TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Today's Must Read

John McCain's go-to economics adviser isn't holding up very well under close scrutiny.

Phil Gramm, the former Texas senator and economist, is taking a lot of heat after reports that up until April 18 he was a registered lobbyist for UBS, the Swiss bank that is the world's largest manager of private wealth.

A former economics professor at Texas A&M, Gramm has long advocated for tax cuts, supply-side economics and less government regulation. But as David Corn over at Mother Jones reports in "Foreclosure Phil?" Gramm also played an integral role in the financial scandal commonly known as the "subprime meltdown."

Gramm took to the Senate floor on Dec. 15, 2000 -- just two days after the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the Bush v. Gore decision -- and inserted a 262-page measure into a massive budget bill.

The act, he declared, would ensure that neither the [SEC] nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] got into the business of regulating newfangled financial products called swaps--and would thus "protect financial institutions from overregulation" and "position our financial services industries to be world leaders into the new century."

If your eyes tend to glaze over at the details of complex financial markets, Corn spells out the mechanics in simple terms.

Bottom line is the free-for-all in credit-default swaps during the past seven years added greatly to the financial markets' instability, as investment banks began laying out cash like, Corn says, "bookies trading bets."

Gramm remains the vice chairman of the UBS investment arm, and he appears to have benefited from his close ties to the financial industry since leaving the Senate a few years ago.

Whether or not Gramm had bothered to ponder the potential downsides of his commodities legislation, having helped set off an industry free-for-all, he reaped the rewards. In 2003, he left the Senate to take a highly lucrative job at [UBS], Switzerland's largest bank, which had been able to acquire investment house PaineWebber due to his banking deregulation bill. He would soon be lobbying Congress, the Fed, and the Treasury Department for [UBS] on banking and mortgage matters.

Corn spells out how long and intimate Gramm's relationship with McCain has been:

Gramm's record as a reckless deregulator has not affected his rating as a Republican economic expert. Sen. John McCain has relied on him for policy advice, especially, according to the campaign, on housing matters. The two have been buddies ever since they served together in the House in the 1980s; in 1996, McCain chaired Gramm's flop of a presidential campaign. (Gramm spent $21 million and earned only 10 delegates during the GOP primaries.) In 2005, McCain told a Wall Street Journal columnist that Gramm was his economic guru. Two years later, Gramm wrote a piece for the Journal extolling McCain as a modern-day Abraham Lincoln, and he's hailed McCain's love of tax cuts and free trade. Media accounts have identified Gramm as a contender for the top slot at the Treasury Department if McCain reaches the White House. "If McCain gets in," frets Lynn Turner, a former chief SEC accountant, "we'll have more of the same deregulatory mess. I like John McCain, but given what I know about Phil Gramm, I wouldn't vote for McCain."

Gramm recently told a reporter "I don't have a scarlet 'L' burned onto my chest," referring to the dread lobbyists McCain has been trying to rid his campaign of.


30 Comments

| Leave a comment

Am I remembering correctly also that Gramm's wife was on the board of Enron?

I have no reason other than my native suspiciousness to believe this, but I always thought that if the names of the investors in those outside entities that Enron created to hide things and skim bucks were revealed Mr. & Mrs. Gramm would be on the list.

Not only was she on the board, she was on the audit committee of the board, which had primary responsibility for accuracy of the financial reports.

And just shortly after that, the Bankruptcy Reform Act passed (3/01) with little fanfare, further restricting people from being able to file bankruptcy, whether due to medical bills or what have you. Financial training and debt counseling became a requirement prior to any bankruptcy which put off people's ability to file for upwards of six months - six months where, in many cases, allowed people to lose their homes.

But nothing was done to curb predatory lending. And, as this article shows, everything possible was done to eliminate any kind of oversight to any financial industries.

Couple the bill Gramm pushed through with this one and it was a one-two punch to consumers and this one did trickle down to the investors who bought worthless mortgage instruments. Had some people been able to file bankruptcy, it might have saved their houses from foreclosure.

Not that I am advocating bankruptcy (possibly as a last resort if someone had a catastrophic illness and the resulting costs), but this gives perspective in the vastness of the corporate interests over anything relating to people. And, in this case, we see how the trickle-up effect worked for not just homeowners but for those investors.

Live Frankly

It seems funny every time a republican like Gramm calls for some kind of deregulation, we can expect 5 to 10 year time frame before the fiasco that the original regulation was created to prevent happens.

The "savings and loan scandal happened 6-10 years after the Reagan era of deregulation also.

The regulations the republicans are after were installed after the worst economic meltdown the US ever endured, the 1929 crash.

You would wonder why they never learn,

Remove all regulations so anybody can do anything, and some crooks will always try to use what ever scam they can to fleece the public.

Reagan and the rights claim that government is the problem is just another way to say that.

Gramm is just the latest incarnation of that axiom.

They really want to privative the profits and when the economic problems start, socialize the solution AKA a tax payer bailout.

So we now have the government setting up bailouts for the problems Gramm and his ilk created just like the government bailed out the savings and loans scandal, including the Keating mess McCain was involved in during Reagan's deregulation.

In early April, Terry Gross interviewed Prof. Michael Greenberger, who directed the Division of Trading and Markets from 1997-99. He explained the
credit market fiasco, and on Gramms role in it:

Greenberger:.....But since the late 1980s, a much more powerful system has developed, and that is called the--and it's often referred to as "complex derivatives." And essentially, the banking community developed these products, starting in the mid-'80s, and it's just developed a herd of steam since that time, and at this point in time worldwide, there is more money invested in derivative products than there are in stocks and bonds, which usually comes as a great surprise to many people.

And these derivative products, when you boil down to their fundamentals, are essentially bets on the direction that certain events will take place. ....

And those are private transactions. They are not easily made public. You can't open the newspaper and see what's happening. And when you enter into a bet, if you want the bet, the counterparty who takes the opposite end charges you a fee
for having that bet. That's a very profitable piece of business for banks and hedge funds to do. And so that's why this is called a shadow system. We don't see it in our day-to-day lives, and it goes on sort of in what people refer to as dark markets.

GROSS: And there's no regulation?

Prof. GREENBERGER: There is no regulation. In fact, when I was in the government, we argued very strenuously that these kinds of hidden bets could be very disruptive to the financial system, and they played as important a role as securities and bonds did, which are regulated. We wanted them to be regulated. That was a battle that we lost out on, and essentially, in December 2000 on the
floor of the Senate, Phil Gramm, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, introduced a piece of legislation that completely deregulated these markets, not only at the federal level but, for the most part, at the state level. So they are completely outside the law, so to speak.

GROSS: And what was this legislation?

Prof. GREENBERGER: It was called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. It was a 262-page bill, and it was added as a rider to an 11,000-page omnibus appropriation bill as Congress was recessing for Christmas in 2000. I would say there was no one, except the drafters of the bill, who understood what it did, and I can assure you that the drafters of the bill were not members of Congress. They were the lawyers for the investment banks on Wall Street. They convinced Senator Gramm to introduce this, they freed the system from any regulation, and we've been embarking on financial fiascoes ever since.

The whole interview is painfully blunt.

http://prairieweather.typepad.com/the_scribe/2008/04/the-shadow-syst.html

Does Gramm's wife Wendy sit on the board of directors at UBS (aka, Enron) jeebus.

You know how Wendy got to sell her stock in Enron just like Ken Lay sold his while all those Enron employees could NOT sell and how to go down the drain and lose everything. Jeebus, how is McBush different than Bush? Same old nasty people are heading everything.

user-pic

As with the bloody horror in Iraq, there is no endgame in mind or sight when these schemes are concocted so that short term "goals" can be realized.
There will always be hell to pay for such cavalier crap. Trouble is, we have to pay it for them.
This damned congress won't do a thing about it either.

mojo- thanks for that article with link... very informative and disturbing...

Bell,
You can catch the audio at Fresh Airs website. Greenberger is very good, especially his take on Paulson's "reform" proposals.

He also testified before the Senate last week on the manipulation of energy market futures trading.

Why isn't this really blowing up in the MSM??

user-pic

I wondered that too. Why isn't this on the front page of the New York Times today? This is a much huger story about McCain and Lobbying with a company like UBS bankers who have been Indicted - than was that vicky story some months ago.

Are the New York Times and the Washington Post afraid to report this story? Afraid they won't be invited to the BBQs. C'mon Big Media Outlets - this is a huge story - get off your butts and do your job!!!!

Why? This from a Glenn Greenwald column regarding journalism during the run-up to the war. While off topic, it answers your question.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/29/yellin/

The central excuse offered by self-defending "journalists" is that they didn't present an anti-war case because nobody was making that case, and it's not their job to create debate. This unbelievably rotted view found its most darkly hilarious expression in a 2007 David Ignatius column in The Washington Post. After explaining how proud he is of his support for the attack on Iraq, Igantius explains why there wasn't much challenge made to the Administration's case for war (h/t Ivan Carterr):

>>>> In a sense, the media were victims of their own professionalism. Because there was little criticism of the war from prominent Democrats and foreign policy analysts, journalistic rules meant we shouldn't create a debate on our own. And because major news organizations knew the war was coming, we spent a lot of energy in the last three months before the war preparing to cover it.

They were "victims of their own professionalism." It's not up to them to create a debate where none exists. That's the same thing Charlie Gibson, David Gregory, and Tim Russert -- among others -- have all said in defending themselves.

The idea that journalists only convey statements from politicians rather than "create debates" is the classic Stenographic Model of "Journalism" -- "we just write down what people say. It's not our job to do anything else."

In short, journalism takes balls. And other than bloggers, the media whores have none.

Live Frankly

user-pic

Dude, who do you think are the highest up in corporations that own the MSM? It's that very shadow or dark market that the article mojo quotes above refers to.

The links between investment banks and corporate behemoths—at the top—is inextricable. We are all very, very screwed unless we get regulation back and there's enforcement.

Without enforcement, it's like congressional investigations that show misfeasance and abuse but don't do anything about them.

Credit Default Swaps are just insurance that a company/issuing entity won't go bankrupt - in fact they have since saved the municipal debt markets from imploding once it came out that the monoline insurers had taken huge positions in subprime debt. Berkshire Hathaway was/is charging huge fees to re-insure municipal debt that was insured by MBIA and AMBAC, but uninsured debt was a cheaper alternative that investors could swallow thanks to the introduction of the Muni CDS market in the fall. The uninsured alternatives help save lots of cities, states, and counties millions of dollars when they had to issue bonds that otherwise would have lined the pockets of Warren Buffett, who of course recently came out as an Obama fan.

I would probably be very careful before implying that CDS contracts are the reason that the subprime mess occurred.

Huh?
They are "just insurance", except that they were specifically not called "insurance" because then they would have been required to be regulated.

That's the whole point. No regulation. No oversight.

The "uninsured alternatives" are going to bankrupt municipalities and pension funds all over the world that are "invested" in these instruments.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/01/28/springfield_left_its_fate_to_merrill/

user-pic

So basically, Phil Gramm is almost solely responsible for the complete downturn of the US economy since 2000. Nice.

Started with the criminal activity of Enron where Phil's wife Wendy Gramm assisted in the accounting nightmare of Enron. Then the Gramm family moved on to corruption in Derivatives used by Wall Street and especially UBS. What a great family legacy of Corrupting the US Economy.

Corn did not report this first

http://www.pubrecord.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51#comment34

McCain Defends 'Enron Loophole'

The Public Record

Sen. John McCain says he opposes the $307 billion farm bill because it would dole out wasteful subsidies, but his chief economic adviser Phil Gramm also wants to stop its proposed regulation of energy futures trading, a market that was famously abused when Enron Corp. manipulated California’s electricity prices in 2001.

Clearing the way for that California price gouging, Gramm, as a powerful Texas senator in 2000, slipped an Enron-backed provision into the Commodities Futures Modernization Act that exempted from regulation energy trading on electronic platforms.

Then, over the next year, Enron – with Gramm’s wife Wendy serving on its board of directors – worked to create false electricity shortages in California, bilking consumers out of an estimated $40 billion.

Gramm invested in the porn movie making business while promoting himself as a good solid GOP pillar of the community?

UBS bank is tied to CIA PUT OPTION TRADERS DUSTY "false flag" Foggo, and Deutsche Bank....where the put options checks for 9/11 profits of doom.

Do you understand that....US INTEL COMMUNITY made money off of bets on terrorism when 3,000 American families were destroyed?

user-pic

A little thing to add about Wendy Gramm:
"In 1992, Wendy Gramm, then chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, approved Enron’s request to exempt its trading of futures contracts from the oversight of her agency. She then quit the commission and, within weeks, was named to Enron’s board of directors, where her special task was to oversee Enron’s accounting procedures."

Timing. Always, timing....

user-pic
user-pic

And the credit card bill(s) allowing them to jack up rates on a whim. I've had a 7.9% rate on purchases, transfers and cash advances for 6 - 7 years. I usually pay the balance, I always pay on time; this month the rate on cash advances jumped to 24.99% (not that I would be stupid enough to use credit card cash advance) with no explanation. Also, there was an insert with a big promotion of 'Now pay your bill by phone, easy, fast!' and a tiny notation that 'a $15 service charge may apply.' Wasn't Gramm part of that crew as well?

user-pic

My bill this month came with encouragement to use the credit card for things like paying utility bills and other things... to have the bills automatically deducted and paid by them!!!

Not only are they trying to move into paying every possible thing on credit. But I note that they are shortening the time you have to get your check to them.

We pay our bills. But so many people are going to get caught in usurious cycles!

user-pic

During his heyday, Phil Gramm was known to publicly favor a popular bill, then kill it behind the scenes. That was called Gramm-Standing. One more example of the GOP's rampant dishonesty since the big Gingrich congressional revolution in the 90s. It morphed into the DeLay congress after Newt left and became even more corrupt and the whole mess came to a head in 2006 when DeLay's shenanigans with Abramaoff became more widely know.
McCain seems completely clueless about choosing advisors. One was a lobbyist for Myanmar (!) a cruel dictatorship, recently in the news for denying aid to its flood stricken people. Where are the freedom-loving GOP principles he so loves there?
His econ advisor turns out to be largely responsible for the conditions leading to the mortgage meltdown.
How long before this hits the fan and McCain throws Gramm under the bus?

user-pic

Extremely interesting and informative comments everyone.

God save us from Texas politicians.

I assume you mean bad Texas Politicians.

Certainly you don't mean Rayburn, LBJ, Jordan, Bentsen, etc...do you?

Gramm is a hack, and not particularly bright.

user-pic

The important thing is to note how deeply involved McShame is with folks who are doing dastardly deeds.

Something tells me that this election is going to be one mud fest when it comes to exposing the ways in which McShame is implicated. Past. Present. It's going to be fun to see all this exposed! Trumpeted.

It will be a Muck Fest! TPM leading the charge.

A good primer on the subprime mess, and the reaction of conservative Republican, former SEC Chair Bill Donaldson, appeared on Bill Moyers last October. Bob Kuttner also appeared. http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10122007/transcript1.htmlDonaldson didn't last long under Bush when it turned out he actually wanted to regulate the financial services industry.

WILLIAM DONALDSON: Well, it-- yes. And this has grown, like Topsy. Latest figure's $1.7 trillion of money in hedge funds today versus-- that's ten times growth in less than ten years.

Through a quirk in the regulatory structure hedge funds are not regulated like mutual funds are, or like investment advisors are, or like investment management and brokerage firms are. This is, I believe, just crazy, that we can have, you know, $1.7 trillion dollars. On some days, hedge funds account for 50 percent of the volume on the New York Stock Exchange. So it seems like we ought to at least understand what's going on in the hedge fund business.

Gramm is a particularly odious Texas politician.

When Reagan was first elected, but Democrats still controlled the Congress, Gramm participated in the House Democratic Caucus, and then secretly reported to Reagan Budget Director David Stockman (now under indictment for cooking the books of a company he invested in.) http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/03/26/feds-indict-david-stockman-in-securities-fraud-case/

Stockman, knowing the Democratic playbook, "mysteriously" beat them at every turn in the Congress. Gramm was subsequently caught, thrown out of the Democratic Caucus, and became a Republican. Nice, principled friend to have, McCain!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address