TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Dems Accuse Freedom's Watch of Working with GOP

Everybody knows what Freedom's Watch is looking to do this election: get Republicans elected. But there's a line that can't be crossed and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee says that they crossed it. From The Washington Post:

Democratic Party officials said they will file a complaint today with the Federal Election Commission alleging that a conservative political group has illegally coordinated its advertising with a Republican Party campaign committee in advance of a May 3 special election in Louisiana.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the fundraising and campaign arm for House Democrats, alleges that the script for a television ad purchased by Freedom's Watch, an independent conservative political committee, can be traced to the National Republican Congressional Committee.

You can see details of the DCCC's complaint here, including a side by side comparison of an ad run by the National Republican Congressional Committee and Freedom's Watch's ad, which according to the DCCC started running immediately after the NRCC's ad ceased. There are indeed some remarkable similarities.

But Patrick McCarthy, the media consultant who put together Freedom's Watch's ad, tells the Post that there's an innocent explanation.

McCarthy, who used to work at the NRCC, says that he pulled up an old Microsoft Word document that he'd used when he was at the NRCC and had cut and pasted the Freedom's Watch ad script over it and then sent it out. "They're grasping at straws if they're saying recycling an old Word document is illegal," he says.

McCarthy is not the only old NRCC hand now at Freedom's Watch. There's Carl Forti, the group's executive vice president was the NRCC's spokesman for many years, and also Ed Patru, who succeeded Forti at the NRCC. The question is whether that group of old NRCC hands ever quite left.

Of course, the complaint won't result in any action by the FEC anytime soon.


11 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Shining the light of day on what the rightwing has been up to and how they've been gaming the election process is always a good thing. Good for the DCCC for calling them on this.

"Mistakes were made."

Don't believe it. Unfortunately, the bar for proving collaboration is way high. McCain wanted it that way.

user-pic

This problem with 501(c)(4) nonprofits goes both ways, really. If you look at the FEC's electioneering communications reports page, you can get a quick glance at all the soft money being spent to influence American politics, and it stinks on both sides here. Democrats are just as guilty as Republicans. It's probably why some Dems were willing at one point to compromise on Hans von Spakovsky's appointment.

Ah, kabuki never goes out of style in DC. Why on earth file a complain with only the FCC against Freedom’s Watch? The FCC won’t be in action for this election cycle. Since Freedom’s Watch has filed as a 501(c)4 non-profit, wouldn’t filing a complaint with the IRS in tandem with the FCC make more sense and get faster results?
(prior post at thinkprogress)

It's likely that Freedom's Watch hasn't even been granted 501(c) status yet - you can see in most of their publicity that they only claim to be "operating as a 501(c)(4) organization."

Not sure how long it takes to become a c4, but it's probably not overnight.

And what will happen, as it has happened before is that the organization will last until the election, have it's effect, then close up shop. Fines and investigations will be too late.

That's one way to look at it. You might also say that since President Bush has effectively crippled the FEC's enforcement efforts, the sanction for violations has passed from the legal system to the public realm. So filing the complaint is less about any eventual enforcement action than about publicizing the violation, thereby rendering flouting the law more costly.

Yes, there would in fact have to be an actual functioning Federal Election Commission for there to be any action against Freedom's Watch and the like. While I wholeheartedly support resisting George Bush's attempts to stack the FEC in the Republican's favor for the next six years, this will loom large in the coming election as these 501 variations run rampant. Once we seat a new FEC sometime in 2009, they will spend years investigating old complaints.

FYI, Patrick McCarthy is a partner at the nebulous Designated Market Media. According to SourceWatch other partners also include former White House political director Sara Taylor, former top Gringrich aide Sam Dawson and infamous NH phone jammer/Delay money launderer Terry Nelson.

-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud

It's truly disgusting. The GOP cripples the FEC, thus enabling their continuing election fraud. Democrats, assuming they are not already doing so, will be incented to cheat as well so as not to be at a disadvantage. Yay, Democracy. I'm not an America hater, I'm an American government hater.

user-pic

I wonder what the courts will do with the suits against McCain. There is some interesting maneuvering going on here.

user-pic

The word 'Accuse' in the headline is incorrect . . . The phrase 'Point out the fact that' would be far more accurate.

user-pic

Additionally, does not the farging law require that 501c's have a primary social purpose that provides them a reason to weigh into political discourse?

WTF is Freedom (for Fascists) Watch' social purpose?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Tag Cloud



Subscribe to this blog's feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address