« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Fired U.S. Attorney Among Those Who Appealed DOJ's Hiring Decision

We already knew that Michael Elston, chief of staff to the Deputy Attorney General and former U.S. Attorney Carol Lam, weren't best buds. Their acrimonious phone calls over her December 2006 firing as U.S. attorney for San Diego are well known, but according to the DOJ Inspector General's report issued today, the two butted heads as early as October 2006, over the "deselection" of a young attorney for the Justice Department Honor's Program.

On October 11, 2006, Lam sent an email to Elston inquiring as to why a candidate, an honors graduate from Stanford Law School who had held a Federal clerkship, was unqualified. Lam told the OIG that she suspected the candidate was deselected because of a previous article she had written on gender discrimination in the military, and because the judge she clerked for was a Clinton appointee.

From the report (pdf):

Elston replied by e-mail that most deselections were for poor grades. He acknowledged, however, that poor grades did not appear to be the issue with this candidate, and he offered to check into the application and let Lam know whether an appeal would be successful.

Elston replied later that day: "I have reviewed her application materials, Carol. I do not think an appeal will be successful. If it helps, she was not selected by the other components to which she applied."

Lam responded: "Thanks Mike. Just curious, though - I don't see anything unacceptable in her online application that was made available to us. Do the other components see something that I don't?"

Elston replied: "Not that I know of, Carol."

Elston was found by the report to be in violation of federal law for hiring candidates on "political and ideological" grounds.

Before leaping to the conclusion that Lam's firing, which has yet to be fully explained, was prompted by the honors program dispute, keep in mind that Lam's name appeared on a preliminary list of U.S. attorneys to be fired as early as January 2006. She was then fired in December of that year, one of eight U.S. attorneys asked to resign by the Justice Department, but one of the only ones (at least initially) to put up a fight. At the time she was asked to leave, Lam was in the midst of securing indictments on CIA operative Dusty Foggo and defense contractor Brent Wilkes.


Comments (8)

avatar

Thank God Scott Bloch stepped in and saved us all. A true Patriot, that Bloch!

Just a question for all: What is the status of those cases she was working on: Dusty Foggo and Brent Wilkes. Were they dropped or have they moved forward?

avatar

Just to clarify for waywuwei, she had them indicted before she left the building, so there would be no funny business.

I recall she had them indicted, but have those cases moved along, or have they been stalled?

avatar

One of the spins the right is putting on this is that the whole scandal is against policy, but not necessarily illegal. My understanding is that the politicization of DOJ and other federal branches IS illegal, just not criminal.

But aren't there aspects of this - like the Lam firing and the phony prosecution of Don Siegelman - which ARE criminal? I'm thinking that the overall aim seems to be obstruction of justice on a massive scale.

avatar

Yes, I'm sure an honors grad from Stanford Law School with a judicial clerkship was unqualified for an entry level position, while Monica No-Goodling and her Regents Law School credentials qualified her to be at the highest levels of the department.

Can this former candidate sue Michael Elston and Esther McDonald in civil court?

If yes, then that needs to happen for the betterment of the country.


avatar

Most idiots in moron land...DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHY LAM WAS RESIGNED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES...as a cover story to CONSPIRE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.


I made sure LAM knew that DUKE CUNNINGHAM'S POLITICAL DONORS INCLUDED FORMER AIR FORCE GENERAL WILLIAM LYONS....the same guy who set up the diploma mill in San Diego to help two 9/11 hijackers get their student visas stamped.

LYONS also tied to WYLE BROTHERS...who divested themselves from the re insurance businesses..who got soaked paying off billions in insurance coverage after 9/11 WITH MOSSAD SHILL SILVERSTEIN taking most of the money.

THERE IS ALSO A LINK BETWEEN THE PUT OPTION BANKERS AT DEUSTCHE BANK....AND...DUSTY "false flag" FOGGO at CIA.


THAT'S WHY LAM got canned....also...Duke did not live up to his plea agreement when DIA investigators were not given answers by Duke on his PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF 9/11 as proven by his overt acts with Wilkes, Foggo others...prior to 9/11 as they waited for the no bid front loaded gov contracts to occur.


THAT'S THE REAL STORY THAT GOT SAN DIEGO FBI SAC FIRED BY MUELLER because the SAC did confirm to the media that "...the firing of LAM did tamper with other investigations".

Post a Comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address