TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Don Young: I Wasn't Even in The Room When They Changed The Coconut Road Earmark!

In the clearest language he's used yet, Rep. Don Young (R-AK) disclaimed responsibility for changing the language of the Coconut Road earmark after it had cleared both houses of Congress on the House floor today. He also repeated his earlier criticism of the Senate's vote to require a Justice Department investigation, calling it a "slippery, slippery road." You can see his comments here:

All this notwithstanding, Young supported the overall bill, which contained a fix to change the earmark's language back to the way it was before the infamous change. The bill passed easily today.

Young's spokeswoman had earlier called the change a "correction" by staff, but Young was more specific on that point today. Young said that the "enrollment" process, where technical changes are made by the House clerk to tidy up the bill that Congress passed, "is not a process I own or control." He added: "I have never been in an enrollment office." The ambiguity remains, however, of whether anyone on Young's staff urged the change.

And he went on to say that it was nothing remarkable that there had been a change. For instance, he said, there had been an earmark for a Jacksonville in the bill, but that the enrollment clerks had changed the language to specify for which of the six U.S. Jacksonvilles it was intended.

As we explained at length in this post, minor changes are regularly made to bills in the enrollment process. But Young's earmark was unique of the 6,371 earmarks in that underwent such a substantive change. It was originally for the widening of I-75 in Collier and Lee counties in Florida, and it was changed to concern only the Coconut Road interchange in Lee County. So he's being more than a little slippery here.


11 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

As much as I am pleased to see the happy go lucky mink bite man have a comeuppance, look at what his kindred spirits in the White House get away with. He was counting on that look-the-other-way business to apply to him just as liberally as it does to them.

Is there a specific law dealing with this?

user-pic

How very Karl Rove. Next we find out that the change wasn't made in a room, no, it was in a car. So no, he wasn't in the room.

I have been trying all day to figure out if Don was just tanked, or has been using Dubya's speech coach?

At 16 or seconds into the speech, he invents two new words, induendo and motivication. He uses them again and again, so its not just a one time slip up.

In the first half of speech, not included here, he clearly says or wants to say I-95, when the highway in question is I-75.

user-pic

Is TPM lawyering up? I thought a previous post included an admission of responsibility by one of Young's staff. Instead of "more than a little slippery" can't you just say "economical with the truth" or "deliberately misleading" or -- heaven forfend -- "lying"?

user-pic

Republicans behaving BADLY!

1) Why is a rep from Alaska involving himself in Florida affairs?

2) Forget Collier and Lee Counties. My vote is for 1-75 to be expanded from the Venice Connector to River Road. It miserable driving through there with only two lanes. Especially during season.

You listening Buchanan?

user-pic

It would greatly help us colorblind guys (about 10% of your male readership) if you would distinguish links by something in addition to color. The red and the black type look exactly the same to me. How about also making links boldface?

Thanks for listening.

user-pic

Leisure Guy! I learned my shaving technique from your blog!

Though I'm not colorblind, I can see how that would be a problem, and in fact I believe this is exactly the reason why the oldschool convention of underlining links was implemented. However, like the Schick Dodecaheddro blade vs. the double-edge, you may be inserting yourself in the troublesome zone between form and function. I do believe a lot of browsers let you force underlines for all links, though.

This guy should seek out a linguistics coach. Or maybe he's drunk AND a liar. I'm sick of these guys using the public till as their personal patronage fund. Everyone knows damn well that he slipped that change in post facto; yet, there he is, trying to lie his way out so hard that he can't speak or look at anyone directly for fear that his lying eyes will betray him. His speech already has. It is the people's job to make sure he is not reelected for another term - ever. And responsible private citizens should not hire this man for any job higher than a fast food shlepper (not meant as an insult to fast-food workers). As usual, dishonesty thrives in our civil service.

how many stories does this guy have on this criminal act ???

first he claimed he was innocent

then he threw a staffer under the bus

now he's saying that connie mack is the guilty person ???

at least he's throwing a repuglitard congresscritter under the bus this time (guess he figured out that the "staffer" excuse was lame and didn't deflect any blame at all)

you've had 3 chances to come up with a reasonable explanation for a VERY UNREASONABLE act mister young

like to take another swing at it congressman, (under the "kkkarl rove" rules of repuglitard truth-telling you get five chances to tell the truth) or have you figured out that your credibility is already shot ...

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Tag Cloud



Subscribe to this blog's feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address