TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Today's Must Read

Remember that young Bush campaign worker who landed a job in the NASA public affairs office, where he was accused of blocking the country's top scientists from talking publicly about global warming?

His name was George C. Deutsch and he was one of several officials accused a couple years ago of manipulating the public disclosure of scientific research about climate change.

Well, NASA's own inspector general looked into the matter and -- whaddya know -- the Bush administration's critics were right.

A 48-page report from the agency's own watchdog, released yesterday, concluded that political appointees in the NASA press office were downplaying scientific conclusions about global warming by withholding certain press releases and limiting reporters' access to top scientists who might veer off message.

"Our investigation," the report said, "found that during the fall of 2004 through early 2006, the NASA Headquarters Office of Public Affairs managed the topic of climate change in a manner that reduced, marginalized or mischaracterized climate change science made available to the general public."

The report said most evidence supported contentions that politics was "inextricably interwoven" into operations at the public affairs office in that period and that the pattern was inconsistent with the statutory responsibility to communicate findings widely, "especially on a topic that has worldwide scientific interest."

The NASA press office came under scrutiny a couple years ago after the agency's leading climate scientist, James E. Hansen, and other agency employees, publicly complained about restrictions imposed on their public comments and distortions of their scientific conclusions.

What today's story leaves out are some great details about the characters involved in shielding the public from the taxpayer-funded science.

Deutsch, who got his job at age 23 and once told a Web designer to add the word "theory" at every mention of the Big Bang, resigned after revelations the he had lied on his resume and did not, in fact, graduate from Texas A&M University.

How'd he get such a prominent position? According to the Times:

Mr. Deutsch, 24, was offered a job as a writer and editor in NASA's public affairs office in Washington last year after working on President Bush's re-election campaign and inaugural committee, according to his résumé.

Another political appointee, Dean Acosta, who was NASA's deputy assistant administrator for public affairs and now works in the private sector of the aerospace industry, criticized the IG's report about his former office.

"My entire career has been dedicated to open and honest communications," Mr. Acosta, who now is director of communications for the Boeing space-exploration business, wrote in an e-mail message. "The inspector general's assertions are patently false. The report itself does nothing but raise questions about a three-year investigation that has yielded nothing but flimsy allegations aimed at hard-working public servants."

21 Comments

| Leave a comment

As McClellan wrote, and we knew for years, all part and parcel of the "permanent campaign." The campaign run by Karl Rove.

Is it a coincedence that, today, Jane Cherry, a former Rove deputy in the White House Office of Political Affairs, is now the White House liaision at NASA? Jane is 25-ish.

Heck of a job, Dean, George and Jane!

user-pic

It would be great for someone to follow up and ask Acosta to bring for evidence or data to support his claim of the IGs report being "patently false".
Am I supposed to believe the words of a professional PR monkey over those of a highly trained investigator and a group of the most prominent scientists in the world?

Perhaps Mr. Acosta would like to testify before Congress about his entire career.

user-pic

I smell executive privilage.

LOL, somehow I dont see him testifying before anything.

JJ
http://www.Privacy-Center.net

I recommend reading The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney. I haven't read but plan to read Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health.

I've always wondered if NASA flack Dean Acosta is somehow related to Bush-appointed US Attorney in Florida R. Alexander Acosta.

The Florida Acosta was a key figure in putting Abramoff in jail over the Suncruz issue.

I wonder if NASA has a garbage scow on the launch pad where all these flat-earthers to gather; be put ON the scow; and, sent to a place on bush-world (non-reality) that will confirm their talking points... Hopefully soon!!

Traditionally, don't patronage appointees resign when a new president takes office? I worry that these people -- in NASA, but also in the Interior Department and the DOJ, State and everywhere else they've infested -- have no intention of leaving once Bush does.

This is a legitimate concern.

There is a practice called "burrowing in" where politcal appointees use an arcane government personnel preference to land career jobs in the Federal system. It's perfectly legal, but rife with abuse.

The current Administration has stepped it up a notch, though, creating new positions in the career federal government for ex-politicals to burrow in to. These positions did not exist before. Others have been changed from political to career.

This needs to be closely examined.

Hi Andrew,

Nicely Done,

Welcome Aboard.

These guys don't even get me angry anymore. As a proud liberal, I will continue put forward the things I am for; and not rage against the things I'm against.

You got to admire the republicans complete and thurough attempt at politicizing all areas of the goverment...some more successful than others

I hear that the IG is just disgruntled, and a miserable creature to boot.

He's just not the IG they all knew back then...

user-pic

Ah, as if we didn't know. These people would poison their own children living by a health hazard if it would assist their corporate overlords.

A Bush appointee distorting and hiding the truth?? Shocked I am...SHOCKED!

user-pic

The inspector general's assertions are patently false.

Old habits die hard. They can't resist the urge to attack institutions of government, even when it's their own appointees and their own government. But it plays to the 28 percenters.

user-pic

To be sure there aren't too many "burrowed" appointees, the next president needs to be reminded to "send in the Bobs" (aka Office Space) to go through departmental rosters, check references, and root out possible plants.

But we'd have to make sure they are impartial, or Dems could repeat the mistakes of the current administration.

OK - let's bust this down: He lied on his resume, he's a snot-nosed little jackass punk from Dimension Dolto, and... oh... he's in at key position at one of the cutting-edge research and technical facilities in government.

How could George C. Deutsch NOT be a Bush appointee?

This slavish devotion to the counterintuitive process of putting unqualified JUGHEADS in top spots at crucial departments is a White House trademark, and will probably be remembered - and tittered over - for decades to come. Washington had his cherry tree, Harding had Teapot Dome... and Bush will be stuck with memories of his "Albertaphonsos".

But if a GOP Presidency is on tap for the next four years, the process of devolution could become extreme. Think about it... in the final years of the McCain Era, White House flunkies will chop into the bush and cage hairy tree sloths; once home, they'll shave their necks and sling on some taupe Pronto Uomo. Then, it's briefcase time. Toss them a few grubs, whup their asses and watch them smoke yet another key American agency.

NASA... jeez...


user-pic
"The inspector general's assertions are patently false.

I'm beginning to understand how they get away with their mendacity. "Patently false" sounds definitive doesn't it? It seems as if Acosta is denying the assertions. He's not. He's not saying anything other than it is clear to Mr. Acosta that the assertions are false.

It's clear to him...
the assertions are patently false...

Of course it's clear to Acosta that the assertions are false. He's deluded himself into believing that. But using the language of "patently false" he doesn't even commit to believing the statements aren't true. All that he says is that it is clear to him.

I'm not an English major or a grammarian, but I never thought I'd have to be so in order to parse the lies and mendacities spread by the Republicans and repeated by the press.


ITMFA

user-pic

The Bushies hate science. They are part of the FAITH-based community. They don't want to have their little heads cluttered with facts.

It is going to take all the brain cells we can muster to clean up the mess these assholes have made.

user-pic

Perhaps one of the reporters at TPM could email Acosta to see if he could substantiate his allegations.

Was Mr. Deutsch one of the "hard-working" public servants that Acosta referred to? Is it appropriate for someone with false scientific credentials to edit scientific reports to the press?

Did the Inspector General report note any specific and questionable decisions that Mr. Acosta made? Does he have any comment on those, or are Mr. Acosta's remarks merely assertions without support?
etc. etc.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address