« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Wilkes Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for Bribing Cunningham

So it appears that Brent Wilkes will get only a slightly more severe sentence than Duke Cunningham. Wilkes, convicted last year on all counts, was reportedly sentenced to 12 years in prison today -- prosecutors had asked for as much as 25 years and no fewer than 15. The probation officials had recommended as much as 60.

But Judge Larry Burns, for whatever reason, decided on 12. Cunningham himself was sentenced to a little more than 8 years after pleading guilty. We'll have more information when it's available.

Update: The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that "the judge disagreed with prosecutors who contended Wilkes masterminded the scheme." As the prosecutors had put it in their sentencing recommendation, “There can be little doubt Wilkes was the spider, and Cunningham the fly, in this web of corruption.”

Apparently Judge Burns thought Duke was at least part-spider. He may have been really dumb, but he knew what he was doing.

Remember that Wilkes had contended that he was just playing Cunningham's game -- a system he termed "transactional lobbying."

Update: It's worth mentioning that though this sentence is well below what prosecutors requested, it's the most severe sentence meted out for political corruption in the last several years (see update below). Even Jack Abramoff himself is likely to finally be sentenced to fewer than ten years in prison.

Update: Ask and you shall receive. A TPM Reader writes in to flag a more severe sentence meted out to the former mayor of Lynwood, California -- he got about 16 years. There very well might be other examples of less widely known cases with similarly severe sentences. But certainly, when it comes to the flurry of congerssional corruption cases in D.C., Wilkes has received the most severe sentence so far.

Update: More from The San Diego Union-Tribune:

The judge disagreed with prosecutors who contended Wilkes masterminded the scheme, yet said he was troubled by Wilkes' demeanor in court.

“Mr. Wilkes, you have not indicated any sense of contrition to this day,” he said.

“I'm not big on sending a message, but I do think people will pay attention to what happened here,” Burns said.

Update: More here.


Comments (7)

avatar

I was expecting more but 12 years in prison still ruins an old man's life.

avatar

Wilkes hearing isn't over yet - there are a few other issues to deal with today-
1) whether he lied on his financial disclosure documents that he submitted under seal in order to get public defenders. Prosecutors are contending that he lied and the judge allowed them to look at Wilkes docs. Wilkes could get a perjury charge added on and be required to pay for the lawyers

2) Geragos asked that Wilkes be allowed to stay free on $2 million bail pending an appeal. If Judge Burns agrees that Wilkes lied about his financing, Wilkes will likely lose his freedom very soon despite any appeal.

3) Whether or not Wilkes is taken in to custody sortof affects the possible decision to transfer the Wilkes/Foggo somewhere else. Prosecutors now want to move the trial to Eastern Virginia where they have more charges to tack on for Foggo. Prosecutors have said they will drop charges against Wilkes for now but may recharge later. Wilkes and Foggo have both said that they agree to moving the trial to Wash DC but not to Eastern Virginia.

There is more to come in the Brent Wilkes saga.

avatar

Oh Wow!

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/15343159/detail.html

Wilkes' attorney lawyer, Mark Geragos, asked Burns to allow Wilkes to remain free pending appeal, but the judge said Wilkes can't be trusted to follow bail reqirements and ordered U.S. Marshalls to take Wilkes to jail immediately.

Before sentencing, Burns rejected an effort by Wilkes's attorney to throw out those verdicts. Defense attorney Mark Geragos claimed he did not have enough time to prepare for the trial and that prosecutors committed misconduct.

sorry if the html tags don't work as anticipated

My parents, who retired in San Diego, are still pissed off @ the firing of Carol Lam, their excellent US Attorney, who initiated the investigations into Cunningham, Wilkes, Foggo, et al.

This one's for you, Mrs. Lam.

Amen to that Savannah. I am a San Diego native and was thinking the same thing when they handed down the sentence.

avatar

So... can the taxpayers who were so rudely ripped off, sue these clowns now? No, I thought not. The public has no recourse for recouping losses after the "important people" take their hard earned money...

avatar

Someone should ask Brent Wilkes, a Bush Pioneer, if there are other Pioneers who he practiced "transactional lobbying" with. And what is his relationship with Mercer Reynolds, III, the creator of the Bush Pioneers, the top money wrangler for Bush '04, and now the top money wrangler for McCain '08?

Post a Comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address