TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Conyers Considers "Criminal Referral" For Gonzales, Other DOJ Officials

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are talking about a criminal investigation for DOJ officials -- Alberto Gonzales included.

Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said today's report about politicization in at the DOJ suggests that former AG Alberto Gonzales and other Justice officials may have given false statements under oath before Congress.

Conyers said in a statement this morning:

The Report also indicates that Monica Goodling, Kyle Sampson, and Alberto Gonzales may have lied to the Congress about these matters. I have directed my staff to closely review this matter and to consider whether a criminal referral for perjury is needed."

A spokesman for the committee said the committee's lawyers are currently looking over the report and past testimony on the Hill.

That's probably not as dramatic as it sounds. Any criminal referral would be passed on to DOJ, which has so far refused to appoint a special prosecutor for the matter. Attorney General Michael Mukasey has said he's not going to pursue contempt referrals from Congress.


32 Comments

| Leave a comment

(, , and

The Report also indicates that Monica Goodling, Kyle Sampson, and Alberto Gonzales may have lied to the Congress about these matters. I have directed my staff to closely review this matter and to consider whether a criminal referral for perjury is needed."

Rep. Conyers will NOT DO anything about this latest flaunt of the law just like he has taken NO ACTION against Rove and the others for not honoring the law and appearing before his committee. Conyers, in the old days, was a hero of mine. Today he is complicit to the Bushies and a disgrace of his former self! All of these actions are clear cut violations and yet he does nothing! What ever happen to upholding the law and his swearing to uphold the constitution?

What happen Rep. Conyers??? Have you been paid off? Lost you will to be honorable?? Arrest Rove, Barlett or Miers and do you job!!!!

Right you are.
And don't think Sanchez is going to do anything about it either.
Well actually, I'm probably wrong.
They will both post another useless essay at huffpo about how hard they're trying to hold someone, ANYONE, accountable.
It really is unbelievable how Rove, et al, spit in their faces, and how unconcerned they seem to feel about it.
If it were me, I would be out on my own with a sergeant at arms, looking to arrest Karl by now.
What's the NEW deadline for compliance?
I'm guessing it's never.

The only reference I heard to a deadline was Conyers wrote a letter(I know yawn) to Rove's lawyer giving him 5 days to reply to his non-appearance. I haven't seen a word since then. Deadline means nothing to Rep. Conyers.

user-pic
...DOJ, which has so far refused to appoint a special prosecutor for the matter and also said it will not pursue contempt citiations that Congress may pass on.

Translation: Any law-breaking this administration has done is just fine by us.

Looks like the Goodling's hiring policy has been paying off in spades.

Any criminal referral would be passed on to DOJ, which has so far refused to appoint a special prosecutor for the matter.

You can expect Mukasey to ride that pony all the way to Jan.

user-pic

CONYERS, GET OFF YOUR A$$ AND START PURSUING CONTEMPT CITATIONS! You're really beginning to disgust me!

user-pic

Conyers might want to pursue this, but even as the article notes..Mukasey won't do squat.

Its just a little heavy breathing on the part of Conyers for the media, thats all folks!

Conyers does NOT want to do anything about this. He may be a pitiful relic whose best days are far behind him...but he is not so stupid as to think that referring puny DOJ miscreants to the big DOJ miscreant (Mukasey) will accomplish anything, or even fool anyone... This is pathetic. Banana republics are the picture of accountability by comparison. The Government must have something really good on his wife.

What's to Martin Mull about this? Just do it!

DID YOU KNOW THAT A FED JUDGE CAN SIGN A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ordering an executive branch official...to do his descretionary function that is owed to the American Public?

THAT MOTION CREATES THE DUE PROCESS HEARING...WITH SUBPOENAS...OF...ANYBODY NAMED IN THE FACT PATTERN?


DID YOU ...THE DEMS HAVE LAWYERS...THAT KNOW THIS?

Isn't it possible that, following its investigation, the Judiciary Committee could recommend a criminal action be taken by the next, presumably Obama, administration? Seems to me a violation of law during the Bush administration remains a violation of law when the next president takes office. Unless Bush pardons everyone (and I concede that it is a good bet he will pardon Gonzales) they would still be vulnerable to an action brought under the next Attorney General's Department.

user-pic
Unless Bush pardons everyone (and I concede that it is a good bet he will pardon Gonzales)

To the best of my knowledge, the President can't issue pre-emptive pardons. Meaning that once Bush is out of office his whole gang wouldn't have a Presidential Pardon ace-in-the-hole for convictions after Bush left office.

user-pic

Actually, apparently he can. He can't pardon future acts, but while it's rarely been done, he does have the power to pardon acts for which no legal proceedings have begun.

user-pic

Man that's just depressing. So basically Bush can grant pre-emptive pardons to all his criminal buddies. Just his way of saying "thanks for helping me wipe my ass with the Constitution and flout the Rule of Law".

user-pic

Bush WILL pardon them all.
And Obama has said he WILL NOT prosecute any of them unless "egregious" offenses come to light. Re: this DOJ stuff, he considers this a "different" interpretation of the regs by these employees...not egregious.
I don't see any egregious. You see any egregious? No egregious here.

The dirty laundry is out for everyone to see so get your eyeful and laugh you asses off. The last sentence says it all ... they won't go any farther; this thing has run its'course.

Seems to me that DoJ is more concerned with protecting the President and his political appointees than with pursuing justice and the rule of law. The office is too politicized now.

At the very least, this kind of investigation should help identify persons who WERE hired by these yahoos because of their rabid idealogy and who are still in important positions within the Department. The idea of "stealth" rightwing hires throughout many agencies is a real danger that doesn't get talked about enough. My guess is that there are a number of idealogues holding important non-political appointment positions in a number of agencies who may be able to impede Obama's ability to get things done that need to be done. These needs more scrutiny. I would hope that Rep Conyers et al could help shine some light on this, even if no criminal indictments get handed down.

Investigations without punishment are useless.
No one from Iran Contra went to jail, and they wound up running the country (superbly you can see).

" Any criminal referral would be passed on to DOJ, which has so far refused to appoint a special prosecutor for the matter. "

Well Conyers had better remind DoJ that every damned referral that's not acted on will be treated as an obstruction of justice charge come next January. In fact, I would have those referrals drawn up already, and send them through the same channels as the first.

And a blanket demand that all of these flunkies demand would be a good start at correcting the corruption that they're all guilty of.

How about 'a blanket demand that all these flunkies resign?' That would make more sense. (*sheepish grin*)

user-pic

If John Conyers does anything about this at all, except for writing a sternly worded letter, I will eat a hat.

user-pic

And I will eat a boot. As long as Harriet Miers et al remain in contempt, with no other action, it's all sound and fury, signifying nothing...

user-pic

...adding that Conyers should really stop pretending he's going to do anything. All it does is piss off the people who used to have a little faith in him.

There's a reason people hate this congress. they are as bad as the republicans, and worse in some ways (FISA comes to mind).

For example, I have no one, literally NO ONE to vote for in PA's next senate election. Specter? Casey?

Crapola, the two of them

John Conyers - "Keeping the powder dry."

user-pic

"Conyers Considers "Criminal Referral" For Gonzales, Other DOJ Officials"


LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

I guess Conyers is beyond being embarrassed.

There are allegations being made that Karl Rove attempted to blackmail a computer tech for the GOP into taking the fall for election fraud in Ohio '04. Rove apparently threatened to prosecute his wife for lobby law violations.

Conyers does nothing more than send letters, despite in-your-face violations that are almost certainly covering up very grave crimes. Is it a coincidence or another tactical example that John Conyers' wife is being investigated in some kickback scheme in Detroit? I wonder if her fate depends on how her husband behaves?

Do many of these politicians have an illegal act or two hanging over their heads? Already fully investigated, only to be prosecuted if "necessary" for some purpose?


Conyers won't do anything but talk. I have stopped listening to the hearings on CSPAN where they allow the Bush Administration's hacks to lie repectively with no consequences. It is all show trials.

user-pic

Skip the word trial and just call it a show.

user-pic

Conyers is considering perjury referrals and is also considering diddling himself in his office in silence to further prove his insufferrable fecklessness and well paid cowardice. I bet he only accomplaished the latter.

user-pic

You hit the nail on the head.

The reason it was so important to populate the justice department with unqualified political loyalist is that now, anyone loyal to Bush can break any law and get away with it.

This justice department is ironic.

The only thing Conyers is mulling these days is cider.

user-pic

A civilized approach to Bushist prosecutions would, I speculate, have to be a massive integration of many green investigations.

Taken alone, Rove's excesses haven't even been fully cataloged as yet. So how is it logical to charge now? The same with Gonzo. Why impeach when bad guys control the evidence of guilt? How does that work? [picture]

http://www.light-to-dark.com/rove_and_gonzales_do_justice.html

I believe Informed America has done the big integration and has for some time been quite ready to see Justice expressed unreservedly. But there's much bigger fish to catch than Libby and I'm assuming it would have an order. [picture]

http://www.light-to-dark.com/fitzs_dominoes.html

My guess is Pinky Rove and Gonzo aren't quite ripe yet. On the brighter side, I suspect that the House doesn't ask questions about things they can't prove with evidence already in their possession. On live burial: [picture]

http://www.light-to-dark.com/erosion_along_the_tigris.html

Should Bush attempt a pardon for anyone under investigation, would he not be admitting guilt?

I wish I knew the time line from Justice's perspective.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address