« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Today's Must Read
Criticisms leveled in former White House spokesman Scott McClellan's new memoir are sure to get a lot of attention over the next few days.
What separates McClellan's account from other tell-all books from former Bush Administration officials is the personal tone. McClellan followed Bush from Texas and left the White House on good terms. But he's obviously not pleased with some decisions that were made -- and the way he was treated at times.
To some degree, McClellan's book tells us a lot of things we already know.
From today's Washington Post:
Bush is depicted as an out-of-touch leader, operating in a political bubble, who has stubbornly refused to admit mistakes.
But he also takes a swipe at the Bush public persona that exudes confidence.
"A more self-confident executive would be willing to acknowledge failure, to trust people's ability to forgive those who seek redemption for mistakes and show a readiness to change," he writes.
Among the most interesting stories McClellan recounts is his role in the CIA leak investigation that led to Scotter Libby's conviction for obstruction of justice last year. Here is where McClellan seems to get personal.
"I could feel something fall out of me into the abyss as each reporter took a turn whacking me," he writes of the withering criticism he received as the story played out. "It was my reputation crumbling away, bit by bit."
Intriguingly, he recounts his suspicions about a previously undisclosed West Wing meeting between Rove and Libby:
"There is only one moment during the leak episode that I am reluctant to discuss," he writes. "It was in 2005, during a time when attention was focusing on Rove and Libby, and it sticks vividly in my mind. ... Following [a meeting in Chief of Staff Andy Card's office], ... Scooter Libby was walking to the entryway as he prepared to depart when Karl turned to get his attention. 'You have time to visit?' Karl asked. 'Yeah,' replied Libby."I have no idea what they discussed, but it seemed suspicious for these two, whom I had never noticed spending any one-on-one time together, to go behind closed doors and visit privately. ... At least one of them, Rove, it was publicly known at the time, had at best misled me by not sharing relevant information, and credible rumors were spreading that the other, Libby, had done at least as much. ...
"The confidential meeting also occurred at a moment when I was being battered by the press for publicly vouching for the two by claiming they were not involved in leaking Plame's identity, when recently revealed information was now indicating otherwise. ... I don't know what they discussed, but what would any knowledgeable person reasonably and logically conclude was the topic? Like the whole truth of people's involvement, we will likely never know with any degree of confidence."
McClellan writes in a way suggesting he really didn't see this at the time. Really?

I am very curious to know more about what went on between Scott McClellan and the people whose mouthpiece he was acting as. But the idea that he wasn't consciously misleading the press corps strains credulity. He should be encouraged to come clean, but his crocodile tears should be wiped away with sandpaper.
May 28, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I took from the same text that he noted it at the time, yet didn't pursue it, not that he didn't see it at the time.
May 28, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
At the end of the day, this (mal)administration will have produced more cover-your-ass memoirs from former officials than any in history. And, given the depth and breadth of incompetence and plain old criminal conduct that has occurred under Bush's watch, this is no surprise.
May 28, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he's entered the "confess your sins and apologize" part of his "Republican Enablers Anonymous" 12 step program.
Are there subpoenas in li'l Scotty's future?
Hope he's got good bodyguards.
Hmmmm...wonder if there's anything in the book that might cause Fitzgerald to "un-suspend" the Plame investigation?
May 28, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
That, or the "smear your shit everywhere" stage which is to basically tell the public what they already know, but try and also spread the blame around in the process.
So far it's hard to tell.
May 28, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm also very skeptical of "tell all" books that pin the blame on the Bush Admin alone, as they're leaving office, as though it wasn't widespread in the Republican Party and didn't bubble up from the think tanks, conservative journals, and so on.
There is a huge effort being made by Republicans who supported Bush loyally for years to now portray him as some rare anomaly, a rogue actor in the Republican party. Nonsense.
May 28, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any revelations on "Jeff Gannon" or James G. Guckert?
Who cleared him in?
Whose agenda was he "servicing"?
May 28, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is ALL absolutely SHAMEFUL and NIXONIAN!
May 28, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Waiting to see how McCain tries to spin this to his advantage and create 'separation' from the Bush administration.
May 28, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
that would require an operation to separate those conjoined twins...
May 28, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It looks more and more like the reason the Bush administration refuses to allow its members to talk to Congress is that they want to keep the juicy things they know about for their upcoming "tell all" books. After all, we should realize by now that the Bush administration is about making money for the insiders more than anything else. In fact I doubt that a single decision has been made by the "decider" that was not driven by money matters.
May 28, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Mr. McClellan now comes across as a nice guy because he's written a "tell all" book (partially so, anyhow).
But when you get to a position of "Press Secretary" for the president, you too are a big time player whose soul is bought.
But it does seem that maybe, just maybe, he finally realized his soul was worth more than he was being paid, "I could feel something fall out of me into the abyss as each reporter took a turn whacking me," he writes of the withering criticism he received as the story played out. "It was my reputation crumbling away, bit by bit."
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
May 28, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Conspiracy to obstruct justice? Naaaaahhhhh...
May 28, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Press Secretary has to articulate the Presidents talking points, even when they disagree with them, or know them to be lies. That tells you the type of person required to be the Press Secretary, with the outstanding exception of Bill Moyers. Bill was honest enough that he couldn’t continue lying to the public about Johnson’s war in Vietnam and quit the Administration. Bill Moyers and the Vietnam War increased my distrust of Press Secretaries. Successive presidents have had increasingly mendacious Press Secretaries who remind me of Joseph Goebbels and his propaganda machine. Perhaps it’s time to make the Press Secretary a Cabinet level position. In deference to Minister Goebbels, we can call the post Secretary of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.
May 28, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jerald terHorst, Ford's first press secretary, resigned over the Nixon pardon. I think you could add him to your short list of presidential press secretaries with integrity.
May 28, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I gess, it is geting closer to the end of the bush term, when it's save to kick the administration. But I wonder, how about long hands of GOP?
May 28, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think he "realized" anything - correct me if I'm wrong, but he didn't walk away, they pushed him out.
May 28, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow - too bad there's no email trail from the White House to DISPROVE anything McClellan authors...
May 28, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's amazing (but not surprising) how these guys will stonewall anyone and everyone including Congress and special prosecutors but then they sing like birds when they can make some money with a tell-all book that they stand to make millions on.
Hey Scott, thanks for telling us what we already knew. Asshat.
Super Jesus
http://theSuperJesus.wordpress.com
May 28, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he blames the "Liberal Media" for not being tougher.
Well, as we all know and paraphrasing Colbert....any investigative journalism that benefits The People is labeled "Liberal". 'Any real journalism being done' should be what McClellan talks about, not somehow trying to blame Liberals for being soft.
Oh, and bytheway...the media is corporate. So it was the complicit, warmongering, defense-contracting, ComGlotCo Press corp which was too soft on buuusch and scotty...not liberals. Liberals were howling in every way they could back then, and the Corporate Media and the WHpress corps were SUPPRESSING what liberals wanted to say. Scapegoating liberals, calling them traitors, etc...getting Dan Rather fired, etc.
We heard about this book a long time ago. It seemed to contain a bombshell or two....which the publishers really tried to downplay. Then it all seemed to go underground for quite a few months (a year?) and now it resurfaces with quite a lot of buckshot for bouusch. I sure wonder what was going on in the background.
There are amazingly few people from this administration who have come forward and really dished. Lots of reasons...they are embarrassed, frightened, being intimidated, paid off, their acts were illegal, and certainly because they were born assholes and fessing up to this stuff just isn't in their makeup.
Still, there have been amazingly few leaks. We all know that millions of emails were destroyed. Thousands of conversations took place. Hundreds and Hundreds of illegal acts. I never thought in my naive 42 years that so much illegality could happen with civil servants in the pursuit of our govt. responsibilities....so much lying and corruption and stealing. Stabbing the american dream over and over....by regular joes. And basically NONE have fessed up. NO-ONE in that party shows the least remorse or has the LEAST amount of courage to say No More and to speak the truth and produce the evidence. Just shocking. I knew the world was full of bad and indifferent people, but I have been stunned that 8 years into a thoroughly criminal regime the american people stood for it and the republican party held together as an america killing crime family. Don't ever let another ReThuglican off the hook. They espoused these ideas, and they carried them off, and stood silent while it all went down.
Scotty knows a lot more than he is telling, and he is trying to get off easy by saying others lied to him. But his chief job was lying, face it. He uses the word Propaganda pretty frequently, apparently, in his book. That is a strong word. And he stresses that his bosses were involved in a FULL TIME propaganda and campaign mode. Even stronger words. And he was in charge of propaganda, basically.
So, even tho we have had very few whistleblowers, and 99.5% of the evil has yet to even been identified, and scotty himself was privy to thousands of conversations where impropriety and illegality and brute larceny of the american people was the currency - and he has only made visible a few examples - what he does reveal is very important and about some of the biggest crimes, and he uses strong and accurate words that we have only RARELY heard from the ranks of the Crimelicans, the DeceptiCons.
May 28, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regrettably, it's shameful but it's actually not Nixonian. Loath to admit it though I may be, Nixon's government, though evil through and through, was a paragon of competent management compared to this infestation. Here you have smarmy, uneducated bigot pig Rove with hands on the levers...bear in mind, he was the trainee of Donald Segretti, a contemptible court jester in the Nixonian hierarchy. Only GWB could manage to combine conniving dishonesty - his default reflex - with this degree of incompetence. Remember, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Dean and others in RN's inner circle were paragons of good management - and a number of rungs up from Segretti and his ilk - compared to the loathesome jackasses who are the primary pullers of Bush's marionette strings.
May 28, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of this in any way exonerates Scott McClellan from being involved in a criminal enterprise. He should be hauled before Congress to testify. The Bush record of lawlessness must be documented. Unfortunately, there will be no legal remedy. No impeachment (thanks Ms Pelosi) and no war crimes prosecutions (thanks Congress for passing the Military Commissions Act). We've come very close to the destruction of Democracy.
May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
So was there testimony from Rove or Libby that disclosed or denied these meetings?
May 28, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where did you find the Hunter Thompson campaign poster?
May 28, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I imagine Scott is trying to position himself as the John Dean of this nightmare. If so, the effort is pretty risible.
Any of us posters here ever lied? Sure as shit we have. Lied to cover some crap for somebody else? Many. So Scott sort of sees himself, I'm thinking, as no different from anybody else who made mistakes.
On the other hand, have you lied so that thousands would die for the craven objectives of the powerful and greedy? Scott did. Wouldn't you?
May 28, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Successive presidents have had increasingly mendacious Press Secretaries who remind me of Joseph Goebbels and his propaganda machine. Perhaps it’s time to make the Press Secretary a Cabinet level position. In deference to Minister Goebbels, we can call the post Secretary of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.
that's because, as ground-breaking sociologist Jacques Ellul explained 50 or so years ago, the post/modern State cannot communicate with its constituents by any other means than propaganda. Every communication will necessarily be freighted with the requirements of political survival. Every utterance emanating from the State or any of its agents, including the corporate/economic facet of the arrangement, must always be regarded as propaganda--that is, information spun to political effect.
May 28, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for bringing Ellul's thoughts about modern mass media (back) to mind. Think about the following sentence when you are watching one of TPM's amusing montages (say, Release the Hounds, 6/2):
"The orchestration of press, radio and television to create a continuous, lasting and total environment renders the influence of propaganda virtually unnoticed precisely because it creates a constant environment."
June 3, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't wait to hear what Scotty said about cheney. By the way...where is cheney...did he quit his job as VP??
May 28, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's lounging around on a palm frond in Dubai...
Having a pina colada with his buddy Ken Lay and their old pal Bib Laden.
May 28, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Big Dick is in his undisclosed location plotting to bomb Iran.
May 28, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, lets not shoot a gift horse in the foot...
(Yogi Berra's got nothing on my wife for mixing cliches!)
Cut Scotty a break, we need all the truthiness we can get from these former Bush enablers.
May 28, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The slaves can yell and complain and rant and talk and state how they've been mistreated and explain how things "should be", but in the end they are still just slaves and have no power within their own ranks to change the future... because the masters are STILL in charge. The slaves must just wait until they are sold to a kinder master...
May 28, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wasn't it during Nixon's reign that the term "limited hangout" was coined? Probably during the hysteria on both the left and right over this book yet more egregious acts will be committed.
May 28, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, "limited hangout" was vintage Nixon/Haldeman/Ehrlichman.
May 28, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's interesting how many Republicans like this fellow suddenly see clearly what many of us viewing from afar saw all along in terms of the lies, deceptions, general dishonesty, criminal activity and so on. It's also interesting to read how they view things once they start being a little honest with themselves. But it is clear that they (and little Scotty in this instance) are not being completely honest with either themselves or the public.
McClellans self exculpation for any responsibility for the dishonest, deceitful, unethical and frankly immoral cooperation with his colleagues in the Bush regime is exactly the same (ineffective) arguments so many Nazi's used to try and escape responsibility for their complicity in Nazi crimes. Yes, I know the Nazi's were worse than the Bush regime, but only in terms of degree friends. If you were the parent of a murdered Iraqi child would you find Bush any better than Hitler given that the war he is presiding over was and is nothing more than an imperialist war of agression all dressed up in a see-through gown of fighting terrorism and spreading democracy? No, McClellan is fully culpable for aiding and abetting all of the unethical and illegal activity he writes about and no one should forget it.
That is what has always made John Dean credible: he was the only Nixon white house man who ever honestly and openly admitted his contribution to the criminal activities he took part in. I hope (but know it will never happen) that Democrats would use these past 7 years of criminality to permanently paint the Republican Party as one prone to authoritarianism, corruption, and criminality because that is the truth of the matter. It bothers me that all these hacks get away without any punishment whatsoever and instead write books about it washing their hands of reponsibility. They should all face charges.
May 28, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
in Nixonian Thought, there was the "hangout route", the limited hangout route, & the limited, modified hangout route.
It all had to do with how thick to plaster on the lies.
like this bunch.
The nixon bunch (and the US itself)got away with it- the big it- Viet Nam, plus a plague of smaller "its". then the Reagan bunch all walked, now we have this. Im shocked.
if this bunch is allowed to walk away, we are just another banana republic......
May 28, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds to me like a good/bad situation.
Good in that, "We The People" finally get a glimpse inside the Bu$h Admin machinery and it confirms our worst fears of a government gone bad.
Bad in a sense that what Scotty has said will stiffen repug resolve to entrench themselves deeper to thwart any attempt to haul any Bu$h puppet before any House or Senate tribunal to answer for their misconduct.
Sad fact is, no matter what is said, its always been Congress's responsibility to keep both Justice and Executive in line and they failed us...Party interest over the people's interest.
It's humiliating to realize those responsible for the havoc and destruction of this nation for the past 7 plus years by Bu$h and company will walk away and no one will hold them accountable. Some will try but they will be stopped dead in their tracks.
It makes me wonder if the sole purpose of the opposition party is the disolvement of the foundations upon which this nation was founded.
May 28, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are entirely correct that Congress (and that means members from BOTH parties equally) has failed and failed egregiously in it's duty to the people and to the Constitutional republic in which we live.
The leadership in both parties are either cowardly, corrupt or both. In any event they are all complicit in the crimes of the past seven years. Though they should be held accountable, clearly no one will be held accountable.
What must the citizens of the world think of our sham democracy in light of what a joke America has become? It's very sad.
May 28, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dan Bartlett crawled out from under his rock about an hour ago . . .
to pronounce Scotty's personal memoir "thinly sourced"
May 28, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
It dosent matter what his motivations are -he was a creep and will continue to be one till he helps bring the others to justice (then he will be a recovering creep) -criminal conspiricies begin to crumble when the first bird sings -he's not the first but he's singing.
May 28, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I don't know...a lot of hummers have rolled out of the WH and things still seem to be zipped up well enough to obscure the evidence. (Don't pardon that pun.)
May 28, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hermann Goering:
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on
a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of
it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people
don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in
Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the
country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to
drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. It works the same in any country."
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
May 28, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Questions for the book tour:
Probe the mindset of "insiders" and "loyal" aides. When do growing disagreements and suspicion of patterns break off into consequential convictions of wrongdoing? How would you prepare the next or current spokespersons and advisers?
May 28, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think it matters if he's disgruntled or not.
Do you really have to be disgruntled to conclude that this Admin has been habitually full of sh*t basically since day one?
May 28, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it possible for these guys to be any more ironically/amusinly/horrifyingly similar to the Mafia?
BTW, since there is no evidence to prove or disprove Scotty, is it possible that right now he is sitting down somewhere with rove and company celebrating how they have once again spit in the face of the little people? jeez, couldn't they at least provide some lubrication before the violation?
Actually, this villany is so poetic it's almost admirable.
May 28, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The book, as reported by the press, has been described to the President. I do not expect a comment from him on it - he has more pressing matters than to spend time commenting on books by former staffers."
"Described" to him in the manner in which Katrina was "described" to him? And was it "described" to him by you personally, Dana?
Maybe in some forthcoming exchange he can "describe" the Cuban Missle Crisis to you, assuming he knows what it was.
And what could those "more pressing matters" be now that he's not golfing...bicycling?
May 28, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yet more evidence that Bush can't actually read on an adult level.
May 28, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Missile", I meant.
May 28, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Scotty always seemed pretty uncomfortable with the constant lying; I'll give him that. It was a striking contrast to Ari Fleischer, who knew when he was lying and clearly enjoyed it, and Dana Perrino, who appears to be a complete sociopath for whom the very concept of truth and lying has no meaning.
May 28, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but Dana is hot so nobody cares.
That right there tells you a lot about the state of US society, doesn't it?
And isn't it ironic that an administration in permanent campaign mode ends us so totally despised? Oh, but they have successfully raped the US taxpayer for 8 long years, so what does it matter now.
They are all sociopaths, the whole lot of them, most especially Bush who "convinces himself to believe what suits his needs at the moment" and has engaged in "self-deception" to justify his political ends.
May 28, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
From: Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/ah-scotty.html
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Ah, Scotty...
From the Post:
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" and "downplaying the major reason for going to war."
McClellan includes the charges in a 341-page book, "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception," that delivers a harsh look at the White House and the man he served for close to a decade. He describes Bush as demonstrating a "lack of inquisitiveness," says the White House operated in "permanent campaign" mode, and admits to having been deceived by some in the president's inner circle about the leak of a CIA operative's name.>
It would be utterly inconsistent to praise McClellan for his revelations, now that he needed to find something sensational from his anxiously subservient, painful-to-watch tenure as Press Secretary, which at best could only evoke sympathy for his agonized predicament. It might have helped in eliciting such praise if these revelations had emerge at some point between the end of his tenure and the beginnings of promotion for the book.
Ironically, in now falling to the likely demands of his current masters for something to add spice and sales power to an otherwise agonizing episode, one might posit that he is repeating the same pattern that occurred during his work in the Administration. Nevertheless, this is a man who has demonstrated beyond doubt his characteristic fear of censure. That he comes forward with these accusations, despite putative motive, is of considerable note.
The claims that McClellan makes have the benefit of being supported by numerous contemporary and highly confirming reports (Woodward, Suskind et al). Now, the fact that even McClellan, the truest of camp followers, endorses them, gives them an additional bottom line power--the fearful, sweaty, anxious party line stalwart, who was also among those closest to the action, now confirms what all but the most deluded now must know.
McClellan, like other Press Secretaries before him, could have downplayed, soft pedaled, or diffused these critiques--as they did, in their books, which also had sales imperatives. He does not. Instead, he emphasizes and confirms the critical through-line narrative--a war, driven and unvetted by a lack of necessary curiosity regarding likely effects on our nation, our citizens and the world; a sales campaign yoked to this poorly vetted effort in the most cynical ("one doesn't unveil new products in August") fashion, and, overall, a brutal narrowness of vision, combined with the excitedly combative anti-intellectualism, masked by a shallow pose of ideological self-certainty (i.e. half-blindness) that characterized this administration. His willingness to express, in print, Bush's tendency to convince himself of what he wanted to believe, and this Administration's embrace of secrecy is a genuinely noble and a brave act.
But, ah, Scotty. The wreckage.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/ah-scotty.html
May 28, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hah! Seems like Scott McClellan is getting some payback for the shabby way Texas Republicans treated his mother in the 2006 GOP primary for the governor's race.
May 28, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many "disgruntled" staffers is this now??
1. Paul O'Neill
2. Richard Clarke
3. Rand Beers
4. The head of faith-based initiative who called Bush admin Mayberry Machiavellians.
5. Jack Goldsmith who questioned the wiretapping program.
6. Matthew Dowd
7. Former surgeon general, Dr. Richard Carmona
Who am I forgetting?
May 28, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's so funny about the hub bub surrounding this book is how unshocking the "revelations" are at this point.
"The Administration is deceptive and manipulative"
Yawn. This is basically just commonly held wisdom at this point.
May 28, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are a lot of comments invoking the Nixon era, but while the operations of this administration are different, one aspect is similar—the blind loyalty.
John Dean, "Bud" Krogh, Charles Breyer, and Jill Wine-Banks discussed attorney ethics on a panel at St. Thomas Law School, shown on C-SPAN over the weekend. The first two were convicted in Watergate, the latter two were prosecutors for Watergate.
Of the people who made the choice to cross what they knew was a legal and ethical line—and stay over there—for the Nixon administration, most were simply blindly loyal to that presidency. They weren't blind about their actions, even if they could rationalize them to themselves, but they were blind in their loyalty to the president and the office.
McClellan may or may not have been a dupe in much of what he spouted to the press as fact and truth. Dean admitted that when he started questioning things he learned were going on in the White House before Watergate, he was suddenly out of those loops. Maybe that was the case with McClellan.
None of this excuses the Watergate actions and lies or the Bush admin actions and lies.
What it does is to emphasize the dangers of blind loyalty to and, by extension, belief in anyone or anything. How many parents of serial killers have purposely blinded themselves to what their children were out of love for them? Gee, that turned out well.
Love, loyalty, and belief do not have to be blind, and I think they should never be blind. Once you let yourself become blinded to anything, you have opened the door to compromising your ethics, your responsibilities, and your values.
Dean and Krogh realized their actions were wrong, admitted what they did, and went to the prosecutors to tell the truth and unburden their souls. They know they made very bad choices and that the costs to this country were high.
McClellan, if he accepts no responsibility for going along with the program, has a very, very long way to go before he even starts to atone for what he's done to this country.
May 28, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink