« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Today's Must Read
Just in time to run during the Spring sweeps, the Pentagon has rolled out a slate of charges against five Guantanamo Bay detainees for conspiring in the 9/11 attacks. Kudos to the Convening Authority for beating expectations with a well-timed launch.
Unfortunately, the move does come shortly after one of the senior Pentagon officials working on the commissions was disqualified from dealing with Osama Bin Laden's alleged driver Salim Hamdan's case. For some reason, the judge didn't seem to appreciate Brig. Gen. Tom Hartmann's taste for "sexy" cases that grab the public's attention (he's obviously never tried to run a PR campaign himself). It was a black eye surely, but you know the old saying: there's no such thing as bad press. They are riding that wave.
Now, the naysayers will point to the fact that the nascent commissions are sure to drag on for possibly as much as a year before the actual trials begin. There are still plenty of kinks (allegations of torture, politicization, lack of due process, etc.). And then there's the small matter of the Supreme Court, which might overturn the applecart all over again in the near future. You can understand the frustration of the administration: they had hoped to roll out the trials before the 2006 election, and here we are in the run-up to the 2008 election, and the clock is ticking.
But all is not lost. The detainees should be arraigned in June. And there should be frequent opportunities between now and November to remind the public of what's going on down there. Finally, justice is served.
Note: The Convening Authority Susan Crawford had planned to include charges against Mohammed al Qahtani, the supposed 20th hijacker, along with the other five, but Qahtani has been struck from the charging sheet. Now, Qahtani's lawyer has immediately jumped to the conclusion that Crawford's decision to dismiss the charges affirms "that everything he said at Guantánamo was extracted through torture -- or the threat of torture," and that his treatment was "so well documented and unconscionable that he is unprosecutable.'' But I gotta figure that this crew is sharper than that. Crawford can bring those chargers against Qahtani at any time. The 20th hijacker deserves his own unique launch, to be sure. Maybe in October?













Wasn't Zacarias Moussaoui convicted for being the 20th hilacker? This is becoming like the "2nd in command of al QAEDA" being captured/killed. I guess they figure, and probably correctly, that Amurkans are just weary of listening to the bullsh*t they can put any label they want on these people and it will stick. Is Susan Crawford's position a patronage job or civil service? If patronage, did she attend Regent?
May 13, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Scaliato may change law and precedent to such a degree that their decisions will make mockerys of the Constitution.
The numb-nuts who in 2000 and 2004 forgot that the most influential power of the president is to appoint Supreme Court justices really, really damaged our nation. Alito and Roberts lied through their teeth at their confirmation hearings. Their professions of upholding stare decisis were the epitome of mendacity.
It's not just those two either. Scalia is the worst of the lot. I heard him interviewed and I'm still in shock at his statement that torturing a prisoner doesn't constitute cruel and unusual punishment because punishment can only commence after conviction. With this view, police can beat the crap out of you to get a conviction and it's constitutionally okay with Scalia -- just don't let the prison guards beat you up after you're convicted... This man is seriously wack. He's the same one who decided he shouldn't recuse himself on a case before the court concerning The Big Dick, even though Scalia went duck hunting on a VERY expensive vacation trip with the Vice President. He's dangerous.
It may be decades before the law recovers from the present Court's decisions.
May 13, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Without a compliant media, the Administration would careen it's rattletrap PR bus off a cliff every other week. Where are Bush's keepers? ...The guys with the man-sized bug nets? By gearing up these "terrorist" show trials on election eve, the White House will end up shattering two glass houses with one stone: first, that Gitmo houses anything other than unfortunate hearsay victims swept up in brutally off-hand dragnets, and, second, that Americans now give a damn about his sluggish "war on terror."
Even with cheerleaders like Fox News chanting for blood, the White House may find most Americans disgusted by hauling in these hapless stewballs - chained up for years and tortured to senselessness, like Jose Padilla. As it is, the much-despised Commander in Chief is an albatross around the GOP's neck this fall - is anyone telling the jackass to back off? Where are the top Republican hacks? Isn't there some Dick Armey-type to shake some sense into this most infantile of Presidents?
May 13, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
This apparently has nothing to do with Justice.
It's all politics our military is engaged in.
May 13, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is nothing in our entire system of government which hasn't been politicized. Every aspect is corrupt. We are allowing our tax dollars to be gifted to cronies, our rights to be taken away and completely obliterated, and are not rebelling against a media which is solely against us.
Un-fucking-real.
o/t: Did you know that many in the Bush Administration have been charged with war crimes? Read it now!
May 13, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink