« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Pelosi Gets Reform Bill While GOPers and Some Dems Kick and Scream
Last night, the House passed an ethics reform bill, which will create an outside panel to review ethics complaints against lawmakers. It's a noted improvement over the current setup -- which isn't saying much since the House ethics committee has been a punchline for many years.
The outside panel, which will have six members (3 GOPers, 3 Dems), won't have subpoena power. And it will simply forward recommendations to the actual House ethics committee for further action after investigating. That's why some critics like CREW's Melanie Sloan call it a "paper tiger." Other good government types have given their support on the theory that something is better than nothing.
As The Hill reports, the Dem leadership pushed hard for the reform bill despite Republicans and a number of senior Democrats digging in their heels and doing what they could to prevent the vote. As The Washington Post reports, "Even with two House members under indictment, two others sent to prison, and several others under federal investigation, nearly half the House did not want to submit the body to the scrutiny of a panel not under its control." Some of the choicer quotes from last night's debate:
Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-KS): "If you have a single ounce of self-preservation, you'll vote no."
Mighty reform foe Rep. John Murtha (D-PA): “We have a New York governor in the news right who shows that you can’t legislate ethics. It always comes down to the individual.”
And most quotable of all:
Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii), a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, registered his displeasure with the proposal by using a parliamentary tactic to delay the vote. Just after 8 p.m., Abercrombie forced a vote on a motion to adjourn, which only served to delay the vote on the ethics resolution until an hour later. The vote failed 177 to 196, with 14 Democrats voting in favor of it.Afterward, Abercrombie railed against the proposal to resounding applause on both sides of the aisle.
“With this proposal we are indicting ourselves, yielding and retreating to those who would tear this House down and denigrate us as crooks and knaves and hustlers…we cringe before our critics,” he said. “If we have no respect for ourselves—how to we expect it from anybody else?”





Comments (19)
"[C]rooks and knaves and hustlers" sounds about right , though a little conservative.
March 12, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The conservatives are crooks, knaves, and bumblers!
March 12, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Finally, a government official who actually knows what the country thinks about the company he keeps. So remember kids to not hang out with "crooks and knaves and hustlers" or you will be considered one of them.
This guy needs to be VP, or a new position like "Captain Obvious."
March 12, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saying Congress can responsibly invesitgate itself is like saying Alberto Gonzales can responsibly investigate the Bush White House.
March 12, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not that the bill itself is self indictment but their opposition to it certainly is.
March 12, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
scoundrels,scalawags.......
March 12, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Caesar's wife pal.
March 12, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy shit. These people are really worried. The times, they may be a-changin'. Maybe...
March 12, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please keep us posted on the progression of this....any time I get to hear a gaggle of politicians squirm, it makes me feel like our system might be actually working.
March 12, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man... if they're this scared of a paper tiger, they must really be hiding something. Imagine the reaction if this new group did have subpoena power.
Now we need a paper tiger to go after corrupt presidents and their cronies.
Meow.
March 12, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Imagine if Obama gets elected. He passed the most sweeping ethics reform biil in IL in 20 years. There was a lot of kicking and screaming in that one too. But Obama's bill prevailed. He convinced both dems and republicans that it was the best thing to do.
That is some arm twisting.
March 12, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I think it has more teeth, not a lot, but more than a paper tiger.
http://obama.senate.gov/issues/ethics_and_lobbying_reform/
March 12, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like they've got their first candidate for investigation.
And the second.
I feel the same way about all of those policemen out there on the streets and highways. How dare the government assume that some of we citizens might commit a crime?
March 12, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hang on a second. I'm sure every out-and-out crook in the House voted no out of "self-preservation," but there are legitimate and principled reasons to oppose this. Whether they outweigh the need to do something is another matter.
If Members are behaving unethically, and other Members are too chummy or timid to do something about it, the problem is the Members, not the system. You could make a case that outsourcing the business of caring about ethics is a band-aid at best, and might compound the problem. For example, Joe Freshman Rep might see something shady that he'd otherwise risk making a stink about, but now he can tell himself that there's a whole staff who's on top of this sort of thing, so it must be legit.
I'm not saying we don't badly need to do something, or that this couldn't work out just fine. I really don't know enough to say. But we don't need to assume everyone opposed to this reform is a "reform opponent."
March 12, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
-- But we don't need to assume everyone opposed to this reform is a "reform opponent." --
Yes, we do, unless we get evidence otherwise. Given the recent history of the House, there's no excuse for opposing this bill. At the very least, it indicates that the Representative cares more about himself than about the country.
I'm not going to declare them guilty of some unspecified crime, but I'd say they deserve watching.
March 12, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Priceless comments from the fearful ones.totally priceless.
However, since all the supposedly independent Inspectors General of just about every government office could not get past the Cheney stonewall, how can we expect results with yet another investigative group?
good idea on creating an Ethics Panel, but methinks Pelosi may have intentionally created a paper tiger.
March 12, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's right everybody, all Congresspeople are crooks and thieves and knaves, so why should we worry who gets elected, right?
Its not like elections matter, right?
Or do you think that an Al Gore Administration would have launched us into a war in Iraq after 9/11, if they would have even had a 9/11 under a Gore Administration.
There's some GOP talking points going on here that I do not care for at all.
Now, if you wanted to say all Republicans are crooks and thieves and knaves, well, okay then. And actually, that last quotefrom Abercrombie is not as far fetched as some seem to think:
“With this proposal we are indicting ourselves, yielding and retreating to those who would tear this House down and denigrate us as crooks and knaves and hustlers…we cringe before our critics,” he said. “If we have no respect for ourselves—how to we expect it from anybody else?”
If the Republicans hadn't blocked any ethics reforms whill engaging in the most profoundly unethical behaviors since 1992 or so, and if the Bush Administration weren't the greatest assemblage of crooks and thieves and knaves we've ever seen in this country, just look at HUD right now for instance, then perhaps Democrats under the prodding of these new vocal progressive advocacy groups that exist today might have actually taken steps to curtail the excesses, improved the election systems and so on. Maybe not, but we'll never know now.
And I find it pretty depressing to read the mindless Congress are crooks talking points here and elsewhere, as if that is the solution, accepting the premise of republican framing, then regurgitating it for all to see. Thanks, thanks very much.
March 12, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Congress has been for sometime now, a real "den of thieves", resistant to any changes that might curtail their unethical activity. While I do find humour to be therapeutic, I think it speaks volumes that we find it funny, rather than outrageous, when its members say some of the things said last night.
Please read the declaration of independence and tell me if the time has not come to change our system of government.
March 12, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is an insider panel, not an "outside" panel as claimed. For this panel to be the least bit effective, it must also include a rotating jury of randomly selected citizens with equal authority to review any issues that might come up.
The American jury system provides a fine model for an effective ethics review panel. I'm sure Americans would be more than happy to participate. And including regular citizens on the panel would help prevent partisan deadlock and attacks.
March 13, 2008 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink