« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Conyers: Mukasey Should Immediately Implement IG Recommendations
Following this morning's release of the DOJ inspector general's report on political bias in hiring and firing practices, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), called on Attorney General Michael Mukasey to implement the IG's recommendations:
Yet again, the Department has been putting politics where it doesn't belong. The report concludes that under former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' tenure in 2006, several Department officials including Michael Elston violated federal law and Justice Department policy. We already know from the Committee testimony of Monica Goodling that she 'crossed a line' in hiring career attorneys as well.When it comes to the hiring of nonpartisan career attorneys, our system of justice should not be corrupted by partisan politics. It appears the politicization at Justice was so pervasive that even interns had to pass a partisan litmus test.
The committee's recommendations included making sure guidelines "explicitly state that political affiliations may not be used as criteria in evaluating candidates and that ideological affiliations cannot be used as a proxy to discriminate on the basis of political affiliation;" changing the DOJ Human Resource Order to emphasize that hiring attorneys must be "merit based," and having Department leaders be "vigilant to ensure that political or ideological affiliations are not used to select candidates."
[Late Update]: Attorney General Michael Mukasey has issued a statement saying that the Justice Department will immediately implement the suggestions of the Inspector General's report.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said today that the "troubling" report "confirms our findings and our fears that the same senior Department officials involved with the firing of United States Attorneys were injecting improper political motives into the process of hiring young attorneys."
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) echoed those sentiments, stating that the report "confirms that the Bush Administration was engaged in a deliberate effort to inject partisan politics into the administration of justice."





I hope Mr. Conyers is not holding his breath.
-- ARG
June 24, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would this be another Strongly Worded Letter? I can see why we use them as they have been so terribly effective in the past.
June 24, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rep. Conyers is really a huge disappointment for me. His responsibilty for oversight has failed and primarily by his failed leadership. I believe his days of being a true leader and an activist are all long gone! This session of congress and his committee has produced very little to be proud of or feel we have taken back our constitution rights. I don't understand him or his lack of confronting the Bush administration. I hope the next congress will be inspired before it is all too late to correct this sinking ship!
June 24, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
So can the applicants now sue for discrimination? Just wondering if they have any legal recourse?
June 24, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
John Conyers is a smart guy. He knows that he needs to write at least 10 pleading letters before being totally ignored by this administration. This is only Letter 1. Nine more to go.
June 24, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So can the applicants now sue for discrimination? Just wondering if they have any legal recourse?
Posted by Anna N Omuss
I would think so and they certainly should sue.
Of course the WH will then lean on their Democratic enablers (Hoyer, Pelosi & Ried) to write some legislation giving the
Loyal Bushies[tm] retroactive immunity from suits brought about because of Hatch Act violations.
June 24, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security".
June 24, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great work, Hank. While you're at it, maybe you could ask The Fisherman to keep an eye on Murmur.
June 24, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I guess this was Conyers, not Waxman. I can't keep 'em straight.
June 24, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink