TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Today's Must Read

Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), your prayers have been answered! The D.C. Madam's attorney tells the AP that he will not be calling her most famous former client as a witness.

Of course, Vitter's attorney made it as clear as he could that Vitter would not be a helpful witness for the former madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey. Palfrey's defense is that she was running a legitimate "fantasy sex" operation from her laundry room in California. Vitter's attorney said his client would plead the Fifth if called; not a helpful spectacle for the madam's case.

If Vitter and his escort didn't restrain themselves to fantasy, they weren't alone. The prosecution has called more than a dozen of Palfrey's former escorts to testify, and it hasn't been pretty. From The Washington Post:

The jurors have watched a procession of scared, mortified ex-prostitutes (13 so far) reluctantly take the witness stand, forced to reveal their secret former lives in intermittently graphic detail -- a past each clearly hoped was buried forever. Most testified that they grew weary of the business in less than a year and quit.

At $250 for 60 minutes or so, these weren't high-priced call girls, it turns out. They didn't measure up in appearance to the elites in the business. As the women tell it, Palfrey's niche was a middle-of-the-road, largely suburban clientele -- a long way up from the streetwalker trade, but well south of Emperors Club VIP, the four-figure-per-hour call girl outfit that last month proved the undoing of former New York governor Eliot Spitzer....

[T]he trial has been just a long, sad parade of former prostitutes, some in wigs provided by the government, a feeble disguise, a few dabbing tears on the witness stand.

The Post offers some snippets of testimony to convey the tone of things:

Prosecutor: "Of those 80 appointments, approximately how many times did you have sex?"

Ex-call girl: "Seventy-nine. . . . All except the gentleman who was a quadriplegic."

and:

Defense attorney: "Ma'am, you ultimately decided that this wasn't for you, right? . . . I believe you were tired of lying to your boyfriend, correct?"

Ex-call girl: "Yes."

Defense attorney: "And you're not particularly happy to be here, are you, ma'am?"

Ex-call girl: "Who would be?"

Amen to that, eh, Sen. Vitter?


7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I suspect the DC Madam's lawyer will be appointed to a plum position in the Republican party or the Bush Administration.

The Pampering of David Vitter continues.

But it's gotta be hard to be David Vitter; someone should give him a big Huggie...

Couldn't the prosecution give Vitter immunity and call him as a witness for their side? Or will they only degrade the women and not the johns? If they can make the women lay out every sordid detail, they should do the same to Vitter. After all, no one expects him to be brought up on soliciting charges, so immunity and testimony would be the one way to give him what he is due - at least relative to what the women are being put through.

Can anyone track down his wife and ask her if she is still more Lorena Bobbit than Hillary Clinton? Just like to know if she is still that arrogant and judgemental now that the shoe is on the other foot.

user-pic

Why is i the prosecution is only interesting the women's retelling of the lurid details of these transactions? Why aren't the "customers'" version of events just as important?

If the jury needs to know if a hooker still had sex during menstruation, the percentage of times she engaged in sex acts on calls and whether the number of times intercourse and oral sex prosecutor change[d] your number?," shouldn't it learn if Vitter used Viagra? Or if Randall Tobias enjoyed his whores?

Jeez. Why is it that only the prostitutes' perspectives are necessary to obtain a conviction. For all we we know, they are all lying. Now if we heard from the customers. . .

A plum position ? That's ripe

user-pic

It's surprising that some of the "up scale clients" didn't try to influence the judge or the jury for an "innocent" verdict. So, when's that little black book with the names of all the male clients going to be released?

You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address