« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Who Needs Oversight?

Today on Fox News:

It's similar to a question that the White House has also often asked.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment

If Fox is arguing for "no oversight," then it's implicitly saying, "We at Fox are not needed."

Actually, I would bet that that headline was in response to the Roger Clemens HGH/Steroid Scandal which is, yeah, quite a large waste of taxpayer money.

Yes, both drug abuse and perjury are illegal, but a full blown investigation into whether a giant, balding, raging, senior-citizen athlete took some "juice"?

As I remember, we were all complaining about these sorts of misplaced priorities when Bill Clinton was being railroaded.

Wait for it.
Fox is losing ratings cuz the GOP has the white house and they won't attack the white house wait tell Obama is in there then FOX will be back on top baby! With freaked out charges that no one but a wingnut will buy and we will hear about it 24/7 for 4-8 years.

Planned, contribed, executed. The administration's formula for the last year of gwb.
Nothing will function. The "goverment is dead."
And, describing it as such, a million times if needed, and blaming the democrats for that failure they will demand your vote to continue their misguided way.
Listening?

Leave a comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address