« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
When Lobbying for Dictators Is OK
The McCain campaign has provided an ongoing tutorial in the subtle ethics of lobbying. For instance, you might think that a politician who professes to be abhorred by special interests would not surround himself with lobbyists. Not so. What a politician can be drowning in lobbyists -- what matters is his integrity. And for that, you'll just have to take his word.
Charlie Black, McCain's campaign chairman and a veteran lobbyist, provides another tutorial today. Some have criticized the McCain camp for keeping Black while other McCain campaign officials have had to resign for their lobbying on behalf of Myanmar's ruling junta. Black lobbied for plenty of shady characters, they say, including Ferdinand Marcos and Jonas Savimbi. But Black has an answer for that. He has a code:
Black said he never took on work for foreign figures "without first talking to the State Department and the White House and clearing with them that the work would be in the interest of U.S. foreign policy."For instance, he said, the U.S. considered Marcos an ally when his firm took on work for his government, and "when the White House pulled the plug on Marcos, we resigned the account the same day," Black said. He said his firm was hired to help show [Mobutu Sese Seko in Zaire] how to form political parties and conduct elections, and when Mobutu canceled the results of the parliamentary election, "we quit."
This rule would surely also cover Black's work for Ahmad Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress, which provided much of the dubious evidence that formed the administration's case for war with Iraq, and the Lincoln Group, the State Department contractor that was hired to plant stories in the Iraqi press. So I guess there's no problem with that.













Meaning: any gangster or terrorist that the U.S. government is willing to work with is A-OK with us. Who are we to make our own judgments about these people? Let George Bush look into peoples' souls. We just look at their bank accounts.
May 14, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Er, the work he specified doesn't seem to be lobbying. And working for foreign governments is working for foreign governments, seems to me a lot of Dems got in trouble for such associations.
May 14, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Black . . . Dark Sithlord Cheney redux?
Yep! McCain is a Republican.
May 14, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Charlie Black must have misspoken, what he clearly meant to say was "talking to the State Department and the White House and clearing with them that U.S. foreign policy would be working in the interest of" his clients. It's the only way it makes any sort of sense at all.
Hey, is he related to Conrad Black?
May 14, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I'm not mistaken, wouldn't a certain Mark Penn be involved with Burson-Marsteller? I'm sure that has nothing to do with the plug Hillary Clinton gave to Iraqi opposition groups in her floor speech before voting for the IWR, the speech in which she closed using 9/11 to justify her vote.
That's besides the point now, I guess. Suffice it to say that Charlie Black is a name that should come to the surface at every possible moment from now until November.
May 15, 2008 1:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Charlie Black and Erik Prince need to start their own hybrid lobbying/security firm, they could call it "Black-Prince Inc."
May 15, 2008 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink