« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

EPA and OMB Give Oversight Committee Attitude

The Bush Administration has had since March 12 to respond to the subpoenas from the House oversight committee requesting documents pertaining to the EPA decisions on greenhouse gas and ozone regulations. Yet it waited until this morning -- the day the Committee was scheduled to vote on their contempt for their failure to respond -- to assert executive privilege.

Time and again, that inveterate stonewaller, EPA administrator Stephen Johnson, has gone up against committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) and bobbed and weaved through his testimony, never quite answering questions but never quite invoking executive privilege either.

During a May 20, 2008, appearance before the committee, Johnson was specifically asked by Waxman whether he was invoking executive privilege. "Not at this time," Johnson replied.

Well that time must have passed.

More on "Stonewall" Johnson's evasive maneuvers after the jump.

In a letter to President Bush dated just yesterday, June 19, Attorney General Michael Mukasey wrote that, "[t]he Office of Legal Counsel is satisfied that the subpoenaed documents fall within the scope of executive privilege."

Mukasey asserts executive privilege based on the subpoenaed documents threat to presidential decision making and the volume of documents (over 30,000 pages) already provided to the committee:

Addressing the subpoenaed documents in their entirety, I believe that publicly releasing these deliberative materials to the Committee could inhibit the candor of future deliberations among the President's staff in the EOP and the deliberative communications between the EOP and Executive Branch agencies, particularly deliberations concerning politically charged issues.

Johnson and Susan Dudley, Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget both relied on Mukasey's analysis in asserting executive privilege. Representing Dudley, Director Jim Nussle attached Mukasey's decision in his letter to the committee, along with a snippy reiterative response:

It is curious that you are now unsatisfied to have received "thousands of pages" of documents from OIRA in advance of your May 20 hearing--more than 7500--including the communications directly between OIRA and EPA that identify explicitly the role played by the EOP in the process. Without providing any legitimate justification or demonstration of need, you demand 1,735 pages of internal deliberative documents from the President's EOP staff at OIRA, and 221 pages of communications between the President's staff at OMB and other EOP offices. In order to preserve the confidentiality that is essential to the ability of current and future Presidents to receive candid analyses, advice and recommendations from EOP staff, and for the reasons set forth in the attached letter from the Attorney General, I have been authorized to report to the Committee the President's decision to assert Executive Privilege with regard to the documents that have been withheld by OIRA. Accordingly, we will not be providing them.

Representing Johnson, Deputy Administrator Chris Bliley's letter asserting Executive Privilege has a little less attitude, but still admonished the Oversight Committee:

In a further effort to accommodate the Committee' s interests, we will be providing an additional 71 documents today, including redacted copies of documents relating to communications with the White House. In sum, less than 25 out of over 10,000 responsive documents are being withheld in their entirety. In light of these substantial accommodations, the Committee's threat of contempt and failure to recognize the need to balance the interests of the two co-equal branches of government is disappointing.

Waxman wasn't so pleased to get the run-around from the White House again, stating, "I would hope and expect this administration would not be making this assertion without a valid basis for it. But to date, I have not seen a valid basis for their executive privilege, but I do want to give extra time to review the matter more fully before we proceed further."

Full video of Waxman's thoughts on the Bush administrations overuse of executive privilege is below:


Comments (13)

avatar

Nussle's entry into this fray makes it even more obscene.

Nussle used to be a Member of the House.

Clearly he doesn't respect the "traditions" of the body of which he was once a part.

avatar

Can we please just impeach them NOW?
There are too many months for them to continue their malfeasance.

ITMFA

avatar

Inveterate stonewaller meets invertebrate Congress.

I need more Waxman! Gotta have more Waxman!

No apparently congress is not only not willing to impeach them but instead wants to grant them immunity in the FISA issue. Talk about adding insult to injury. It's like telling the rapist he can go free because he gave you something (whatever that may be) that you wanted. How are the american people supposed to feel as the victims of these perpetrators. Right now, because of the FISA bill, I am furious with the congress, the democratic leadership, and this administration. I am writing every senator this evening. Any other suggestions? I am looking for real answers about alternative ways we can hold officials accountable besides having to wait until election day?

avatar

lbrillante,

Donate to the campaign to punish democratic house and senate members who voted for this fisa/immunity law. Check out Glenn Greenwald's blog at Salon for more info. I feel the same as you -- we have been sold down the river by both parties and I am just disgusted by the lot of them. I still do have some hope that Obama can change things, despite his lack of fight on this bill. I do think the dems are horribly miscalculating and they should impeach now and impeach often.

avatar

You don't seem to have any published opinion on BO's AIPAC speech. I've been wrestling with what to think of Obama for months now, but that is a question I've been seeking other's opinions on. Do you have any?

avatar

Wasn't Nussle one of Bill Clinton's grand inquisitors during BJGate?

Let's not forget to thank good ol' Chuck Schumer for working his butt off to get his good buddy Mukasey in as AG. It's so refreshing to have an AG who only covers Bush's ass about 95% as much as Gonzales did.

I think it's pretty easy to predict how Mukasey's going to rule on asserting executive privilege for any given document request by Congress. Mukasey's rule of thumb is that, if there's any chance at all that documents might produce incontrovertible evidence of a crime by the president or someone near him, then the president has the privilege of withholding that evidence. In other words, Mukasey's primary function is the obstruction of justice.

Mukasey's got seven months to save up for his legal representation. And when the time comes, he might be wise to cop a plea. He knows what he's doing and he's not going to get away with it.

Its deja vu all over again.


Waxman said:

"But to date, I have not seen a valid basis for their executive privilege, but I do want to give extra time to review the matter more fully before we proceed further."

I love Waxman, but get off it Henry, what's the purpose of giving them extra time? And, what's the alternative to giving them extra time?

That's it. The Nazi Party has won. Waxman, my congressman, should be throwing his gavel through a window and screaming he is coming after the lying sons of bitches ..... but he is going to give them more time to shit on the constitution, and congress, and us. Great.

avatar

The stakes are apparently so high at this moment for this Congress that they are willing to look like total supplicants in the face of the Bush tyranny. If Waxman, or Pelosi, were to stand up and say what is being said in the blogosphere, there would have to be adjudication.

At least in their minds this scenario allows them to escape as pragmatists in the face of bloody revolution. Sanguinely, they may face the altar and swear that they actually feared Bush would not leave office graciously, and, even if bombs should fall on Tehran, they would still have their holes from which they could crawl.

"But to date, I have not seen a valid basis for their executive privilege, but I do want to give extra time to review the matter more fully before we proceed further"?

He gave a moan of pain and pleasure mixed as the President's purple throbbing earthmover plunged into his rosebud-like rectum.

WTF?

Jesus. C'mon, folks, it's time to take to the streets.

Um, hello? Anybody out there??

Post a Comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address