TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Bush to Lay out New Way Forward on Global Warming

After seven years of foot dragging and stonewalling by the Environmental Protection Agency, has the administration finally seen the light? From the AP:

President Bush is giving a Rose Garden speech on Wednesday on climate change to lay out the way he thinks the U.S. can reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

White House press secretary Dana Perino says that Bush will not outline a specific proposal, but instead will spell out a strategy for long-term goals for curbing emissions....

In his remarks, he also will talk about legislative proposals on Capitol Hill that the administration has expressed opposition to, as well as regulatory issues.

So, in brief, no. The Washington Times reported on Monday that Bush would begin pushing on global warming because Bush administration officials "fear a coming regulatory nightmare."

In other words, the stonewalling and foot dragging, though masterfully executed by EPA chief Stephen Johnson, won't be able to buy much more time. The Supreme Court ruled one year ago that the EPA had the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, and that it had to act. Johnson may soon run out of string on that one. And several states are suing the EPA over his decision to block California's institution of tough emissions limits on cars and trucks.

So "regulatory nightmare" or "regulatory train wreck," as White House spokeswoman Dana Perino prefers, is a way of saying that the resulting limits would be too low for their taste.

So what will the White House support? Something that threads the needle with a solution that is not so weak that Democrats will not support it, while somehow placating conservatives who would prefer that there be no mandatory limits. Perino describes the administration's aim as a "reasonable and responsible action." Should be fun.


16 Comments

| Leave a comment

Way to get out in front of this one, George!

I'm sure you'll solve the problem in your final 9 months. Along with Mideast peace, that's quite a legacy.

user-pic

I'd much rather have him pretending to set policy for future administrations than trying to enact restrictions that will constrain what a reality-based administration will be able to do. Unfortunately, I suspect he'll try to do that, too.

He said that his presidential approval ratings would rise, maybe this is his srategery! Good luck with that one. I was angry and motivated before and nothing he does, except for a few moments of common sense, will prevent me from my civic duty of rasing fundemtnal questions against his and his administrations complicteness in breaking the law and massive amounts of failed management.

You know that joke about a person being so short that they are the last one to know it's raining...? Bush is like an intellectual dwarf, and he's wondering why it's gotten so hot, and why the rain is so yellow.

user-pic

Hails of derisive laughter. This is the funniest thing I have read in a long time. Did I click on The Onion by mistake?

user-pic

Breaking News!

Cheney and Bush are going to announce that the single proposition that the white House finds acceptable is nuking Iran into a mile think sheet of glass thus causing a nuclear winter that will stop global warming short in its tracks.

Tune it FAUX News tonight for their analysis of the details . . .

Next week, Bush announces his next legacy project, a manned trip to Mars, the week after, a cure for cancer--all to be wrapped up by the end of the year...if only the Democrat party doesn't mess it all up for him.

No one before has promised so much and produce so little.

"Seven years of foot dragging and stonewalling" is, of course, another way of saying the Bush administration pursued environmental concerns in exactly the manner it intended from Inauguration Day 2001: Doing nothing - ever.

This is just like the Mideast "peace intiative" charade last fall; everybody suits up and busts out the Polaroids, and proceeds - vigorously - to do exactly nothing. It's an election year, and Bush must throw out these hastily concocted, empty gestures if he's going get invitations to the really big barbecues in 2009.

But by that time, even the most blinkered of Red State dunderhead may realize this empty shell piped off this country to the international stool pond. It's not like we're going to easily or quickly wipe "torturer" and "geopolitical terrorist" from the national CV. And we'll be living down this blood-drenched obscenity of a war for a long, long time.

So, what's next neglected mess at which he can crook a finger and pronounce cured?

The Big Dig?

...BRITNEY?

Bush's bold plan:

Tax cuts for the rich!

Always good to have Bush go on the record, especially about Global warming. Future historians will have direct references to those most negligent.

user-pic

Now I am worried about global warming it's so serious that Bush can't kick it down the road for the next Pres to deal with. But don't worry he'll find a way to say plenty and do nothing.

user-pic

You know what, folks? The sky is falling.

All these years of letting the market regulate itself has led us here: an environment so raped and pillaged that to reverse the climate change—which is fast leading from over warming to water shortages to food shortages to famine to wars to death and chaos on a level we need to watch The Road Warrior to picture.

We may not see the worst of it, but our children or grandchildren will, and it ain't gonna be pretty.

What we have right now are airlines flying with unsafe aircraft, because a politicized FAA didn't want to squelch business growth by making the airlines maintain their fleet properly.

We have a superclass that has for decades methodically worked toward the massive gap we have between their wealth and the rest of us, based, I can only imagine, on pathological needs for money and power, because they sure as hell couldn't eat any better than they did in 1965.

We have a society in which those disenfranchised by deregulation and free markets are those who in generations past were the people who used to disenfranchise other races and ethnicities. And they're still reeling from the loss, so much so that their bitterness—yes, their bitterness—is aimed at people who had nothing to do with disenfranchising them. But the superclass has had its minions tell the white former middle class over and over that it's the blacks, the Mexicans, the liberals, the Jews, the terrorists, the gays, the atheists—everyone but those actually responsible for it—took away their jobs and their way of life.

And those minions are the middle managers who buy into the superclass's dreams, because they think that by doing their bidding, they'll get a piece of the pie.

Well, wake up, kids. Wake up, Condoleezza and Colin and Alberto, and really, Harriet and Judith and Lurita. Because the guys in charge have absolutely no intention of sharing the pie with you. You are not one of them, and you never can or will be. You are the pie makers; you don't get to take it home.

Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Perle and Rove, along with some select moving-and-shaking senators (not the ones who do the dirty work, Joe L.) but no representatives (really, the grunts? I think not!) and, of course, the business moguls who share the beds of of the politicos in the superclass are the ones who win. No blacks, Mexicans, or women. Oh, and Johnny Yoo? Nice work on the memos. We'll call you if we need anything else done.

Unless those of us who are on to what the superclass has done to us rise up—and I mean that in its classical revolutionary definition—nothing will ever get better for anyone but them. And unless we shove the faces of all of those enablers into the reality of their not being included in eating that pie—which they were never intended to share—they're going to keep on helping the people who have done the world more harm than any war, any despot, any plague, or any disaster.

So anything Bush says? More smoke and mirrors to keep us from screaming out the truth and taking back our utilities, our infrastructure, our transportation, our communications, our media, and anything else that has been deregulated or allowed to be "free marketed" into the current state. And we've got to deregulate the hell out of all of it, and tax the bastards within an inch of their lives. At least we can stop them where they now stand and maybe even get something back for the rest of us.

But you know what? No matter what we do to the superclass—short of incarcerating the lot of them in Pelican Bay or building some guillotines—they will always have more money than they rest of us can imagine. That shouldn't stop us from doing what we need to do, though.

So take up metaphorical arms and do what we need done to save us all.

After all of this time, it is ludicrous to call EPA Administrator Johnson the "decider" in the California waiver case.

Hell, the Department of Transportation was running a lobbying operation headed by Secretary Mary Peters to blow the California case up.

Remember this: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/09/25/MNTUSD603.DTL

President Bush's transportation secretary, Mary Peters, with White House approval, personally directed a lobbying campaign to urge governors and two dozen House members to block California's first-in-the-nation limits on greenhouse gases from cars and trucks, according to e-mails obtained by Congress.

The e-mails show Peters worked closely with the top opponents in Congress of California's emissions law and sought out governors from auto-producing states, who were seen as likely to oppose the state's request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency allow the new rules to go into effect.

user-pic

San Fernando Curt:

Since you ask: "So, what's next neglected mess at which he can crook a finger and pronounce cured?"

The answer is the "War on Terra".

Expect along about December or January for Bush to announce that the "War on Terra" has been won just to prevent the incoming Democratic President from having the "Commander-in-Chief" powers that he has so abused.

with Bush it's always yadda, yadda, yadda. who bothers to listen to the little man...the commander-in-chief, the decider, the irrelevancy.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address