TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Daily Muck

The Antoin "Tony" Rezko trial has focused attention on a "vaguely worded" e-mail that alludes to Barack Obama's role in empowering a state health planning board that Rezko allegedly packed with associates - many of whom made political contributions to Obama. At the time that the e-mail was written, the board was set to expire and Obama was chairman of the Illinois Senate’s health committee. (New York Times)

The Washington Monthly features 37 short essays on torture. Though the contributors are from across the political spectrum, the unifying message of the articles" is, "simply, Stop." (Washington Monthly)

A new report from Human Rights First, entitled "Tortured Justice" criticizes "the use of evidence tainted by torture and other inhuman treatment" in the cases against detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. The report also states that the use of such evidence is "tainting the legitimacy of the proceedings, both at home and in the eyes of the international community; alienating US allies and empowering terrorists." (AFP)

Yesterday the Justice Department issued new rules for how deferred prosecution agreements will be administered and today former Attorney General John Ashcroft will testify about his no-bid multimillion-dollar contract to administer such agreements. Though the new rules require that the Justice Department's second-ranking official approve new contracts, representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) argues that the guidelines are actually an attempt to "thwart" "stronger standards." (AP)

A new report by the Government Accountability Office suggests that because the military makes use of so many government contractors, contractors should be be required "to disclose their financial interests so as to avoid any conflicts of interest." Currently, "contractors are not bound to most government ethics laws and regulations." (AP)

The Hillary Clinton campaign has said that it will release her tax returns "in or around April 15," but both the candidate and campaign refuse to explain why the public must wait at all for the type of financial disclosure that John Kerry, Al Gore, and Barack Obama willingly disclosed. Watchdog groups are interested in how the Clintons have amassed and managed assets estimated to value between $10 million and $50 million. (ABC's "The Blotter")

Though some Democrats are nervous about empowering non-lawmakers with investigative powers, party leaders in the House of Representatives will attempt to hold a vote today on the proposed independent ethics office. Democrats were forced to postpone action last week because of concerns that the ethics bill would foster partisan witch-hunts and initiate ethics warfare. (The Hill)

With his party plagued by corruption scandals, the chairman of the Alaska Republican Party is facing "a coup attempt" by Republicans who say he should step down. Among those calling for his replacement is Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who said, "I have believed for the last few years that the party was heading in the wrong direction and it is due for a change in leadership." (Anchorage Daily News)


5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Re. the Washington Monthly's short essays on torture:

In other words, not only was torture unnecessary, but it was actually counterproductive. KSM produced no new information under torture, only a litany of false confessions — maybe out of vanity, maybe in an effort to protect other al-Qaeda operatives. Who knows. What we do know is that torturing KSM did no good, sent hundreds of agents scurrying after phantoms, and has made his prosecution far more difficult than it needed to be.

My deep frustration with this—and with all of the stances Bush and Co. have taken—is that nothing that anyone else reports when more facts are learned matters once they have made a decision. This past seven plus years have been a time of anti-thought, of anti-rationality, of a stubbornness born of ... well, that's where I get stuck.

Because I may never be able to wrap my head around the inability or unwillingness to adapt one's beliefs and opinions to further evidence.

Intransigence, narrow mindedness, and a conscious rejection of critical thinking have done more harm to this world than I have seen before in my lifetime. Would that the people in this Administration had been born in a country with limited world influence. They could have created their own version of North Korea or Turkmenistan—very bad for its own people but, fortunately, contained within its borders.

user-pic

Why doesn't the NYT article say how many Democratic and Republican leaders other than Senator Obama "worked" with Pickering and Wilhelm?

It might take a while to determine if some had more to do with selecting nominees than others or if anyone had much influence, but basic decent reporting ought to include some indication of what "several" state legislators means here. 3? 10? 30?

"...Mr. Pickering said he and Mr. Wilhelm had “worked closely” over six months with several state legislators to extend the life of the health facilities board. [B]He then listed Democratic and Republican leaders in the state House and Senate, including Mr. Obama.[/B]

Mr. Pickering’s message went on to suggest four candidates to serve on the board, stating that “our attached recommendations reflect that involvement” with the political leaders."...

user-pic

Maybe the House Democrats could simply adopt CREW as their de facto investigative arm - that organization has proven a hell of a lot more effective that any of the committee hearings our elected officials have held.

CREW's success is their independence. Congress has the power to conduct investigations with Committees. We've seen what the "investigative arms" of Congress have done: Grown jelly-like fingers.

In re DoJ settlement monitors [See: "Yesterday the Justice Department issued new rules for how"]:

- What would the process be to ID/assign a monitor to review whether the telecoms were or were not complying with settlements?

- Does DoJ AG have a conflict: Refusing to spend money to prosecute something he, as DoJ AG would have to spend money to monitor compliance: Telecom/NSA/other contractors alleged war crimes, FISA violations?

- Tainted DoJ: Does DoJ have an interest in blocking prosecutions of US DoD contractors accused of war crimes; if Blackwater were prosecuted, would DoJ interfere with the settlement monitors in re procedures Blackwater would have to implement to ensure it fully complied with the laws of war, tax reporting, and other alleged criminal conduct?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address