TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Today's Must Read

No doubt that good news about Iraq has been hard to come by lately for the administration. The failure of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's offensive against the Shiite militia of Moqtada al-Sadr in Basra and Baghdad still stings, and the postmortems by The New York Times and Washington Post are not pretty. The Times also reports this morning that "more than 1,000 Iraqi soldiers and policemen either refused to fight or simply abandoned their posts" during the fighting last week, a toll that features "dozens of officers, including at least two senior field commanders in the battle."

Earlier this week, just after the offensive went kablooey, intelligence officials delivered a new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq to Congress. It's a bit of tentative good news amid all the bad. If the administration has its way, however, you'll never see a declassified version of it. Director of National Intelligence Mike "public debate of intelligence issues kills Americans" McConnell will do what he can to ensure that. Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Ted Kennedy (D-MA) have begun a push for the administration to release a declassified version of the report, writing a letter earlier this week to McConnell earlier this week (see below).

The general conclusion of the report is evident from the headlines this morning. "Report: Security in Iraq is improving," says the AP. "U.S. Study Finds Progress in Iraq, but Fragile Security and Potential for Terror Attacks," says the Times. A senior administration official tells The Wall Street Journal, "The NIE update confirmed that the surge strategy the president announced in January of last year is working. There's more work to be done, but progress has obviously been made."

And that pretty much seems to be the scope of it. Democrats who have read it are mightily unimpressed and say that it's just part of the broader PR push which will culminate in next week's testimony by Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker.

As Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) puts it, "The stuff that was positive, they emphasized. The negative, they stated, but deemphasized." Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) complains that it doesn't cover most of the stuff you'd want it to cover: "It's much less insightful than other, recent products and focuses narrowly on counterterrorism efforts in Iraq and the progress of the Iraqi leadership."

And Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), a member of the House intelligence committee, is mighty suspicious -- both of the report's content and its timing: "One might ask whether the timing of the release and the apparent departure from usual procedures means this is more of a political document than an intelligence document," he tells the Journal.

As the Journal points out, "intelligence reports are often delayed by major developments that could affect the assessments, such as the Sadr fighting." This report, however, was not delayed, and there is no mention of the failed offensive in the report. It has, however, come right in time for the Petraeus and Crocker hearings next week.

April 2, 2008


The Honorable John M. McConnell
Director of National Intelligence
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Washington, DC 20511


Dear Director McConnell:

We are writing to ask you to release an unclassified summary of the key conclusions and judgments in the new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq.

This information is critical to the public debate in the coming weeks and months. Without a current unclassified assessment of the situation in Iraq, Congress and the American people will not have the essential information needed for an informed public debate.

There is no compelling reason not to release an unclassified version of this latest NIE that summarizes the major conclusions and judgments of the classified report, while still protecting the sources and methods of our intelligence community. Recent NIE’s on Iraq have included unclassified versions that were released to the public, and we urge you to continue this established practice.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter, and we look forward to the release of an unclassified NIE on Iraq before General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker testify to the Congress.

With respect and appreciation,

Sincerely,


Edward M. Kennedy
Carl Levin


16 Comments

| Leave a comment

America is doomed until it addresses the crime of 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyCX9hfo8wo

"More of a political document than an intelligence document," says Rep. Holt. Really? BushCo politicizing the current NIE, or whatever the hell they're trying to call it?

Gee, Mr. Holt, you mean like they've succeeded in politicizing every g.d. thing in the fed. gov., including the Dept. of "We-Used-To-Count-On-Them-For" Justice?


(alternate addressee)

The Honorable John M. McConnell

Soon-to-be-Unemployed Director of National Intelligence

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Washington, DC 20511

user-pic

The proof is in the pudding, as my dear mother says. Let any Congressional fat-ass, be it Dem(especially those who keep authorizing billions and billions to Bush for Afghanistan/Iraq) or Repub, repair to Iraq and live like a commoner for about 6 months and report back.
And at the same time let Juan Cole or Dahr Jamail bring this NIE report to Congress and tear it apart.

Private concoction of spin as intelligence and the divorce from reality created KILLS AMERICANS. Politicizing intelligence material is suicidal. We're drinking our own kool-aid. We're believing our own press. We're kids with a new chemistry set who won't be satisfied until we've blown off our heads screwing around! The 'Pax Americana' will be very short lived . . .

user-pic

"We are writing to ask you"!?!?!?!?!?

And when you tell us to go f**k ourselves, then what?

I am guessing nothing.

How NOT to get BushCo's attention: another strongly worded letter sans, of course, any followup action.

But it is a way to look like you're concerned & doing something, while actually doing as little as possible.

Strongly (& so sternly) worded letter writing to this administration- an exercise in futility recently perfected by Pat Leahy & John Conyers.

user-pic

Interesting....
The Federalist Papers gave two suggestions for dealing with a president who gave false or misleading information to Congress concerning wars.

The first had to do with putting a rope around their neck...
The second is off the table...

Too bad the pigs have become so equal that there is no stopping them...

user-pic

This is mindlessly stoopid --

"America is doomed until it addresses the crime of 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration.

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyCX9hfo8wo

"Posted by ghost_of_911"

THINK, child: all that was necessary was for them to allow it to happen.

user-pic

This is mindlessly stoopid --

"America is doomed until it addresses the crime of 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration.

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyCX9hfo8wo

"Posted by ghost_of_911"

THINK, child: all that was necessary was for them to allow it to happen.

user-pic

"Interesting....

"The Federalist Papers gave two suggestions for dealing with a president who gave false or misleading information to Congress concerning wars.

"The first had to do with putting a rope around their neck...

"The second is off the table..."

1. The Federalist Papers is not law.

2. The Federalist Papers represented the view of three (four, actualy) of over 40+ Constitutional Convention delegates who agreed on little.

3. And there were three delegates on the other end of the spectrum: opposed to ratification; and we don't take their view as some sort of gospel -- either.

user-pic

---Note to JNagarya---
Re: Federalist Papers

Note that Congress's debate and discussion, as well as supporting research, about legislation are referenced in SCOTUS ruling regarding said laws. The same method applies when reviewing the content of the Constitution: the debate, in camera and in the newspapers where the Federalist Papers were published, is referenced. Check the recent 2nd Amdmt case's discussion, and then read the ruling when it comes down.

As for your #3, losers lose, and are ignored, unless they refuse to acknowledge their loss. Examples of the latter include The South. Another would be Cheney's minority report on Iran-Contra, where he justified unconstitutional and illegal warfare, and created the process by which he would personally profit from war 20 years later.
And of course, there's the Federalist Society, which (as demonstrated by their rulings) wants to eliminate the Constitution and go back to a Monarchy.

This reads like a guantamano trial script from the democrats. All conjecture, no facts, secrecy, torture evidence. What more to a good NIE script.
And America learns nothing. The republicans tie all hands. And apparently legal as everything republican.
And don't forget they have ALL your money or will before they leave washington for the beach. And that is legal as well. Just wait the decision by the decider.

What an incredible press corps we have! Three major news outlets release reports based on nothing but anonymous Bushie hearsay, and the right wing has another field day. It's a wonder that most Americans don't believe we found the WMDs and Iraq is now a peaceful, America-loving paradise.

user-pic

2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll

http://www.votenic.com

Check Out Our New Vid "America The Beautiful"

Remember To Vote Weekly!

Results Now Posted Instantly!

WHY SO MUCH FEAR OF WITHDRAWAL?

It is time to give Iraqis their nation back before too few are left to remember that most Shiite, Sunni or Kurd Iraqis described themselves as Iraqis above all else and religious or sectarian group members second.........

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-fear-withdrawal-from-iraq.html

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address