TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

NJ: Casino Mogul Funded Anti-Dem Surveillance Ads

Last week, a group called Defense of Democracies let rip with a national ad campaign aimed at pressuring House Democrats (and targeting 15 in particular) to buckle and support the Senate's surveillance bill, which contains retroactive immunity for the telecoms. The ads ended by encouraging viewers to contact their representative and urge them to convince the House leadership to bring the Senate bill to a vote -- because "the law that lets intelligence agencies intercept Al Qaeda communications" has expired, "crippling" surveillance.

The group, other than denying that the telecoms themselves were behind the $2 million campaign, refused to disclose where the money had come from. But in the current issue of the National Journal (not available online), Peter Stone reports that Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino mogul, "chipped in much of the $2 million," citing "sources."

That's not all that surprising, since Adelson (with a net worth of $26 billion, Forbes' 12th richest person in the world) is a big backer of conservative attack groups. For instance, he's the big money behind Freedom's Watch, which reportedly plans to spend $250 million defeating Democrats this election.

Defense of Democracies, a non-profit 501(c)(4) organization, was formed by the related Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a supposedly "non-partisan" non-profit that lost all of its Democratic board members after news of the ad campaign broke. It'll be interesting to see whether the run of ads, which lasted one week and ran on the national cable networks, was a preview of more to come in the election. I guess that depends on how generous Adelson is feeling.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment

501(c)(4) is the NeoCons cutout of choice these days, attempting to hide contributors and using the regulations to provide propaganda for the administration. The Christian Coalition was denied the exemption. How can we pursue this evasion since they are supposedly “nonpartisan”?

The GOP will take money from anyone for their attack ads.

To illustrate this whorish behavior, consider the Swift Boats Veterans for Truth Group.

One of the major funders was Mark Andrews of Chesterfield, MO.

Mark Andrews is the head of CasiNO! Watch, an anti-casino group. Or so he says.

I bet Mr. Andrews and Mr. Adelson have a lot to talk about.

user-pic

No amount of campaign-financing or political-advertising reform will matter if groups like Defense of Democracies are allowed to exist as "nonprofits."

It's doubtful that during the rest of Bush's reign that any kind of clarification of what defines a nonprofit can occur, but the criteria for establishing and operating nonprofits must be changed. One thing that has to happen is transparency in "donors."

The mission statements for nonprofits must be more narrowly defined, because I cannot see what societal benefit is derived from Defense of Democracies. Goodwill Industries they're not.

user-pic

According to IRS records the largest single (recorded) donor to Foundation for the Defense of Democracies was Ameriquest who led the way in predatory subprime mortgages. Ameriquest's founder Roland Arnall is a big Republican contributor who was rewarded with an ambassadorship to the Netherlands, a post he has recently given up.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address