« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
Manfred Nowak, the torture investigator for the U.N., said yesterday that he has heard "credible" allegations that in 2002 and 2003 the U.S. detained terrorist suspects on the island of Diego Garcia, a British territory housing a joint U.S. and UK military base. Britain has revealed that the U.S. has used the island in the past as a refueling stop for secret renditions, but says that the U.S. has "denied using the island as a detention center." (AP)
Given President Bush's remarks to newspaper editors that "I don't want you reading my personal stuff," it is not surprising that the White House has been so negligent in archiving its e-mails. Recent Congressional testimony and court filings reveal that the CEO president disregards "fundamental principles that well-run private companies adhere to routinely." Despite two federal laws that require preservation of White House e-mail, approximately 1,000 days of e-mail are missing from the White House. (AP)
On the eve of the Pentagon's first death penalty trial, the American Bar Association has told President Bush that inadequate resources available to the Chief Pentagon Defense Counsel and the fundamental lack of due process in the Guantanamo Bay tribunal system undermine American standards of justice. The ABA's president emphasized that Guantanamo detainees "cannot challenge their detention by habeas corpus," "the standards for admissibility of evidence could allow for convictions based on rank hearsay," and "statements secured through coercion could be introduced against a defendant.'' (Miami Herald)
As the trial of Antoin "Tony" Rezko gets underway this week, questions still surround the relationship between Rezko and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL). Among the questions are how did Rezko, who by 2005 was struggling with debts, get the money to buy a vacant lot adjacent to the Obamas' home; and why did Rezko, considering his financial difficulties, choose to buy the lot at all? While Rezko is being tried for charges unrelated to his relationship with Obama - he is "accused of extortion for allegedly peddling influence" in the Illinois Governor's administration - a ruling that "that prosecutors could introduce evidence that Rezko used "straw donors" to give to politicians" makes it likely that Obama's name will surface during the trial. According to the Los Angeles Times, Rezko raised "at least $200,000" for Obama between 1996 and 2004. (New York Times, Los Angeles Times)
Indicted Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) allegedly (sub. req.) told officials from Resolution Copper Mining in May 2005 that he would not support their request for a federal land swap if they did not agree to buy property owned by his former business partner, James Sandlin. However, even after the company turned down his request, Renzi still twice introduced a bill for the land swap, withdrawing his name in April 2007 "after the FBI raided Renzi’s family business." (Roll Call)
On the campaign trail John McCain asserts that the GOP lost the 2006 elections "not because of Iraq but because spending got out of control.” Recent analysis from the Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz suggests that the Iraq war will cost trillions, yet McCain blames only earmarks and has vowed to break from the Republican leadership to support a one-year ban on earmarks. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) secured $126 million in individual earmarks in the recently enacted spending law. (The Times, The Hill)
Although Barack Obama (D-IL) has repeatedly said the U.S. should have focused more on Afghanistan rather than starting the war in Iraq, since becoming a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he has missed three meetings on Afghanistan strategy. Responding to criticism, Obama spokesman Bill Burton says that Americans "understand that both John McCain and Barack Obama have missed Senate hearings and votes during their campaigns." (The Hill)
Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) has a new medium for showcasing the $500 million in earmarks he secured last year. In an effort to bring "sunlight and transparency" to the Alaska congressional delegation's work, Alaska lawmakers "will begin disclosing every request from the state for specially earmarked federal money" on their individual Web sites. Because the new rules require the disclosure of who is asking for the money, the public can now learn from representative Don Young (R-AK) how, according to his preferred metaphor, he stuffs a spending bill like a turkey. (McClatchy)
Mississippi attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs still faces charges for bribing a judge but he no longer has to worry about a criminal contempt (sub. req.) charge. A federal judge ruled that an Alabama court lacks the jurisdiction to try Scruggs for his alleged refusal to turn over hurricane Katrina-related insurance documents. (Wall Street Journal)













"American Bar Association has told President Bush...."
I'm sorry, but Bush has been told this many times already. Problem is...God has told him that killing non christians (or even christian infidels)is the christian thing to do...
March 3, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) secured $126 million in individual earmarks in the recently enacted spending law"
According to my hometown newspaper, Pelosi received $94 million in earmarks..
March 3, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
ABA emerges from its cave, and seven [7] years after the JAGs first raised concerns, they decide to make a peep:
Arguably, very irresponsible for the ABA to wait this long. Untimely. Unimpressive.
The public needs credible oversight of the American legal community. Something that will inspire a defense of the Constitution, not seven hears of undisturbed sleep. The lawyers have lost a reasonable expectation that they can remain "self governing".
March 3, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
President Bush's remarks to newspaper editors that "I don't want you reading my personal stuff,"
---
Anyone else see the delicious irony and utter hypocrisy here? He wants to be able to read all of our personal stuff but we can't see any of his. The GOP line about searches and the like for years has been "if you don't have anything to hide you shouldn't be worried about anyone going through your stuff." From this I deduce he has something to hide.
And hasn't he said he doesn't use email for this very reason? So what is there to even look at? Don't tell me he was fibbing.
On top of that he shows his stupidity since documents turned over to investigators are routinely scrubbed and non-related material is excised. Does he really not understand that concept?
Finally, why is he doing personal business on my dime? Just about every business in the world has rules about employees using company resources for personal business. Does he think he's the king and exempt from the rules? Wait, don't answer that. I already know.
March 3, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
He was for email before he was against it.
Candy Crowley: We are with the Republican presidential nominee, George W. Bush. Thank you for joining us for your first online, on-air news interview. This is a complicated process here, at least for you and I, so let me set the stage for our viewers and our listeners.
This is an online news interview. Participants are now logging into CNN.com. They're submitting their questions live for you. To allow those online participants who couldn’t join us live to benefit, we have taken questions by e-mail prior to this. We’ve done this sort of thing in the past.
Now, participants can watch this interview on CNN.com, but they can also watch it live on CNN, on CNN International, on CNNfn, and they can listen to it on CNN’s radio affiliate station. So everybody’s watching and listening. Shortly after the conclusion of this interview, an on-demand transcript for the interview and a complete transcript of the interview will be available at CNN.com.
So having said that, there are lots of questions. But you know, here I am, so I have to ask you the first. Do you go online? I mean do you use this technology at all?
George W. Bush: I do. I do. Not only do I do it, I use it personally at my home in the governor’s mansion in Austin. Generally, I’m an e-mail person. I e-mail my brothers. Hopefully, my daughters will e-mail me when they get to college. Matter of fact, at my convention speech, I encouraged them to do so.
Our campaign has a Web page that encourages people to log on and to learn more about me and express their opinions, one way or the other. I’m told we have thousands of hits. And so the Internet is becoming more and more widespread, and not only personally, but in terms of politics.
Source
March 3, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we want the renditions and torture to stop. If we want to regain our standing within the international community. We MUST keep Bush from using the veto on the Intelligence Authorization Act this week.
See http://blog.psaonline.org/2008/03/03/under-one-flag-one-manual-on-interrogation for more on this.
March 3, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we want the renditions and torture to stop. If we want to regain our standing within the international community. We MUST keep Bush from using the veto on the Intelligence Authorization Act this week.
See http://blog.psaonline.org/2008/03/03/under-one-flag-one-manual-on-interrogation for more on this.
March 3, 2008 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Undermining the system of justice for detainees is a trial. If we swallow it, they will move on to the next outsider group. "First they came for the trade unionists and I said nothing . . . . and when they came for me there was no one left to speak."
A fascist is a fascist is a fascist.
March 4, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink