics claim FEMA should have reacted sooner to concerns that formaldehyde is to blame for a host of ailments reported by trailer occupants.

"They knew full well something was wrong. They were just hoping nothing would happen," said attorney Daniel Becnel Jr., who says he represents about 5,000 trailer occupants.

Another plaintiffs lawyer said trailer makers are the "real culprits."
–The Associated Press, February 16, 2008

Poor trailer manufacturers. No retroactive immunity for them. They should have thought ahead and made big donations to the senators and representatives who could be helping them now.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address