« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Witness for The Prosecution
You remember the D.C. Madam, the not-a-people-person who ran a high-end escort service out of her laundry room in California.
Well, Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) certainly does, and in a hearing Friday, Vitter's lawyer was trying his best to keep the senator from being called at Deborah Jeane Palfrey's upcoming trial. Palfrey, who has pleaded not guilty and says that she was running a legitimate "fantasy sex" operation, has subpoenaed Vitter, apparently with the idea that Vitter would testify that no, there was no sex, only fantasy.
But for some reason, Vitter seems reluctant. From The Times-Picayune:
[Lawyer Henry Asbill], who represented Vitter in some earlier motions related to the Palfrey case, told [Judge James] Robertson that the defense has a responsibility to establish that it has a valid legal reason to call his client other than to simply "harass and embarrass him." He also said that it's hard to imagine a legitimate reason to call him as a witness given that the escort service had hundreds, if not thousands of customers, and the defense hasn't even spoken to his client about whether he would have anything to say that would assist its case.Preston Burton, Palfrey's attorney, told Judge Robertson that he shouldn't be required to reveal his reasons for putting people on his witness list because it would disclose his defense strategy to prosecutors.
The judge declined Asbill's suggestion that he hold a hearing in chambers, and declined to nullify the subpoena. Robertson said he didn't know the name of Asbill's client and "didn't want to know."
Vitter narrowly avoided testifying earlier in the case at a pretrial hearing in November. That hearing was mercifully canceled.
Asbill also seems keen to indicate that Vitter would be no help to Palfrey's defense. He'd take the Fifth, Asbill told the judge -- obviously not what Palfrey would want since fantasy is as legal as can be. As the Legal Times reports, the prosecution have a line up of 14 former escorts from Palfrey's service who are expected to testify that the job involved more than a vivid imagination.
And what does Sen. Vitter have to say about all this? Well, when the Times-Picayune queried, he was both sentimental and eager to change the subject:
"I want to reaffirm how sorry I am to have hurt the people I love so deeply, starting with my family and certainly including the people of Louisiana," Vitter said. "I continue to work every day to make up for that."He continued: "I continue to focus on crucial challenges for Louisiana families like health care reform and good-paying jobs."













Louisiana, here are the "Good Paying Jobs" that Sen Vitter has in store for you
- Blow Jobs
- Hand Jobs
- Rim Jobs
and many many more
April 7, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Infinitive: to plead
Present tense: plead
Past tense: pleaded or pled
Past participle: pled
April 7, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
And what happened to the question mark at the end of the first sentence? :)
April 7, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
that wasn't a question. that was a statement of fact. we all do remember him. he's a slick, double chinned, frat boy who misleads the public in order to remain in his little boy's club.
a loser in any other life.
April 7, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hasn't the Statute of Limitations run out for Vitter? And if so, how could he possibly plead the 5th (well, he can TRY, but it shouldn't work).
IIRC, the only reason that it isn't Vitter in the dock is that the clock has run out on prosecuting him.
...unless there's something NEW that Vitter wants to keep hidden.
Let it all hang out, Diaper Boy!
April 7, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all of the insanity of the campaign, I would love to have this idiot embarrass himself under oath. I kinda feel sorry for his wife even though she dissed Hillary for what she 'didn't' do to Bill after she found out about his little tackle and tickle. Walking a mile in someone else's shoes ain't that easy huh, Mrs. V? Anyway, once again the MSM lets the macho boys of the republican crime family off the hook! I am already sick of the McCain media love-fest.
April 7, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's Elliot Spitzer focused on right now? Ohh... never mind, that's right - Spitzer is a democrat.
April 7, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why hasn't he gone the way of Spitzer?
April 7, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since this story is back in the news, here (I hope) is a link to an interview with Deborah Jeane Palfrey from last August (note: the blog is not-safe-for-work).
April 7, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
As to SOL - we don't know. He may have continued to participate by concealing his acts or lying to investigators this would keep teh SOL open.
To assert the 5th he merely has to have reason to believe he may incriminate himself by his testimony.
Just saying he knew they were advertising sex may be enough, or that he knew prostitution was illegal in DC.
Any statement that "could be used against him" as in the Miranda warning is incriminating.
April 7, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a Republican, he can expect to be pampered.
So to speak.
April 7, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Incredible how Republicans get a free pass on this stuff --even as they lecture about their alleged moral superiority.
Eliot Spitzer resigned in a matter of days when caught with escorts. But David Vitter and Larry Craig still hold their US Senate seats after sex-for-money scandals.
If they were Democrats, the Mainstream Corporate Media would have hounded them out of office by now.
April 7, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be fair, Sen. Larry Craig (R) was not involved in a sex-for-money scandal. Instead, he was cruising public restrooms for anonymous gay sex with consenting gay men. I believe that there has not been not been th accusation that he was planning on paying any of the gay men with whom he was hoping to perform homosexual acts in public places.
Oh yeah, there was at least the implication that Larry Craig (R) attempted to intimidate the arresting officer by abusing his office.
But no, no money exchanged hands. Let's be fair to Larry Craig (R).
April 7, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good, sick of their free pass.
April 7, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least Spitzer's resignation means the Republicans can't use him to excuse Vitter, like we could have used Vitter to excuse Spitzer. They committed the same transgression, but the penalties have been radically different. They only downside to demanding Vitter's resignation is his replacement would almost surely be another right wing loony.
April 7, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The DC service wasn't the only the family-values candidate the Senator used. He also frequented the Canal Street brothel in New Orleans, which he misteriously stopped using right before it was busted by the feds. See http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/madam_vitter_a_client_at_canal.html
April 7, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shouldn`t the title be "Witness For The Prostitution"?
April 7, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
Well played sir.
April 8, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink