« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Dems to Push Again to Limit Interrogation Techniques
Last month, Democrats, with the help of a few crossover Republicans (but not Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)), passed a bill that would have limited the CIA's interrogation techniques to those authorized by the Army Field Manual. Waterboarding and other "enhanced interrogation" techniques (use of hoods or duct tape over the eyes, inducing hypothermia, etc.) would have been specifically and unambiguously outlawed.
President Bush, as promised, vetoed that bill, saying that restricting CIA interrogators "could cost American lives." An override vote failed in the House.
Now Senate Democrats are going to try again. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) says that she'll introduce the measure as an amendment to 2009's Senate intelligence authorization bill, because "at the time [of the veto] we vowed to come back - again and again if necessary - to ensure that torture by U.S. intelligence agencies is outlawed for good." Sens. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), John Rockefeller (D-WV), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), and Ron Wyden (D-OR) are also sponsoring the amendment. Over the weekend, Wyden released correspondence from the Justice Department showing how lawyers there dealt with current ambiguity in the relevant laws. What counted as an "outrage upon personal dignity," a DoJ official wrote, depended on whether "an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack."





Comments (20)
Torture by US Intelligence agencies is outlawed. Torture is prohibited by whichever Geneva torture accord we signed. Signed treaties are the law of the land.
This will codify precisely what is illegal and what will happen to the torturers after they do it.
April 29, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amazing that it is even a discussion as to whether our so-called Christian nation tortures. Frankly, no matter the lies and obfuscation from this sorry administration. torture is not even in the best interest of getting accurate intel. Now, before McCain sold his soul to the Neocons, he was dead set against torture because in his words, "intel received that way is unreliable." But no surprise sine McCain, the straight talker now talks with a forked tongue.
April 29, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Olympia Snowe ought to just switch parties. She has seemed like one of the good guys (gals) for quite some time.
April 29, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Snowe only acts like a progressive senator when no vote is being taken. Once it comes down to a vote she is a very reliable vote for whatever Bush wants. She is very much in the Republican mainstream in that way.
April 29, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't always agree with SciFiDiFi.
In this effort I am totally behind her.
April 29, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better late than never? No. She had her chance to shut down torture, but she didn't.
Take Pelosi of the table in 2008
Drown out Feinstein in 2012
April 29, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is more too-little-too-late from the Cowed Crowd.
Di-Fi wants to stop torture? Well GEE, Diane, maybe you should have thought of that before confirming Michael "Stonewall" Mukasey.
People like Di-Fi, Hagel and Snowe get to make a big show and prance around in their Righteous Indignation about The Very Bad People Who Torture. They don't make as much of a show about the fact that they confirmed the guy who allows the torture to continue.
You'll pardon me if I don't join in the applause. You don't get credit for fixing something YOU broke to begin with.
April 29, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
A) The previous attempt to explicitly ban the CIA from using waterboarding failed because it was part of a larger bill and the Republicans were able to claim that they were anti-torture but unfortunately they didn't agree with the rest of the bill.
Yet again, we're trying to stick this onto another bill. History will repeat itself. Fools.
Make a stand alone bill. Make the Republicans vote against THAT.
2) Waterboarding is ALREADY illegal. This is a huge waste of time. If a government agency breaks any other law, what is the usual process?
Oh yeah, you go to the DoJ. But oh yeah, the DoJ issued an advance pardon to the CIA, so they can't investigate.
And Conyers is just now threatening to subpoena the people who issued the advance pardon.
And nobody in Congress is talking about impeachment. Not of Bush. Not of Cheney. Not of Condi. Not of Mukasey.
So the torture will just continue. And the torturers will never be held accountable.
We'll just wank, wank, WANK our way to the November election and watch as the combined forces of the Media and Ralph Nader and Democratic In-Fighting hand the election over to John McCain.
Get used to it.
Maybe if enough of you go vote then the Democrats can gain enough seats in the House and Senate to allow for meaningful oversight.
Maybe then we'll stop torturing people and not get into a war with Iran.
Whatever. Doesn't matter. Nobody is talking about what we'll do as a country if there's another 9/11. If they committed war crimes against foreign Muslims after the first 9/11, what do you think they'll do after the second one?
April 29, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rather than "torture" or other controversial interogation "techniques", perhaps we should just use the "Daniel Pearl" method on those people who use that method.
April 29, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever - what does Nader have to do with it?
April 29, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
xopl refers to the vote-sucking blamed on Nader, who has actually talked about running again this year, but seems to have been marginalized; perhaps xopl refers to any independent who might pull votes away from the Democratic Party.
I'm starting to think it'll be the Democratic Party that drives votes away from the Democratic Party this time.
April 30, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
The entire world (at one time or another) has been at war with "radical Islam" for many centuries longer than your daddies have known your mommies. Declaring that there is no war, or declaring that the war is over just isn't sufficient to deal with a religious/political movement that requires either your subservience or your death, and really doesn't care which. When they feel strong they attack, when they don't feel strong they wait until they feel strong.
One doesn't need to read history which may be slanted by the writer, just look at historical maps. The truth of a movements intentions are known by their actions rather than their words.
We would all like to learn from the mistakes of history, but history doesn't start until a century after the event. Learning from history requires the clear light of unemotional reason. Life must age to become clear history. History tells me to beware, recent "politics" which by definition are argued and arguable, tells me only that radical Islam feels strong now.
In war, what matters is effectiveness. Nicities are nice, but I would like to win any fight I'm in. If torture is effective, I'm okay with it. If it's not, shelve it. It's one thing to have an agreement between combatents on behavior if all sides follow the agreement. Unilateral agreements by definition are NOT agreements. If it's okay to butcher and decapitate our POW's, requiring our government to provide religiously correct conditions and pleasant incarcerations for their POW's is absurd.
April 29, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
mendowood: First, we have the testimony of military professionals that torture is not effective. (I, too, think the utilitarian argument has merit -- but it works both ways.)
Second, I think the definition of torture hinges less on some sliding scale of outrageousness (as in "outrage upon personal dignity") than on a sliding scale of personal dignity. In other words, the danger when we're at war is that the importance of personal dignity in general will be diminished. I don't want my country to stand for diminished personal dignity, whether in war or peace.
April 29, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
DonQ: Thanks for your polite response. From a philosophical standpoint I too would like my country to always have the moral high ground. In war, sometimes, philosophical positions need to take a back seat; at least in my opinion.
That said, It is my understanding also that pain is an ineffective interrogation tool. Fear of immenent death however seems to be VERY effective (the speed in which "victims" break under waterboarding is undeniable). However with religious zealots, sometimes death is not feared. It is these people who present the real challenge for the interrogator. For these types, sleep deprivation and other psychological "tortures" do seem to be effective.
Sometimes I hate the truth, but I never fear it.
April 29, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Philosophical positions never take a back seat in war. War simply exposes the philosophy that some people have but usually hide, or are perhaps unaware that they even have.
We've learned in recent years that the Bush administration believes in torture. It wasn't 9/11 that changed their minds - it simply gave them an excuse to use what they've always believed in. That they only 'limit themselves' to waterboarding is certainly not because they find other forms of torture repugnant - they use it because that's what they can get away with, so far anyway.
I'm disgusted that my country is now in league with other torturing nations. And I am similarly disgusted at how other Americans can be so utterly blase about it.
April 29, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, I am disgusted that people insist on having a war against Islam. The majority of Islamic nations are not in the Middle East, they are in Asia. Very, very few nations of any kind have shown any desire to attack our country, and those that have shown that desire do so largely because we support some of the worst actions taken by Israel, we attacked Iraq for no rational reason, we are setting the stage (fixing the intelligence) so we can attack Iran, etc. Any war between us an Islam will be one we start.
April 29, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
psyclone and mendowood: I don't think mendowood, at least, is blase about torture -- s/he has a pretty well thought out position. I just disagree with it!
If the suspected bad guys break under waterboarding, how do we know that what they say is the truth? They'll just say anything to stop the pain or terror. That makes the technique useless. And, all the while, we become known as people who torture. For a country based on ideas, that's an idea that's pretty important!
April 29, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
To hoppycalif2: In the early years of the last century, my grandfather and my great uncle immigrated to the US from eastern Europe. They had 4 brothers who immigrated to France. In the early 30's they corresponded with my grandfather and greatuncle in New York about assassinating Hitler who the saw as a potential danger (I inherited the correspondence when my father passed in 2000). They, as a family decided against taking action because it was "wrong".
As it turned out, those four great uncles of mine and their wives, and their children, and their grandchildren all died in the death camps. Sometimes not taking action against someone you "know" wants to hurt you is "wrong".
April 29, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a disgusting comparison. Hitler made no secret of the fact that he intended to take over Europe, as Germany's natural right. He made no secret of his plans for Jews and others he believed to be inferior, as if anyone could be inferior to him. Saddam was an American ally, greatly aided and encouraged by our government, given American permission to do as he pleased with Kuwait. Not once could he have been believed to be a threat to our country.
So, if your little story is true, unlikely as that is, lots of people have considered killing the leaders of their or another country, so it can be no surprise that occasionally following through might have been a good idea.
April 29, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
When we talk about another "void for vagueness" operational term that "nobody knows what it means" (ENHANCED INTERROGATION)....once again, every commentator is lost in the spin and focuses on waterboarding, stress positions, etc.
WHAT MOST READERS AT TPMMUCKRAKER.COM DON'T KNOW AND WON'T LISTEN TO IS A KEY SEN JUD COMM CONTACT NAMED THOMAS S. BEAN who signed a 47 page US DOJ OIG complaint that brought light to THE USE OF TORTURE ON US CITIZENS because they were "political enemies" who had contacted THE US SEN JUD COMM.
This is all corroborated by Senator CHARLES GRASSLEY, whose finance aid looked into the LEO WANTA TRUST FUND THEFT after Grassley got my ten page memo?
THE TORTURE THAT WAS USED AGAINST ME INCLUDED:
--CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A FED CRIME OF VIOLENCE;
--CONSPIRACY TO TAMPER WITH A WITNESS who signed a DOJ OIG/FBI OPR Complaint;
--USE OF A DOD DARPA WEAPON CALLED DEW (Directed Energy Weapon) that focuses microwave radiation to induce death, brain strokes, brain tumors, heart attacks, pain, discomfort, sleep deprivation, etc.
--USE OF AN RFID MIND CONTROL VERICHIP illegally inserted in my skull while I was asleep in my own home, after I contacted Grassley, who confronted Mueller who flipped on NsA TSP tothe NY TIMES.
--MIND CONTROL includes subliminally programming the Manchurian Candidate while also disturbing Deep REM sleep to create confusion, lost long term memory, frustration, aggravation, hostiliy, and the eventual emotional outbursts later recorded on pin hole spy cameras, bugging devices, emails, letters, and phone calls (NO WARRANTS for this TICKLING THE WIRE neutralizaion).
THIS TORTURE also included targeting of DR. MARK GORDON (a known associate of mine, brother of a murdered brother named RICH GORDON, who also was coerced into cooperating with Minneapolis FBI who forced him to take polygraph exams focusing on the illegally seized tape recordings of our phone conversations).
HOW DOES A LYING, TREASONOUS, LOWLIFE FAGGOT NAMED ROBERT SWAN MUELLER, III....ignore the attempted murder of an FBI witness named MARK GORDON?
When Minnesota US ATTY THOMAS HEFFLEFINGER FOUND OUT, he made inquiries, and was brought to DOJ HQ to discuss the matter (At DOJ HQ all US Attornys go through an x ray machine to make sure they are not recording the conversation as evidence of ANOTHER CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE).
HEFFLEFINGER RESIGNED IN DISGUST WHEN HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PROSECUTE RUMSFIELD'S DOD CIFA GOON SQUAD, who worked with Minneapolis FBI who protected their right wing military pals pursuant to Mueller's bogus punk protocol in which "FBI FAGGOTS HIDE BEHIND SILENT INDIFFERENCE, AND REFUSE TO ENFORCE AND INVESTIGATE OUTRAGEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE FED CRIM CODE.
This indifference by Minneapolis FBI....was a pattern and practise involving the "lack of criminal focus" on the MURDER OF DASCHLE'S EX CHIEF OF STAFF, RICHARD GORDON, IN CUSTER, SD,....as FBI/Rumsfield's CIFA/NSA/NSA TSP, SD AG...all colluded to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE when they ran an illegal bogus investigation designed to discredit Rich Gordon who was slandered by THE NY TIMES after FBI leaked them info?
JUST HOW STUPID AND WEAK...IS THE MSM, AND WORTHLESS PUNK WHORES AT DNC (Pelosi, Reid, Leahy).
April 30, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink