« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
A high profile trial for two former high-ranking Shiite government officials accused of kidnapping and killing "scores of Sunnis" has ended abruptly, despite intense preparation for the trial and extensive evidence, because prosecutors dropped the case. A U.S. legal adviser believes that this stunning collapse "shows that the judicial system in Iraq is horribly broken" and "sends a terrible signal: If you are Shia, then no worries; you can do whatever you want and nothing is going to happen to you." (Washington Post)
When Edgar Domenech, the 23-year veteran of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (he was second-in-command for four years), told the Justice Department about mismanagement at ATF, Justice first ignored him but then demoted him, denied him a bonus, and attempted to give him a poor job review. Domenech, who yesterday filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel, realizes that "In retrospect, I was naive to believe that the department would welcome my honesty." (Washington Post)
The White House issued an executive order on Friday that takes some of the powers given to the Intelligence Oversight Board and shifts them to the Director of National Intelligence. The administration says the change is designed to strengthen the office of the National Intelligence Director, while critics argue that it will weaken oversight and "dilute the independent board's investigatory powers in favor of a member of the president's administration." (AP)
In April 2007 the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s office issued a directive that "effectively immunize[d] the Iraqi president, the Council of Ministers, and any current or former ministers from being prosecuted for corruption without the Prime Minister’s consent." Representative Henry Waxman has requested that Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice provide the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform with all documents relating to Maliki's order. (Committee on Oversight and Government Reform)
Representative Mike Capuano's (D-MA) proposed ethics review office met stiff resistance from Republicans who mocked the bill as a "silly" (sub. req.) and "pointless new bureaucratic layer" that fails to address problems with the existing Ethics Committee. Capuano asserts that the GOP's counter proposal is "very troubling" because it makes "no distinction between an allegation of improperly accepting a cup of coffee and an allegation of accepting a million-dollar bribe" and "would refer even violations of House Rules to the Department of Justice, an area over which that Department has no jurisdiction." (Roll Call)
In the debate over the passage of new FISA legislation, Newt Gingrich has been promoting a survey purporting to show that Americans support the granting of retroactive immunity to the telecom companies who may have participated in the warrantless wiretapping program. But, The Economist's "Democracy in America" blog points out, "the two central questions posed to survey respondents were premised on clear falsehoods." (The Economist's "Democracy in America")
John McCain's "straight talk express" has hired John Green, a top GOP lobbyist, to manage his message and solidify his support from GOP lawmakers. Green will help the maverick McCain align his presidential campaign message with the GOP agenda in Congress. (Politico)
Later this month the National Archives will release Hillary Clinton's schedules as first lady, but it hopes to delay the release of thousands of the first lady's telephone records for either one or two years. Though the conservative public interest group Judicial Watch has demanded the release of all phone logs immediately, the National Archives wants more time to review the 20,000 pages of phone records. (AP)
When Governor Eliot Spitzer was campaigning to be governor of New York he vowed to eradicate the influence of excessive money in politics by capping contributions to his campaign at $10,000. But Spitzer is now helping donors skirt his own, self-imposed rules by having wealthy donors give to both Spitzer and the state Democratic party that he essentially controls. (New York Times)





Comments (7)
I was working at ATF when Truscott was exposed for being an idiot who couldn't spend straight. My job was made infinitely more difficult because the decision making process was broken. Any and all policy and budget decisions that should have been based on input from areas of expertise throught out the bureau were make by the small group of cowboys at the top.
Anything submitted to OMB was a complete fabrication and misrepresentation of facts.
Domenech was an obnoxious SOB, but he did what was right.
Just another example of how Bush has fucked us over.
Can we impeach him now?
March 4, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
No evidence telecoms would oppose lawful requests for data.
March 4, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
**********
the judicial system in Iraq [America] is horribly broken" and "sends a terrible signal: If you are Shia [protected by Bush], then no worries; you can do whatever you want and nothing is going to happen to you."
***********
So you leave a few battered, tortured, frozen bodies here and there - a few stray Canadians and Germans get disappeared and tortured, the whole nation becomes a State Sponsor of torture - as long as it makes George happy and leaves his enablers with nifty sinecures in the corporate world and academia, who's to worry about a few unaccounted for children here and there?
***************
In April 2007 the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s [American President George Bush's]office issued a directive that "effectively immunize[d] the Iraqi president, the Council of Ministers, and any current or former ministers [telecoms, DOJ officials, NSA offiicials and personnel, and Executive Branc] from being prosecuted for corruption without the Prime Minister’s [Bush's]consent."
********************
It's no wonder that Waxman wants to see it all the Iraqi paperwork. Since Bush, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Mukasey won't turn in their papers, at least he can see what such a thing looks like before Reyes, Hoyer and Pelosi collect from the telecoms and enable the same thing here.
I guess this is kind of our version of IRAFTA. First we export to them, them we import from them.
Yes Jim, we can impeach him now, but Congress can't. Democrats/Republicans - no differnce.
March 4, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Senate would ask that we reward its rubber stamping:
What did we get in exchange for this rubber stamp, Senator Leahy? Leahy doesn't say. Judiciary would ask that we celebreate their rubber stamps.
How is rubber stamping something, without anything in return, a win for "fundamental" values?
Why is the Senate reluctant to link Senate action with Presidential responsivness?
Why is the Senate keen to "respond" despite the President's continued unresponsiveness to the rule of law?
Why aren't nominations on hold until the President and his staff respond to subpeona requests?
March 4, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
On this FISA immunity, the House has to pass a rule to consider the legislation. Why is the House responding to the President on FISA, when the President does not cooperate with the House on the US Atty firings?
March 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that the relentless consolidation of power that Bush continues to pursue (eliminating the independent intelligence oversight board, insisting making the PAA permanent with telecom (and therefore Bush administration) immunity, etc.) does not smack of a "lame duck" president, who intends to be out of office within the year. If anything, he seems more intent than ever on building himself a premise upon which to base a claim as permanent "Commander in Chief of the United States", with the capitulation of Congress & the Judiciary.
There's no longer any will by those in office in our Federal government to "protect and defend" our form of government; only their respective positions.
March 4, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the President was eliminating independent oversight of the intelligence community, the Congress should unleash the GAO to oversee the intelligence community. That's too much change. Congress refuses to increase the GAO oversight of the intelligence community.
March 4, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink